I don't understand the hate for Candace, by anyone, and I see it a lot. Maybe she's an acquired taste? Or people just can't handle truth she reports on.
She is speaking facts that no one else is. The hate is a bunch of Mossad agents and bots and a few people who's opinions have been swayed from said Mossad agents and bots.
My wife has not listened to Candace. Yet she holds a negative opinion of her. All because some tv 'Christian' says she's bad. My wife is usually smarter than this.
Her faith was belittled at her last job. Infested with atheists. So, she has developed a sensitivity response.
Yeah.
She got her start as a 'model'. Make her bones with a anti-conservative doxxing site.
Then suddenly became pro-MAGA.
When Trump 'lost' in 2020 she turned on him when it was convenient. Then when it looked like he was coming back was back on the Trump train.
says a lot of good things - but also has sketchy connections - like her husband being involved in that obvious honeypot Parler.
I evaluate everybody on the merit of their present arguments. Candace has come a long way and she's been making headway like few others. She's figured out a lot of things since her days at Prager U and Daily Mail. She's got bigger kajones than just about everybody else out there in the public eye. And her rapid rise in subscibers proves it. She passed Tucker a few months back and she's picking up almost 200K new subs a week right now. That's phenomenal considering YouTube suppresses her channel.
She's still wrong about quite a few things, but my hope is she'll gradually wake up to these errors. If she does however, she'll lose subscribers as the truths she is still ignorant of, are not popular, as is the case with all truths in our present state of mass human ignorance.
I happen to agree with Candace's assessment and analysis of Trump. Most everybody here is hoping for some advanced "5D chess" explanations for many of his actions and positions, but that's some serious hopium as far as I'm concerned. Her conclusions are the obvious, "Occam's razor" explanation. It's simple, obvious and makes sense. The "5D chess" explanations don't make sense and have frankly lost their luster a long time ago in my estimation.
The only reason Trump called for a truce is because public opinion had slipped dangerous all-time-lows on the situation in Gaza and the US "unyielding support" of it no longer held water. Trump has lost a significant amount of support over these past two years because of it, and Candace is obvious on that bandwagon. The "stand down order" rhetoric was obvious days after all the details were revealed. Anybody with a whiff of common sense knew it was the only logical explanation.
I happen to agree with Candace (and many others) in their analysis of the past 9 months....which isn't popular with the majority on this board of course.
The most eye opening thing about this situation is that Candice has said she will stop asking questions and talking about what led to Charlie's assassination if Erika Kirk tells her to stop. But that hasn't happened.
Clearly, Erika thinks there is something more going on here than what we were led to believe.
Same. Something is off with her. I can't put my finger on it but for sure I get an odd feeling with her and it's not a positive feeling for some reason even though I wish it was.
Understood. I had seen numerous people say this stuff verbatim on a few of those short video platforms weeks ago. Even heard as such on a couple of podcasts. I guess it took Candace to organize the facts and present it to more people. It’s good that it’s happening. Might well be tough on her when it’s al out in the open though. I wish her luck.
It's possible, but also there's a possibility that they are making things blatantly obvious to the public right now to expose Israel. That kind of psyop always feels dangerously close to just allowing them to go ahead, but hopefully Israel will be fully exposed, and something will be done about them.
I'm thinking this looks really bad for Israel, but it also looks really bad for Charlie. Why do these political commentators get so much money? I've never trusted any of them. Whether it be Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, you name it, I don't trust them. They're paid to change people's minds.
It looks worse for federal investigators and the DOJ. Between this, the back off from the Epstein files, and comments about "hate speech" (Charlie would have hated that one), there's a lot of trust being lost right now and not just from leftys. There seem to be some serious gaps in the investigation and the text exchange that magically filled in all the gaps doesn't hold water.
They also "accidentally" destroyed a critical piece of physical evidence, the note he left behind. That's not a sign of good work being done.
Kash and Bongino being in the mix this time was something a lot of people were excited about. I rarely hear that opinion anymore. I have hope there's a larger plan.
Yeah most people on the street think Trump is compromised by Israel now. Between no Epstein files, the COL crisis and no mass deportations of illegals and H1-B’s young people are pissed
The H1-Bs in particular is something I hear about A LOT and is very personal to young people trying to build careers and raise families (me included). Well said.
Yup I honestly don’t give a shit about Comey or any of that. Cause I can’t AFFORD to care about it. Grocery and housing prices and Pajeet’s are a much more in my face problem.
