Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
in the 2006 documentary entitled hacking democracy, the partisan democrat filmmakers made the exact same allegations of election fraud that were made in 2020 by partisan republicans…
This should tell us that every election is controlled, and that whoever gets the office is not there because they won an election, but because they were installed by a corrupt election system
It doesn’t matter if they are democrat or republican they will get installed if they are a stooge for the Uni party
I just recently saw somebody comment on Lisa Markowski from Alaska. Supposedly nobody in Alaska likes her and yet somehow she continues to win election elections she’s being installed by a rigged election system.
So that’s why when you take your election rigging allegations to the government itself to complain about it. Nothing ever gets done because the people that are in charge of fixing it are the people that benefit from it being rigged.
If the system wasn’t rigged to begin with these people wouldn’t be in those positions they’re not gonna turn against the system because the system works very well for them
And Lara Logan’s recent documentary called [S]election Code about the rigged voting. She said similar as you during the promotion trailer. Politicians have a -10 approval but 95+% reelection? It’s not all redistricting
I’m from Jefferson Iowa. My dad and RW were good friends as teenagers racing cars and chasing girls. I spent a couple days a week drinking White Russians in Randy’s garage or riding motorcycles together in 94-95. He was at my parents house about once a week back then. I know all of his family. His sister and nieces babysat me. I dated another niece. We had the same US Probation Officer. The only difference there was the PO came to my house for visits but RW had to meet him at the police station.
…and a civilian going out for a smoke spotted him. I bet that they were disappointed that they had to stop breaking the 4th Amendment when told where the perp was.
But then they changed the story and said he went out to walk the dog
This detail seems trivial at first, but it’s actually one of the pivotal moments in this entire story.
Whenever they do these narrative developments, the way they tell the story is that
Person X was doing Y, and thats when Z happened.
Where X is a supposed witness, who is necessary for the story plotline continuity
Where Y is some boring, mundane thing that most people can relate to,
And Z is the BIG SURPRISE that ties the storylines together
once you notice the formula template,
You can spot these fake witnesses from a mile away
This particular fake witness was “the boat owner”
And “the boat” was a critical part of the storyline
Actually, I think the boat owners story changed yet again,
And he said that he noticed a piece of foam had came loose from underneath the wrapper around his boat, and the foam was out in his yard,
So we went out and picked up the foam and he was putting it back under the cover of the boat and that’s when he noticed there was blood on the boat cover
That’s a whole Nother rabbit hole
I’ve got lots of pictures showing the boat cover with no blood on it
So clearly, the boat owner was not able to notice blood if there was no blood there
I have other pictures where there is blood on the boat fender
But that blood appears to have been planted as part of the scene,
Because I also have pictures of that boat fender with no blood on it
They spent about a week trying to explain and re-explain and re-explain this story because they’re narrative just was not adding up
This all looks like police instigated this "fake manhunt" no military troops were involved. If the people wanted to see warrants, could they have demanded to see them and would the police have stopped? That is my specific question. The police can not and (more importantly) should not do this type of search. It may have bee a test to see what the police could get away with. And in this case, it was a lot of the people's rights being trampled.
And, an added question, do we know if anyone out of this sued and what the outcome was? It should have been a court win and much money awarded to them. Not that that makes up for the taking of the rights each individual has under the constitution.
Genuinely curious, is the theory that there was no actual bombing or manhunt at all? Or that the bombing was staged?
I ask because I was living right outside Boston at the time. I didn’t attend the marathon, but friends and family were present. None of them were injured, but they certainly witnessed a large explosion and total panic.
We were living on the border of Watertown, where the perps were caught. Maybe 1-2 miles down the road? Again, I was not a direct witness but was close enough to hear the sounds of a firefight and improvised explosions between the police and the suspects. This all took place in a residential neighborhood with lots of people watching from inside their homes. As far as I know, there was no evacuation of potential witnesses - everyone was told to “shelter in place.”. So there was certainly a commitment to a very realistic “show” if nothing else. How do you understand what was really going on there?
DHS had been doing multi-agency training exercises during the Boston Marathon since at least 2003
The DHS itself was created by the PATRIOT ACT,
“in response to” 9/11… 2001
And DHS became the umbrella over many formerly-independent government agencies
Also created were “fusion centers” that put all levels of law enforcement in one room.
Feds, state police, county sheriff, local cops, all supposedly sharing info with each other,
for your protection, of course
So they do these exercises/drills to test the system.
Like a fire alarm drill at school.
