Am I the only one who thinks Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth is controlled opposition? I followed him many years ago until he just seemed off one too many times. And then I disregarded him and saw something on Voat or the Q boards that solidified my opinion on that. It's the reason I have also disregarded George Webb -- because they collaborated a lot back then. But now I see people having respect for George Webb's work and I am now wondering if something has changed that I am unaware of. So, my initial question is sincere: am I the only one who thinks Jason Goodman is controlled opposition?
Yes, I agree with you. He is deflecting away from the truth. I thought it was settled the bullet came from the microphone under Charlie's shirt. Pointing to someone in the crowd with a pellet gun is complete bullshit.
Could be … but considering the wound pattern doesn’t match the “high power” rifle round and the “cameraman” from the other video I mentioned acting really suspicious , this theory seems most likely
TLDR: I think so, but I reserve judgment that he is one, unintentionally. Same with Webb.
Though the two weirdos at AIM (american intelligence media) and their 3rd wheel the cowboy hat guy who whines that facebook stole his idea, claim that Webb is a DIA agent meant to sow discord amongs conspiracy groups (in other words operation trust, again) As bizarre neoanthroposophists who had an absolutely psychotic interview with Jason (that wholly pissed me off), which he did not deserve in the least, I can say with confiden they themselves are not credible.
The breakup of George Webb and Jason Goodman was very weird and not very well explained other than Webb was getting drunk a lot and acting like a dick to Jason and possibly that the girl Webb and Goodman were interviewing, I believe it was the new tenant of house that was rented formerly by a black veteran who was the new tenant of Imran Awan's old house, had found a congressional drive (congressional id tag) or something that; and she was talking about how Imran was renting to her but drawing massive amounts of electricity SHE was having to pay for because the belief was that he (Imran, her landlord) was bitcoin mining in his shed. Goodman I thing got close to her, and Webb thought she was controlled opposition; and I think they had a falling out over this GIRL. It's all so dumb. I transcribed for them, when google was totally failing and was trying SO hard not to put "Imran Awan" in the subtitles. It came up with every type of variant in english possible not to say imran awan. It thought that itself was the most important thing I learned--that google was covering up imran awan. And why?
Anyway, Jason became very paranoid all the time, and kept violating hanlons razor which is that you don't assume everyone has malicious intent when really they're just being a dummy or careless or have some other non malicious ulterior motive like haivng to go take a dump. He is paranoid by nature. And George Webb can't seem to finish his long running tapestry of the history of the deepstate and the grand chessboard; he talks in endless circles, and that's the point
By the time you're figuring out what he's really trying to say, he's already run down at least 3 more rabbit holes. George webb is a rabbit warren of endless conspiracies; he might as well be an infinite landscape covered by kudzu. You'll get lost in there, you'll never find your way out. And even if you DO bring back something profound, nothing will be done about it
Imran Awan research was incredibly good, and kudos to both of these two and their excellent work. But at the end of the day, Awan got away. Even the US president couldn't bring "that pakistani guy" to justice
It's just another offense by the deepstate, another crime syndicate, it goes on forever, and the whole point of some of these people in our 'conspiracy research' space is to reveal the fulsome details of exactly how the deepstate got away with it, providing facts and figures, endlessly filling in the details that will
NEVER
EVER
BE
PRosecuted.
So in a way, these people are like a novel kind of gatekeeping that ties you up and wastes your effort. It's a lot like masturbating to porn, actually, but at least porn has a payoff, no matter how brief. Webb and Goodman leave you with justice blueballs
Right. It's one of those "low velocity" .30-06 rounds that comes out of a WWII era Mouser -- after they've been converted from 7.62 by a faggot and his boyfriend. Oh......then the bullet stopped after it hit his healthy spine -- just like it NEVER DOES when you blow a hole thru a horse sized elk. What bullshit.
For the hole in Charlie's neck to be an entrance wound, the caliber of bullet would have to have been about that big - so huge it would have blown most of his head off, creating an enormous exit wound splattering the backdrop behind him.
For the hole to be an exit wound, the caliber of bullet must have been extremely small - and look how nearly perfectly circular and clean-edged that hole is, very strange for an exit wound—and no splatter, just a steady stream.
I heard an explanation for this, that the bullet did not have time to expand, as it was a short distance from impact to exit, which is why it did not leave a large wound on exit. This was from a person on youtube who is a munitions and gun expert. He was convinced that the bullet came from behind, and that the shooter was above, hiding behind a bush.
Very interesting video. I saw another video online also that showed a similar catch of the projectile behind Charlie that correlates well with this, but it also showed a projectile from another camera coming down between Charlies legs towards the ground, rather than being caught in Charlies shirt. I give this video a high ranking towards the truth. He also explains the bang-crack from the supposed shooter on the roof.
I've heard different scenarios on where the bullet came from. The front, Charlie's right at his level, from below, from Charlie's right but above, and now from the back. I wonder how many clowns are trying to muddie the waters to keep the truth from being seen. And every single video is awful.
There were three thousand kids in the audience and they all had Iphones or the latest Google incarnation of a smart phone, yet there is only a few POOR vids of the moment Charlie got shot? Hmmm, I bet AI is doing something to the quality.
IMO the suggested bullet seems to be from the wrong side of Charlie, his rear left.
He alleges that the t shirt caught the bullet too. (around 14 mins).
Not at all sure about this at all.
It's interesting that he's alleging that these frames came from a 240 fps camera.
Why doesn't someone release that high speed footage and not a reduced rate version?
It seems to me that this guy Goodman is a very smooth talker and has a narrative to sell.
I still don't think we are at the bottom of this at all.
