Just sharing this hilariously cringe hate mail I just received. Apparently CatsFive is a "soyboy globetard manbaby" for not allowing Flat Earth retards (FER's) here. Huh? That insult is so 2018, it’s practically fossilized. PRAY FOR THIS PERSON! THIS is why FE tards are banned on sight here on GAW!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🚥 NIGHT CREW 🚥
I do understand that it is verbotten but....
one wonders how the FE faithful conceive of an atom? Is an atom flat, too? Do electrons rotate around the nucleus in a circular manner, or do they simply glide along a static horizontal plane? Or do atoms not exist in Fat Erth?
If atoms are flat, are molecules also flat? So, perhaps the screen on which we experience the universe is also flat, and we do not actually live in a 3-dimensional universe? I mean, a dice (3 dimensions) is flat, right? A ball is flat?
How do we get these three dimensions we live in, if atoms too, are flat?
A sphere is a structure fundamental to the entire universe. It is the dynamic interaction of three dimensions x, y and z axes, in the most efficient form.
Sorry. Could not help myself. I shall now self-ban for approx 10 hours.
Well, string theory somehow believes that we exist on a membrane, and that all dimensions above two are projections, I'm not sure I understand that.
Other than that, I didn't see anything verboten about your comment! Carry on
String Theory sounds ridiculously retarded because it is ridiculously retarded. And also has been proven to be patently false by a guy who helped invent it. I don't have time to go into the details now, you'll have to research it yourself, unfortunately.
Might I suggest Eric Weinstein's geometric unity theory as a starter?
So we should call it "Silly String theory"?
For those non-Americans that might not know what silly string is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silly_String
I’m guessing you might be thinking of someone like Leonard Susskind, a pioneer in string theory, or maybe even Ed Witten, though neither has outright debunked it. More likely, you’re referring to the broader sentiment from folks like Peter Woit or Lee Smolin, who’ve argued it’s stalled physics by sucking up attention without delivering hard evidence. No one’s definitively "proven it false" in the strict sense—physics doesn’t work that fast—but it’s true the theory’s taken hits for being nigh impossible to test with current tech. The Large Hadron Collider didn’t find those extra dimensions or supersymmetric particles it hinted at, which has left some people calling it a dead end.
Eric Weinstein’s Geometric Unity—totally different beast. He’s coming at the problem from outside the academic mainstream, which is both its charm and its challenge. Weinstein’s pitch is to start with geometry, not strings, and build a framework that spits out the known particles and forces naturally. He’s talking about a 14-dimensional "observerse" where spacetime’s just a slice, and he claims it could explain dark matter and other mysteries without the quantum gravity headache String Theory wrestles with. It’s bold, and he’s got a knack for making it sound compelling—check his 2013 Oxford talk or his Portal podcast for the vibe.
Thing is, Geometric Unity’s not exactly lighting the physics world on fire either. Critics like Timothy Nguyen have pointed out it’s got gaps—mathematical loose ends and no clear quantum story. Weinstein’s released a draft paper in 2021, but it’s still more of a sketch than a fully baked theory with predictions we can test. So, while it’s a fresh take, it’s not like it’s replaced String Theory or won over the establishment.
Tongue in cheek, of feline one. Tongue in cheek.
But I do think that among the various reasons for making FE offlimits at GAW, one is the most obvious ones is that it opens up a rather stinky can of rhetorical worms. Comments to my TIC comment indicate that! Oooh lala!
It helps to think of it like a movie screen. It looks 3d etc and the people on screen all move in 3d, but it's all projected onto a flat surface.
I don’t think you have to go to microscopic spheres for debunking examples. Ask a flatty what shape are the sun and moon. If they aren’t spheres, are they discs that just so happen to be always exactly perpendicular to our line of sight so that we never see the edge of a disc? If the moon isn’t a sphere, then how do some of its phases show shadows along its curvature? The only excuse the flatties have left is the Fake Space idea, that somehow the images we see are faked, like on the “outdoor” ceiling in The Truman Show. Then you have to wonder who has been able to fake images of space to all of humanity for all of history. The razor says that space isn’t fake. And if the sun and moon (and other planets in a telescope) are spheres, there’s little reason for the earth to be different.
But anyway, flatties should be able to state their case without censorship and without mods fretting over public relations. This post is just bragging about flexing authority on some guy. The post is gross
Calm down. This post is just about a hate mail that is funny.
I’m perfectly calm dude. Calmer than you are
The sun is a giant light bulb, the good old fashioned incandescent ones, that Trump loves, with an invisible power cord.
The moon is made of cheese, I saw a documentary about it when I was a kid. Or was that a cartoon?
And that documentary was by Nick Park.
Nick Park is a genius! ✨
Of course the moon is made of cheese, there have been comms. It's Vermont Cheese of course, they were trying to let you know with the song Moonlight in Vermont.
