What do you think?
It's starting to become clear to me that Satoshi Nakamoto= white hats who created Bitcoin to alter satanic cult's plan to create CBDC and to send mockery to the fiat monetary system.
Satoshi holds 1,100,000 BTC. Trump said gov't will use bitcoin as asset backing for currency.
What if, we already have 1,100,000 Bitcoin? Remember, there only 21,000,000 BTC. That is a massive holding. White hats already have it?
Fun to think about. Thoughts?
It represents 60 billion USD. So, indeed, additionally to all the liquid gold, it may be a nice support.
To add a bit more fuel to your hypothesis, listen to Jason Lowery from SpaceForce regarding BTC and the military:
https://piped.video/watch?v=PInd7uRiGjs
It’s also about 40% of our share of world GDP.
When did China pass us in % of global GDP?
https://www.worldeconomics.com/Share-of-Global-GDP/United%20States.aspx
Reminds me of those IPs that were freed up for an undisclosed purpose right around the election.
Wouldn't surprise me if the Bitcoin Trump talked about using as the reserve was in Satoshi's wallet. Since I began watching Rugpull Radio I've been more inclined to believe Bitcoin is a Whitehat op.
On the other hand the Crypto Conspiracy podcast was arguing a couple years back that Bitcoin is connected to Epstein and co. They also did have a couple guests who argued that it was a goodguy thing that got co-opted by the banksters a long time ago and that Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV branches closer match the whitepaper that laid out the proposed evolution for Bitcoin.
These conspiracies exist for a reason, because stupid people tries to make conclusions without knowing the full picture.
Take encryption for example, some of the best algorithms are created by the NSA. But the specifications are open, the code is open source, and it's mathematically proven by multiple independent third parties that there is no back doors or other fuckery, you can verify this yourself too with basic math and programming skills.
So what's the deal you might ask? Why are they giving us access to good encryption. The answer is simple, because if CIA was the only ones using say AES-256 encryption everyone would see those packages and instantly know that it's CIA traffic, when everyone uses is you can't tell the difference between a CIA agent and the average Joe.
Same exact thing with the TOR network. If only CIA was using it every webmaster would know that TOR = CIA agent. Now anyone can use TOR and you have no idea who's behind the proxy IP, could be a CIA agent or more likely an average Joe. Benefits overrides the negatives.
Same thnig with crypto, open source and mathematically verifiable. It doesn't matter who created it and why as anyone with basic math and programming skills can verify that there's nothing shady going on within the network itself. There's of course shady exchanges and plenty of scammers trying to steal your coins which is why proper knowledge is important.
You're right on that some people come to erroneous conclusions because they are missing key details, I see this all the time with friends and family who reject Q or never heard of it and Devolution.
However I still pay some attention to it 1) to avoid falling into an echo chamber and 2) if someone outside is coming to similar conclusions (like how Devolution Theory already lined up heavily with Q before the author had even read Q drops) it provides some extra evidence that we're on the correct path.
Yes, too many people misunderstand "security through obscurity" and think it only applies to trying to hide your insecure server from bad guys and hope they never stumble upon it. It can also refer to hiding something in plain sight that is also secured but because it's not obvious it's less likely to be directly attacked to begin with and if it is attacked it tries to repel it without being too obvious.
Bitcoin Cash was a blatant attempt by Jihan Wu and Micree Zhan (co founders of Bitmain) to split the fledgling bitcoin community and sell more mining equipment. They spent millions pushing Bitcoin Cash trying to make it a real competitor. With their mining equipment and low difficulty rate on the BCH chain, they held nearly all the BCH in the early days, and desperately needed to create a market place for it. No. BCH is most certainly NOT a white hat op, unless you believe the white hats needed the Chinese to make it work.
BSV is even worse. Craig Wright is the world's worst scam artist, laughably trying to convince people that he was Satoshi, when he can't even be remote placed with Nick Szabo. While nobody is 100% sure what person or group represents Satoshi Nakamoto, Bayesian Analysis of the writings in the early days shows that Nick is almost certainly one of the people who wrote the early emails under the pseudonym.
And what was the big controversy back then?
Whether or not to make larger blocks so more transactions could be included at a cheaper price (BCH), or whether they wanted to keep the existing block size and separate out some non essential components to allow more space inside the traditional 4MB size (BTC). There were technical reasons for both approaches. If keeping the 4MB block size and going to SEGWIT was a black hat operation, it was a damn good one, because there was very little psychology involved in the discussions during those days. They were purely technical discussions about the plusses and minuses of both sides. But the real reason I think BTC won out is precisely because Bitmain was so hated. As soon as they publicly sided with BCH, the deal was sealed.
Bitcoin cash and bitcoin sv are frauds.
Be VERY weary of Craig Wright.
I promise you he is a fraud.