Goodman is a piece of work...
Original video could have been 60p or 120p because they both produce 20p and 30p with even slicing…
Good point.
Am I the only one who thinks Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth is controlled opposition? I followed him many years ago until he just seemed off one too many times. And then I disregarded him and saw something on Voat or the Q boards that solidified my opinion on that. It's the reason I have also disregarded George Webb -- because they collaborated a lot back then. But now I see people having respect for George Webb's work and I am now wondering if something has changed that I am unaware of. So, my initial question is sincere: am I the only one who thinks Jason Goodman is controlled opposition?
Yes, I agree with you. He is deflecting away from the truth. I thought it was settled the bullet came from the microphone under Charlie's shirt. Pointing to someone in the crowd with a pellet gun is complete bullshit.
Could be … but considering the wound pattern doesn’t match the “high power” rifle round and the “cameraman” from the other video I mentioned acting really suspicious , this theory seems most likely
TLDR: I think so, but I reserve judgment that he is one, unintentionally. Same with Webb.
Though the two weirdos at AIM (american intelligence media) and their 3rd wheel the cowboy hat guy who whines that facebook stole his idea, claim that Webb is a DIA agent meant to sow discord amongs conspiracy groups (in other words operation trust, again) As bizarre neoanthroposophists who had an absolutely psychotic interview with Jason (that wholly pissed me off), which he did not deserve in the least, I can say with confiden they themselves are not credible.
The breakup of George Webb and Jason Goodman was very weird and not very well explained other than Webb was getting drunk a lot and acting like a dick to Jason and possibly that the girl Webb and Goodman were interviewing, I believe it was the new tenant of house that was rented formerly by a black veteran who was the new tenant of Imran Awan's old house, had found a congressional drive (congressional id tag) or something that; and she was talking about how Imran was renting to her but drawing massive amounts of electricity SHE was having to pay for because the belief was that he (Imran, her landlord) was bitcoin mining in his shed. Goodman I thing got close to her, and Webb thought she was controlled opposition; and I think they had a falling out over this GIRL. It's all so dumb. I transcribed for them, when google was totally failing and was trying SO hard not to put "Imran Awan" in the subtitles. It came up with every type of variant in english possible not to say imran awan. It thought that itself was the most important thing I learned--that google was covering up imran awan. And why?
Anyway, Jason became very paranoid all the time, and kept violating hanlons razor which is that you don't assume everyone has malicious intent when really they're just being a dummy or careless or have some other non malicious ulterior motive like haivng to go take a dump. He is paranoid by nature. And George Webb can't seem to finish his long running tapestry of the history of the deepstate and the grand chessboard; he talks in endless circles, and that's the point
By the time you're figuring out what he's really trying to say, he's already run down at least 3 more rabbit holes. George webb is a rabbit warren of endless conspiracies; he might as well be an infinite landscape covered by kudzu. You'll get lost in there, you'll never find your way out. And even if you DO bring back something profound, nothing will be done about it
Imran Awan research was incredibly good, and kudos to both of these two and their excellent work. But at the end of the day, Awan got away. Even the US president couldn't bring "that pakistani guy" to justice
It's just another offense by the deepstate, another crime syndicate, it goes on forever, and the whole point of some of these people in our 'conspiracy research' space is to reveal the fulsome details of exactly how the deepstate got away with it, providing facts and figures, endlessly filling in the details that will
NEVER
EVER
BE
PRosecuted.
So in a way, these people are like a novel kind of gatekeeping that ties you up and wastes your effort. It's a lot like masturbating to porn, actually, but at least porn has a payoff, no matter how brief. Webb and Goodman leave you with justice blueballs
Right. It's one of those "low velocity" .30-06 rounds that comes out of a WWII era Mouser -- after they've been converted from 7.62 by a faggot and his boyfriend. Oh......then the bullet stopped after it hit his healthy spine -- just like it NEVER DOES when you blow a hole thru a horse sized elk. What bullshit.
Common Sense Minute
For the hole in Charlie's neck to be an entrance wound, the caliber of bullet would have to have been about that big - so huge it would have blown most of his head off, creating an enormous exit wound splattering the backdrop behind him.
For the hole to be an exit wound, the caliber of bullet must have been extremely small - and look how nearly perfectly circular and clean-edged that hole is, very strange for an exit wound—and no splatter, just a steady stream.
Two impossible scenarios.
I heard an explanation for this, that the bullet did not have time to expand, as it was a short distance from impact to exit, which is why it did not leave a large wound on exit. This was from a person on youtube who is a munitions and gun expert. He was convinced that the bullet came from behind, and that the shooter was above, hiding behind a bush.
This corroborates what “jimmy dore” has analyzed which shows the alleged assassin and his alleged “ camera gun” from Charlie’s 4 o’clock
Very interesting video. I saw another video online also that showed a similar catch of the projectile behind Charlie that correlates well with this, but it also showed a projectile from another camera coming down between Charlies legs towards the ground, rather than being caught in Charlies shirt. I give this video a high ranking towards the truth. He also explains the bang-crack from the supposed shooter on the roof.
Which video is that? I want to see what it caught.
I've heard different scenarios on where the bullet came from. The front, Charlie's right at his level, from below, from Charlie's right but above, and now from the back. I wonder how many clowns are trying to muddie the waters to keep the truth from being seen. And every single video is awful.
There were three thousand kids in the audience and they all had Iphones or the latest Google incarnation of a smart phone, yet there is only a few POOR vids of the moment Charlie got shot? Hmmm, I bet AI is doing something to the quality.
🙄
@jammyjams
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0nbwqtm/i-believe-this-is-the-most-compe/