What ties to Durham? In the case against Michael Sussman, Durham got it on record that FBI knew the stuff he was saying was not true (that was one of his defence against perjury to FBI)
No let's not. Q said we have more than we know. It doesn't take AI to decipher drops. Quit thinking about using this satanic tool and think for yourself. It's called critical thinking for a reason.
I’ve got to call bull crap on that, every time in the last 100+ years, the church would run away and abdicate their position in the culture, first it was radio then it was television then it was movie industry, each one of these invited leaders of faith to have input, but we said “don’t touch the unclean thing” and advocated ourselves positionally as a light in the world, and then in the 70s 80s and 90s we got our” RAPTURE RUG” all ready to go, and this is why we are in a world of shit,, evil triumphs in good men do nothing, we should be not only involved with AI, but we should glorify the Lord with it and support those monetarily and any other way that want to put for this with excellence and not think that it has “cooties” this crap has to end and end now.
Tools are not satanic. That's determined by what people do with them.
Thank you! I have been advocating this point for a while, but there is a subset of GAW that seems to be hopelessly lost and convinced that ANY advanced technology to be Satanic (even gotten into an argument with one yesterday in the General thread on GAW)
Hard agree! Additionally, we have to look at adopting AI similar to an arms race. If we unilaterally refuse to develop this technology, we'll be cannon fodder for the other countries that do. 🤷♂️
I love Grok! I know some think it's crap, but I've found it pretty useful in crunching numbers and compiling lists. Here is one I made of the average cost of electricity in each state per kwh, when both the kwh charges are added to the "other" charges the utilities add.
Seems to be true on most things :) It's almost like taxpayer money is going toward other things :) If you want to be really disgusted, check out the annual cost per student in public schools in each state! New red-blue correlation isn't apparent there:
It depends. Typically no, you can't. Not at least in any sense of getting an immediate turn around. You can come up with prompts that will somewhat achieve this, but its not the same as "training" the model per se.
Now, model usage data does very likely feed back into the training of the next model for each company. So in effect, your actions could play a role in part of the training of the next model. However, this has such a long turn around time and I doubt something like "training to decipher Q posts" would make it through the training of the next model for most companies.
With Grok however, they are supposedly updating it constantly and its still going through constant training. It is supposed to have access to live data as well, so I wonder if our usage of it plays a bigger impact in its training and will produce more immediate results since they are constantly updating it? That I don't know.
This one is about the Carter Page FISA and Proofs coming post DECLAS.
Why is Carter Page FISA important? Because thats the one that Kash Patel focused on in his famous "Nunes Memo" when he uncovered the whole Russia Hoax.
Same with GPT. You just have to ask it to cut out all the opinion and bullshit and put its thinking cap on and go with the provable facts only and you’d be amazed with what it will say. Told me the other day that Trump and the white hats are definitely saving world.
Believe it or not i had an amazing conversation with gpt a few days ago. Its completely willing to research and even humor my insights and provide thoughts and feedback. I wanted to post it but i didnt know how. It was a pretty long convo and i wasnt sure about character limits
One of the significant Q drops that ties Durham to Q operation is this one. I think we can expect something related to Durham on April 15th.
BTW Apr 15 is right in the middle of the "Sacrifice Month" so it would be poetic if the Satanists are the "sacrifice"
u/#q3969
What ties to Durham? In the case against Michael Sussman, Durham got it on record that FBI knew the stuff he was saying was not true (that was one of his defence against perjury to FBI)
But Durham is also connected to CF investigation:
u/#q4760
Also, April 15th is the last day to pay taxes. Time to pay up!
Also, Scavino posted that it's time to abolish the IRS!
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AdbqeZts/dan-just-postedtime-to-abolish/c/
No let's not. Q said we have more than we know. It doesn't take AI to decipher drops. Quit thinking about using this satanic tool and think for yourself. It's called critical thinking for a reason.
Tools are not satanic. That's determined by what people do with them.