Kinda like Congress, right? Only one (Thomas Massie) doesn't take AIPAC money.
Ted Cruz alone has reportedly been given $1.8 million by AIPAC.
Add that to the Big Pharma money, (hundreds of thousands - to millions$$ each), their free insider's stock tips, etc., and they are all now very rich with in their compromised states, it seems.
The data surrounding the Kirk Assassination (and the absurdity of the FBI narrative) strongly points to a State power being behind the murder.
Israel is absolutely a suspect. But we need to be careful and dispassionate.
And Candace has knocked it out of the park on her digging and analysis. As has John Cullen on X, though I don't get the impression the two like each other very much.
How so? This text exchange was just verified as real by Andrew Kolvet, one of the main guys at TPUSA who was on the text exchange. There's a clip of him verifying it today.
See:
Charlie Kirk's Text Messages CONFIRMED ACCURATE by TPUSA, Days Before Assassination | Redacted News
Whenever some politician or public figure says a pro-Israel stance represents most Americans, I always wonder who they're talking about. I feel like most people if they aren't against Israel, they are pretty much indifferent.
I don't understand the hate for Candace, by anyone, and I see it a lot. Maybe she's an acquired taste? Or people just can't handle truth she reports on.
Libs hate a black person off the plantation
Women hate a woman being anti-feminist
Conservatives hate a conservative calling out Israel
Amen! Darkness resisting the light.
She's not anti-feminist. Her life is feminism. She's anti-feminist movement. One is about personal rights; one is about political power consolidation.
Big difference.
People can't handle the truth
Just as they were appalled with Trump they are doing the same with her
She is speaking facts that no one else is. The hate is a bunch of Mossad agents and bots and a few people who's opinions have been swayed from said Mossad agents and bots.
And Evangelicals who can’t give up their dispensationalist heresy.
My wife has not listened to Candace. Yet she holds a negative opinion of her. All because some tv 'Christian' says she's bad. My wife is usually smarter than this.
Her faith was belittled at her last job. Infested with atheists. So, she has developed a sensitivity response.
Well, she's called out Trump on at least a dozen different occasions and is convinced he's controlled and handled and controlled by certain forces.
She makes a lot of good points, but that type of analysis won't fly on this board.
Yeah. She got her start as a 'model'. Make her bones with a anti-conservative doxxing site. Then suddenly became pro-MAGA. When Trump 'lost' in 2020 she turned on him when it was convenient. Then when it looked like he was coming back was back on the Trump train. says a lot of good things - but also has sketchy connections - like her husband being involved in that obvious honeypot Parler.
I evaluate everybody on the merit of their present arguments. Candace has come a long way and she's been making headway like few others. She's figured out a lot of things since her days at Prager U and Daily Mail. She's got bigger kajones than just about everybody else out there in the public eye. And her rapid rise in subscibers proves it. She passed Tucker a few months back and she's picking up almost 200K new subs a week right now. That's phenomenal considering YouTube suppresses her channel.
She's still wrong about quite a few things, but my hope is she'll gradually wake up to these errors. If she does however, she'll lose subscribers as the truths she is still ignorant of, are not popular, as is the case with all truths in our present state of mass human ignorance.
I happen to agree with Candace's assessment and analysis of Trump. Most everybody here is hoping for some advanced "5D chess" explanations for many of his actions and positions, but that's some serious hopium as far as I'm concerned. Her conclusions are the obvious, "Occam's razor" explanation. It's simple, obvious and makes sense. The "5D chess" explanations don't make sense and have frankly lost their luster a long time ago in my estimation.
The only reason Trump called for a truce is because public opinion had slipped dangerous all-time-lows on the situation in Gaza and the US "unyielding support" of it no longer held water. Trump has lost a significant amount of support over these past two years because of it, and Candace is obvious on that bandwagon. The "stand down order" rhetoric was obvious days after all the details were revealed. Anybody with a whiff of common sense knew it was the only logical explanation.
I happen to agree with Candace (and many others) in their analysis of the past 9 months....which isn't popular with the majority on this board of course.
Since she left the Daily Israel Wire she has been on a roll for sure.
Agreed!
Because she's a truth teller and she's scared of nothing.
I think her and Trump might be playing the save Israel for last roles.
Their job is to weaken support for Israel.
So the jews killed Charlie?
Given recent information coming out concerning JFK's demise, I can connect the dots ......
It's always them in some form or another
They were the primary reason behind JFK and 9/11 too. Sure there are co conspirators but they are always the main driver.
