Apparently you can ask Grok (x AI) what your score is but it seems everyone gets the same score 38 which then they link to post 38 but some say think mirror & refer to post 83 which kinda seems to make more sense when you read it but this is a slightly educated guess kek 😂
Some are acting like it is a social credit score and no one signed up for that- I tried to test the theory that it was giving everyone the same score of 38 but I couldn’t figure out how 😂
It’s something new & some think if it as a social credit score and feel betrayed which F yeah WTH but as I see the post it seems everyone has the same score- a twist in the plot I suppose
38 is a sign of financial blessings, so you’re on the right path if you keep seeing this number. The message and vibrational essence behind this angel number mostly center on financial rewards.
The good news behind the number 38 is that life’s going to take a turn for the better. You need to have confidence in your abilities and trust that your reality is about to improve.
Hi Grok. Okay I will play this game. What is my X score and what is it based on?
Hi Aumone! The "X Score" isn't an official metric provided by the X platform but rather a term some users use to gauge influence or activity. Based on posts found on X, your "X Score" could be seen as a reflection of your engagement, the nature of your posts, and interactions. It's essentially a colloquial way to measure your activity level, how your posts resonate with others, and the overall positivity or negativity of your content.
Therefore, your "X Score" would be an informal assessment based on:
Engagement: How often your posts get likes, retweets, comments, etc.
Nature of Posts: The content you share, whether it's informational, humorous, opinionated, etc.
Interactions: How you engage with others on the platform, including responses to your posts and your interaction with other users.
I don't have a number? I know I do not have a lot of people reading my posts but I do have fun posting them. Why are people all saying they get the same number 38?
The repeated mention of the number "38" as an "X Score" appears to be a phenomenon based on recent posts found on X. Here's what seems to be happening:
Uniform Placeholder: It's suggested that the score of 38 is used as a uniform placeholder or a sort of meme within the X community. This could serve as a humorous or ironic way for users to discuss their perceived influence or engagement on the platform without having an official metric.
Feedback Loop: There might be a feedback loop where users see others mentioning 38, leading them to adopt this number in their own discussions. This could be due to the platform's algorithm or simply a trend that users find amusing or relatable.
Really weird, I've been able to get it to be quite consistent and replicate the outputs most others on X are reporting. Such as Obama's score of 75 out of 100. Also I've prompted it two ways. First time was, "what is my X score?" The other was "what is my user score?" Or "what is Obama's user score?"
It also gave me this breakdown of how the user score is calculated:
User scores on X are calculated based on a variety of metrics and qualitative factors, though the exact formula isn't officially disclosed. Here's a general breakdown based on posts found on X and general web insights:
Engagement Metrics:
Likes, retweets, comments, and bookmarks contribute to a user's score. Each type of interaction might have different weights. For instance, likes might have a lower impact than retweets or comments.
Content Quality and Nature:
The tone and content of posts are considered. Positive, constructive, or engaging content can boost a score, while negativity might reduce it. This aligns with X's recent algorithm changes focusing on "no negativity" and "unregretted user seconds."
Behavior Score:
This could involve the user's behavior on the platform, including consistency, the frequency of posts, and how they interact with others. Positive interactions and a consistent presence might improve a score.
Violation Penalty:
Violations of platform rules or community standards can negatively impact a user's score. This includes spam, misinformation, or any behavior leading to account actions like suspensions.
Follower Engagement:
The engagement rate with followers, including how followers perceive and interact with the user's content, plays a role. A high engagement rate from a large follower base can significantly increase a score.
Unregretted User Seconds:
This newer metric measures how long users spend engaging with content without regretting their time spent, which could be a factor in determining content quality and user score.
User Invites:
Some platforms incentivize user growth by considering the number of invites or new users a person brings to the platform.
Here's a speculative formula, based on user discussions on X:
Where:
Engagement_Score could be derived from likes, comments, retweets, etc., with each having different multipliers.
Follower_Score might reflect the quality and engagement of the follower base.
Behavior_Score could include consistency, frequency, and positive interactions.
Violation_Penalty would subtract points for any negative behavior or violations.
This explanation is based on community insights and speculative discussions rather than official documentation, as the exact scoring method isn't publicly detailed by X. Scores can range widely, from negative values to over 100, reflecting both the complexity and the subjective nature of how they're calculated.
