If the causes of Autism are 'environmental chemicals' and 'electromagnetic fields'... then why doesn't sudden onset autism affect adults?
Autism only seems to affect babies or very young children... but mostly newborn babies... who haven't been exposed to many environmental chemicals. Strange that autism seems to occur right about the time of the baby receiving multiple IMMUNIZATION SHOTS.
The same reason it was majority children being neurologically damaged by DDT…children’s blood-brain barriers are semi-permeable and their bodies are much more delicate and susceptible to even small doses of poison.
Additionally, Allen Frey already proved in the 1960s and 70s that exposure to RF fields opens the blood brain barriers, which means more toxins/heavy metals get into the CSF than otherwise would. He was doing this research on mil bases with radar, this was decades before even 1G was rolled out to the general population.
Just extrapolate from there, think about the advent of baby monitors, smart homes, new mamas streaming Netflix on their phones while nursing, 5G small cell rollouts in urban and suburban neighborhoods everywhere. There's your answer. And why CA has been the leader in autism rates among the population, despite so called healither lifestyles and diets of Californians compared to almost every other state.
Ultrasound can do some interesting things, but is unlikely to be a bad actor unless it is being introduced into the body through bone conduction. In air, due to the nonlinear properties of sound conduction, ultrasound dissipates into heat over short distances. In other words, the acoustic waves are damped out due to the viscosity of air.
Static magnetic fields are not the same as electromagnetic fields (waves). We've lived in the Earth's magnetic field for eons. Electromagnetic fields (other than sunlight and light from fire) are largely man-made.
The human brain is developing from conception to teen years, maybe even later? Any effects on that development will be magnified compared to effects on adult brains.
It's not EM fields buddy, or poor food. This is happening to babies on the breast who live well away from EM fields, but who do have vaccines.
For God's sake, concentrate on the vaccines!! DEFINITELY the leading cause. Guess which two arent billion dollar businesses that will be ruined overnight - yeah, it's those guys, trying to shunt things toward other areas.
Yes, it's the vaccines. Any other factors are secondary.
Vaccines cause sudden cranial inflammation which in turn causes brain damage. Because of the complexity of brain specialization, where the damage occurs, and how severely, determines the type of injury. Autism is just the most extreme reaction. Many lesser diseases also result from vaccination, especially with insane childhood vaccination schedule in place since the 1990s. Including ADHD down to allergies. I'm probably not saying anything you do not already know.
This 1990 book is still important reading. The author was well ahead of the curve.
Vaccination, Social Violence, and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain. Harris L. Coulter.
As part of his thesis Coulter makes the case that the rise in crime rate seen over the decades is not just cultural. It is also likely a result of vaccine-induced brain damage affecting our capacity to moderate emotions, especially anger.
The Telcom industry is a multi trillion dollar global industry who have a documented history of funding the "science" and scientists setting the safety standards of non ionizing RF radiation. Nice try hand waving that off. You can remain ignorant of the potential mechanisms and research done in this area, but its another thing to write that all off when many have been raising the alarm for half a century now.
Bottom line... jabs PLUS a considerable EMF footprint is the perfect storm. The biophysics on why is deep, but one reason among many are the heavy metals in the jabs interacting with ambient RF raising oxidative stress, opening the blood brain barrier, etc.
Microwave radiation has been found to cause chronic illness, different global agencies like the FCC place a microwave safety maximum of something like 50-500 microwatts per square centimeter.
The reason the distribution of maximums is so large is because the health effects are small, certain, and not very well mapped out.
Agreed. At this stage a head-on attack would end in failure. Political necessity dictates he must follow this more indirect path. He knows damn well what the culprit is. It's a question of the strength of the adversaries and how nimbly RFK Jr. can navigate enemy waters. Can he get there by September? I hope so. It's a tall order though.
I agreed. Hopefully, he gets it straight by the time my gkids start school this next year. Two of them are going to high school this year. Every shot is damaging them.
I asked Grok which countries have the highest Autism rates. Grok's response:
Based on available data, countries with the highest reported autism rates include:
🟢 Qatar: Approximately 151 cases per 10,000 individuals (1.51%). This high rate is likely due to increased awareness, advanced diagnostic services, and comprehensive screening programs.
🟢 United Arab Emirates: Around 112 cases per 10,000 (1.12%), attributed to similar factors as Qatar, including robust healthcare systems and awareness campaigns.
🟢 Oman: Approximately 107 cases per 10,000 (1.07%), with government efforts enhancing early intervention and diagnosis.
🟢 Bahrain: About 103 cases per 10,000 (1.03%), supported by active awareness and resource provision.
🟢 Saudi Arabia: Roughly 101 cases per 10,000 (1.01%), with improvements in autism awareness and support services.
