Can someone explain what the content of the fake letter from Trump to Epstein was? And was the fake letter itself published or just a made up story about the existence of a letter ?
The letter itself has not been published only described. You can find the description all over the place. I'd post the original source (WSJ) but it's paywalled.
Sued my ass. This is the same Treason and the same 'obama' COUP that Fixed the 2020 elections, and it is still Treason. Put them ( MSM )in GITMO ALL of them.
You cannot put them to death either or the normies will never shut up for the rest of time about how conspiracy theorists killed people to silence the truth.
He has baited them so fucking hard its almost unbelievable. This is why he didn't say really anything about it for so long, or address the accusations, cause he had the TRUMP card on it. Anons already knew though. KNOW WHEN TO HODL.
I have a good friend who has long maintained that the Wall Street Journal was above the fray of propaganda and was the golden standard of impeccable journalism. It will be interesting how he responds to this. I kind of suspect the cognitive dissonance will cause him to brush it aside and dismiss it as a triviality.
WSJ at one time was seen like your friend describes - among that top echelon of American periodicals; doubtless in probity, wholly austere in journalistic conduct.
They have both been exposed and reduced themselves to nothing more than another blithering propagandist rag, awash in the kind of base and comical drivel once reserved for the tabloids. Speaking of which, they (quite shockingly) ACTUALLY are now outstripped by their own New York Post in the dimensions of reporting quality, readability and authenticity. ...That is, in my opinion, however; you're not required to share it.
When Rupert decided to "un-person" Trump in 2021 it seems like his vision was to make the Wall Street Journal a principle vector of attack. The Editorial page took a very sharp left and the paper itself sort of skewed in a direction similar to National Review.
They had to take a far more gentle approach with his Fox News, who merely forgot Trump's name or where his events were being held for a solid 18 months or so. Watching the talent read off a teleprompter, clumsily written to avoid saying "His" name, contorting their faces rather hysterically as they went was certainly an awkward exercise for all involved, BUT it successfully kept their anesthetized viewership stable and in place. Likely sizable portions of the dedicated audience didn't even notice.
"Hmmm... something different about The Five lately?"
"Ya know! I was thinking that too!"
Rupert could have left it there and just allowed Trump to drift off in tranquil fashion, but we both know his hubris is FAR too great for that. He had a biological NEED to go on the offense against his old pal Donald - and thus opened the door to the (profoundly damaging) transformations that WSJ has now undergone.
Bizarre as it is to say, but even The New York Times has gotten through triage at this point and begun to salvage its reputation. Unfortunately I see no such point when the bleeding finally stops coming for the Journal - and here now, potential for a yet more grievous wound, and self-inflicted.
They've no more 'ethics' than garbage like the Atlantic or Huffington's tissue paper at this point. They've become so desperate for subscriptions and relevance that they have lowered their standards to printing salacious, unvetted tripe like this story of the Trump letter.
They are another mongrel in the circle now, drooling involuntarily at the scent of any juicy meat they pick up on, haplessly jumping on the chance to break the controversy first and hold the conch shell for that day, consequences therafter be damned.
With the exception of the Washington Post in the Bezos-era, I don't think any single publication has fallen further. They are just another one of the circus clowns, hypnotically skipping around the may pole that Trump has captured them all with.
Wow. Thanks for the overview. Not being a WSJ reader, I was not aware. Reminds me of the fall of Scientific American: "It is neither scientific, nor American"---Edward Teller.
Trump haters (TDS) never learn, they take the bait hook line and sinker, much like "You call me up at five to five and you asked me if I'll drop by that you need me tonight you're all alone. Like a fool I am and the fool I'll be, I drove there anxiously but when I got there you were not alone" Don Williams
This was in 2003? Two years after the buildings came down and Trump knew what really happened and was being asked to run for President and he WROTE a letter? This is a man who knew the consequences of putting anything in writing. This is as believable as a handsome billionaire and celebrity raping an ugly woman in a department store dressing room.
Chi’ching LOTTO $$$$$$ sold some rag news article and know you’re getting fired and lots and lots of money paid out, hope the case is brought into a Florida court
Teflon Don knows Dem approval rating under 20%. This feels like housecleaning. They’re about to shine up the WSJ. About time, rag INDEED!
I mean seriously who approves of either party these days? Let's bring back the party Jefferson ran under, the Democratic-Republican party.
Can someone explain what the content of the fake letter from Trump to Epstein was? And was the fake letter itself published or just a made up story about the existence of a letter ?
The letter itself has not been published only described. You can find the description all over the place. I'd post the original source (WSJ) but it's paywalled.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/17/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-wsj.html
Sued my ass. This is the same Treason and the same 'obama' COUP that Fixed the 2020 elections, and it is still Treason. Put them ( MSM )in GITMO ALL of them.