I’ve got to call bull crap on that, every time in the last 100+ years, the church would run away and abdicate their position in the culture, first it was radio then it was television then it was movie industry, each one of these invited leaders of faith to have input, but we said “don’t touch the unclean thing” and advocated ourselves positionally as a light in the world, and then in the 70s 80s and 90s we got our” RAPTURE RUG” all ready to go, and this is why we are in a world of shit,, evil triumphs in good men do nothing, we should be not only involved with AI, but we should glorify the Lord with it and support those monetarily and any other way that want to put for this with excellence and not think that it has “cooties” this crap has to end and end now.
Well said sir, give the flatards hell
Oh God. It’s just a better calculator, luddite weirdo.
Thank you! I have been advocating this point for a while, but there is a subset of GAW that seems to be hopelessly lost and convinced that ANY advanced technology to be Satanic (even gotten into an argument with one yesterday in the General thread on GAW)
Hard agree! Additionally, we have to look at adopting AI similar to an arms race. If we unilaterally refuse to develop this technology, we'll be cannon fodder for the other countries that do. 🤷♂️
I'm with you, moebop.
I love Grok! I know some think it's crap, but I've found it pretty useful in crunching numbers and compiling lists. Here is one I made of the average cost of electricity in each state per kwh, when both the kwh charges are added to the "other" charges the utilities add.
Alabama: 14.72
Alaska: 24.19
Arizona: 14.53
Arkansas: 12.81
California: 32.68
Colorado: 14.96
Connecticut: 27.84
Delaware: 16.42
Florida: 14.92
Georgia: 14.11
Hawaii: 39.62
Idaho: 11.53
Illinois: 15.27
Indiana: 15.03
Iowa: 13.91
Kansas: 14.27
Kentucky: 13.25
Louisiana: 11.84
Maine: 25.17
Maryland: 17.63
Massachusetts: 29.41
Michigan: 19.06
Minnesota: 15.62
Mississippi: 13.87
Missouri: 12.94
Montana: 12.79
Nebraska: 11.84
Nevada: 16.73
New Hampshire: 24.06
New Jersey: 19.27
New Mexico: 14.31
New York: 23.91
North Carolina: 14.58
North Dakota: 11.92
Ohio: 15.71
Oklahoma: 12.63
Oregon: 14.03
Pennsylvania: 18.06
Rhode Island: 28.39
South Carolina: 14.36
South Dakota: 12.97
Tennessee: 12.91
Texas: 14.96
Utah: 10.91
Vermont: 21.03
Virginia: 14.83
Washington: 11.67
West Virginia: 14.39
Wisconsin: 17.03
Wyoming: 12.14
District of Columbia: 17.91
The darker the Blue, the higher the rate.
Almost without exception.
Seems to be true on most things :) It's almost like taxpayer money is going toward other things :) If you want to be really disgusted, check out the annual cost per student in public schools in each state! New red-blue correlation isn't apparent there:
Alabama: $13,461 (K-12 spending, FY 2025 estimate) Alaska: $22,000 (K-12 spending, FY 2025 estimate) Arizona: $10,315 (FY 2022, Census data) Arkansas: $11,781 (FY 2023 estimate) California: $16,352 (FY 2023 estimate) Colorado: $13,153 (FY 2023 estimate) Connecticut: $24,453 (FY 2022, Census data) Delaware: $18,773 (FY 2023 estimate) District of Columbia: $27,425 (FY 2022, Census data) Florida: $11,714 (FY 2023 estimate) Georgia: $13,149 (FY 2023 estimate) Hawaii: $18,165 (FY 2023 estimate) Idaho: $9,670 (FY 2022, Census data) Illinois: $20,228 (FY 2023 estimate) Indiana: $12,797 (FY 2023 estimate) Iowa: $14,082 (FY 2023 estimate) Kansas: $14,152 (FY 2023 estimate) Kentucky: $13,693 (FY 2023 estimate) Louisiana: $13,353 (FY 2023 estimate) Maine: $19,099 (FY 2023 estimate) Maryland: $18,315 (FY 2023 estimate) Massachusetts: $22,667 (FY 2023 estimate) Michigan: $14,747 (FY 2023 