I thought the US was high on the list, but we were strangely abscent until I asked it specifically what the rate was in the USA. Grok's response:
The autism rate in the USA, based on the most recent data from the CDC, is approximately 1 in 36 children (about 2.78% or 278 cases per 10,000). This figure comes from the 2023 report, reflecting data on 8-year-old children in 2020. The rate has increased over time, largely due to improved diagnostics, broader awareness, and expanded diagnostic criteria, though environmental and genetic factors are also studied. Rates can vary by region, sex (higher in males), and ethnicity, with some studies noting higher prevalence in certain communities due to access to diagnostic services.
People have been living under power lines for generations without harm. They even figure out ways to steal electric power by induction. In my neighborhood, there are large plots beneath the power line right-of-way where people keep horses and other livestock, and have their houses (not directly under, but maybe 100 feet to one side). The lines also are spread across downtown Federal Way and you simply do not notice it.
Well this is the thing, electric fields are not a single thing. As others have said, a static field is by definition practically undedectable, it is the frequency of its oscillation that determines the effect. A power line is operating at 60 cycles - doesn’t do anything much, the Earth itself having some 7 cycles per second variability also doesnt do much, but then a microwave oven is tuned to interact with water molecules and generates heat - microwaves will cook you but wont heat something that doesn’t contain water (or molecules of a similar size). Keep going up in frequency and you can get to the point where it heats oxygen (43GHz or something like that I cant recall). There will be frequencies for brain tissue etc, but higher frequencies are also very short range so distances have to be small from the emitter or the power level extreme etc etc.. it's not a monolithic thing, but a spectrum. Some of it is light, some Xrays, etc etc.
A static field is always detectable. We use Earth's magnetic field for compass orientation. We have the ability to measure both magnetic and electric fields, both of which can be static in nature. It is fairly well established that migrating birds are able to orient themselves to the terrestrial magnetic field.
That aside, interaction with molecules depends on the molecule's electromagnetic resonance, as you say. There are other effects that depend on field strength. Put a metal implement or pot in a microwave and watch the sparks fly. What can always happen is for a high amplitude wave of nearly any frequency to have a strong enough transient electric field that it can ionize the air it is passing through. But any heating only persists up to a point where the molecule is at a new equilibrium temperature. After that, there is no more net absorption, because the molecule is emitting as much as it absorbs. In the case of water, this can be pretty hot. In the case of ammonia, not so much.
Human tissue is dominantly water. We are a huge heat sink for any heating due to microwaves. The issue is intensity (power/unit area). Radars operate with high intensity, and the military has developed standards for safe operation with personnel in the vicinity. Millimeter waves have been part of military technology since the 1980s, so it is not like they are an unknown quantity.
The problem I have with the scare reflex is that the papers I have seen treat the subject in obscure ways, with measurements that are not helpful to the determination of a safe environment. What I am interested in is (1) frequency, or wavelength, (2) exposure intensity, and (3) mechanism of effect and on what. Measurements of electric field potential are pretty meaningless. I can be touching an electrostatic generator and be at a very high potential, but it means nothing.
I don't hold my cell phone to my ear for reasons of caution, but because cell phones are designed for pocket convenience, not for ergonomics. In order to hear well, I orient it so I am speaking directly into the microphone and the speaker is oriented directly at me. Maybe I am doing myself a favor, but the jury is still out. (I have a vision of a nitinol mesh pad that opens up into an actual handset that fits the head, with microphone and speaker in place for mouth and ear, and then collapses back into a pad again. Dream on.)
They are finally looking into what I and many others have said are the likely causes of autism, and that big Pharma can truthfully say, "there is no proof that vaccines cause autism", because it is not JUST vaccines. I think cell phone radiation (from the phones and towers) may be the biggest factor.
Or they were categorized as different varieties of mental deficiency. There is such a thing as an "inspection effect" (the more you look for something, the more instances you find) and we should not deny it. The situation is bad enough. The problem comes when people look at an incidence rate and try to rationalize it as "being normal." Being normal is not the question. How to ameliorate it is the question.
If the causes of Autism are 'environmental chemicals' and 'electromagnetic fields'... then why doesn't sudden onset autism affect adults?
Autism only seems to affect babies or very young children... but mostly newborn babies... who haven't been exposed to many environmental chemicals. Strange that autism seems to occur right about the time of the baby receiving multiple IMMUNIZATION SHOTS.
The same reason it was majority children being neurologically damaged by DDT…children’s blood-brain barriers are semi-permeable and their bodies are much more delicate and susceptible to even small doses of poison.
and yet they start jabbing them at birth.
Right. It’s downright demonic.
Their brains are unmyelinated.