You cannot put them to death either or the normies will never shut up for the rest of time about how conspiracy theorists killed people to silence the truth.
Sue the piss out of them, Sir!
He has baited them so fucking hard its almost unbelievable. This is why he didn't say really anything about it for so long, or address the accusations, cause he had the TRUMP card on it. Anons already knew though. KNOW WHEN TO HODL.
~ Pepe Rogers 🐸🎶
Looking forward to these corrupt media pricks being taken down.
Trump TS post - https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114871422727186590
On qagg - https://qagg.news/?read=TT28457
I have a good friend who has long maintained that the Wall Street Journal was above the fray of propaganda and was the golden standard of impeccable journalism. It will be interesting how he responds to this. I kind of suspect the cognitive dissonance will cause him to brush it aside and dismiss it as a triviality.
WSJ at one time was seen like your friend describes - among that top echelon of American periodicals; doubtless in probity, wholly austere in journalistic conduct.
They have both been exposed and reduced themselves to nothing more than another blithering propagandist rag, awash in the kind of base and comical drivel once reserved for the tabloids. Speaking of which, they (quite shockingly) ACTUALLY are now outstripped by their own New York Post in the dimensions of reporting quality, readability and authenticity. ...That is, in my opinion, however; you're not required to share it.
When Rupert decided to "un-person" Trump in 2021 it seems like his vision was to make the Wall Street Journal a principle vector of attack. The Editorial page took a very sharp left and the paper itself sort of skewed in a direction similar to National Review.
They had to take a far more gentle approach with his Fox News, who merely forgot Trump's name or where his events were being held for a solid 18 months or so. Watching the talent read off a teleprompter, clumsily written to avoid saying "His" name, contorting their faces rather hysterically as they went was certainly an awkward exercise for all involved, BUT it successfully kept their anesthetized viewership stable and in place. Likely sizable portions of the dedicated audience didn't even notice.
"Hmmm... something different about The Five lately?"
"Ya know! I was thinking that too!"
Rupert could have left it there and just allowed Trump to drift off in tranquil fashion, but we both know his hubris is FAR too great for that. He had a biological NEED to go on the offense against his old pal Donald - and thus opened the door to the (profoundly damaging) transformations that WSJ has now undergone.
Bizarre as it is to say, but even The New York Times has gotten through triage at this point and begun to salvage its reputation. Unfortunately I see no such point when the bleeding finally stops coming for the Journal - and here now, potential for a yet more grievous wound, and self-inflicted.
They've no more 'ethics' than garbage like the Atlantic or Huffington's tissue paper at this point. They've become so desperate for subscriptions and relevance that they have lowered their standards to printing salacious, unvetted tripe like this story of the Trump letter.
They are another mongrel in the circle now, drooling involuntarily at the scent of any juicy meat they pick up on, haplessly jumping on the chance to break the controversy first and hold the conch shell for that day, consequences therafter be damned.
With the exception of the Washington Post in the Bezos-era, I don't think any single publication has fallen further. They are just another one of the circus clowns, hypnotically skipping around the may pole that Trump has captured them all with.
Sad to see really. Godspeed.
Wow. Thanks for the overview. Not being a WSJ reader, I was not aware. Reminds me of the fall of Scientific American: "It is neither scientific, nor American"---Edward Teller.
Trump haters (TDS) never learn, they take the bait hook line and sinker, much like "You call me up at five to five and you asked me if I'll drop by that you need me tonight you're all alone. Like a fool I am and the fool I'll be, I drove there anxiously but when I got there you were not alone" Don Williams
What's in this letter?
I can't read it because of paywall...but this looks like it is what Trump was referring too...
The leather-bound book was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. The president says the letter ‘is a fake thing.’
https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796?mod=hp_lead_pos7
Here is the fully readable archive link.
https://archive.ph/xLRmo
Thanks! 👏 I tried looking for it, but archive must not have had it when I looked.
Edit: It wouldn't open for me, says Server Error.
Hey fren, hit pause on your VPN to access the page.
I use a VPN all the time, and pausing it to archive and read archived pages usually works.
Here are some backups:
https://archive.ph/VAqj7
https://archive.ph/EA64F
https://archive.ph/tPESq
Thanks so much!
Thank YOU, fren!
This was in 2003? Two years after the buildings came down and Trump knew what really happened and was being asked to run for President and he WROTE a letter? This is a man who knew the consequences of putting anything in writing. This is as believable as a handsome billionaire and celebrity raping an ugly woman in a department store dressing room.
Also if Trump was having sex with teenage girls on an island..
Why would he be raping women in a department store??!!
I've tried logic with those types with no avail. smh
Chi’ching LOTTO $$$$$$ sold some rag news article and know you’re getting fired and lots and lots of money paid out, hope the case is brought into a Florida court
So this explains a lot.
Fake Jews (khazars) though. The real Jews of Jesus don't do "jew things".
That’s a good one