We should NEVER have ID in the United States. No, it's the other way around: The government needs to prove to US who THEY are.
There is only one reason and ever one reason for the government to try and identify someone, and that's when they have evidence that a crime has been committed, and they suspect someone of committing it. THAT'S IT.
Social security number was supposed to be a government only ID. The SSA extended it to state government.
None of us is supposed to have a social security number, but we do because our parents (who didn’t know any better) got one for us. It’s not your signature on those documents, you were too young to contract with them. It’s fraud at the highest level, and it’s allowed to happen to enslave all Americans.
And for those that digged into USC 26, you know that your not a US citizen according to their own definitions.
That was my awakening in 2010 when I found a website about the redemption theory and the strawman. It was many pages of small text in English to read (which is not my native language) and I read through the whole night until 3 a.m.
After that I stumbled into the Tavistock Institue rabbit hole and watched "Century of the self" - My life was never the same again.
Yea but you need to keep appealing an already existing case to get them off your ass. Their not going to just leave you alone just because. And the harder part is that no lawyer will help you. Their loyalty lies with the bar association, but you can still sue them. Most people end up before an article 2 court. If you manage to drag them into an article 3 court, you pretty much win. It’s their job, their pension, their lively hood on the line at that point.
If you think someone is voting who should not be -- then point at them and accuse them of a crime.
It used to be we have polling stations in precincts small enough that everyone knew each other. We should go back to that. No anonymous voting. If you don't live in the area, and people don't know you, you don't get to vote.
Voting should be private, NOT ANONYMOUS. There is a big difference.
Private voting verifies your identity and existence on the correct voter roll, while who you vote for remains private (to avoid pressure, intimidation, etc.)
I personally think voting should be treated the same as a financial transaction, with proof of identity and a full audit trail of your vote (paper ballots and paper receipt as proof of the "transaction").
PUBLIC RECORD VOTING. Everyone knows who voted and how.
The is no "in between". You can't know who voted but not how they voted.
In terms of who is allowed to vote -- every polling place I ever visited had an election judge right there to determine who is and is not allowed to vote. If you think someone shouldn't be voting, you can sit yourself down in one of those polling places and point to them and challenge them then and there.
My guess is you don't actually KNOW who most of of the people you know actually are, you've taken their word for who they SAID they were. How do you really know your neighbor Bill Smith is actually Bill Smith?
If they are living in the woods by themselves -- they have no "civil" to have civil liberties in! Do you think the bears or coyotes care whether they are here in the US legally? Or maybe they care whether they've had too much to speak?
When it comes to voting, people forget that votes are not magical. It is the physical presence of a man who declares that not only does he support something, but he has the military arms to back that decision up. Go back to Athens and Rome and go look at what voting meant for them.
The idea that people who exclude themselves from society should have a say in how that society is governed is ridiculous.
Our political ancestors had a solution for people who don't pay taxes: Don't charge taxes!
The Jeffersonian model is to only tax imports. This provides the funds to secure the border, because you can only tax imports if you secure the border!
Agreed. Reread what I wrote - the “income” tax is a false accusation. They, and employers, falsely accuse us of having earned “income”. In their case, some of them know, but in the employers’ cases, very few likely do.
“Income” does not mean what we think it does.
Now that two people have accused us of being subject to an “income tax” by virtue of having earned “income”, though, they aren’t out of line in seeking to collect what is owed.
The trick is in correcting the “income” claim they levied on us by two or three witnesses. They’re following a Biblical law in this, even! We are just witnessing against ourselves out of ignorance!
There is only one reason and ever one reason for the government to try and identify someone, and that's when they have evidence that a crime has been committed, and they suspect someone of committing it. THAT'S IT.
Exactly. All our SS# have long been compromised ever since every company wanted to use it as an ID decades ago
Social security number was supposed to be a government only ID. The SSA extended it to state government.
None of us is supposed to have a social security number, but we do because our parents (who didn’t know any better) got one for us. It’s not your signature on those documents, you were too young to contract with them. It’s fraud at the highest level, and it’s allowed to happen to enslave all Americans.
And for those that digged into USC 26, you know that your not a US citizen according to their own definitions.
That was my awakening in 2010 when I found a website about the redemption theory and the strawman. It was many pages of small text in English to read (which is not my native language) and I read through the whole night until 3 a.m.
After that I stumbled into the Tavistock Institue rabbit hole and watched "Century of the self" - My life was never the same again.
Bravo to you ee! I'm sure that was difficult. 👏
Post 3906...