Additionally, Allen Frey already proved in the 1960s and 70s that exposure to RF fields opens the blood brain barriers, which means more toxins/heavy metals get into the CSF than otherwise would. He was doing this research on mil bases with radar, this was decades before even 1G was rolled out to the general population.
Just extrapolate from there, think about the advent of baby monitors, smart homes, new mamas streaming Netflix on their phones while nursing, 5G small cell rollouts in urban and suburban neighborhoods everywhere. There's your answer. And why CA has been the leader in autism rates among the population, despite so called healither lifestyles and diets of Californians compared to almost every other state.
And smart meters on the houses which take all the EMF and pump it into the house wiring turning it into a big microwave
maybe he means unnatural EMF like ultrasound (not technically EMF but still has risks and long term studies not done) and cell phones
Ultrasound can do some interesting things, but is unlikely to be a bad actor unless it is being introduced into the body through bone conduction. In air, due to the nonlinear properties of sound conduction, ultrasound dissipates into heat over short distances. In other words, the acoustic waves are damped out due to the viscosity of air.
I love my scientificanon
But the FDA said it puts fart pockets inside your cavities 💨
I bet my mom did a ton of ultras I fart all the time
To paraphrase Shakespeare: "Farting is such sweet sorrow."
Frequencies and amplitudes matter. It's why you don't microwave your pizza pockets with the earth's magnetic field.
Static magnetic fields are not the same as electromagnetic fields (waves). We've lived in the Earth's magnetic field for eons. Electromagnetic fields (other than sunlight and light from fire) are largely man-made.
The human brain is developing from conception to teen years, maybe even later? Any effects on that development will be magnified compared to effects on adult brains.
Brain development last into the early twenties for girls and late twenties for dudes.
YES. YES. YES.
(and we can include "sky spraying" in the Environmental Chemical category.)
ka-BOOM !!
It's not EM fields buddy, or poor food. This is happening to babies on the breast who live well away from EM fields, but who do have vaccines.
For God's sake, concentrate on the vaccines!! DEFINITELY the leading cause. Guess which two arent billion dollar businesses that will be ruined overnight - yeah, it's those guys, trying to shunt things toward other areas.
Yes, it's the vaccines. Any other factors are secondary.
Vaccines cause sudden cranial inflammation which in turn causes brain damage. Because of the complexity of brain specialization, where the damage occurs, and how severely, determines the type of injury. Autism is just the most extreme reaction. Many lesser diseases also result from vaccination, especially with insane childhood vaccination schedule in place since the 1990s. Including ADHD down to allergies. I'm probably not saying anything you do not already know.
Recent (April 20) essay by A Midwestern Doctor. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-cause-autism
This 1990 book is still important reading. The author was well ahead of the curve. Vaccination, Social Violence, and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain. Harris L. Coulter.
As part of his thesis Coulter makes the case that the rise in crime rate seen over the decades is not just cultural. It is also likely a result of vaccine-induced brain damage affecting our capacity to moderate emotions, especially anger.
The Telcom industry is a multi trillion dollar global industry who have a documented history of funding the "science" and scientists setting the safety standards of non ionizing RF radiation. Nice try hand waving that off. You can remain ignorant of the potential mechanisms and research done in this area, but its another thing to write that all off when many have been raising the alarm for half a century now.
Bottom line... jabs PLUS a considerable EMF footprint is the perfect storm. The biophysics on why is deep, but one reason among many are the heavy metals in the jabs interacting with ambient RF raising oxidative stress, opening the blood brain barrier, etc.
Microwave radiation has been found to cause chronic illness, different global agencies like the FCC place a microwave safety maximum of something like 50-500 microwatts per square centimeter.
The reason the distribution of maximums is so large is because the health effects are small, certain, and not very well mapped out.
Kennedy has to test out these other factors to prove it is the vaccines that are causing autism.
Agreed. At this stage a head-on attack would end in failure. Political necessity dictates he must follow this more indirect path. He knows damn well what the culprit is. It's a question of the strength of the adversaries and how nimbly RFK Jr. can navigate enemy waters. Can he get there by September? I hope so. It's a tall order though.
I agreed. Hopefully, he gets it straight by the time my gkids start school this next year. Two of them are going to high school this year. Every shot is damaging them.
Hallelujah! This is definitely one facet of this gem we call home that needs some serious polishing!
It’s too far fetched.
… will likely investigate …
All 3 words together = in the unknown future RFK may (or may not) start an investigation that may (or may not) find anything.
I asked Grok which countries have the highest Autism rates. Grok's response:
🟢 Qatar: Approximately 151 cases per 10,000 individuals (1.51%). This high rate is likely due to increased awareness, advanced diagnostic services, and comprehensive screening programs.
