As part of a custody battle, a Tennessee judge ordered a family to vaccinate all three of their children, all of whom had never been vaccinated. Five-year-old Isaac immediately became ill and was eventually diagnosed with severe regressive autism.
(www.theburningplatform.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
No, having the government force medical treatment onto human beings that it does not care about and is not affected by is wrong. Now this child, really all the children have to deal with what was done to them. Basically they have been medically raped by the government through force. The victims are now expected to be OK with having things done to them against their will. I would like to turn the tables and through edict force this judge to take his own medicine. Like a full battery of covid shots. Just one after another. Because MSM said it's safe and effective.
Judge deserves life imprisonment plus vax... exactly the sentence he gave the child.
Judge deserves execution.
Slow execution. I really pray the med beds are real so we can help these kids out.
Let his execution consist of continuous vaccinations of all sorts until his body fails.
And the mom too, she willfully harmed her child to get one over her husband. The evilness of that shouldn't be understated.
I can’t agree more. Vengeful women are dangerous. Quite a few kids are no more than pawns in a twisted game of “You Will Pay” for whatever the perceived wrong was about. It makes me sick. But really, the kids wind up cold hearted at best, emotional wrecks otherwise. They’re the ones that pay. When your parent doesn’t value you as precious, it creates a lifetime of questioning your own worth.
The mother is a typical Karen.
Oh yes he would be executed by yesterday.
make sure it's18 vaxx's at one time.
who has ever heard of this?? damn, i took my dog to the vet a few weeks ago because she wasn't feeling well and they gave her a rabies vax while she was sick. i was pissed. and that's just a dog.
Mine did that once "oh he needed bordatella (kennel cough) vaccine, so we gave it". I told them to mark my file that I wasn't paying for any vaccines given to any of my animals, period. And the vaccine talk/assault all stopped from that point on.
Death. Penalty. Period.
Until someone sues and wins a financial settlement for the rest of this child’s life, nothing will change. If I had it to do over, none of my children or dogs would be vaccinated.
This is just State sanctioned poisoning of innocent citizens.
And do people still wonder why a Sheriff would walk into a judges chamber and shoot the judge dead?
Judicial branch is out of control and all lawyers win no matter which party is given each "decision".
https://www.wlwt.com/article/letcher-county-sheriff-billy-jones-shawn-stines-charges/62640882
What's the story behind that? Link doesn't give much details.
In that case, the judge was abusing the sheriff's teenage daughter. Names are in the linked story so it can be verified. I link it because it is current and lack of respect and lack of boundaries leads to much abuse.
I would do the same to the judge
Don't forget the mom, she was complicit. She willingly hurt her children to win.
You put your finger on the key piece of this. I was surprised no one else caught it.
When women are in divorce/custody battles, part of the programming driving them is a wide rage of negative emotions targeted at their spouse. Understandably. (Divorce should be unthinkable--it goes against everything that good/evolved humans try to build in terms of family, community, etc.) This is the case even where the woman has initiated the divorce. The sense of betrayal, and the need to punish/get even, can run deeply.
Lawyers feed on that like the loosh harvesting parasites they are.
I'm always amazed how many people don't realize that getting even with the spouse is part of these situations. On both sides.
This can mean causing harm to the spouse's offspring, as well as the spouse. We see this again and again in the animal kingdom--a female loses a mate, finds another, and the offspring of the first mate are destroyed.
Today we have a social order where a huge cadre of parasites feeds on these biological realities (as they are allowed to exist in the absence of higher standards of behavior and family formation). Lawyers, mentioned above. "Social" "workers." Judges. Teachers. LE. Doctors. Nurses. Politicians.
Pharma well knows this: it constantly pushes for "health" "care" policy that divides family members against one another for gain. And exploits these animal-tier reactions/behaviors.
The notion that a judge could have the power to force medical treatment on anyone is widely accepted by most people. The ones aching for a paternal social order. (And many can't see or admit that, in themselves.)
