Responsible gun owners have a duty to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. If you are forced to surrender your guns against your will make sure they are useless. Just in case they get lost on their way to be destroyed. For safety.
A dab of JB weld in the chamber should do the trick. Once the bolt closes, it ain't ever shooting again.
EDIT: To all the folks saying "Muh 1776!"... Only a small percentage of Americans went to war with the redcoats. A lot of people comply, for many reasons. This is for them, retailers especially, they can at least guarantee these guns don't go to Ukraine, Syria, ISIS, Gangbangers, etc.
We had 2A freedom before Trudeau got in. And yes you could get hand guns and AR15s too despite what people were telling you. Most Canadians didnt even know that because most Canadians were not interested in getting guns. The only difference between Canada and US is in Canada you have to take a gun course and pass a back ground check.
Yeah I know you Americans go on and on and on and on about how there should be no checks. But if you look at the crime in Canada before Trudeau you would have seen it was a really really safe country. Mass shootings were rare you would hardly see 1 in every 10 years. So background checks worked. In Canada a mentally unstable person would not be able to buy a gun and that is the way it should be.
Since Trudeau came in and started letting all the middle eastern people in thats when the violence in Canada went way way up. You see homeless camps all over Canada now and we have never seen that before. Thats how much Trudeau has ruined this country.
You're 100% wrong, friend.
It has never been a 'right' or Charter protected to own a firearm in Canada. Owning a firearm in Canada is a privilege like a driver's licence. All assault type rifles were banned in the 70s.
Mass shootings are still extremely rare in Canada. Yes there is gang violence in the bigger cities, but nowhere near like some cities in the USA. The only mass shooting that happened in Canada where an actual assault type rifle was used was the one in Nova Scotia during convid. 95%+ of all shootings in Canada are by hand gun.
The "mass shooting' at the Montreal college in the 80's was a semi automatic rifle.
You might want to check your facts, no offence.
BTW... just for clarity & to not tarnish the good nature of law abiding Americans:
Every single one of the so called "mass shootings" in America that Europeans and others are so quick to bring up any time firearms are mentioned in conversation, were committed by a government affiliate in one shape or another - bar NONE. Our intel agencies or foreign or both, to push the agenda.
We, God loving, law abiding Americans aren't going to let this bullshit continue to be hung around our necks...
Thanks for listening...
"We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook" on BitChute (https://www.bitchute.com/video/lpU6vjKP4Jc3/). Don't let the Alice Jones lawsuit pull the wool over your eyes, take a look at that video. PLANNED BY SOME OF THE COMMUNITY!
And remember the recent Texas one where the cops all stood outside? A father was getting his haircut. Heard about it. Got to school, ran in, and saved some kids. IIRC.
Thanks for that. I'll add a few things to your good points.
One doesn't have anything to do with the other. As we know, nearly all of the "mass shootings" are planned for political reasons. The more shootings that are planned, the more that the normies think they want guns eliminated. If they would use even one brain cell and figure out who actually wants guns eliminated (hint - it starts with govern and ends with ment) they might understand how the mass shootings help their agenda.
Remember - without guns we will become worse than Australia. There will be no more checks on the government's power.
Everyone needs to brush up on their Charlton Heston:
Yep. THAT'S the general idea...
So far they've been smart enough to keep their distance.
Oh, yeah and that mass shooting seems to have been the RCMP themselves. The guy they said did the shooting was paid off like 400k the week before the shooting by the RCMP, they claimed the guy had a replica police car 🙄 and then they were seen torching their cars after the murders.
Next the government banned all the guns. Problem, solution. Like in New Zealand with the hoax mosque shooting, or Australia, where they brought in Mossad gunmen to mass murder innocent civilians and then pinned it on a mentally disabled guy they said was a gun nut.
Wasn't that one an inside job by the RCMP?
The main reason I am an Absolutist on the 2nd Amendment, "The RIGHT to bear arms," is simple.
Once you start saying things like, we just need to do background checks, we just need you to have proof of training, you must show that you secure your guns safely, etc. Is because a nation will end up just like Australia and Canada.
Gun Confiscation, disarming the masses, centralized government control.
The 1A, the right to say whatever the fuck we want, and the 2A, the right to back it up, is how a nation stays free from government tyranny.
Our Founding Father's knew this and this is precisely why the 1A and 2A exist. No other reason. To STOP Government Tyranny.
The “well regulated” in the second amendment refers to the militias being well trained and drilled in operations, not “heavily/‘appropriately’ restricted”.
The structure of the 2nd Amendment is that the right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed IN ORDER THAT there will be a well-regulated militia. It is a preliminary requirement for a militia, not a contingency depending on a militia. A militia's regulation (training, not infringement of the right) is covered by specific duties of Congress (training and arming). Where weapon bans have been imposed at the federal level, it is because the courts found that the weapon in question was not suitable for militia purposes. I don't agree with this limitation, but it is directly opposite what the liberals would have you believe.
Excellent point. Very true.
The well-regulated militias from the newly independent states were a crucial force multiplier for the Continental Army in the War for Independence against the world's greatest military of the day.
Teach that sucka something. Right on MAGA. I dig what you said and how you said it.
We have to pass background checks here in Texas in order to purchase guns.
That's everywhere. Either state AND federal or just federal.
In NJ you have to also be anal swabbed...or might as well be... AND you can have your piece: At home, at place of business, the range (but can't stop to eat - gotta go straight to/from, or hunting lands same deal) - You ain't traveling to/thru/outside NJ with a piece.
Oh and 10 rounds max... it's obscene.
We're hoping lawsuits by GOA reverse a lot of this bs. True constitutional carry would be excellent - and over-rule draconian states.
Because the traitorous government lackeys have infringed on the 2A doesn't make it lawful or right. SHALL NOT INFRINGE.
In stores and gun shows. However we can still buy an AR from a guy in a parking lot outside the gun show. Or we can buy our friend's or family's gun(s).
Also if we are lucky enough to find some dumb liberal city doing a gun "buyback" and giving the morons HEB gift certificates, we can always walk up to the people in line and offer them cash instead - a little more than the "buy-back" people are offering.
I really need to figure out how to make an algorithm or a google news alert (is that still a thing?) to tell me whenever a buyback is happening within 250 miles of my home.
We don't require a background investigation for any of those cases.
And why would we?
Mass shootings would be rare here, too, if 1) cops were allowed to do their jobs correctly in the solidly blue leftists cities and states, and 2) we didn't have a corrupt Intel community purposely mind fucking people into becoming mass shooters, and 3) we didn't have a corrupt Intel community actively training such people with skills you would really only learn in a combat setting, and 4) we didn't have a corrupt DOJ, HSC, and Intel community working in tandem to flood our cities and gangs with true assault weapons.
And, really, mass shootings are rare here in the U.S., when compared to other crimes.
The problem, like with the rest of society all over the globe, isn't The People, it's the governments working to keep us divided on every issue imaginable that is plaguing our society, including the gun debate.
Pretty sure all modern mass shooters were on SSRI’s, too.
Well over 90% of mass shootings are in so-called "gun free zones," where the shooter understands there would be essentially zero chance of being opposed by anyone with a gun. He has a free ride and he can take his time. Reloading is no problem, so magazine capacity limits have no utility. I have taken to calling these zones "shooting galleries," because of this fact.
"Mass shootings were rare you would hardly see 1 in every 10 years. So background checks worked. In Canada a mentally unstable person would not be able to buy a gun and that is the way it should be."
I'm sure that's what your masters in Ottawa told you at the time