Thanks for sharing. I get pretty damn tired of the overuse of the term BREAKING by twitter folks "on our side." It's lazy at best, and outright dishonest at worst. Either way it makes us look dumb when we share it.
You do realize that the ENTIRE "Pompeo wanted to kill Assange" narrative is based completely on articles and reports written by deep state Leftist propaganda hacks, right?
It is true that a report published by Yahoo News in 2021 claimed that, based on the accounts of former unnamed U.S. officials, there had been discussions considering killing Assange, with "senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration" even requesting "sketches" or "options" on how to kill him.
"former unnamed U.S. officials" speaking to leftist propaganda anti-Trump 'journalists'? Really?
Where did the narrative start?
Sources speaking to Yahoo News called the plans "unhinged and ridiculous," and it was unclear how serious they were, one saying, "It was just Trump being Trump." Trump denied the claim.
His work has appeared in Politico, The Atlantic, Atavist Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, Foreign Affairs, and The Nation, among other publications.
Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump
The incredible, harrowing account of how American democracy was hacked by Moscow as part of a covert operation to influence the U.S. election and help Donald Trump gain the presidency.
Fren, take a step back, and realize that there is 5G warfare happening EVERYWHERE, and that you are a target and that the Cabal are desperate to undermine team Trump wherever it can.
Who do you trust more? Trump and Q, or deep state propaganda artists....
This is OLD NEWS. Do some RESEARCH before posting what appears to be "CURRENT" Events.
This entire Assange ordeal is 1000 x more involved and complicated than yesterday's headline news of his so-called "freedom."
A random Assange-related post is USELESS in trying to figure out this debacle. We're talking about almost a 10.YEAR HISTORY of Assange's persecution. NOTHING has been solved yesterday, today, the day before, or since it all began.
Isikoff appears to have been a substantial operative in teh Russia hoax agenda, writing up a book that gives "The incredible, harrowing account of how American democracy was hacked by Moscow as part of a covert operation to influence the U.S. election and help Donald Trump gain the presidency."
Am I missing something? Does our constitution cover an Australian citizen in the Ecuadorean embassy located in London? How and why would it? Our constitution isn’t the world’s constitution.
"Pompeo is accused of providing oversight for a criminal conspiracy to violate 4th Amendment rights of American lawyers and journalists inside the Ecuadorian embassy. The CIA, and UC Global/UC Global director David R. Morales Guillen, are also listed as defendants."
Dumb comment. Ignorant. Why do you allow yourself to be so easily manipulated by the other side?
Put aside your biases and personal tastes, and do some research.
EDIT: apologies for the 'dumb' comment. Reactive on my part and not warranted. Can you please provide some information or data that indicates that Pompeo did NOT serve DJT well?
[they] hide behind the letter of the law. In this case, the U.S. Constitution doesn't protect against the Feds spying on people suspected of colluding with a declared "enemy of the state," or someone accused of having and sharing classified info, which Assange has been accused of being by no less than 3 "separate" Admins.
Whether, or not, it's true Assange was handling classified intel is up for debate. What isn't up for debate, is that the current whistleblower protections don't include "whistleblowing" to an org like WikiLeaks. Only properly vetted and approved whistleblower outlets are covered under the current "Whislteblower's 'Protection' Act."
I suspect there's more than a kernel of truth when the uniParty says Assange violated U.S. law when taking in docs from whistleblowers. Which would make his prosecution justifiable under even the "color of law" argument.
He's not as squeaky clean as people around here think. No body in the media world is. He's been trying to subvert America for a while now, attempting to expose anyone he thinks may be "guilty" of malfeasance, regardless of possible affiliations and info they have. Which makes me think he's actually an agent working for the AUS Intel community. Sort of like how Epstain was a purported double agent for Mossad/C_A.
Don't get me wrong, he's done some good, but remember, not everything [they] say are lies. There is always a measure of truth to what [they] say.
Couldn’t happen to a better guy
Do you even lift, bro?
Yes. For decades BRO. Freeweights only.
kek. Ossum!!!
Can I ask. Why do you think Pompeo is such a bad guy?
This appears to be old. Here's an article from 2022.
Thanks for sharing. I get pretty damn tired of the overuse of the term BREAKING by twitter folks "on our side." It's lazy at best, and outright dishonest at worst. Either way it makes us look dumb when we share it.
Hey, it's never too late to post massive disinformation content!!!!!
EXACTLY.
Assange was a US Citizen?
If not he is not covered.
Visitors, lawyers, etc. would be however if they were citizens.
Actually, under the current bastardization of the Constitution, it's only a small leap from where we are now to covering him.
Pompao needs to burn with Fauci and thd entire j6 show trial participants
You do realize that the ENTIRE "Pompeo wanted to kill Assange" narrative is based completely on articles and reports written by deep state Leftist propaganda hacks, right?