Yes, the real Bitcoin has slightly deviated from satoshi’s original whitepaper, but the deviations were not just co-opted and changed by big bankers…. The miners themselves are the only ones who can vote on and make a change to the protocol.
These are done through BIP “Bitcoin improvement proposal”
If an improvement is good, and the miners agree it is good, they can effectively trigger this change on the network to take place by directing their mining power to do that.
In the early days of bitcoin, the mining hashpower was so evenly distributed to individuals, there was not these huge mining pools back then… so it was impossible to have enough hashpower to force a vote to pass when the majority of people voted against it, and vice versa.
What BCH did was simply a money grab, they forked the blockchain and created their own coin just to get a 1:1 copy of their BTC, but on BCH.
What BSV did was basically just Craig Dumbfuck Wright’s narcissist plight to assume the role as Satoshi Nakamoto. Until he proves he owns the genesis wallet, he is a fraud.
Yeah one of the guys (maybe it was Craig Wright) said a lot of things that didn't sit right with me. Another said some stuff that gave me some Charlie Ward vibes as well.
You could use this wealth to bridge a temporary Line of Credit that will keep all vital systems alive until a new currency can be floated. Id freeze all wealth that belongs to Corporations rather than individuals. Over time unfreeze it as it assigns itself to massive projects that will preserve Humanity and the value of the equity long into the future. I've previously spoken about a Universal Brotherhood that is comprised of Hard workers and financiers up to a Million dollars each. They become the active groups who move Humanity into the secure future.
I’ve been saying this for years… Bitcoin is PART of the plan.
So yes, I believe fully that the white hats created this. You have to also look at WHEN it was created…
It was created when Obama was doing obvious treasonous things that would put the world and America into a massive monetary collapse.
Bitcoin countered their plan in a massive way, it quite possibly prevented our extinction and we just don’t even realize it.
The moment there was an unstoppable way for the people to transact without need for bank or any middleman, was the moment the monetary collapse plan was cancelled. They knew the people would just switch to the new system, and the world would continue.
Another great point I completely forgot about. When it was released. Seems like the timing seemed perfect for what they were trying to accomplish.
That 1.1 is remarkably close to the 5% stockpile that was promised, and we all know Trump likes to promise things first then go win, rather than win first then sell the win.
Just a coincidence though, I’m sure.
Where's the training manual on how to become a Bitcoin miner?
Mining your own Bitcoin grew way outside the reach of the average guy a decade ago. It takes entire server farms of dedicated hardware now.
Building a data center is cheap in certain third world countries.
Welp. There goes that idea for a job.
Unless, somehow there's cooperation of many servers (farmers)??
There is a private company called RIPPLE, you might want to look up. Also go to google and type in Worlds bridge currency.
I thought XRP was a deep state stablecoin though. Then again if it is then why does the SEC block it so much? Unless that's some sort of Operation Trust misdirection for until they do want everyone to trust and jump onto it.
I was under the same impression because they are deeply connected with the current banking system. Any banking co is deep state to me. Maybe I'm wrong with that assumption, but they're all involved in fcking retail over.
It is very simple now compared to in the past.
Wait for Trump to be back in office and to drive electricity prices down again.
If you pay under $0.10 per kWh then you very likely can mine for profit.
The company who produces the most efficient and reliable miners for purchase is called Bitmain, they are a Chinese company but have a large factory in the U.S.
There are many other companies too, just none have devices that are as long running as Bitmain’s.
Anyway, there’s a nice website: https://whattomine.com
This website lets you check current profitability for all mineable crypto coins. For Bitcoin, you want to go to the “ASICS” section, since that coin is mined with “asic” miners.
There are coins you can mine with CPU’s, GPU’s, and ASIC’s.
I’ve been mining since 2017. It was much more profitable in the past than it is currently; but that can easily swing back the other way if our electrical costs reduce significantly.
For a long while, ethereum was far more profitable to mine than Bitcoin was, but Ethereum went woke (green) and changed their consensus model to disable Proof of Work mining in favor of a Proof of Stake model.
It's easy to figure it out. Just need a graphics card, a piece of software, and a Bitcoin wallet. Plenty of YouTube tutorials
And what asset backs BTC? Nothing. Just demand and supply. Until it is no longer popular.
I 100% believe this to be true. I'm convinced Bitcoin is a project from Q
Trump said that the US govt holds 1% of all BTC. That's 210,000 BTC. If BTC goes to $150,000 per BTC then the US would have BTC valued at $31.5 Trillion. All it takes is BTC to go up a little more in price from $150,000 and BOOM we can pay off the National Debt in one payment.
He said that he won't break he cardinal rule of not selling BTC holdings (HODL) but I believe that's for the masses. My suspicion now is that the WHs are going to use BTC to pay off the US National Debt. After selling all of their BTC, they will wait for the price of BTC to completely collapse and buy more at a discount. All they have to do then is wait for the next BTC cycle high to happen to get a return on their new investment.
Billion, not trillion.
