If it were when women first started being allowed into these types of roles, I would have to say they actually met the required standards for it.
After all these years though, based off what I experienced in my time in and the last 4 years of dei practices, I'd say she was most likely given an edge and should not have been flying.
I watched standards be lowered across the board in the military because females couldn't match the men. At first, for the sake of diversity, standards were lowered only for women. Then, because some feminazis started crying discrimination, the standards got lowered for both males and females. Now we have sub par men and women in the military that shouldn't even be there in the first place.
This has resulted in more loss of life over the years due to the fact that the military in general has gotten beyond soft. All just because of having to meet forced numbers of women, men, races, sexual preferences and many other forms of nonsensical bullshit.
Edit:
I also wanted to add on that in this particular scenario, I don't think dei is the fault. I think it was hacked and controlled remotely. Q post deltas too close about a crash and the whole revealing remote controlled Blackhawks not too far before Trump's return are the reasons I have that hunch.
I know some very good pilots (civilian and military) who are real women, it all comes down to them having the proper training and experience and hired or recruited for their abilities not their lady parts.
It is sad for them, isn't it, that we have to wonder?? In a meritocracy, we would not have to wonder or doubt that they were best qualified!
Speaking of qualified:
It is not enough to be trained to be a "bus driver" -- another name for routine pilot.
A MILITARY pilot, such as one who is trusted to evacuate POTUS such as in this training mission, has to also have character qualifications: intrepidity, calmness in crisis, etc. [Think Sully who brought his plane down in the Hudson . . . almost beyond ordinary comprehension that he was able to do that.]
Before affirmative action and diversity goals, there were pilot errors.
Too bad though, that now we have to WONDER if the best are selected . . .
It is too bad we have to wonder. All three of the commercial pilots I know received their training in the military, so I dont know what kind of training is given for most airline pilots but I have seen some pretty bad videos of DEI hired pilots, definitely not the best of the best!
I believe they will, eventually. If I were making the decision to withhold, I would give them 30 days to do the funeral and all. Tell them 30 days and then release the name, that's fair to the family and to the public.
"Koziol confirmed to reporters on a conference call that the male instructor pilot had more than 1,000 hours of flight time, the female pilot who was commanding the flight at the time had more than 500 hours of flight time, and the crew chief was also said to have hundreds of hours of flight time."
Well none of them appear to have been looking out the window at the time, which is puzzling to me. They should have had their head on a swivel when transiting a busy A/C corridor, yet they flew along without any attempt at avoidance. The ATC is also a puzzle for their lack of control when it had to be obvious there was a danger of collision. But the lack of cockpit awareness is definitely the bigger question mark.
I think this question (which is being asked almost everywhere) is a red herring. Someone wants us to focus on only that question.
The real question is - why was the helicopter flying at double the altitude they were allowed to fly, and why were they 1/2 mile off-course?
The helicopters (any of them) are not allowed to fly above 200 feet in that area so they are not in the path of fixed-wing aircraft taking off or landing. There is also a route they have to take that helps keep them safe. These and other helicopters fly the same route multiple times every day. Why was this helicopter doing something different? Why were they flying at 400' - the exact altitude as the plane upon impact?
Also - just because it pisses me off that so many keep saying this (not you but X users and some on here) - YES - they have to train there. If something happens in the US and POTUS, SECDEF, or some other leader has to be evacuated to provide continuity of government, I for one want the pilots to be able to get them from point A to B safely, as fast as possible, and be able to do it from muscle memory. That to me is non-negotiable.
I’m a former USMC pilot. The first female USMC pilot, Sarah Deal, was legit. She was a great pilot. But even 30 years ago, the Navy and Marines would do anything to try and keep a terrible black pilot. This has been an ongoing issue for many years. And it cheapened the accomplishment of black and female pilots who had what it takes.
If it were when women first started being allowed into these types of roles, I would have to say they actually met the required standards for it.
After all these years though, based off what I experienced in my time in and the last 4 years of dei practices, I'd say she was most likely given an edge and should not have been flying.
I watched standards be lowered across the board in the military because females couldn't match the men. At first, for the sake of diversity, standards were lowered only for women. Then, because some feminazis started crying discrimination, the standards got lowered for both males and females. Now we have sub par men and women in the military that shouldn't even be there in the first place.