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/sep/27/senior-cia-officials-trump-discussed-assassinating-julian-assange
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-cia-want-julian-assange-killed-1917171
"former unnamed U.S. officials" speaking to leftist propaganda anti-Trump 'journalists'? Really?
Where did the narrative start?
(ibid)
Here's where it started:
Zach Dorfman, Sean D. Naylor and Michael Isikoff
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kidnapping-assassination-and-a-london-shoot-out-inside-the-ci-as-secret-war-plans-against-wiki-leaks-090057786.html
Zach Dorfman
https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/people/zach-dorfman
Sean D Naylor
https://www.yahoo.com/author/sean-naylor/
Michael Isikoff
https://www.yahoo.com/author/michael-isikoff/
https://www.hachette.com.au/michael-isikoff-david-corn/russian-roulette-the-inside-story-of-putins-war-on-america-and-the-election-of-donald-trump
Fren, take a step back, and realize that there is 5G warfare happening EVERYWHERE, and that you are a target and that the Cabal are desperate to undermine team Trump wherever it can.
Who do you trust more? Trump and Q, or deep state propaganda artists....
Just wrote this post making the case ...
Wow Sweet.
Noted that in another post earlier, but you went into mucho detailio.
Well done. There is a stench of Oy vey off Zack.
ooh, can you link me the post?
This one…
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLFgDTqD/what-we-factually-know-about-jul/
thanks. Excellent.
This is OLD NEWS. Do some RESEARCH before posting what appears to be "CURRENT" Events. This entire Assange ordeal is 1000 x more involved and complicated than yesterday's headline news of his so-called "freedom."
A random Assange-related post is USELESS in trying to figure out this debacle. We're talking about almost a 10.YEAR HISTORY of Assange's persecution. NOTHING has been solved yesterday, today, the day before, or since it all began.
https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/mike-pompeo-lawsuit-assange-lawyers-b2217043.html
Not to mention that the narrative itself is from Deep State Leftist journos citing anonymous 'former officials' in the Trump Administration...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kidnapping-assassination-and-a-london-shoot-out-inside-the-ci-as-secret-war-plans-against-wiki-leaks-090057786.html
Isikoff appears to have been a substantial operative in teh Russia hoax agenda, writing up a book that gives "The incredible, harrowing account of how American democracy was hacked by Moscow as part of a covert operation to influence the U.S. election and help Donald Trump gain the presidency."
Am I missing something? Does our constitution cover an Australian citizen in the Ecuadorean embassy located in London? How and why would it? Our constitution isn’t the world’s constitution.
Did you not actually read the tweet?
"Pompeo is accused of providing oversight for a criminal conspiracy to violate 4th Amendment rights of American lawyers and journalists inside the Ecuadorian embassy. The CIA, and UC Global/UC Global director David R. Morales Guillen, are also listed as defendants."
who did Pompeo really serve? Not Trump.
Dumb comment. Ignorant. Why do you allow yourself to be so easily manipulated by the other side?
Put aside your biases and personal tastes, and do some research.
EDIT: apologies for the 'dumb' comment. Reactive on my part and not warranted. Can you please provide some information or data that indicates that Pompeo did NOT serve DJT well?
[they] hide behind the letter of the law. In this case, the U.S. Constitution doesn't protect against the Feds spying on people suspected of colluding with a declared "enemy of the state," or someone accused of having and sharing classified info, which Assange has been accused of being by no less than 3 "separate" Admins.
Whether, or not, it's true Assange was handling classified intel is up for debate. What isn't up for debate, is that the current whistleblower protections don't include "whistleblowing" to an org like WikiLeaks. Only properly vetted and approved whistleblower outlets are covered under the current "Whislteblower's 'Protection' Act."
I suspect there's more than a kernel of truth when the uniParty says Assange violated U.S. law when taking in docs from whistleblowers. Which would make his prosecution justifiable under even the "color of law" argument.
He's not as squeaky clean as people around here think. No body in the media world is. He's been trying to subvert America for a while now, attempting to expose anyone he thinks may be "guilty" of malfeasance, regardless of possible affiliations and info they have. Which makes me think he's actually an agent working for the AUS Intel community. Sort of like how Epstain was a purported double agent for Mossad/C_A.
Don't get me wrong, he's done some good, but remember, not everything [they] say are lies. There is always a measure of truth to what [they] say.
Pompeo must be in here with the downvotes
Can't stand this clown.
Oohhh! Something is getting a little too spicy for the pepper!
Isn't Pompeo having tried to arrange Assange's murder, which is a known fact, enough reason to send Pompeo packing??
"Known fact"
Would you like to actually cite the sauces of this? Where did the so-called 'known fact" start? Who promulgated the story? How? When?
You might be surprised with what you find out.
they are just doing this to him because of his CIA sting....Assange and the people win.
CIA used to be a protected class who always had the secrets and the money. Now they are losers.