She claims the man in the white hat/shirt is Frank Turek - a close friend of Charlie's
alisachilders
23h
Some are spreading the lie that the man in the white hat next to Charlie Kirk was signaling the sniper. The truth? That man is Frank Turek—Charlie’s close friend, mentor, and a man of God. Frank loved Charlie and would have done anything to protect him. Don’t spread false rumors. Let’s make truth go viral.
You can also check the official statement from CrossExamined at @drfrankturek
Will our gov agencies look into this ? If this is true we need to keep pounding them until they do wtf ! Omg if there is real proof why aren’t they looking at it !
Allow me to explain what happened. Tyler Robinson was on the roof but was used as a distraction so that the real shooter could get away.
The real shooter is the guy in the white shirt standing next to the jewish lady. The security team was giving him signals on when to shoot. They were all in on it. He is holding a cellphone pistol. The cellphone pistol is called IDEAL CONCEAL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_Conceal
Notice the guy in white hold the "phone" in a weird position like he's pointing a gun. Then notice the recoil right after Charlie gets shot.
Notice that Charlie slumps to the left after he gets shot. That means the force was coming from the right where the guy in white was standing. The hole in Charlie's right neck is the exit wound, not the entry wound. Entry wounds are always minimal compared to exit wounds. https://x.com/ArcaneKnowledge/status/1966861368570638711
If you watched the video you would clearly see that a high powered rifle was used. A cellphone pistol would not have caused his shirt to recoil the way it did.
wouldn't they be able to check the bullet. I'm sure it would have to be a smaller one than from that rifle. Doesn't seem logical to me, but I'm no expert on firearms.
Such a shot would have created an entry wound on the victim's right. No such wound. Also, there's no way a mere phone(or gunphone) held in one hand like that wouldn't experience extreme recoil from that shot.
Interesting, I saw something yesterday about the very same dude in a white shirt was the shooter but not with a cellphone gun. I'd never heard of such...
I've been avoiding these things but I did watch the section suggested. If you watch, watch the hands as the presenter suggests. When the gun goes off, is that a bit of gunsmoke? I see a puff right after the sound of the shot. Check it out and comment.
This guy is wrong on a number of things. First of all the "cellphone gun" is not a cellphone at all. There is no screen. Also, I never saw the guy unfold the grip so that it could be fired.
Yes, there is probably another shooter, as in many of these things, but the guy pointed out in the video probably isn't the one. It's just like with Trump, the guy on the roof didn't fire a shot from the roof that nicked Trump's ear and then went upward to kill the man higher up in the stands. I think the real shooter then was inside the building shooting from the door or through a window. There are lots of patsies, at least since Lee Harvey Oswald.
Ballistic forensics would easily tell what type of bullet caused the damage.
FYI, yeah it was a neck shot/ricochet, but I've NEVER seen nor heard of a .22 cal doing that kind of damage. One in a million shot perhaps. Very doubious of this.....🤔😡
The screen is "tiny" only because your equipment is tiny. The video he showed was almost a foot wide on my screen, as I'm using a real computer with a 40" monitor. The main thing that makes it a bit hard to see is the low resolution.
The main problem with the guy is that he claims there's one of those "cellphone guns," but they were taken off the market years ago. He talks about a screen, but those guns are not cellphones in any way. They are just guns that are skinny with a fold up grip that locks the gun so it won't go off accidently. If that had gone off that loudly, someone next to the shooter would have heard that it was next to them.
Thanks for replying. I found the whole event confusing.
He allegedly identified the shooter and that was a state of a confusion. Was the shooter a man or a woman?
Then apparently the FBI disappeared to throw Kash under the bus.
I don't think it's the white shirt guy. He looks like he is jumping due to the sound. See how his whole body jumps a bit? That is surprise, not a recoil.
Also the trajectory does not look right.
The guy confessed to the shooting. His trans roommate is spilling his guts about his conversations on Discord admitting there was a conspiracy. Too many of the AI videos muddying the water!
Keep in mind that Tyler shot a blank with his rifle on the rooftop.
Find alisachilders' on instagram
She claims the man in the white hat/shirt is Frank Turek - a close friend of Charlie's
alisachilders
23h Some are spreading the lie that the man in the white hat next to Charlie Kirk was signaling the sniper. The truth? That man is Frank Turek—Charlie’s close friend, mentor, and a man of God. Frank loved Charlie and would have done anything to protect him. Don’t spread false rumors. Let’s make truth go viral.
