No, simply considering that there is a war between the DS and the Trump forces, and we cannot always tell who is winning that particular war or which battle, etc.
The Duck is saying that in his view, if the files get released, it will indicated that DJT has gained effective control over the rogue DS IC.
Basically it was all CIA. CIA killed JFK. CIA killed JFK Jr. CIA killed RFK. CIA killed MLK.. CIA did 911.. etc. CIA probably also assassinated Trump twice.. everything links back to to CIA
It was a hot button issue then, communism, it doesn’t hold the same weight now as it did then because it’s over used but how else would they convince the good people in government to go along with such a murder?
What everyone who is espousing something about the CIA is VERY, VERY TRUE...however, most are missing the point, the murders of these people,
JFK. JFK Jr. RFK and MLK is due to the two things:
Communism was being annihilated during the first three, however, MLK was assassinated because CERTAIN people wanted the blacks under their (DEMS) control for purposes that we will never know, but for one, keeping them on the plantation for their votes...MLK was opening the blacks eyes to this...Hence the threat to the democrats.
What some may/may not know is that the CIA is an outgrowth of the OSS (Office of Special Services) after WWII...Alan Dulles was part & partial of getting this outfit started. So, what do EX-SPOOKS do...when they are called to do some nefarious op...they do the op and be damned of the consequences.
NOTE: There is A LOT OF MONEY TO BE MADE BY THESE OPERATORS, MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT!!! TA!!!!!
pretty sure hot button issue today. Trump just beat communism! the IC was always communism in disguise IMO. I don't agree MLK was a communist although their reports and what MSM reported may have indicated such
No no I’m not saying it’s not prevalent I’m saying when you tell a normie someone is a commie or try to point it out to a leftist it gets blown off at least in my experience. I’m in agreement with you about the label they put on MLK. I just pointed out it was a slander to get people to rally against him is all. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
I believe by law the CIA isn't allowed to spy on the American people (only foreign countries). However if you research a program called "5 Eyes", they can share intelligence with Great Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand ('cause, you know, NZ is SUCH a hotspot of terrorist activity!). So if the CIA wants info on you, they just legally get it from the four other countries...
Now in researching just this comment, apparently there's also 9 eyes and 14 eyes. You know, because you pesky citizens are being so bothersome these days.
It has been reported that Pompeo advised DJT to not release ALL the files, even though a significant amount of the files were actually released under Trump.
It's the "All the files" part that is significant. Personally, I wonder if it simply wasn't the right time during the First Administration, and that Team Trump needed to withhold the release until the right moment (aka NOW, when DJT has the public mandate in the House, Senate, Overwhelming electoral victory both Electoral college and popular).
I think this makes sense from the viewpoint of a CIA-trained intel officer. Why? because in the CIA context, psyop always means manipulation.
I think that as used by the broader Q movement, "psyop" has a slightly different connotation. Taking the original term, and attaching a slightly different meaning/nuance to it. "Psychological operation".
In the 5G sense of the word, I think it would be fair to say that psychological operations are engaged in to "influence", which is different from "manipulate". And, in 5G war, the psychological aspect is very real, and both sides must engage with it.
two
"If there was a highly positioned officer with highest clearance dropping classified information on the dark web, they would be arrested for espionage within a week"
Sigh. "arrest" You mean like all the evil perpetrators at C_A etc, who do all manner of evil shit but who are NEVER arrested? Kind of a joke to say "if some intel officer was doing [x], they would be arrested within a week when all manner of intel officers have been doing crap for decades and never, ever been arrested.
Who would do the arresting? The DOJ? Or does he mean that the DS C_A would attack such an individual/team and destroy them?
"Classified information" Did Q ever drop classified information? Kek. Even the humblest anon knows that Q did not ever drop classified info, precisely because it would be illegal to do so. Rather, Q used publicly available data to inspire and stimulate thinking and research. Strike two, Mr. Shipp.
"On the dark web" Er, the chans, 4-chan/pol, 8-chan, 8-kun, these are "the dark web????? This statement throws a lot of doubt on Shipp's whole narrative about who he is. I mean, it's fundamentally basic hacker or serious netizen level knowledge that the chans are NOT the dark web.
The idea that the chans are or were the dark web is a totally normie level MSM narrative to scare folks about Q and redirect them away. How could an intel officer of that level of experience that Shipp purports to be say this?
That's as far as I've gotten.
