I tend to fall on the side of Nuclear Weapons are comms for Nation Destroying Info...
But seriously, all the stuff I asked in the title, I haven't seen vids yet & am wondering if any normies will ask the same questions too, or if there is a rational explanation why there isn't nuclear fallout (assuming there isn't, or it isn't made a big deal)?
Uranium enrichment facilities were destroyed not detonated weapons.
This is the point most people, and MSM, are missing. NO NUKES. It is an enrichment plant.....
You'd still detect significant radiation. Maybe they detected it, maybe they didn't. We'll never know the truth if it makes them look bad.
I've read that the nuclear material was so far underground it would be mostly buried.
However I've also read that the type of bombs used would pull dirt/dust/debris up into the resulting cloud while sucking all the air out (and really doing bad things to the lungs of the people trapped inside).
I am not sure both things can be true at the same time.
I also heard that attacking a (above-ground) nuclear power plant would result in much more nuclear fallout.
Why should there be any concern? The only radioactive element present would be uranium, which is low radioactivity. I hope everyone reading this understands that our own bodies are radioactive by virtue of incorporating carbon-14 and potassium-40. Granite countertops are radioactive from potassium-40 and pitchblende (uranium ore) inclusions. We experience exposure to cosmic rays (the universe is radioactive!).
No nuclear fission has occurred. Iran does not have nuclear devices or nuclear reactors. Ergo, there are NO fission products, which are highly radioactive. And no fallout, except rock dust.
Everybody should buy a Geiger counter, and be horrified at how commonplace low-level radioactivity is. And how harmless.
I had seen a video a while back about a researcher (wish I could recall his name now) that claimed nuclear energy was lick sunshine & he would eat/swallow nuclear material on stage with an audience to show it wasn't dangerous & scary.
Another buddy told me stuff like gama rays are much different than the others $I forgetht heir reasoning. Though it made sense in that a 110 outlet will hurt, but not kill you & a transformer from a power line tower will help you meet God much faster.
I recall the person you are thinking of, but I can't remember his name either. I think he offered to swallow some small amount of plutonium. Still not a good idea, in my book, as it is a heavy metal. The normal radioactivity of plutonium (and uranium) is alpha particles (helium nuclei), which does not penetrate far into tissue. Gamma rays, however, are very high-energy photons and can go through you like sleet. Classic ionizing radiation. Typical of fission products.
I still think it is instructive to get, say, an inexpensive civil defense Geiger counter to check out each other, granite countertops, and just good old-fashioned cosmic rays. We live in this stuff, and there is an argument that, at low levels, it is beneficial to our health by constant stimulation of our healing responses.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZWzMQxZ/x/c/4eU2YU9Vh4r
u/winn was awesome & sent a link with the same guy. I had not seen this video yet.
Thank you for the comment.
There was no fallout because there was no nuclear explosion. Uranium is not like nitroglycerine.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QmJN-LMPnX0
u/honestbobbin
tbh this video makes me wonder. But how to reconcile this with the very obvious superness of the A-bomb... something definitely differentiates that from regular explosives
What are the constituents of black powder? Sulfur, carbon black, and saltpeter (potassium nitrate). Separately, they are no big deal. Mix them together homogeneously and you have a high explosive, which is a chemical reaction (oxidation) among the ingredients.
The atomic bomb is a manifestation of a nuclear reaction, incited in a fissionable material with high sensitivity to neutron activation, AND the ability to produce more neutrons upon reacting, so as to achieve a self-perpetuating chain reaction. The primary bomb fissionable ingredients are either Uranium-235 or Plutonium-239. A chemical explosion releases the energy latent in chemical bonds. A nuclear explosion releases the energy latent in the conversion of mass to energy. It is many orders of magnitude greater (per unit mass of the explosive material) than a chemical explosion. The speed of this energy release is much higher than the speed of the propagation of a chemical reaction, as a result of the geometric growth of the numbers of available neutrons through the chain reaction process.
Does this help? It is off the top of my head, but it is correct.
Thank you for this vid Winn. I need to do a deep dive into the visuals of explosives at some point. I recall thinking some of the explosions on Mythbusters looks like small mushroom clouds & wondered how many others look like that. I can't for the life of me recall the episodes though.
Nearly any explosion can produce a mushroom cloud. It is the natural result of smoke, ash, and dirt being drawn into the updraft of a volume of hot combustion products. Nuclear detonations are distinctive for the cloud being so large and lofted to a high altitude.
Thank you for this, that makes sense given the basics of what I learned in chemistry.
That said, it is hard to discern truth from lies if we do not educate ourselves & I know I need to keep learning so I can understand more & discern better.
ThanQ for being part of this conversation!
(Relevant GIF) https://greatawakening.win/p/17r997YFKT/the-gif-uploaded-of-thanq/c/
Everyone thinks alpha radiation is the least dangerous because it is stopped by paper. What they don't consider is inhalation or swallowing - like in a blast. That stuff will kill you from inside your body.
The uranium needs to be confined in a tight enclosure and a specialized source of ignition. It is not like you can throw a lit match on it and it will explode.
Thank you jhartz. I always appreciate your analysis on issues & the research you have done in the past.
Bunker busters take out a target and fill in the hole with the rubble. Stockpiles of enriched uranium or even assembled nuclear weapons would not be detonated, just buried under 90 meters of rubble.
We had nuke sniffers flying around the upper central US sniffing for radiation in the jet stream last week because the nuclear power plants Israel hit 8 days ago have a higher likelihood of atmospheric radiation release than physically destroying a stockpile of Uranium or a nuclear weapon sitting in a bunker.
Iran already said ahead of attack hat all the enriched material was move elsewhere.
Do you happen to have a source on that? This could get interesting.
Proof?
It's been 18 hours and you haven't answered the last guy asking where you pulled that "info" from
Sorry for delay, been out of country without computer access.
Try this: 2:27 mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVt8p7DAcBQ&t=4s
Thank you, with the discussions of newer weapons this makes sense.
It’s sealed in under hundreds of feet of debris and concrete. They claim it was impervious to bunker buster bombs but each got 3 apiece. It probably wasn’t to destroy them but to make it impossible to get to them again.