There is no doubt in my mind that Grok is NOT as absolute as we would like it to be. It is too late tonight for me to do anymore research, but when I have time I will actually ask Chat about this situation.
Have a great rest of the night! It is also good that we have found that AI is not so Absolute as we have been to believe.!
According to Grok: An "X Score" isn't an officially defined metric by X Corp (formerly Twitter). However, based on posts found on X, the term "X Score" appears to be colloquially used by some users to estimate or discuss their influence, engagement, or activity on the platform. This informal score can reflect:
Engagement: Likes, retweets, comments on posts.
Content: The nature of the posts, whether they align with platform trends or community guidelines.
Interactions: How users interact with others, including positivity or negativity in content.
From posts found on X, users mention scores like 38 out of 100 or 65 out of 100, suggesting a self-assessment based on these factors. However, this is not a formal metric provided by X Corp but rather a user-generated concept.
This seems like a genius way to get millions of users who wouldn't do so otherwise to engage with Grok. Remember the Facebook aging craze? No, because people are sheep. 🐑
Explain this to me like I'm a Fetterman 1.0.
Ok - I’ll try:
Uggg-aaahgg. Ggoogh-feent blablle scourge Koumba. Ahem, Carhartt.
That’s the best I can do😀
Omg that’s too funny.
You win the internet for the whole weekend.
Your Fettergrammar is terrible ... I mean, you completely forgot to add a "goodnight" at the end for starters ... :-p
Greems shartta gabugga, Charthartt
Gigg bet jar if kelpyin axes goodnight!
😀
Apparently you can ask Grok (x AI) what your score is but it seems everyone gets the same score 38 which then they link to post 38 but some say think mirror & refer to post 83 which kinda seems to make more sense when you read it but this is a slightly educated guess kek 😂
Oh jeez I’m as confused as Fetterman. 1.0 of course.
Some are acting like it is a social credit score and no one signed up for that- I tried to test the theory that it was giving everyone the same score of 38 but I couldn’t figure out how 😂
There is a social credit like score on your post history on X. Seems like all of us have 38 as a score. Q post 38 says the calm before the storm.
What storm Mr President? "You'll find out."
What is an X score?
It’s something new & some think if it as a social credit score and feel betrayed which F yeah WTH but as I see the post it seems everyone has the same score- a twist in the plot I suppose
He is probably already designing the island where he will have squid games held.
That's how it always starts. We are seemingly all equal...until the truth emerges (ominous music plays).
MrSmith1177 on GAW
It's the score of the Carolina 38 - 38 Atlanta game with 17 seconds left, which pushed it into overtime. Final score was Car 44 - 38 Atlanta.
Lotsa Georgia/Giorgia comms lately.
38 is a sign of financial blessings, so you’re on the right path if you keep seeing this number. The message and vibrational essence behind this angel number mostly center on financial rewards.
The good news behind the number 38 is that life’s going to take a turn for the better. You need to have confidence in your abilities and trust that your reality is about to improve.
Superbowl 38 half time show disagrees.
But 38 is 2x COV-ID 19, so maybe this time we'll get it right?
I had 38 as well. My content is squirrels only, but I reply on politics a lot.
I tried and Grok did not give me any numeric score. He simply said it is something users developed on their own and is NOT calculated by Grok.
I did the same and got the 38 out of 100 score from Grok along with reasonings as to why.
Makes one wonder how dependable Grok is.
Here is my conversation with him.
Hi Grok. Okay I will play this game. What is my X score and what is it based on?
Hi Aumone! The "X Score" isn't an official metric provided by the X platform but rather a term some users use to gauge influence or activity. Based on posts found on X, your "X Score" could be seen as a reflection of your engagement, the nature of your posts, and interactions. It's essentially a colloquial way to measure your activity level, how your posts resonate with others, and the overall positivity or negativity of your content.
Therefore, your "X Score" would be an informal assessment based on: Engagement: How often your posts get likes, retweets, comments, etc. Nature of Posts: The content you share, whether it's informational, humorous, opinionated, etc. Interactions: How you engage with others on the platform, including responses to your posts and your interaction with other users.
I don't have a number? I know I do not have a lot of people reading my posts but I do have fun posting them. Why are people all saying they get the same number 38?