Not too highly motivated to listen much more.
I listened to his interview with Owens, and while I found it both compelling and believable, I also found myself wondering, how is it that Owens is on yutub, never banned, never deplatformed like anons or other serious truth tellers?
Afaik, Owens outed herself as a Con Inc. (aka "RINO" for the truth community - TTINO Truth teller in name only) Anti-trump stooge after the 2022 midterms
I recall at first liking her when she came across my radar pre-2022, then hearing from frogs here that her father was dodgy, came to think she is controlled oppo. In recent times, she's been going much harder on some core topics, like 9-11, C_A, JFK assassination, etc, so I've wondered... "Did she have an awakening?"
Never pay attention to her, because essentially I know she comes from the fair-weather 'maga' pretender crowd, outed in 2022, but I decided to listen to the Shipp interview.
She is clearly a lightweight. Very lightweight, in the least. Very smooth for the public airways type of person, but doesn't have that grittiness that more serious (and upfront) people have. And, I wonder, why is she on youtube.
Now I have to wonder about her and Shipp. I should listen to Shipps Q statement more, because although I think his initial position makes sense (research, make up your own mind, due diligence, etc), even the statements above start to ring out like FAKE, FAKE, FAKE because the arguments are MSM narrative level stuff. Like controlled oppo.
Anyway, a few thoughts. Glad you posted to link, winny, although I am not that much drawn to listen to stuff outside my portfolio these days. This, interestingly enough, has serendipity written all over it, considering that I listened to the Shipp interview just earlier this week (and that is something outside of my usual routine, completely)
Fwiw, this "George" guy also seems pretty lightweight and a nice TTINO. "All will come out in the next four years..." We do NOT know what will happen or how things will unfold, and anyone who tells themselves that they do know is fooling themselves. Me? I've learned to eschew the fallacy of comforting beliefs based in bias confirmation and my own projection. I consider myself much more based now.
OP also posts a lot of that sort of stuff, fwiw. Big declarations, certainty in thinking "this is it". Etc. Q called me to learn to think freely, not to learn to simply switch one matrix (set of beliefs) for another.
I also notice the direction of these "burst on the scene with dubious beginnings" personalities appear to be working in lock-step to advance the "Jews are behind everything" narrative, which, to me is a cabal narrative with which to shield themselves. Time will tell if they actually trace things to the top, or merely stop at the front lines.
When it all goes down blame the Jews, right? Meanwhile the actual ringleaders escape to regroup and fight another day, another generational secret society network begins. New names, new logos, same old tired bullshit.
And don't get me started on their (the burst on the scenes) religion. I notice patterns is all, honest!
CIA Whistleblower Kevin Shipp reveals that Martin Luther King was murdered by the CIA.
While I do not doubt that this is true, I think its important to be circumspect and not simply take the word of one man because he is a whistleblower.
FWIW. I listened to the entire interview (full), and found it utterly believable. However, "reveal" is something that needs to be reserved for those with authority to provide facts.
I would use "claims" or "asserts" or "testifies", etc. Otherwise, we get in to a practice of accepting the testimony of a single person as the stone cold truth.
It's a small point, but I prefer to always be on the alert to how easy it is to slide into areas where confirmation bias, prejudice or belief take supremacy over facts. Avoiding that requires a certain mental and emotional rigorousness that steers clear of simply believing or accepting things because we believe them, but then treating them as facts.
While Shipp claims this, I would love to see when the information all comes out so that it can truly be 'revealed'.
When all the data is there, only THEN is it revealed.
I'm thinking that an important signal of whether Trump has overcome certain powers embedded in the IC is if these files get released or not.
If he releases the JFK/MLK files, then he has gained control. If not, the the IC still has control over him.
This is very plausible, excellent insights pede
They have it all! If they can hear Lyn D Rothschild breathing it only means that, timing is everything!
Someone should do a parody song Queen "I want it all".
We have it all
We have it all
We have it all
And we're coming for you.
What's "IC"?
Intelligence community
Insinuating that Trump is controlled opposition?
No, simply considering that there is a war between the DS and the Trump forces, and we cannot always tell who is winning that particular war or which battle, etc.
The Duck is saying that in his view, if the files get released, it will indicated that DJT has gained effective control over the rogue DS IC.
Intelligence Community, that unelected 4th branch of Government.