Sometimes I think that the whole vax thing--bad as it is--is a Trojan horse for even more extensive government interventions that Pharma has always had planned. We see this play out in the tsunami of policies of the past 15 years like Kaiser Permanente's, where 13 to 18 year olds are entitled to Degeneracy Interventions (drug, alcohol treatment; abortion and other sex related treatment; tranny stuff) on their parents' dime...but also can keep secret from the parents the nature and details of that treatment. (Muh HIPAA).
I do not like divorce. BUT...I ardently wish my Grandmother had divorced my Grandfather. He was an abusive alcoholic who burned his children with cigarettes when angry, set fire to money so my grandmother couldn't adequately feed the children, and basically was a sorry excuse for a human being. Thank God -- he suffered a major stroke and became too disabled to kill anyone. But the damage was already done. ALL of my aunts and uncles had major psychological issues and so did my mother.
Now being Catholic -- my grandmother would never have dreamed of divorcing this man. She should have. It would have saved her children a lifetime of misery.
So I must respectfully disagree with your statement that "divorce is unthinkable".
My point was not that the practical act of divorce was unthinkable.
My point was that many people harbor a keen need for certainty in relationships, especially marriage. Divorce violates that--even when it appears/is screamingly needed for the family's greater good.
When that need for certainty and security is violated, they may, or may be likely, to act out in predictable, biological/evolutionary ways, including victimizing of children per OP's example ("I hate my husband, I'm going to work with the court to do something to our offspring that I know he doesn't want."). Poor kids.
My point, if you read my comment again, is that there are countless demonic parasitic forces (lawyers, judges, social workers, doctors, Pharma, etc.) looking to turn these junctures of human anxiety, disruption, etc., into opportunities for money and power.
We are living in a cultural setting where there is no certainty or security of that sort, that's needed by so many people. We no longer have the authority structures in place to create that holding system.
But she didn't. Have you ever reflected on her choice? Or why, I think you're suggesting--she turned that choice over to others? If you blame ecclesiastical authority that takes away her moral agency, doesn't it? If she chose to align with that authority over her situation, that has to be an indication of how profound is the need for that relationship security.
I believe that unless you are raised Catholic, you probably would not have an appreciation for the profound sense of terror the breaking of that particular rule invoked. It has lessened in subsequent generations, but in my grandmother's day, the total control exerted by the church would simply not allow her to consider such an option.
The fear of hellfire was a very real and a compelling reason to put up with all kinds of abuse from her husband.
My husband had an aunt (same generation) whose abusive husband drove her to divorce in spite of the church. The poor woman ended up with electroshock therapy to deal with the emotional upheaval of this "sin" preying on her mind. The church was not known for its empathy to abused women and advised them to stick it out because marriage is a sacrament.
Now personally although I am a Catholic, I can not believe a merciful God would require a woman to stay married to a man who burns her children with cigarettes. But perhaps my understanding of the nature of God differs somewhat from that of the clergy.
Nevertheless -- I do believe in marriage and have been married to the same man for over 45 years. BUT...I was a very lucky woman and God gave me a husband who treated me well. So I can say my marriage is truly "sacramental" and believe it with all my heart.
However, no one will ever convince me that my poor grandmother had a sacramental marriage. I do not believe God intends anyone -- man or woman to suffer a lifetime of grievious harm at the hands of another.
The key term here though Is "grievious harm". I totally agree that marriages should be made with a serious intent for lifetime commitment. And the dissolution of any marriage should not be for frivolous reasons or simply a desire to change partners.
Thanks for sharing all this...I have many family experiences that track with yours, and am thankful every day to have been given the grace to rise above them.
Agree, same here (which is why loss of my darling this year has hurt so horribly--the sacrament truly makes Two into One, and without the other, it's just staggering around in a kind of mutilated state...even as I know where we will be reunited some day).
Can competely track with this.
