The internet must be stopped - Jody Bruchon
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
All the governments of the world are restricting access to the internet all at the same time?
I wonder if they are expecting an awakening they don't want.
All signs point to the Storm hitting VERY SOON
They are pulling out all the stops to quell the Awakening because they are doomed if the public majority opinion turns against them
Too much information coming out about how the Democrat leaders are traitors? Time for the emergency broadcasting system?
I like this guy but he needs to go a little bit further....
Education is not the role of government. They took it away from parents and the church. Every major ivy League school in the US that's older than 100 years was started by churches. Before government intervention, communities used neighborhood Churches for classrooms or they homeschooled their children.
Hell even most hospitals over 100 years old were started by Churches.
Since government stepped in and stole this role from the churches, these once Christian institutions have become secular institutions and the cost has risen exponentially while the quality has decreased.
As Ronald Reagan famously said: The scariest words in the English language are... "I'm from the government and I'm here to help"
Quit giving your kids to Caesar to be taught and being shocked when they come home as Romans.
Organized religion isn't necessarily better.
True, the cancer is not just limited to the government. After all, they wouldn't have been able to the subvert the government if they hadn't subverted the church beforehand.
Who put it in the Bible that jews are gods chosen people?
"Were" it's the key word there.
God put it there, the same God that said that Jews have become a synagogue of Satan.
Those that are in Christ are God's chosen people now. No one can even call themselves a jew legitimately since the genealogy records which were held in the temple were destroyed in 70 AD.
So why is it still there?
Is that a real question?
Seriously. Think about it.
You're asking why did God, the author of all things, not take out a plot point that pointed to the new covenant after Jesus came and established the new covenant.
You can't have a "new" covenant without an old one.
That's like asking why the Bible has animal sacrifice in it to cleans people of sin in the old testament when Jesus sacrificed Himself to cleans us of sin in the new testament.
When you read a novel do you rip out plot points and pages in earlier chapters when there's a plot twist later on?
This place is awesome because of anons like you. God bless you!
Animal sacrifice, like projecting your sins on to chickens, then killing them (which is what the Jews do)?
Last I remember, mortal men wrote the Bible itself.
There's no recorded information on whether anyone edited it after the fact (probably jews to make them look good and neuter Whites).
Dude I'm gonna be honest, you should read the material you're questioning before diving into critique. You are revealing your stupidity RAPIDLY because it's clear you know nothing about it despite the confidence (read: arrogance). Fair warning, God bless.
The topic isn't organized religion, it's Christianity and the history of the country would prove you wrong on that.
Before governments took away education from church American led the world in education.
Are there absolutely garbage churches that capitulate to government and trends? Absolutely.
Does that mean your lungs them in all together? Only if you're intellectually dishonest or borderline retarded.
Without Christianity you wouldn't even have America or the Constitution or the bill of rights. The American revolution was called the Protestant rebellion in england. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights was drawn correctly out of the general equity of God's law in Scripture.
That's because so much of it has lapsed into the secular-liberal culture as a default.
I'm old enough to remember when it was still common knowledge that in the past the Catholic church would not teach the masses to read, burned people at the stake for teaching others herbal medicine, and Galileo being subjected to the Spanish Inquisition for talking about the planets revolving around the sun.
Watchutalkinboutwillis?
Galileo was never subject to the Spanish Inquisition, but to the Roman Inquisition. He lived in Italy and got crosswise with the Pope over church doctrine on the structure of the universe. His espousal of heliocentric theory was correct---but unprovable at the time, because it resulted in the same description of the heavens as the geocentric theory. (It was later that we were able to make stellar parallax measurements to make the determination.) Galileo did not help his cause by being rude and abrasive to the Pope.
But the Catholic church would not enable the masses to even read the Bible. All that the church goers got was church dogma, not the Word of Scripture. Hand copies of the Bible were rare and expensive and kept away. That was the great liberation of the Gutenberg revolution in mass printing of Bibles.
Burnings at the stake were bi-partisan. Witchcraft burnings were committed by Protestants as well. A very ugly example of the pitfalls of "Everybody knows..."
We have come a long way from those days. It's a blessing that we can learn from experience.
We had an entire thing called the Protestant Reformation that took us away from the unbiblical practices and traditions of the Catholic church and back to what scripture actually teaches.
Also the majority of the founding fathers were Protestants and England even called the American revolution the Protestant rebellion.
Without Christianity you wouldn't have America and you certainly wouldn't have the Bill of Rights and the Constitution or which were drawn out of the general equity of God's law
Government is the problem. The solution is get government out!
And for that to happen, certain people need a Jack London Sea Wolf Experience.
That said: It is incumbent on any user of Information Technology to get experience with:
If this list a overwhelming, I agree, Had you started 5 years ago with learning no 1, you would have progressed down this list quite well.
Although search results are heavily skewed and AI is geared towards obedience to the system, a lot of information is still available.
I do note however, that European Countries have a huge incentive to repress any dissent: your assets. TO create a way to scoop up your assets is simply a way to stealthily increase taxes. Hence, countries like The Netherlands are awarding themselves the right to take your stuff if they "suspect" you to be a criminal. No judge needed. And even if a judge is speaking out on it, it may be insufficient to make you whole. The object is to
This is a war against humanity.
Who knew clubbing baby seals could be so relevant to today's situation?
Mind Cuntrol.
They seek to Govern your thoughts, mind and control them in a narrow cage of "safe" (for them) ideas ...
