Was it Justified? Kentucky Judge Shot and Killed in His Chambers by Local Sheriff—High-Ranking Government Sources Uncover Shocki...
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: A shocking and tragic incident has unfolded in Letcher County, Kentucky, leaving the community in disbelief. High-ranking government
Let’s be honest: MANY fathers would do the same.
The only good pdophile is a dəad one.
Let’s be honest: The sheriff and judge both gave oaths to up hold the law. A judge raping the daughter of a sheriff?
One person is using their power to break the law and get away with it.
The other person is the sheriff.
He was just doing his job.
Tagging in with your line op... great one.
And to further the cause:
The Infidel.com
A group focused on just this.
100% agree with you u/conservativeamerica!
If this were the standard, normal, acceptable practice for all allegations, there's a greater-than-zero chance innocent husbands, fathers, sons, political candidates could wind up dead with no accused left alive to defend themself in court.
The question:
What would stop some crazy democrat neighbor who hates your Trump signs from getting their 17 year old daughter to say "YOU, YOUR HUSBAND, YOUR SON, DJT, etc etc... r**ped me" so the dad shoots you/him and then there is not even a trial?
Then your husband/son is dead so the accusers are the only ones alive to give their side of the story only.
L A W L E S S N E S S
"Caught in the act" is a completely different story. I say light them on fire.
Down votes are fine, but showcase your intelligence by giving an answer to the question because this would be the newest easiest way to get killed by someone without consequence.
Your question doesnt make sense because there will always be a trial, if not for the rapist then for the murderer of the rapist. Now you have to justify your actions. can you convince the jury the same way the sherrif convinced members of his community? if you can then i agree with the article, jury should choose to not indict him, but if you cant, lawlessness only goes so far.
e: if you catch them in the act, beat the shit out of them and plead temporary insanity.
So if someone scheme to kill your son, and the schemer gets found out and convicted of his murder, that makes it OK?
You care nothing for the greater than zero amount of innocent men who would be murdered?
The dead get no defense and the murderer (IF caught) goes to jail and everything is just fine?
I think if someone's convicted of crimes like this, they should be turned over to the family of the victim.
Being lit on fire would be fitting if convicted of the rape of a child.
Thank God our founding fathers were men of great intellect. They could connect the dots and enshrined the right to a jury trial.
The question in my original comment is much broader and deeper than the specific incident in the OP.
Questions of great consequence rarely do make sense to those without the intellectual ability to deeply understand them u/Furecrotch
your question is basically what stops someone from bearing false witness and committing murder, isnt it?
conspiracy is more than just a theory, its a felony. whats the alternative, precogs from the minority report?
in this new hypothetical, what is he convicted of, murder or attempted murder? is there evidence against him that he did or tried to murder my son? if so then its absolutely ok. otherwise your stuck in a 12 angry men situation.
personally id refer to matthew 18 or luke 17.
thats basically what i said, there will always be a trial. which is why your question makes no sense. youre dwelling into whataboutism. what if this, what if that. i would call that hypothetical nonsense before it call it intellectual in any capacity.
Exactly.
Evidence was gathered, witnesses were interviewed, guilt was established, a jury of his peers sentenced him, a humanitarian execution occurred by qualified officials. What's the problem?
the problem is that its a Judge, a high ranking government official in the justice system. If the Judge is a rapist, there's no telling who else by his side is in the same boat.
How many other sexual assailants are getting out with slap on the wrist sentencings. The Sheriff made the hardest decision of his life, and now he's in jail.
But that rapist was killed in the middle of his own fortress, surrounded by his guards, it sends a message of how easy it can be to kill a rapist.
"Its about sending a message."
Well that sheriff really laid it on then. I prefer we just take them to the train station and leave it unsolved.
Make pedophile extermination legal if you're a relative of a victim
No need. Just make duels legal again. That would solve a lot of problems.
There's a reason elites instituted that system in more archaic times, they had money and resources to practice and then literally get away with murder by having a duel. Common men generally didn't have a chance.
That was then. What the fuck does that have to do with how things are NOW?
The advent of dueling pistols that had better penetration and accuracy made dueling a literal bloodbath that often left the families of both parties bereaved, often destroyed businesses and generally wasn't good for society. Also courts got setup so elites can just pay their way out of the consequences for shitty conduct. Imagine going three rounds at ten paces with a modern semi auto firearm. Violence is not the answer, enforcing and patching existing laws is. Would you have it so a pedophile who put in plenty of range time would essentially be allowed to rape whoever they want and then walk free after a show of skill?
You know a bit about dueling... but idiotically think dueling would completely replace the legal system? Who said anything about that? Also, you just assume dueling was only done with firearms. Wrong again. Dueling predates the invention of firearms by centuries.
Dueling was a way to settle personal grievances not covered by the law. Also, it did not have to be to the death. It could instead be fought to "first blood", etc.
It led to a much more polite society, since stupid behavior had potentially serious consequences. Of course, weak people fear any of that type of personal accountability. Relax. I doubt it would ever be reintroduced, so you don't have to be afraid.
As long as most people around you agree, and understand the concept of jury nulification, then it's legal enough.
A conservative site trying to eliminate the word RAPE from our language? This needs to be stopped now before it gets a foothold.
Happened in LETCHER County. How appropriate.
The face gives it away.
You mean that PedoJew face?
If this can be remotely proven i do not see a jury conviction in his future and in fact i could see him being returned to office as sheriff. This is a very good explanation for why this might have happened, makes sense and completely justified, sheriff or not, if true.
Remember this: all murders are homicides; not all homicides are murders.
If the judge was involved in the rape, it was justified homicide. If the judicial system won’t do their jobs, the people will be forced to.
He killed him to fast. Death of a thousand cuts over a 30 day period.
Yes
As a father of a daughter it would be well worth spending the time in jail, the judge ruined his family anyway. So there are no consequences if that makes any sense?
He still needs to stand trial, vigilante justice is no good for society. Let a jury decide justification.
Bullshit. The courts are corrupt, most juries have proven to be full of complete idiots, and the government is full of communists. "Vigilante justice" is all we have left at this point. In fact, we need more of it...
If he stands trial and this sex abuse is provable no jury will convict. It would be better for the State to set up a no jail time plea deal.
Two weeks paid vacation and a pay raise.
How about nah?
Who needs to stand trial, the sheriff? Of course, and the jury should acquit. If the state wants to prosecute child rapists, then they should arrest them before the parents find out.
"Of the People, BY the People, for the People...", no such thing as vigilante or "taking the law into your own hands"...that is why we vote on a sheriff, the power is ours to hire an employee.
And the Bible (older versions) differentiated between murder (the bad kind) and killing (at times justified).
Commandment used to be ‘thou shall not murder’…