Do they make you physically participate in the fire alarm drill, and evacuate the building?
But these drills are much more involved.
Imagine if the fire alarm drill at school involved fireman actually showing up with firetrucks, policeman actually showing up with police cars, and ambulances showing up…
Pretty soon, you got a medevac helicopter there too
The hospitals go into high alert, and prepare to accept incoming trauma patients
the sheriff gets involved.
the governor gets involved.
so they force goverment workers at all levels to participate in these multi-agency joint exercises
The pretext for these multi agency joint exercises, is to discover communication problems, to discover weaknesses or vulnerabilities, to test people’s actual response, so they can anticipate people‘s response in the future under similar circumstances
For example…
Two FBI agents, named Christopher Lorek and Stephen Shaw, were both involved with the Boston Marathon bombing hoax.
These two agents were supposedly part of the hostage negotiation team
They were on site, anticipating the part of the exercise where the suspects took hostages and they were supposed to be the negotiators to get the hostages safely released
For some reason, this part of the exercise never actually happened, so these two FBI agents never got a chance to be the hostage negotiators
Later on these two agents were participating in a training exercise involving rapelling off of a helicopter out over choppy waters in the ocean.
They were trying to rappel down onto a ship that was down below.
During heavy rain…
Supposedly because their gear was wet, these guys slipped off their ropes and landed in the ocean,
The helicopter people had to rescue these two FBI agents that fell out of the helicopter…
They got the two FBI bodies back in the helicopter and headed toward land
Headed towards the hospital, where they would be treated
As the helicopter is transporting these two FBI agents to the hospital, they discovered that the helicopters radio is not compatible with the hospital radio
So the helicopter was not able to alert the hospital that they were coming with two trauma patients
And that’s a perfect metaphor and example for how these exercises work
they are testing the system, to find communication gaps,
like the helicopter radio and the hospital radio, being on different frequencies and unable to communicate
OP here, your resident expert on all things Boston Marathon bombing hoax
This operation was done under a DHS program called Urban Shield, which conducted many exercises like these
The incident commander was FEMA deputy admin Richard Serino, who had been the incident commander for many exercises at the Boston Marathon going back many years
Around the time it happened I remember telling a friend that they were trying to make Christians hate Muslims
And I guess how many years after the fact, I suspect that is still the motivation for this exercise
There may have been other things put into place
for example, supposedly the state had a network of surveillance cameras, watching every single port around the border of the state every road, every way in and out, and they never had a reason to turn it on until the Boston Marathon bombing and then and then they went ahead and turned that on, so it’s probably still on…
Yep. Who knows what is truth in the past. We could have been lied about literally everything. And when I mean literally everything I mean even the stuff that makes us uncomfortable to consider
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Updated May 31, 2021
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
The vaxxx & Remdesivir took life. Denied life.
keep that in mind…
when the government becomes “suddenly concerned” about violence in DC, or chigaco, or LA, or memphis, or portland, or the CDC, or the ICE,
but doesn’t seem too concerned about Anthony Fauci killing millions of people over many decades,
from AZT for AIDS,
to mRNA for COVID.
ARREST ANTHONY FAUCI
Yes, we must be vigilant. We see what happens when we defend ourselves. It is better to clean out the rot.
in the 2006 documentary entitled hacking democracy, the partisan democrat filmmakers made the exact same allegations of election fraud that were made in 2020 by partisan republicans…
This should tell us that every election is controlled, and that whoever gets the office is not there because they won an election, but because they were installed by a corrupt election system
It doesn’t matter if they are democrat or republican they will get installed if they are a stooge for the Uni party
I just recently saw somebody comment on Lisa Markowski from Alaska. Supposedly nobody in Alaska likes her and yet somehow she continues to win election elections she’s being installed by a rigged election system.
So that’s why when you take your election rigging allegations to the government itself to complain about it. Nothing ever gets done because the people that are in charge of fixing it are the people that benefit from it being rigged.
If the system wasn’t rigged to begin with these people wouldn’t be in those positions they’re not gonna turn against the system because the system works very well for them
And Lara Logan’s recent documentary called [S]election Code about the rigged voting. She said similar as you during the promotion trailer. Politicians have a -10 approval but 95+% reelection? It’s not all redistricting
**For those who are unaware of the Boston Marathon Bombing Psy-Op Hoax **
The Boston HOAXathon - Deconstructed. -
They Really Bombed With the Boston Marathon Bombing
The Boston Marathon Bombing, 2013 Scam, Apr 19, 2025
WAS THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING WAS A STAGED FALSE FLAG??
