Letting him nearly get killed on live TV due to sheer incompetence wasn't the plan either. White hats are in control, which means they'd never let a real bullet be shot at POTUS's head, which means it was indeed a planned and staged scare event.
That shot wasn't faked or "planned." I get your faith but the weapon the shooter used, at the range he took the shots from, its already impressive an untrained soyboy like him was even accurate enough to hit Trump at all.
... the weapon the shooter used, at the range he took the shots from, its already impressive an untrained soyboy like him was even accurate enough to hit Trump at all.
Giving credence to the theory of the bullet that hit the President not being fired by that shooter at all.
It looks like a lot of thought went into this post, but I’m going to have to wait until the morning after my caffeine hit kicks in so that I can actually focus on the information.
u/Vapourface what is the timestamp stuff we are looking at?
IF there is a real connection here (not arguing one way or the other at this point), then u/Brent75 may well be onto something (edit - lends more credibility to the idea) & that makes it much more likely God/Christ was working through our own technology to let us know what has already been seen in the future.
Well,
Event timeline is from Wikipedia. First shot is 6:11:33 and the day is July 13 2024 (7.13) This is controllable (if you believe that was a WH shot, not the patsy)
I see that as 9:11 for the 33 brigade. Invert the 6, think mirror type of thing.
So anyway, I was thinking about are there any links to the scare event post, and there is the [@] symbol, and I remember hearing the Comperatory uniform had a missing A in the name. That is a good link I think. A fake death is a controllable too, kill a legend is done all the time. Some say Babbit on J6 was the same.
Next I see 6:11:33 as containing the 11.3 marker, but also, Post 521 (scare event) was posted on January 13 which is a 1.13 date (add six to that month and you get the actual shooting date, 6 years 6 months later
The event date is 7.13 which is sorta-kinda like the length of january (seven letters) and 13th day so that makes it a sorta-kinda delta-ish match too.
The shoes thing - I find that a call-back to Hillary on 9.11.2016 too - it's a bit on the nose.
post number 521 fits in the timeline between two catalogued events, with differences of 7 and 17 minutes, but this is a bit of silliness I was just making notes for connections. I like to throw in some fluff so it's deniable for those who need that comfort.
My main link is the comperatore @ missing, and the 6month 6year delta with a 13th day of the month match. Most of the rest is just me making notes looking for other links.
The other thing that stuck out to me - "not everything will be clean" after the [@] line and before the [scare] line in post 521
I see that as the WHs admitting they will have to "play dirty" (using false flags)
and a "death" is not clean, is it? (Comperatore's "death) that is what not clean means - some will die. (I am not convinced anyone did, but it matches in both senses)
Now, Trump goes behind glass in his rallies. Without this event, if he suddenly started "hiding" behind glass, the media would make a big deal out of it, say he is a coward etc. But it is necessary this time around because they are running out of plays and really will be thinking about using bullets to end their nightmare.
It was seeing him behind glass that started the whole train of thought.
Thanks for laying out that thought process. It is hard for me to imagine a WH sniper being that accurate.
Possibly a stunt with makeup or micro explosive if it was staged. That said, I would need to think more about how someone could fake that if it wasn't a shooter that got his ear.
Maybe there is something to that Project Looking Glass & this attack was already known & Trump survived it 🤷♂️
Thanks for these interesting connections. Lots to chew on.
Trump getting shot in the face was not a planned scare event by the white hats.
Just incompetence by the deep state.
Meaning they failed in their mission to kill him
Correct
Trump was never shot in the face; he was shot in the ear.
Why do people keep saying he was shot in the face?
Honestly piss off
They just mean head, relax
Because your ear is a part of your face (on the sides)
He was snot shot in the torso.
He was not shot in the limbs.
He was not shot in the feet.
He was not shot in the hands.
He got shot in the head.
important clarification here
Letting him nearly get killed on live TV due to sheer incompetence wasn't the plan either. White hats are in control, which means they'd never let a real bullet be shot at POTUS's head, which means it was indeed a planned and staged scare event.
Just keep believing a real bullet didn't rip through his ear.
Just keep believing "100% insulated" means "let's let the enemy take their best shot at him with compromised security and hope for a miracle".
Nobody believes that, but whatever works
That shot wasn't faked or "planned." I get your faith but the weapon the shooter used, at the range he took the shots from, its already impressive an untrained soyboy like him was even accurate enough to hit Trump at all.
Giving credence to the theory of the bullet that hit the President not being fired by that shooter at all.
What in the schizo autist hell am I looking at🤣
we have the best autists, believe me!
Now this is autism racing!
I know, we do
I totally read that in Trump's voice lol.
Yeah I came here to mock the schizo scribbles that make no sense, and just make us look retarded
I should Photoshop crazy Charlie from always sunny into the pic showing his thread conspiracy lines on top of this schizo scribbling
Seems like a bunch of bunk chunk
It looks like a lot of thought went into this post, but I’m going to have to wait until the morning after my caffeine hit kicks in so that I can actually focus on the information.
u/Vapourface what is the timestamp stuff we are looking at?
IF there is a real connection here (not arguing one way or the other at this point), then u/Brent75 may well be onto something (edit - lends more credibility to the idea) & that makes it much more likely God/Christ was working through our own technology to let us know what has already been seen in the future.
So many questions going through my head...
u/#MindBlown
Well, Event timeline is from Wikipedia. First shot is 6:11:33 and the day is July 13 2024 (7.13) This is controllable (if you believe that was a WH shot, not the patsy)
I see that as 9:11 for the 33 brigade. Invert the 6, think mirror type of thing.
So anyway, I was thinking about are there any links to the scare event post, and there is the [@] symbol, and I remember hearing the Comperatory uniform had a missing A in the name. That is a good link I think. A fake death is a controllable too, kill a legend is done all the time. Some say Babbit on J6 was the same.
Next I see 6:11:33 as containing the 11.3 marker, but also, Post 521 (scare event) was posted on January 13 which is a 1.13 date (add six to that month and you get the actual shooting date, 6 years 6 months later
The event date is 7.13 which is sorta-kinda like the length of january (seven letters) and 13th day so that makes it a sorta-kinda delta-ish match too.
The shoes thing - I find that a call-back to Hillary on 9.11.2016 too - it's a bit on the nose.
post number 521 fits in the timeline between two catalogued events, with differences of 7 and 17 minutes, but this is a bit of silliness I was just making notes for connections. I like to throw in some fluff so it's deniable for those who need that comfort.
My main link is the comperatore @ missing, and the 6month 6year delta with a 13th day of the month match. Most of the rest is just me making notes looking for other links.
The other thing that stuck out to me - "not everything will be clean" after the [@] line and before the [scare] line in post 521
I see that as the WHs admitting they will have to "play dirty" (using false flags) and a "death" is not clean, is it? (Comperatore's "death) that is what not clean means - some will die. (I am not convinced anyone did, but it matches in both senses)
Now, Trump goes behind glass in his rallies. Without this event, if he suddenly started "hiding" behind glass, the media would make a big deal out of it, say he is a coward etc. But it is necessary this time around because they are running out of plays and really will be thinking about using bullets to end their nightmare.
It was seeing him behind glass that started the whole train of thought.
Thanks for laying out that thought process. It is hard for me to imagine a WH sniper being that accurate.
Possibly a stunt with makeup or micro explosive if it was staged. That said, I would need to think more about how someone could fake that if it wasn't a shooter that got his ear.
Maybe there is something to that Project Looking Glass & this attack was already known & Trump survived it 🤷♂️
Thanks for these interesting connections. Lots to chew on.
Pulling the A from Comperatore is a bit much