The repeated mention of the number "38" as an "X Score" appears to be a phenomenon based on recent posts found on X. Here's what seems to be happening: Uniform Placeholder: It's suggested that the score of 38 is used as a uniform placeholder or a sort of meme within the X community. This could serve as a humorous or ironic way for users to discuss their perceived influence or engagement on the platform without having an official metric.
Feedback Loop: There might be a feedback loop where users see others mentioning 38, leading them to adopt this number in their own discussions. This could be due to the platform's algorithm or simply a trend that users find amusing or relatable.
Really weird, I've been able to get it to be quite consistent and replicate the outputs most others on X are reporting. Such as Obama's score of 75 out of 100. Also I've prompted it two ways. First time was, "what is my X score?" The other was "what is my user score?" Or "what is Obama's user score?"
It also gave me this breakdown of how the user score is calculated:
User scores on X are calculated based on a variety of metrics and qualitative factors, though the exact formula isn't officially disclosed. Here's a general breakdown based on posts found on X and general web insights:
Engagement Metrics: Likes, retweets, comments, and bookmarks contribute to a user's score. Each type of interaction might have different weights. For instance, likes might have a lower impact than retweets or comments.
Content Quality and Nature: The tone and content of posts are considered. Positive, constructive, or engaging content can boost a score, while negativity might reduce it. This aligns with X's recent algorithm changes focusing on "no negativity" and "unregretted user seconds."
Behavior Score: This could involve the user's behavior on the platform, including consistency, the frequency of posts, and how they interact with others. Positive interactions and a consistent presence might improve a score.
Violation Penalty: Violations of platform rules or community standards can negatively impact a user's score. This includes spam, misinformation, or any behavior leading to account actions like suspensions.
Follower Engagement: The engagement rate with followers, including how followers perceive and interact with the user's content, plays a role. A high engagement rate from a large follower base can significantly increase a score.
Unregretted User Seconds: This newer metric measures how long users spend engaging with content without regretting their time spent, which could be a factor in determining content quality and user score.
User Invites: Some platforms incentivize user growth by considering the number of invites or new users a person brings to the platform.
Here's a speculative formula, based on user discussions on X:
X_Score = (Engagement_Score + Follower_Score + Behavior_Score - Violation_Penalty) / Total_Possible_Score * 100
Where: Engagement_Score could be derived from likes, comments, retweets, etc., with each having different multipliers.
Follower_Score might reflect the quality and engagement of the follower base.
Behavior_Score could include consistency, frequency, and positive interactions.
Violation_Penalty would subtract points for any negative behavior or violations.
This explanation is based on community insights and speculative discussions rather than official documentation, as the exact scoring method isn't publicly detailed by X. Scores can range widely, from negative values to over 100, reflecting both the complexity and the subjective nature of how they're calculated.
There is no doubt in my mind that Grok is NOT as absolute as we would like it to be. It is too late tonight for me to do anymore research, but when I have time I will actually ask Chat about this situation.
Have a great rest of the night! It is also good that we have found that AI is not so Absolute as we have been to believe.!
White Hats are placing assets in place in preparation for the storm! Haiti comes to mind!
Social credit score. Don’t post Sam Hyde’s video on X. You’ll get booted.
Maybe take yer own advice there, Q ol' buddy ol' pal
If that IS your real name...! ;)
According to Grok: An "X Score" isn't an officially defined metric by X Corp (formerly Twitter). However, based on posts found on X, the term "X Score" appears to be colloquially used by some users to estimate or discuss their influence, engagement, or activity on the platform. This informal score can reflect:
Engagement: Likes, retweets, comments on posts. Content: The nature of the posts, whether they align with platform trends or community guidelines. Interactions: How users interact with others, including positivity or negativity in content.
From posts found on X, users mention scores like 38 out of 100 or 65 out of 100, suggesting a self-assessment based on these factors. However, this is not a formal metric provided by X Corp but rather a user-generated concept.
Yep. I'm definitely a 38 too.
This seems like a genius way to get millions of users who wouldn't do so otherwise to engage with Grok. Remember the Facebook aging craze? No, because people are sheep. 🐑
Lol mine too
Yup, X score of 38/100 Musk try harder ehh.............