Boston Marathon Bombing True Lies (FULL VER)
Of course it was a psyop! It was obvious from the get go. You can't hate these people enough!
3rd pic down I thought that was that bitch Vindman....
Waco pretty much showed us they give zero Fs about the constitution and your rights...
They're fking gangsters. They'll shoot your kid's dog right in front of him. Don't you forget it.
After your dog they shoot your son. Fuck the feds.
Ruby Ridge...
I’m from Jefferson Iowa. My dad and RW were good friends as teenagers racing cars and chasing girls. I spent a couple days a week drinking White Russians in Randy’s garage or riding motorcycles together in 94-95. He was at my parents house about once a week back then. I know all of his family. His sister and nieces babysat me. I dated another niece. We had the same US Probation Officer. The only difference there was the PO came to my house for visits but RW had to meet him at the police station.
“ neutralizing threats”
I don't know this one - can you elaborate, fren?
Thanks
…and a civilian going out for a smoke spotted him. I bet that they were disappointed that they had to stop breaking the 4th Amendment when told where the perp was.
the boat owner story changed.
first it was, that he went out for a cigarette,
But then they changed the story and said he went out to walk the dog
This detail seems trivial at first, but it’s actually one of the pivotal moments in this entire story.
Whenever they do these narrative developments, the way they tell the story is that
Person X was doing Y, and thats when Z happened.
Where X is a supposed witness, who is necessary for the story plotline continuity
Where Y is some boring, mundane thing that most people can relate to,
And Z is the BIG SURPRISE that ties the storylines together
once you notice the formula template,
You can spot these fake witnesses from a mile away
This particular fake witness was “the boat owner”
And “the boat” was a critical part of the storyline
Actually, I think the boat owners story changed yet again,
And he said that he noticed a piece of foam had came loose from underneath the wrapper around his boat, and the foam was out in his yard,
So we went out and picked up the foam and he was putting it back under the cover of the boat and that’s when he noticed there was blood on the boat cover
That’s a whole Nother rabbit hole
I’ve got lots of pictures showing the boat cover with no blood on it
So clearly, the boat owner was not able to notice blood if there was no blood there
I have other pictures where there is blood on the boat fender
But that blood appears to have been planted as part of the scene,
Because I also have pictures of that boat fender with no blood on it
They spent about a week trying to explain and re-explain and re-explain this story because they’re narrative just was not adding up
VCSIDS you are on a roll. Fukken saved
Terrorism = Rights Snatching
Thanks!
Lots of good comments in this thread,
might wanna screen cap too…
Sigh Ops need to be made illegal
right! is that too much to ask?
DOGE didn’t have the balls to cut the psyop budget?
Best I can do is Sigh Op Free Zone.
This all looks like police instigated this "fake manhunt" no military troops were involved. If the people wanted to see warrants, could they have demanded to see them and would the police have stopped? That is my specific question. The police can not and (more importantly) should not do this type of search. It may have bee a test to see what the police could get away with. And in this case, it was a lot of the people's rights being trampled. And, an added question, do we know if anyone out of this sued and what the outcome was? It should have been a court win and much money awarded to them. Not that that makes up for the taking of the rights each individual has under the constitution.
Genuinely curious, is the theory that there was no actual bombing or manhunt at all? Or that the bombing was staged?
I ask because I was living right outside Boston at the time. I didn’t attend the marathon, but friends and family were present. None of them were injured, but they certainly witnessed a large explosion and total panic.
We were living on the border of Watertown, where the perps were caught. Maybe 1-2 miles down the road? Again, I was not a direct witness but was close enough to hear the sounds of a firefight and improvised explosions between the police and the suspects. This all took place in a residential neighborhood with lots of people watching from inside their homes. As far as I know, there was no evacuation of potential witnesses - everyone was told to “shelter in place.”. So there was certainly a commitment to a very realistic “show” if nothing else. How do you understand what was really going on there?
DHS had been doing multi-agency training exercises during the Boston Marathon since at least 2003
The DHS itself was created by the PATRIOT ACT,
“in response to” 9/11… 2001
And DHS became the umbrella over many formerly-independent government agencies
Also created were “fusion centers” that put all levels of law enforcement in one room.
Feds, state police, county sheriff, local cops, all supposedly sharing info with each other,
for your protection, of course
So they do these exercises/drills to test the system.
Like a fire alarm drill at school.