Dammit, you're right. I got too excited there. I was hoping the math checked out.
Oh well so much for that hypothesis. Maybe the WHs will just dump the debt onto the DS and leave them holding the bag. Maybe dump our debt onto the EU or something. That's the only thing I can think of because of some of the secret windows from the US Debt Clock website. Some of those secret windows have the EU being trapped with Federal Reserve Debt while the US has a new dollar system in place.
No
BTC was the first attempt, they found what they did wrong and created the next
BTC is for u and me to get used to using digital, it is now being called a store of value
Plus under the MiCA regulations Tether is Not a stable coin
Ripple will have their stable coin out before the end of this year
There will be multiple CBDC’s
Look on the IMF and WEF websites, there are only 2 stable coins / currencies and neither one is BTC
Mica is a European regulation, so who cares.
Tether has much bigger problems than that. They need to prove they are solvent.
That being said, they have passed their audits, they have proved the actual money exists.
So for the time being, there’s nothing wrong with tether.
What makes tether scary is that at any time they could go rogue and cause some real chaos… but they would likely not be able to get away with it because their entire leadership is well known now and the doj would be on them in a big way.
It is important to not call BTC a currency, because it ISNT a currency, it’s a commodity if anything.
The same reason you don’t call gold a currency.
Yes I know gold is a legal tender and thus can be used AS a currency, but that doesn’t make it a currency in and of itself. It just happens to be allowed to be used as a currency, but no store is legally required to accept gold, but they are legally required to accept U.S. dollars.
Bitcoin is the same btw, many countries around the world have passed laws to have it become a legal tender for the country.
I agree that in the future blockchain and crypto will become more of an infrastructure than a speculative asset.
But i don’t see how the overlying assets can ever just disappear… they will always exist if blockchain as a technology exists.
The only really good argument against crypto is the whole power/internet connection is a requirement… but that’s also why I never believe people should put all their eggs into this basket. Something like 1-10% of an investment portfolio being in crypto (mainly just bitcoin…. If any others then ethereum…. Don’t listen to the XRP brainwashed folk… XRP isn’t even a blockchain, and I believe XRP is the one that’s truly tied to deep state actors.)
Off topic but watched a documentary about this fella named Jimmy Zhong and how he hacked bitcoin from the Silk Road and accidentally was worth 3.36 billion. The irs got him years later.
https://youtu.be/3Nq3ye-QCyM?
He didn't hack Bitcoin, he hacked a holder of bitcoin.
SEC & DOJ already said Satoshi is 3 NASA employees and 1 banker back in 2019
Can you give me a link to this? Because I’ve never heard that.
All I’ve ever heard is that the NSA knows who Satoshi is.
It’s the homeland security but I’ve seen another where it’s the sec
Here is a very informative vid for Xrp
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5urrOWO0KDI
https://x.com/nerdnationunbox/status/1544771284697063425s=42&t=mthOBmAkj3YiBTch7zf1ow
Yes.
No. Putin is behind BTC.
There is actually ZERO evidence of this.
There is evidence that implies Satoshi was likely of British descent, but living in America (west coast).
That being said, if Putin is part of the white hats and the plan, then Putin is in some way “behind” Bitcoin. I guess my point is that there’s no evidence to suggest that anyone from Russia was part of the original development team for Bitcoin.
Satoshi is unlikely to even be a single person at all, it could be a pseudonym applied to the group that developed it.
There actually is evidence of this... just because you personally believe the Satoshi fantasy, doesn't mean Putin isn't behind it. Go research... preferably thomewhere other than thnopth.
Any way you slice it, BTC is backed by precisely nothing... so there is that.
Cue the outrage and pearl clutching now... can't dispute it's backed by nothing so they just dv like lemmings...🙄🙄🙄
And what exactly is gold backed by? Precisely nothing.
Bitcoin is actually backed by the electricity cost it took to create it.
But you can continue living in your dream world pal, I’m up 250x off my crypto investment in 2017… couldn’t have done that in ANY other investment market.
I also have plenty of gold… BECAUSE of those investments.
😂😂😂😂😂
Congratulations. You've reached peak retard. Do you actually read what you write?
The FACTS are this:
Nothing on PLANET EARTH has any intrinsic value WHATSOEVER.
What gives something value is, and always was, is directly correlated to what another person will pay for it. And nothing more.
Other people will pay about $60,000 in electricity cost to earn 1 bitcoin… that is precisely why bitcoin’s price is where it’s at.
How about you answer my question? What is gold backed by?
Rather than just turn to insults and laugh emojis. Very reminiscent of arguing with a liberal.
There’s no EVIDENCE of it, only CLAIMS based on assumptions.
The EVIDENCE shows that Satoshi was British living on the west coast of America, and all known cypherpunks close to Satoshi, none of them were Russian.
Putin, Xi and Trump get along because none of them want Central Banks - they are the cabal