Exactly. Billionaire scumbags like Soros don't get rich(er) by writing out checks. Soros isn't using one cent of his own money to pay for Antifa, his corrupt judges, etc. There's a trough that money comes from, and its name is USAID. Wonder how many others there are like it. DOGE's work may only be starting.

HAVE YOU GUYS SEEM THIS ??

https://eko.substack.com/p/override

I think this article is saying that The Storm has started. PLEASE READ.

u/#q1105

Maybe not that, but you can be glad that they won't be burning down all the cities this summer because their funding has dried up.

I'd like to class action sue SOROS - HE can repay us some of our stolen money since I'd bet big he has also profited. Biden didn't pardon him 😁

Blessings to you gobby.

Interesting and thoughtful comment, voices. Updoogle.

I agree with some of what you write, but have some disagreement on a few points.

1. Yes, the Q operation was a back channel to fill 'patriots' in (actually a more specific group within 'patriots' aka the anons and autists were the target group)

2. Yes, one function of the operation was to allow a sector of the population to understand or believe that a plan was in place and avoid the potential for such people to 'take things into their own hands'

3. However, that was not the ONLY purpose of the operation. Another was to seed narratives informing first the anons and then later the wider population about the reality of the situation. Notice how much of the Great Awakening narratives became actual mainstream over the 7 years? A lot.

4. The objectives of the operation never included to simply convince people that Q is real.

The 'Q proofs' were a method, a tactic required to facilitate the actual objectives, including mobilizing a civilian intelligence militia, seeding and promoting of necessary narratives, disinformation to scramble the enemy operations, infuse morale in a sector of the population so that they make the right choices (not 'take things into their own hands'), etc.

5. I agree that what you refer to as the 'public phase' of the Q operation, what I would call the "drops" phase, served its purpose, and accomplished its core objectives. However, the impacts and effects continue to build. If triggering a 'great awakening' was one of those objectives (I believe it was), then that is in fact ongoing.

People will come across Q and it will help them to expand their thinking further. The Q operation is a historical fact.

I think the only people it will 'fade' in to the background for is us. Because we are seeing the hammer drop, the storm being executed, and the promised transformation being realized. We'll be seeing Q in a much larger context, a realization of 'idea' > 'reality'.

But, I think you've misread some key points of the Q interpretation. These are points that will perhaps be disputed for some time to come, and which may only be 'settled' in historical light. These points center around interpretations of that Q means by

• Patriots in Control

So I'll offer you an alternative view.

a) Trump was not 'still' potus. Q being real does not mean that Trump was still potus.

b) White hats were not 'in control' in the sense that they controlled everything and all things. Q being real does not mean that the 'Whitehats' controlled everything and could stop everything.

Personally, I'm confident that the Q team factored in how they expected things to unfold re: the Great Awakening movement, but it very likely did not go perfectly according to plan. Because there are too many variables.

In game theory, one of the players might be 'in control' in the sense that they shape the overall direction of the game, and gradually increase their ability to influence and direct the choices of their opponent, BUT, this does not mean the game is over or that the opponent doesn't have choices.

Similarly, one might consider "how does one dismantle a highly complex bomb with 1000 working nodules and parts that can trigger all sorts of effects if not managed correctly?" >>>>. One step at a time.

The issue of what the Q operation really implies is one that is likely to be debated for a while. There are broadly these 3 positions:

WH full and total control over everything, and everything is simply a show or facade to make 'the people wake up'

WH have game theory levels of control, where they increasingly restrict the choices of the enemy and maneuver the entire game board towards the desired conclusion, while 'managing' or reducing the negative impacts or actions that the enemy can cause or take, from 49% >>> 0%. (51% = effective 'Control' over the game board)

WH did not have control, and the Q operation included a lot of disinformation and so statements like "patriots in control' were merely 5G warfare, and not real.

I'm confident in the second one, partly because this is the one that makes moral and logical sense to me.