Updoot for accepting truth from all sides of the isles. I wish GAW was a free speech community. 😞
From what I understand most FE’s still believe other planets exists and are spheres (however they may not be what we think they are) - just that earth is not. It makes sense if you believe the earth is the center of the universe. Globalists will have you believe we live on a fast spinning ball completely insignificant in space. I myself believe we are the center piece placed at the bottom of the universe and when I read the Bible it confirms this truth throughout scripture.
gaw IS a free speech community. But there is no such thing as freedom without purpose and without responsibility. Some folks think discipline (which involves restrictions) is the opposite of freedom. That's a completely false grasp of reality. Discipline is that creates freedom.
The limitation of topics on GAW is a necessary discipline that ensures the freedom for us to discuss a specific desired range of topics.
I disagree. In order to exist, all things require a purpose. Purpose is what defines the 'constitution' for a thing. It's perfectly fine for a forum like GAW to define its purpose, and prescribe what conforms to that purpose. Not permitting certain topics is fine. it's not censorship. Rather, it is the definition that is required to establish the purpose of the board and therefor allow it to achieve that purpose.
I strongly disagree with just mocking flatties (as you put it). I haven't heard all the arguments, so I cannot really say, except that I do not feel drawn to it. I think the emergence of flat earth in recent times is most likely a psyop with the purpose of undermining the genuine search for truth.
But while I really don't mind folks who believe in flat earth stuff (even if I think its a psyop and nonsensical), I recognize the importance, nay necessity, of the mod team applying definition to the purpose of GAW. This necessarily involves limiting focus and topics, according to purpose.
The mods have put it basically that exact way when they banned the topics, which is also why I didn’t engage on this thread the other day. Everyone who wanted to engage on the topic was directed to the Conspiracy forum.
Some people just can’t accept that though. It’s like insisting on posting 50 threads a day about the Super Bowl Vegas odds to a cooking forum.
BUT MUH FREE SPEECH! Psh.
If we aren’t at the point in the movie where the normies can engage on chemtrails, we aren’t at the point where they can engage on FE, which makes discussion on it counterproductive, especially when a reasonable alternative was given.
muh free speech got me some downvotes. Yippie.
After more than a quarter of a century on a variety of internet communities / forums, most of which were highly effective, it's just simply become crystal clear to me that purpose, and adherence to purpose, is what defines the value of the forum.
The corruption of humanity and all things corrupt starts from violating (true) purpose.
I knew it! My 2D waifu IS real!
j/k
You may be on to something! I believe there is no such thing as time; everything is instant, so it's not too far to imagine that everything exists on an infinitely thin and infinitely expansive sheet :)
Hard to know where the realm of serious and satire divide here! I was serious about the physical universe existing through spherical forms (i.e. atoms, etc).
But to reponse to both you and Salty:
Time is the necessary result of existence in 3 dimensions, aka space. Time exists because changes can happen in the organization of elements within those three dimensions. We recognize the changes, and in this, we experience time.
However, the universe is not simply material. There is a spiritual realm as well, and although u/Saltyarmyanon thinks that time does not exist, it does, but the caveat is that time only exists in the material universe.
In the spiritual realms, which exist at a much higher vibrational level than the material world, time as it is in the material world does not exist. Nor does space.
One can travel infinite distances in an instant in the spiritual realms. The only deciding (limiting) factor is one's spiritual development, aka how much one's spirit self has matured towards (completion/perfection). In the spirit realms, where you can go and what you can do are determined by your own character nature.
Yes, as human beings, we exist on multiple planes simultaneously. This is why we experience time and space through our fleshly body, but we can meditate, imagine, and experience things beyond time and space through our spiritual body.
Just as the physical body has multiple layers, functions, organs and systems, so does out spirit self. However, due to what in Christianity and other religions is understand as "sin", our spirit self is midway between dysfunctional and functional.
This is why perfection is so difficult. It requires bringing the spirit and the flesh into perfect harmony. Historically, these have been in conflict because of "sin", and one result of that is that a lot of human thought on the nature of reality divides between either a materialist view (i.e. Marx) or a spiritualist view (i.e. spiritualism that only recognize the spiritual dimensions of existance).
The reality is, human beings exist with both spirit and flesh. The purpose of the flesh is to provide the 'soil' in which our spirit, the core of which is heart (the capacity to give and receive pure love), can grow and mature.
Religions and faiths that deny either of these dimensions of existence is doomed to limitation. Ultimately, humanity must receive or uncover a unified understanding of the relationship between spirit and flesh, the spiritual and the material, so that finally, we as individuals and as a people, can learn to harmonize the two in their proper role and function.
Timelines are a myth. There is no time in space as it is something humans made up on earth to gather a sense of control. In reality we exist energetically on multiple planes at various vibrational levels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVro5wxqh4U&t=92s
How about holographic universe theory.
Michaela Talbot has entered the chat
I don't know who that is, and for the record, I did not downvote you.
u/#topkek
Methinks that we have a bunch of flat earth frogs here who tolerate the limitation, but cannot help themselves when a naysayer is given time.