You can also check the official statement from CrossExamined at @drfrankturek
I don’t think the .22 dynamics match the 556 rounds
The vacuum created by the rifle round pulled Charlie’s shirt up.
Backup shooter. The transfag probably missed.
Will our gov agencies look into this ? If this is true we need to keep pounding them until they do wtf ! Omg if there is real proof why aren’t they looking at it !
I'm sure they are,but it takes time.
Allow me to explain what happened. Tyler Robinson was on the roof but was used as a distraction so that the real shooter could get away.
The real shooter is the guy in the white shirt standing next to the jewish lady. The security team was giving him signals on when to shoot. They were all in on it. He is holding a cellphone pistol. The cellphone pistol is called IDEAL CONCEAL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_Conceal
Notice the guy in white hold the "phone" in a weird position like he's pointing a gun. Then notice the recoil right after Charlie gets shot.
Notice that Charlie slumps to the left after he gets shot. That means the force was coming from the right where the guy in white was standing. The hole in Charlie's right neck is the exit wound, not the entry wound. Entry wounds are always minimal compared to exit wounds. https://x.com/ArcaneKnowledge/status/1966861368570638711
If you watched the video you would clearly see that a high powered rifle was used. A cellphone pistol would not have caused his shirt to recoil the way it did.
Jewish lady? How can you tell?
The nose.
wouldn't they be able to check the bullet. I'm sure it would have to be a smaller one than from that rifle. Doesn't seem logical to me, but I'm no expert on firearms.
The Bullet from a .30-06 is dramatically larger than a .380 or 9mm bullet.
It’ll be quite obvious and apparent what he was shot by to anyone who checks the bullet.
Thank you. I thought so but not into ammo much.
Really stupid theory in my opinion.
Such a shot would have created an entry wound on the victim's right. No such wound. Also, there's no way a mere phone(or gunphone) held in one hand like that wouldn't experience extreme recoil from that shot.
Interesting, I saw something yesterday about the very same dude in a white shirt was the shooter but not with a cellphone gun. I'd never heard of such...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8OUSL6Cd5Q
No, this wasn't it.
I've been avoiding these things but I did watch the section suggested. If you watch, watch the hands as the presenter suggests. When the gun goes off, is that a bit of gunsmoke? I see a puff right after the sound of the shot. Check it out and comment.
Removed: my BS detector was set of on this and you
More than one shooter? Signals to time the two shooters?
This guy is wrong on a number of things. First of all the "cellphone gun" is not a cellphone at all. There is no screen. Also, I never saw the guy unfold the grip so that it could be fired.
Yes, there is probably another shooter, as in many of these things, but the guy pointed out in the video probably isn't the one. It's just like with Trump, the guy on the roof didn't fire a shot from the roof that nicked Trump's ear and then went upward to kill the man higher up in the stands. I think the real shooter then was inside the building shooting from the door or through a window. There are lots of patsies, at least since Lee Harvey Oswald.
Ballistic forensics would easily tell what type of bullet caused the damage.
FYI, yeah it was a neck shot/ricochet, but I've NEVER seen nor heard of a .22 cal doing that kind of damage. One in a million shot perhaps. Very doubious of this.....🤔😡
It would actually help if you could use a friggin bigger pointer with color to see the origination of the shot. And the screen is tiny.
The screen is "tiny" only because your equipment is tiny. The video he showed was almost a foot wide on my screen, as I'm using a real computer with a 40" monitor. The main thing that makes it a bit hard to see is the low resolution.
The main problem with the guy is that he claims there's one of those "cellphone guns," but they were taken off the market years ago. He talks about a screen, but those guns are not cellphones in any way. They are just guns that are skinny with a fold up grip that locks the gun so it won't go off accidently. If that had gone off that loudly, someone next to the shooter would have heard that it was next to them.
Thanks for replying. I found the whole event confusing. He allegedly identified the shooter and that was a state of a confusion. Was the shooter a man or a woman? Then apparently the FBI disappeared to throw Kash under the bus.
I don't think it's the white shirt guy. He looks like he is jumping due to the sound. See how his whole body jumps a bit? That is surprise, not a recoil. Also the trajectory does not look right.
The guy confessed to the shooting. His trans roommate is spilling his guts about his conversations on Discord admitting there was a conspiracy. Too many of the AI videos muddying the water!