This has resulted in more loss of life over the years due to the fact that the military in general has gotten beyond soft. All just because of having to meet forced numbers of women, men, races, sexual preferences and many other forms of nonsensical bullshit.
Edit:
I also wanted to add on that in this particular scenario, I don't think dei is the fault. I think it was hacked and controlled remotely. Q post deltas too close about a crash and the whole revealing remote controlled Blackhawks not too far before Trump's return are the reasons I have that hunch.
I am not surprised . . .
Was "she" a real she or a trans she?
I know some very good pilots (civilian and military) who are real women, it all comes down to them having the proper training and experience and hired or recruited for their abilities not their lady parts.
It is sad for them, isn't it, that we have to wonder?? In a meritocracy, we would not have to wonder or doubt that they were best qualified!
Speaking of qualified:
It is not enough to be trained to be a "bus driver" -- another name for routine pilot.
A MILITARY pilot, such as one who is trusted to evacuate POTUS such as in this training mission, has to also have character qualifications: intrepidity, calmness in crisis, etc. [Think Sully who brought his plane down in the Hudson . . . almost beyond ordinary comprehension that he was able to do that.]
Before affirmative action and diversity goals, there were pilot errors.
Too bad though, that now we have to WONDER if the best are selected . . .
It is too bad we have to wonder. All three of the commercial pilots I know received their training in the military, so I dont know what kind of training is given for most airline pilots but I have seen some pretty bad videos of DEI hired pilots, definitely not the best of the best!
Withholding her name is nonsense. If she was responsible for all these deaths, we deserve to know who she is.
I believe they will, eventually. If I were making the decision to withhold, I would give them 30 days to do the funeral and all. Tell them 30 days and then release the name, that's fair to the family and to the public.
sauce about the female
"Koziol confirmed to reporters on a conference call that the male instructor pilot had more than 1,000 hours of flight time, the female pilot who was commanding the flight at the time had more than 500 hours of flight time, and the crew chief was also said to have hundreds of hours of flight time."
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/army-black-hawk-crew-involved-dc-crash-made/story?id=118276697
Well none of them appear to have been looking out the window at the time, which is puzzling to me. They should have had their head on a swivel when transiting a busy A/C corridor, yet they flew along without any attempt at avoidance. The ATC is also a puzzle for their lack of control when it had to be obvious there was a danger of collision. But the lack of cockpit awareness is definitely the bigger question mark.
They were conducting training wearing night vision devices.
Military pilots are trained to constantly sweep side to side while wearing night vision - specifically because of the peripheral vision issues.
thanks, so why did not they see the plane? just asking
Interesting article...
Specifically about the air traffic controller's failure to tell the helo which direction to look. ('Above you, and to your left', etc)
https://www.independentsentinel.com/fmr-air-traffic-controller-dc-crash-was-100-controllers-fault/
I think this question (which is being asked almost everywhere) is a red herring. Someone wants us to focus on only that question.
The real question is - why was the helicopter flying at double the altitude they were allowed to fly, and why were they 1/2 mile off-course?
The helicopters (any of them) are not allowed to fly above 200 feet in that area so they are not in the path of fixed-wing aircraft taking off or landing. There is also a route they have to take that helps keep them safe. These and other helicopters fly the same route multiple times every day. Why was this helicopter doing something different? Why were they flying at 400' - the exact altitude as the plane upon impact?
Also - just because it pisses me off that so many keep saying this (not you but X users and some on here) - YES - they have to train there. If something happens in the US and POTUS, SECDEF, or some other leader has to be evacuated to provide continuity of government, I for one want the pilots to be able to get them from point A to B safely, as fast as possible, and be able to do it from muscle memory. That to me is non-negotiable.
Or a he?
What man or woman that has 500 hours of training, are "top of the game" pilots?
yeah we have to doubt that also . . .
I’m a former USMC pilot. The first female USMC pilot, Sarah Deal, was legit. She was a great pilot. But even 30 years ago, the Navy and Marines would do anything to try and keep a terrible black pilot. This has been an ongoing issue for many years. And it cheapened the accomplishment of black and female pilots who had what it takes.
Two different women have been identified as the pilot; one white and one black. Who is the real one?
not the black one
It may have caused her to be on that slot.
The add vaxx status. How much did that add insult to injury?
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-pilot-rebecca-lobach
NOT the black female pilot I've seen referenced on GAW on other posts FYI