It's right there... Truth in advertising: Government
Govern your Mente
Let's not forget... the Internet started via DARPA and the military. Then they brought universities into the fold... It's been a tool of control since it's inception.
No more paper/hardcopies... hardly anyone has their own personal repository of data that can be viewed offline (schmucks think "the cloud" is just as good as a hard drive... it's not at all the same) and few have a contingency plan if for some reason they can't access the net.
Oh yeah... the Storm is coming...the race to continue censorship confirms this...
I have no idea what any of those acronyms are. If you're talking about a RAID array, I know what that is, but not the number designations. You can also transfer files to a PC that's not connected to the internet via flash drives.
I am not sure which acronyms you mean, but a simple internet search will remedy any lacking familiarity with these terms.
Generally:
At the very least, by now, everyone should be using: VPN's, Lokinet-exits, TOR-exits, etc.
However, too many people are still hooked on fuckbook, instagram, youtube, and google, whatsapp. There are better and more privacy honoring solutions.
The issue often is heldhelds. And this ties into point 8.
These are what I meant.
I've been using Nobara Linux for a while now. I tried Zorin and Garuda before. I still have a bootable flash drive with those 3, and I think 2 more on it. When I build my new PC by the end of the year, I'll be using Nobara 42 or 43.
Quebes is interesting as it firejails everything. When I used it felt somewhat schizo. But what the heck, having a profile for each act is not so bad, in order to throw in wrench in the BIG DATA processor lovers.
Fire jail? A profile for each act?
https://www.qubes-os.org/screenshots/
We share the same spirit, but my understanding is web3 is what we need - decentralized web gives power back to the people and blockchain etches information permanently so that it can not be altered. The downside is that it's complicated, and generally speaking it's a David vs Goliath situation ... "We the Davids" are going to need divine intervention to counter the "Google Goliaths" of the tech word. Religion aside, it's my belief that's what we're here for: Q metaphorically providing that Devine intervention (I hope).
That was meant to be. In effect it is fake. Every web3 implementation has its own challenges, and true to form, by putting it on a blockchain, make it permissionless, you get privacy.
And, it is meant to be a system where you decide what to share with whom and you could create a sovereign identity.
That said, there are some things to think about:
However, each service comes with predetermined rules of engagement. At the moment of connecting, you sign agreement with those rules to which you have no option but either accept or reject. No tech company will move from the position of respecting rights at all.
This is a huge omission. Especially, since such transnational services are perfectly susceptible to UCC-1 308 and some other niceties. It allows for some interesting consumer protection advantages, you will not have by simply agreeing to their rules without reservation.
So, the idea is not bad. The implementations are usually shoddy. Hence, my recommendation to be suspicious before entering into an agreement.
Then there is .gov, on both sides of the Atlantic. Both the Stable Act and the Genius Act attempt to regulate stable coins. And every WEB3 system that relies on that is touched. The same, and this is even worse, goes on in the EU with MICA-rules.
To prevent any claim under these regulations, especially because MICA is older than STABLE + GENIUS, it is visible that companies implement even more stringent rules, and their signal-systems are set so, that practically everything is suspect, and thus there is a block.
Of course, these are not perfectly WEB3 implementations. But if you wanted to, then you cannot use stable coins at all. And as soon as you commit to privacy, central exchanges start delisting an asset. See Monero.
Of course, the solution is not WEB3 per se but something that is built with MONERO in mind, doing the same thing (it is already being built).
So, .gov has played it move. No the anarchic part of IT coders is next to make another move to totally rug pull the .gov system.
What does “trusting web3” entail, exactly, and how would you know if you’d done it, or were being presented with an option to do it?
Is signing up for Coinbase, e.g., with their KYC, “trusting web3”?
Nope, quite the opposite. Clearly, you can start by considering the difference between DEX and CEX.
Within DEX, especially as a consequence of MICA & Stable, there are new KYC requirements implemented, and actually, there is a lobby group in Congress that want to go even further.
This push defeats what crypto is all about. And what Crypto/blockchain is all about is the starting point.
That is why it concerning that Layer 2 and 3 are enclosing on BTC. BCH, Monero. Fortunately, there are those who comprehend what is going on and Look for ways to natively link these concepts, so as to make BTC standout from all other DEFI solutions without the stablecoin trap.
I’m still not following, sorry.
What is “trusting web3” then?
I’m guessing you’re against layer2 and layer3 development. I’m not well-versed on those as yet.
I definitely don’t like KYC on DEX applications. Very antithetical.
Think of data you are sharing and the signature a put out there when connecting your wallet. When you contract in a digital way: how do you guard your rights?
Read the doc I referenced and look at the process closely. Not only from a Us centric point of view, but also from a MICA point of view. The vector of intention between the two systems will clash. And then I do not even want to consider the effects of a decentralized organization of who's responsible for what. Technically, you are bearing the brunt of their mistakes, omissions, fraud, etc.
Thank you. Your list should actually comprise a part of modern education.
How about instead we force all governments and government employees and elected officials to be 100% transparent and post everything they do, say, and look at on government property and networks to a ppace online for public review?
Bodycams
I mostly agree, but I'd kinda like to see Google Glass headgear. 24/7 online live transmit.
We need an ID system that doesn't know "who" you are but does merely know that you "are" on an instance basis. Throw away single use "anonymous" ID's that cannot be linked to your other IDs.... somehow.
I posted a slightly racy comment on TS the other day and now I gotta do an annoying "prove you're human" captcha every 10 minutes or so. I wonder if this is why.