🟢 United Arab Emirates: Around 112 cases per 10,000 (1.12%), attributed to similar factors as Qatar, including robust healthcare systems and awareness campaigns.
🟢 Oman: Approximately 107 cases per 10,000 (1.07%), with government efforts enhancing early intervention and diagnosis.
🟢 Bahrain: About 103 cases per 10,000 (1.03%), supported by active awareness and resource provision.
🟢 Saudi Arabia: Roughly 101 cases per 10,000 (1.01%), with improvements in autism awareness and support services.
I thought the US was high on the list, but we were strangely abscent until I asked it specifically what the rate was in the USA. Grok's response:
Why you do me dirty like that Grok?
I found you have to treat AI like a hostile witness under cross examination.
Bahahahah!
I'm DEFINITELY taking your advice Fren. Thank you!
KeK for the last part ;)
I'm glad to see EMF/5G in the conversation.
That's relevant to everyone that vax autism isn't.
"Full spectrum dominance" is one of their goals.
If poisoned "medicine", "food" and metallic air doesn't get you, EMF will.
There's a reason people with triple digit IQ don't live under or near high tension lines... and cell phone towers.
People have been living under power lines for generations without harm. They even figure out ways to steal electric power by induction. In my neighborhood, there are large plots beneath the power line right-of-way where people keep horses and other livestock, and have their houses (not directly under, but maybe 100 feet to one side). The lines also are spread across downtown Federal Way and you simply do not notice it.
Well this is the thing, electric fields are not a single thing. As others have said, a static field is by definition practically undedectable, it is the frequency of its oscillation that determines the effect. A power line is operating at 60 cycles - doesn’t do anything much, the Earth itself having some 7 cycles per second variability also doesnt do much, but then a microwave oven is tuned to interact with water molecules and generates heat - microwaves will cook you but wont heat something that doesn’t contain water (or molecules of a similar size). Keep going up in frequency and you can get to the point where it heats oxygen (43GHz or something like that I cant recall). There will be frequencies for brain tissue etc, but higher frequencies are also very short range so distances have to be small from the emitter or the power level extreme etc etc.. it's not a monolithic thing, but a spectrum. Some of it is light, some Xrays, etc etc.
A static field is always detectable. We use Earth's magnetic field for compass orientation. We have the ability to measure both magnetic and electric fields, both of which can be static in nature. It is fairly well established that migrating birds are able to orient themselves to the terrestrial magnetic field.
That aside, interaction with molecules depends on the molecule's electromagnetic resonance, as you say. There are other effects that depend on field strength. Put a metal implement or pot in a microwave and watch the sparks fly. What can always happen is for a high amplitude wave of nearly any frequency to have a strong enough transient electric field that it can ionize the air it is passing through. But any heating only persists up to a point where the molecule is at a new equilibrium temperature. After that, there is no more net absorption, because the molecule is emitting as much as it absorbs. In the case of water, this can be pretty hot. In the case of ammonia, not so much.
Human tissue is dominantly water. We are a huge heat sink for any heating due to microwaves. The issue is intensity (power/unit area). Radars operate with high intensity, and the military has developed standards for safe operation with personnel in the vicinity. Millimeter waves have been part of military technology since the 1980s, so it is not like they are an unknown quantity.
The problem I have with the scare reflex is that the papers I have seen treat the subject in obscure ways, with measurements that are not helpful to the determination of a safe environment. What I am interested in is (1) frequency, or wavelength, (2) exposure intensity, and (3) mechanism of effect and on what. Measurements of electric field potential are pretty meaningless. I can be touching an electrostatic generator and be at a very high potential, but it means nothing.
I don't hold my cell phone to my ear for reasons of caution, but because cell phones are designed for pocket convenience, not for ergonomics. In order to hear well, I orient it so I am speaking directly into the microphone and the speaker is oriented directly at me. Maybe I am doing myself a favor, but the jury is still out. (I have a vision of a nitinol mesh pad that opens up into an actual handset that fits the head, with microphone and speaker in place for mouth and ear, and then collapses back into a pad again. Dream on.)
Let's get this ball rolling RFK sir! o7
"Likely"? I don't like "likely." Substitute "likely" with "move health and earth to".
They are finally looking into what I and many others have said are the likely causes of autism, and that big Pharma can truthfully say, "there is no proof that vaccines cause autism", because it is not JUST vaccines. I think cell phone radiation (from the phones and towers) may be the biggest factor.
Or they were categorized as different varieties of mental deficiency. There is such a thing as an "inspection effect" (the more you look for something, the more instances you find) and we should not deny it. The situation is bad enough. The problem comes when people look at an incidence rate and try to rationalize it as "being normal." Being normal is not the question. How to ameliorate it is the question.