Basically it was all CIA. CIA killed JFK. CIA killed JFK Jr. CIA killed RFK. CIA killed MLK.. CIA did 911.. etc. CIA probably also assassinated Trump twice.. everything links back to to CIA
100%
CIA killed people in the twin towers.
Ah yes, CIA / MOSSAD also did 911
john lennon
So back then they were killing commies?
It was a hot button issue then, communism, it doesn’t hold the same weight now as it did then because it’s over used but how else would they convince the good people in government to go along with such a murder?
What everyone who is espousing something about the CIA is VERY, VERY TRUE...however, most are missing the point, the murders of these people, JFK. JFK Jr. RFK and MLK is due to the two things:
Communism was being annihilated during the first three, however, MLK was assassinated because CERTAIN people wanted the blacks under their (DEMS) control for purposes that we will never know, but for one, keeping them on the plantation for their votes...MLK was opening the blacks eyes to this...Hence the threat to the democrats.
What some may/may not know is that the CIA is an outgrowth of the OSS (Office of Special Services) after WWII...Alan Dulles was part & partial of getting this outfit started. So, what do EX-SPOOKS do...when they are called to do some nefarious op...they do the op and be damned of the consequences.
NOTE: There is A LOT OF MONEY TO BE MADE BY THESE OPERATORS, MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT!!! TA!!!!!
More REAL black leaders will soon rise without fear of cabal pushback. It's a new dawn.
pretty sure hot button issue today. Trump just beat communism! the IC was always communism in disguise IMO. I don't agree MLK was a communist although their reports and what MSM reported may have indicated such
No no I’m not saying it’s not prevalent I’m saying when you tell a normie someone is a commie or try to point it out to a leftist it gets blown off at least in my experience. I’m in agreement with you about the label they put on MLK. I just pointed out it was a slander to get people to rally against him is all. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
10-4 ! thanks for clarifying
This all better happen.
Pompeo I believe stopped the release of the JFK and MLK files.
CIA = MOSSAD
Birds of a feather!
More like MOSSAD = CIA
One step further:
= Vatican / Jesuits / Freemasons / Knights / Thule / Mystery
I believe by law the CIA isn't allowed to spy on the American people (only foreign countries). However if you research a program called "5 Eyes", they can share intelligence with Great Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand ('cause, you know, NZ is SUCH a hotspot of terrorist activity!). So if the CIA wants info on you, they just legally get it from the four other countries...
Now in researching just this comment, apparently there's also 9 eyes and 14 eyes. You know, because you pesky citizens are being so bothersome these days.
https://cybernews.com/resources/5-eyes-9-eyes-14-eyes-countries/
It has been reported that Pompeo advised DJT to not release ALL the files, even though a significant amount of the files were actually released under Trump.
It's the "All the files" part that is significant. Personally, I wonder if it simply wasn't the right time during the First Administration, and that Team Trump needed to withhold the release until the right moment (aka NOW, when DJT has the public mandate in the House, Senate, Overwhelming electoral victory both Electoral college and popular).
Timing is everything in war.
No shit Kevin Shipp you glowing clown. We've only been saying this for oh Idk, about 3 decades?
In other news, here is Kevin Shipp being an absolute faggot clown: https://www.bitchute.com/video/aIEks8YxKGwX
Hmmm...
A few points (this far into the video):
one
"there is no such thing as a 'good' psyop"
I think this makes sense from the viewpoint of a CIA-trained intel officer. Why? because in the CIA context, psyop always means manipulation.
I think that as used by the broader Q movement, "psyop" has a slightly different connotation. Taking the original term, and attaching a slightly different meaning/nuance to it. "Psychological operation".
In the 5G sense of the word, I think it would be fair to say that psychological operations are engaged in to "influence", which is different from "manipulate". And, in 5G war, the psychological aspect is very real, and both sides must engage with it.
two
"If there was a highly positioned officer with highest clearance dropping classified information on the dark web, they would be arrested for espionage within a week"
Sigh. "arrest" You mean like all the evil perpetrators at C_A etc, who do all manner of evil shit but who are NEVER arrested? Kind of a joke to say "if some intel officer was doing [x], they would be arrested within a week when all manner of intel officers have been doing crap for decades and never, ever been arrested.
Who would do the arresting? The DOJ? Or does he mean that the DS C_A would attack such an individual/team and destroy them?