"When you are awake, you are able to clearly see. The choice is yours, and yours, alone"
Didn't the overturn of Chevron case nullify these codes?
Yea but you need to keep appealing an already existing case to get them off your ass. Their not going to just leave you alone just because. And the harder part is that no lawyer will help you. Their loyalty lies with the bar association, but you can still sue them. Most people end up before an article 2 court. If you manage to drag them into an article 3 court, you pretty much win. It’s their job, their pension, their lively hood on the line at that point.
No voter ID?
If you think someone is voting who should not be -- then point at them and accuse them of a crime.
It used to be we have polling stations in precincts small enough that everyone knew each other. We should go back to that. No anonymous voting. If you don't live in the area, and people don't know you, you don't get to vote.
Voting should be private, NOT ANONYMOUS. There is a big difference.
Private voting verifies your identity and existence on the correct voter roll, while who you vote for remains private (to avoid pressure, intimidation, etc.)
I personally think voting should be treated the same as a financial transaction, with proof of identity and a full audit trail of your vote (paper ballots and paper receipt as proof of the "transaction").
I believe there are only 2 options.
The is no "in between". You can't know who voted but not how they voted.
In terms of who is allowed to vote -- every polling place I ever visited had an election judge right there to determine who is and is not allowed to vote. If you think someone shouldn't be voting, you can sit yourself down in one of those polling places and point to them and challenge them then and there.
My guess is you don't actually KNOW who most of of the people you know actually are, you've taken their word for who they SAID they were. How do you really know your neighbor Bill Smith is actually Bill Smith?
I don't care whether my neighbor is really Bill Smith or not
I only care that he stays off my lawn
If we enter into a business transaction, all I care about is that he holds up his end and I hold up my end.
Identity is overrated. We proved a long time ago that we can have a functioning society on the internet with anonymity.
Lol people these days don't even know their own neighbors let alone every single person that's going to come through they're polling precinct
That's the problem.
If you can't trust your neighbors, you can't trust the government, and you can't have a society.
It used to be we understood this. A vote represented a man's willingness to posse up.
You're out of your mind
Not everyone knows everyone
Some are off the grid, live in the middle of a corn field, grow their own stuff and keep to themselves
And you're going to deprive them of their civil liberties ?
What civil liberties do you imagine they have?
If they are living in the woods by themselves -- they have no "civil" to have civil liberties in! Do you think the bears or coyotes care whether they are here in the US legally? Or maybe they care whether they've had too much to speak?
When it comes to voting, people forget that votes are not magical. It is the physical presence of a man who declares that not only does he support something, but he has the military arms to back that decision up. Go back to Athens and Rome and go look at what voting meant for them.
The idea that people who exclude themselves from society should have a say in how that society is governed is ridiculous.
So you oppose voter ID?
LET ME BE CLEAR
YOU SHOW UP TO A POLLING PLACE
THERE ARE YOUR NEIGHBORS! HI NEIGHBORS! HERE IS YOUR BALLOT! VOTE AWAY!
OH LOOK A STRANGER!!!
"WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE, WE DON'T KNOW YOU!"
"OH I LIVE AT SUCH-AND-SUCH"
"OH NO YOU DON'T BECAUSE WE KNOW WHO LIVES THERE AND YOU DON'T"
"I AM GOING TO TRY AND VOTE ANYWAY!"
"YOU'RE UNDER ARREST!"
Does that make it clear?
It used to be that everyone voted in their PRECINCT. Precincts had like 100 people in them. EVERYONE KNEW EACH OTHER. THERE WERE NO STRANGERS.
Top tier post.
The “crime” everyone is guilty of is a false mass accusation of paying the wrong amount of “income”.
Our political ancestors had a solution for people who don't pay taxes: Don't charge taxes!
The Jeffersonian model is to only tax imports. This provides the funds to secure the border, because you can only tax imports if you secure the border!
Agreed. Reread what I wrote - the “income” tax is a false accusation. They, and employers, falsely accuse us of having earned “income”. In their case, some of them know, but in the employers’ cases, very few likely do.
“Income” does not mean what we think it does.
Now that two people have accused us of being subject to an “income tax” by virtue of having earned “income”, though, they aren’t out of line in seeking to collect what is owed.
The trick is in correcting the “income” claim they levied on us by two or three witnesses. They’re following a Biblical law in this, even! We are just witnessing against ourselves out of ignorance!
There is no tax. It’s just a trick!
Based