Again, and not to be contentious, my point was about how the Divorce Industry swoops in to make money and power off of these incredibly painful instances, and how that meshes with and exploits biological instincts like I noted previously.
Thanks for the give and take, and in such a strong and obviously caring vein as you offered.
Please accept my sympathy for the loss of your beloved spouse. May God bless you!
Sue the judge personally
The family member who kept the kids from being vaxxed was right. How sad that this occurred. The medical industry knows the truth. How can they not see it. But their greed keeps their mouths shut. For every damaged child, they have medical customers for life!
Child has red hair. You have to be careful using any medications on redheads. That being said, the judge needs to see justice for themself.
it seems few people remember or even know this. anesthesiologist have to pay special attention to redheads when under as they have been known to just wake up in the middle if surgery, also irregular results from drinking as well some pass right out while others can seemingly drink you under the proverbial table so to speak.
Yep- could ruin an anesthetist’s day!
Another excellent point.
Pharma pushes their potions as though everyone on earth has the same biological makeup/reactions. They KNOW that there are population-based differences...but it's more lucrative to pump out one size fits all products, force them on people via public policy interventions and propaganda...then when bad stuff happens en masse in those populations, hey, who cares, we have immunity from prosecution!
It wouldn’t matter if they took individual biological make ups into consideration. All vaccine manufacturers know they are using transfection agents in almost all (I say almost all but I don’t know of any vaccine that doesn’t have these agents) knowing this and seeing the testimony of dr plotkin under oath makes me sick.
In addition, these vaccines manufacturers knew about these agents and Then created the studies to show safety and efficacy and all that bullshit we consumers seem to accept. Just like the days of Noah, we corrupted our DNA. Noah was perfect in his generations. Take that how you want. 😇
This story is heartbreaking. We have a good that was vaccine injured- hard years but he's mostly better now. Or situation was NOTHING like what this family had gone through.... My heart puts out to them. Something something just be done to pull back the red tape and help this man. And I'm WTH three others on what should happen to the judge- that man manages to sleep at night knowing what he's done and he doesn't care.
Judge needs to be held accountable...this is disgusting. Poor kid, will be praying for him and his siblings...
I’d be personally suing this judge and the evil idiots who gave the 18 jabs in one day!
The judge needs to be disbarred and prosecuted.
Dr Russell Blaylock was on the Higher Side Chats. I believe he talked about reversing autism through the elimination of toxic foods such as aspartame, msg and a few others. He attributes autism to a toxic overload so through elimination of those toxins one could achieve a positive outcome.
https://content.blubrry.com/thehighersidechats/THC_Dr_Russell_Blaylock_Free.mp3
I’m sorry but my limited experience with brain damage using the best alternative therapies money can buy has had dismal results. It’s just never the same.
‘How can a judge force medical care without a doctor’s input?’
He cant!
OMG that poor kid. What a travesty. Noone should be given that many vaccines ever. And certainly not in one day. Who was his doctor? He needs to be sued for malpractice and the family needs to sue that idiot judge.
The Judge needs sued into oblivion.
In TN no less.
The damn Judge needs to be given 18 vaxes in one day. Covid and boosters.
I would sue that damn judge. He is overstepping and acting as if he is a physician, sans medical license.
FFS these judges need to go. To Hell.
Judge and medical staff and manufacturer should all be in jail on assault charges.
If I'm dad someone's going to answer for it.
He should file for a death certificate if she’s missing.
Can you sue the hell out of a judge?
Sweet Jesus when will this end?
Our son doesnt want to vax his baby, his wife is all about vaccines. First born at hospital skipped them, 1 st check up got a couple, baby sick high fever. Next check up got a couple, not all.. Baby sick high fever! Yet she still wants to vax him.. I dont get it
Judge playing Doctor with no medical license or education. It's that illegal?
Judge should be put to death. Rope.
May this judge's name and memory be blotted out (of the book of the living) and his office be given to someone else. - Unless he repents!