"Classified information" Did Q ever drop classified information? Kek. Even the humblest anon knows that Q did not ever drop classified info, precisely because it would be illegal to do so. Rather, Q used publicly available data to inspire and stimulate thinking and research. Strike two, Mr. Shipp.
"On the dark web" Er, the chans, 4-chan/pol, 8-chan, 8-kun, these are "the dark web????? This statement throws a lot of doubt on Shipp's whole narrative about who he is. I mean, it's fundamentally basic hacker or serious netizen level knowledge that the chans are NOT the dark web.
The idea that the chans are or were the dark web is a totally normie level MSM narrative to scare folks about Q and redirect them away. How could an intel officer of that level of experience that Shipp purports to be say this?
That's as far as I've gotten.
Not too highly motivated to listen much more.
I listened to his interview with Owens, and while I found it both compelling and believable, I also found myself wondering, how is it that Owens is on yutub, never banned, never deplatformed like anons or other serious truth tellers?
Afaik, Owens outed herself as a Con Inc. (aka "RINO" for the truth community - TTINO Truth teller in name only) Anti-trump stooge after the 2022 midterms
https://www.salon.com/2022/11/14/incompetent-one-by-one-longtime-allies-are-trashing-him-in-public-after-midterm-failure/
I recall at first liking her when she came across my radar pre-2022, then hearing from frogs here that her father was dodgy, came to think she is controlled oppo. In recent times, she's been going much harder on some core topics, like 9-11, C_A, JFK assassination, etc, so I've wondered... "Did she have an awakening?"
Never pay attention to her, because essentially I know she comes from the fair-weather 'maga' pretender crowd, outed in 2022, but I decided to listen to the Shipp interview.
She is clearly a lightweight. Very lightweight, in the least. Very smooth for the public airways type of person, but doesn't have that grittiness that more serious (and upfront) people have. And, I wonder, why is she on youtube.
Now I have to wonder about her and Shipp. I should listen to Shipps Q statement more, because although I think his initial position makes sense (research, make up your own mind, due diligence, etc), even the statements above start to ring out like FAKE, FAKE, FAKE because the arguments are MSM narrative level stuff. Like controlled oppo.
Anyway, a few thoughts. Glad you posted to link, winny, although I am not that much drawn to listen to stuff outside my portfolio these days. This, interestingly enough, has serendipity written all over it, considering that I listened to the Shipp interview just earlier this week (and that is something outside of my usual routine, completely)
Fwiw, this "George" guy also seems pretty lightweight and a nice TTINO. "All will come out in the next four years..." We do NOT know what will happen or how things will unfold, and anyone who tells themselves that they do know is fooling themselves. Me? I've learned to eschew the fallacy of comforting beliefs based in bias confirmation and my own projection. I consider myself much more based now.
OP also posts a lot of that sort of stuff, fwiw. Big declarations, certainty in thinking "this is it". Etc. Q called me to learn to think freely, not to learn to simply switch one matrix (set of beliefs) for another.
I also notice the direction of these "burst on the scene with dubious beginnings" personalities appear to be working in lock-step to advance the "Jews are behind everything" narrative, which, to me is a cabal narrative with which to shield themselves. Time will tell if they actually trace things to the top, or merely stop at the front lines.
When it all goes down blame the Jews, right? Meanwhile the actual ringleaders escape to regroup and fight another day, another generational secret society network begins. New names, new logos, same old tired bullshit.
And don't get me started on their (the burst on the scenes) religion. I notice patterns is all, honest!
edit - Aw papist doesnt like my comment again aw
kek.
You and me is 100% on the same page on this one...
Release all documents, King, 9-11, kennedy, wars!? ALL of the m!!!
While I do not doubt that this is true, I think its important to be circumspect and not simply take the word of one man because he is a whistleblower.
FWIW. I listened to the entire interview (full), and found it utterly believable. However, "reveal" is something that needs to be reserved for those with authority to provide facts.
I would use "claims" or "asserts" or "testifies", etc. Otherwise, we get in to a practice of accepting the testimony of a single person as the stone cold truth.
It's a small point, but I prefer to always be on the alert to how easy it is to slide into areas where confirmation bias, prejudice or belief take supremacy over facts. Avoiding that requires a certain mental and emotional rigorousness that steers clear of simply believing or accepting things because we believe them, but then treating them as facts.
While Shipp claims this, I would love to see when the information all comes out so that it can truly be 'revealed'.
When all the data is there, only THEN is it revealed.