only about 2% of them, tho.

Women with vd don't grab their crotch as much as he does. U haven't seen his junk floppin around in numerous videos ? How about barry callin him michael multiple times ? Any pregnancy pics ? I thought this was common knowledge around here, but w.e.

Lots of trannies in gov, movies, music, etc. that don't " loud n proud " it, yet.

if you haven’t seen the video of Michelle Obama, dancing on the Ellen show, and her schlong bouncing back-and-forth, then I don’t know what other evidence you need

let’s not forget… Right after Joan Rivers claimed that Michelle was a tranny, she died during an endoscopy 🤷‍♀️. a common procedure

Also, the reason the left doesn’t understand any of this - is cognitive dissonance. For them to believe that, they need to believe that the Obamas were that happy couple that everybody claimed they were. This was just another part of the psychological operation, and people would have to admit that they’ve been lied to all this time.

Psychological abuse is real

Brave. I like it. Question the narrative. It's important to do so.

Despite the fact that Q was most emphatic about getting away from group think, after almost 4 years without Q posting on any sort of regular basis, a lot of group think has sunk in.

Many pedes simply take it as an axiomatic truth that Ms Obama is a 'transexual'. There is circumstantial evidence, sure, and a decent amount of it, but no real conclusive evidence or proof (i.e. a DNA analysis, for example, would be conclusive, or an admission by the person in question). Also, note, there is a lot of fabricated 'evidence', too, further muddying the waters.

The temptation to move in one's mind from "circumstantial evidence" to "conclusive proven fact" is a powerful one, but intellectually honest folks will be clear about the difference, and even if they have their own conclusions or beliefs (nothing wrong with that), they'll acknowledge the margin or potential error and room for doubt.

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Eunich

eu·nuch (yo͞o′nək) n.

1. A castrated man, traditionally employed as a harem attendant or as a functionary in certain Asian courts.
2. Often Offensive A man or boy whose testes are nonfunctioning or have been removed.
3. Derogatory An ineffectual or powerless man. [Middle English eunuk, from Latin eunūchus, from Greek eunoukhos : eunē, bed + -okhos, keeping (from ekhein, to keep; see segh- in Indo-European roots).] eu′nuch·ism n. Word History: Eunuch goes back to the Greek word eunoukhos, "a castrated male employed to serve the women in the women's quarters of a household and to act as chamberlain," and the Greek word is derived from eunē, "bed," and ekhein, "to hold, to keep." A eunuch is a "bed-keeper," so to speak. To avoid suspicion about the parentage of their children, upper-class men in many ancient societies would post eunuchs to guard and serve in the bedchambers of the women of their households. Nowadays, when the word eunuch is mentioned outside of discussions of history and ancient customs, it is mostly used metaphorically, in the sense "an ineffectual man." In ancient times, however, the eunuchs who served powerful people were often far from being ineffectual. Since they were privy to the personal lives of ruling families and had the opportunity to acquire politically and financially useful information, some eunuchs amassed enormous personal fortunes and rose to positions of great power and responsibility.

Eunich is so close to "Unique"

she's a lawyer and was worth about 12mil before obama was appointed as a senator. no, i dont like either of them.

I don't think she will be a candidate in this upcoming election, too much to lose. However if she is and she comes through with a win-America will be more of a joke than it already is. I heartily agree with your sentiment.