What exactly defines a "climate-related" death? Is there even a such thing as a death that is not "climate-related?" I mean, everyone dies in direct contact with "climate." Therefore all death must be "climate-related," right? Commies and their silly buzzwords.
Climate-related would be deaths where the cause of death is directly or indirectly attributable to a feature or aspect of the climate. i.e. a hurricane, a storm, a drought, etc, etc.
Proximity (in direct contact with) has nothing to do with causality. Most humans die in direct contact with oxygen, but these are not 'oxygen-related deaths'.
If I were a commie making up statistics to fit an agenda, a car wreck fatality could be defined as an "oxygen related death" if the wreck occurred during fog, rain, or snow, or due to ice on the road.
You see comrade, all of those environmental factors are a result of the effects of barometric pressure- which of course is oxygen related...also, without oxygen, there would have been no water, snow or ice...
...And furthermore, gas powered car engines also rely on oxygen to run. Had it not been for evil corporations abusing oxygen by wasting it from burning it in internal combustion (car) engines, those fatalities would never have happened...
And, Snopes, Farcebook, and CNN fact checkers would all agree with me.
Your initial comment needed more context, It was a bit ambiguous, because you started out with questioning what defines a climate related death and then proposing a reasoning that all death is "climate-related".
I'm assuming you aren't a communist, so at this juncture, I can only interpret your comment as a foray into sarcasm, from "what.... to right?". In which case, it makes more sense.
Almost a satirical criticism of the way that Marxism and political satanism twists language and subverts it to their malignant agenda, as opposed to lifting up language as an instrument for truth and freedom.
It's all about accurate data. Hawaii and North Carolina destruction deaths do not seem to have been accurately counted. However, number of deaths occurring in both events might have been excessive due to people in power decisions rather than the actual disaster itself.
This is great, however we must remember these are weather NOT 'climate' related deaths. We must not allow the UNWHOWEF's hijacking of the word 'climate' a single quark of legitimacy by unwittingly endorsing their language subversion.
I think I see what liberals and globalists suffer from... it's a kind of madness that sees a downward trend and their minds translate it to an upward trend. It must be like dyslexia or body dysphoria,... seeing the opposite of what the data shows.
Get rid of that useless UN and tear it down. Thr devil has had that filtly playground long enough. A free nation has no business allowing that faux government to occupants soil.
What exactly defines a "climate-related" death? Is there even a such thing as a death that is not "climate-related?" I mean, everyone dies in direct contact with "climate." Therefore all death must be "climate-related," right? Commies and their silly buzzwords.
Climate-related would be deaths where the cause of death is directly or indirectly attributable to a feature or aspect of the climate. i.e. a hurricane, a storm, a drought, etc, etc.
Proximity (in direct contact with) has nothing to do with causality. Most humans die in direct contact with oxygen, but these are not 'oxygen-related deaths'.
If I were a commie making up statistics to fit an agenda, a car wreck fatality could be defined as an "oxygen related death" if the wreck occurred during fog, rain, or snow, or due to ice on the road.
And, Snopes, Farcebook, and CNN fact checkers would all agree with me.
Ah, ok.
Your initial comment needed more context, It was a bit ambiguous, because you started out with questioning what defines a climate related death and then proposing a reasoning that all death is "climate-related".
I'm assuming you aren't a communist, so at this juncture, I can only interpret your comment as a foray into sarcasm, from "what.... to right?". In which case, it makes more sense.
Almost a satirical criticism of the way that Marxism and political satanism twists language and subverts it to their malignant agenda, as opposed to lifting up language as an instrument for truth and freedom.
Point taken.
Dihydrogen monoxide related deaths are a major problem though!
It's all about accurate data. Hawaii and North Carolina destruction deaths do not seem to have been accurately counted. However, number of deaths occurring in both events might have been excessive due to people in power decisions rather than the actual disaster itself.
This was a theme at this years climate circle jerk. Al Gores talk was about climate refufgees.
This is great, however we must remember these are weather NOT 'climate' related deaths. We must not allow the UNWHOWEF's hijacking of the word 'climate' a single quark of legitimacy by unwittingly endorsing their language subversion.
BAN THEM FROM ALL SOCIAL MEDIA AND ARREST THEM FOR DISINFORMATION kek
na, no social ban let them hang themselves
I think I see what liberals and globalists suffer from... it's a kind of madness that sees a downward trend and their minds translate it to an upward trend. It must be like dyslexia or body dysphoria,... seeing the opposite of what the data shows.
There are "natural disasters" and "man-made" disasters.
Get rid of that useless UN and tear it down. Thr devil has had that filtly playground long enough. A free nation has no business allowing that faux government to occupants soil.
Huh…imagine that. More false reports.