Do they make you physically participate in the fire alarm drill, and evacuate the building?
But these drills are much more involved.
Imagine if the fire alarm drill at school involved fireman actually showing up with firetrucks, policeman actually showing up with police cars, and ambulances showing up…
Pretty soon, you got a medevac helicopter there too
The hospitals go into high alert, and prepare to accept incoming trauma patients
the sheriff gets involved.
the governor gets involved.
so they force goverment workers at all levels to participate in these multi-agency joint exercises
The pretext for these multi agency joint exercises, is to discover communication problems, to discover weaknesses or vulnerabilities, to test people’s actual response, so they can anticipate people‘s response in the future under similar circumstances
For example…
Two FBI agents, named Christopher Lorek and Stephen Shaw, were both involved with the Boston Marathon bombing hoax.
These two agents were supposedly part of the hostage negotiation team
They were on site, anticipating the part of the exercise where the suspects took hostages and they were supposed to be the negotiators to get the hostages safely released
For some reason, this part of the exercise never actually happened, so these two FBI agents never got a chance to be the hostage negotiators
Later on these two agents were participating in a training exercise involving rapelling off of a helicopter out over choppy waters in the ocean.
They were trying to rappel down onto a ship that was down below.
During heavy rain…
Supposedly because their gear was wet, these guys slipped off their ropes and landed in the ocean,
The helicopter people had to rescue these two FBI agents that fell out of the helicopter…
They got the two FBI bodies back in the helicopter and headed toward land
Headed towards the hospital, where they would be treated
As the helicopter is transporting these two FBI agents to the hospital, they discovered that the helicopters radio is not compatible with the hospital radio
So the helicopter was not able to alert the hospital that they were coming with two trauma patients
And that’s a perfect metaphor and example for how these exercises work
they are testing the system, to find communication gaps,
like the helicopter radio and the hospital radio, being on different frequencies and unable to communicate
Oh it gets better…
One of those FBI agents, also just happened to play the role of be a “hair and fiber expert” in the Casey Anthony hoax
Neither of these guys was a “REAL” FBI agent…
They simply played the role of FBI agent on TV
until their characters got killed off in a fake training accident,
Just as a way to retire, those characters and tidy up loose ends
They served their purpose, and once they were exposed, they were no longer useful to the characters creators
And it was more dangerous to keep using these characters than to get rid of them
Because whatever they were involved with next would automatically be suspect by people who were aware of their history
Also, there’s a lawyer named Judy Clarke
I’m convinced that she’s a fake character as well,
And that her entire client list is these high profile bad guys
I would say 100% of the clients on her client list are fake characters that have been involved in these fake news stories going back decades
She does “show trials”
She an actor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Clarke
Good post.
Anyone know the reason for the false flag?
OP here, your resident expert on all things Boston Marathon bombing hoax
This operation was done under a DHS program called Urban Shield, which conducted many exercises like these
The incident commander was FEMA deputy admin Richard Serino, who had been the incident commander for many exercises at the Boston Marathon going back many years
Around the time it happened I remember telling a friend that they were trying to make Christians hate Muslims
And I guess how many years after the fact, I suspect that is still the motivation for this exercise
There may have been other things put into place
for example, supposedly the state had a network of surveillance cameras, watching every single port around the border of the state every road, every way in and out, and they never had a reason to turn it on until the Boston Marathon bombing and then and then they went ahead and turned that on, so it’s probably still on…
Sigh: the tax plantation life
Interesting. Do you think they actually killed people?
Also, very interesting they want us to hate Muslims. They always need us divided. Divided keeps them in power as Q said.
Its hard to know what is true, because all of the info comes from the storytellers themselves.
it is far easier for them to lie to us, than it is for us to prove that they are lying
I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that there were suspicious deaths associated with the Boston Marathon bombing that didn’t get any publicity at all
Like maybe some random guy in Boston was just talking too much and he conveniently got stabbed in a dark alley or something
However, “Martin Richard” age 8, one of the supposed victims, was absolutely a fictional character created for this movie
Martin Richard’s dad “Bill Richard” was employed as a “community organizer”
Sorry but that sounds sketchy af
Obama was a “community organizer” in Chicago
Can somebody explain to me how being a “community organizer” pays the bills?
Yep. Who knows what is truth in the past. We could have been lied about literally everything. And when I mean literally everything I mean even the stuff that makes us uncomfortable to consider
I don't need anyone's help hating Muslims.
i gave up hate 30 years ago