estimate) Minnesota: $16,576 (FY 2023 estimate) Mississippi: $10,984 (FY 2022, Census data) Missouri: $13,567 (FY 2023 estimate) Montana: $14,521 (FY 2023 estimate) Nebraska: $15,051 (FY 2023 estimate) Nevada: $11,711 (FY 2023 estimate) New Hampshire: $21,526 (FY 2023 estimate) New Jersey: $25,099 (FY 2022, Census data) New Mexico: $13,135 (FY 2023 estimate) New York: $29,873 (FY 2022, Census data) North Carolina: $11,976 (FY 2023 estimate) North Dakota: $17,463 (FY 2023 estimate) Ohio: $16,345 (FY 2023 estimate) Oklahoma: $10,890 (FY 2022, Census data) Oregon: $16,221 (FY 2023 estimate) Pennsylvania: $20,742 (FY 2023 estimate) Rhode Island: $21,185 (FY 2023 estimate) South Carolina: $13,452 (FY 2023 estimate) South Dakota: $12,671 (FY 2023 estimate) Tennessee: $11,991 (FY 2023 estimate) Texas: $12,258 (FY 2023 estimate) Utah: $9,552 (FY 2022, Census data) Vermont: $24,608 (FY 2022, Census data) Virginia: $15,246 (FY 2023 estimate) Washington: $18,098 (FY 2023 estimate) West Virginia: $14,495 (FY 2023 estimate) Wisconsin: $15,423 (FY 2023 estimate) Wyoming: $19,293 (FY 2023 estimate)
"List in descending order."
At the rate they are charging in HI, I guess most people get used to the heat :)
Unless Grok is Q lol
Definitely do this. This is a great idea. Only Grok is qualified.
Can you actually "train" the AI? Does the AI learn from the users interacting with it?
It depends. Typically no, you can't. Not at least in any sense of getting an immediate turn around. You can come up with prompts that will somewhat achieve this, but its not the same as "training" the model per se.
Now, model usage data does very likely feed back into the training of the next model for each company. So in effect, your actions could play a role in part of the training of the next model. However, this has such a long turn around time and I doubt something like "training to decipher Q posts" would make it through the training of the next model for most companies.
With Grok however, they are supposedly updating it constantly and its still going through constant training. It is supposed to have access to live data as well, so I wonder if our usage of it plays a bigger impact in its training and will produce more immediate results since they are constantly updating it? That I don't know.
Another possible upcoming Q date is May 23:
u/#q3340
This one is about the Carter Page FISA and Proofs coming post DECLAS.
Why is Carter Page FISA important? Because thats the one that Kash Patel focused on in his famous "Nunes Memo" when he uncovered the whole Russia Hoax.
Just FYI; you have to tell Grok that you want the absolute truth, no bullshit or it just repeats some version of the msm narrative.
Same with GPT. You just have to ask it to cut out all the opinion and bullshit and put its thinking cap on and go with the provable facts only and you’d be amazed with what it will say. Told me the other day that Trump and the white hats are definitely saving world.
Grok should “read” Dave Hayes’ Q analyses. They are the best. Praying Medic.
Praying medic was so helpful during that time. And he admiddet when he wasn’t sure about things.
Believe it or not i had an amazing conversation with gpt a few days ago. Its completely willing to research and even humor my insights and provide thoughts and feedback. I wanted to post it but i didnt know how. It was a pretty long convo and i wasnt sure about character limits
At the end of the conversation there is a copy symbol. Copy and paste here. It works, I’ve done it.
I already did this with chatgpt.
If this is a problem for Q, he’ll tell us. All he has to do is post.
... and then santa will eat those cookies.
Wild!