Of course Candace is right.
The most eye opening thing about this situation is that Candice has said she will stop asking questions and talking about what led to Charlie's assassination if Erika Kirk tells her to stop. But that hasn't happened.
Clearly, Erika thinks there is something more going on here than what we were led to believe.
I'm thinking Erika is worried that people might be skeptical of her if she tells Candace directly to stop talking about it.
Yeah I don’t trust Erika something is off with her. Just a vibe I get.
Same. Something is off with her. I can't put my finger on it but for sure I get an odd feeling with her and it's not a positive feeling for some reason even though I wish it was.
or maybe shes being shielded and is ignoring the noise at the moment?
Or her husband.
There were other sources that broke this stuff long before Candace. She’s just got a bigger platform than those other sources.
I had not seen any 'sources' before, however we all had our own thoughts on the matter. This confirms it.
Understood. I had seen numerous people say this stuff verbatim on a few of those short video platforms weeks ago. Even heard as such on a couple of podcasts. I guess it took Candace to organize the facts and present it to more people. It’s good that it’s happening. Might well be tough on her when it’s al out in the open though. I wish her luck.
What if Q was a psyop by the Israelis
It's possible, but also there's a possibility that they are making things blatantly obvious to the public right now to expose Israel. That kind of psyop always feels dangerously close to just allowing them to go ahead, but hopefully Israel will be fully exposed, and something will be done about them.
Sometimes I think this too but I remember warp speed shut down the FEMA camps.
consider how quickly this administration dropped the epstein files... afterall that was a zionist honeypot operation. somethings off, maybe
I'm thinking this looks really bad for Israel, but it also looks really bad for Charlie. Why do these political commentators get so much money? I've never trusted any of them. Whether it be Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, you name it, I don't trust them. They're paid to change people's minds.
It looks worse for federal investigators and the DOJ. Between this, the back off from the Epstein files, and comments about "hate speech" (Charlie would have hated that one), there's a lot of trust being lost right now and not just from leftys. There seem to be some serious gaps in the investigation and the text exchange that magically filled in all the gaps doesn't hold water.
They also "accidentally" destroyed a critical piece of physical evidence, the note he left behind. That's not a sign of good work being done.
Kash and Bongino being in the mix this time was something a lot of people were excited about. I rarely hear that opinion anymore. I have hope there's a larger plan.
Yeah most people on the street think Trump is compromised by Israel now. Between no Epstein files, the COL crisis and no mass deportations of illegals and H1-B’s young people are pissed
The H1-Bs in particular is something I hear about A LOT and is very personal to young people trying to build careers and raise families (me included). Well said.
Yup I honestly don’t give a shit about Comey or any of that. Cause I can’t AFFORD to care about it. Grocery and housing prices and Pajeet’s are a much more in my face problem.
Kinda like Congress, right? Only one (Thomas Massie) doesn't take AIPAC money.
Ted Cruz alone has reportedly been given $1.8 million by AIPAC.
Add that to the Big Pharma money, (hundreds of thousands - to millions$$ each), their free insider's stock tips, etc., and they are all now very rich with in their compromised states, it seems.
Video Link here: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HQWX6fWHfvM
Of a mixed mind here.
The data surrounding the Kirk Assassination (and the absurdity of the FBI narrative) strongly points to a State power being behind the murder.
Israel is absolutely a suspect. But we need to be careful and dispassionate.
And Candace has knocked it out of the park on her digging and analysis. As has John Cullen on X, though I don't get the impression the two like each other very much.
Everyone nose who it was... and it wasn't that fucking patsy, Tyler Robinson.
Question everything. That includes what she says along with POTUS. Trust is a fragile thing and must be distributed wisely.
This text exchange was just verified today as real by Andrew Kolvet, one of the main guys at TPUSA who was on the text exchange.
There's a clip of him saying so:
See: Charlie Kirk's Text Messages CONFIRMED ACCURATE by TPUSA, Days Before Assassination | Redacted News
(go to the 51:18 mark for the discussion)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELkCI0xadgk
I believe Candace has lost her mind. She is a great researcher, but she needs better judgment. I guess all that money has gone to her head.
How so? This text exchange was just verified as real by Andrew Kolvet, one of the main guys at TPUSA who was on the text exchange. There's a clip of him verifying it today.
See: Charlie Kirk's Text Messages CONFIRMED ACCURATE by TPUSA, Days Before Assassination | Redacted News
(go to the 51:18 mark for the discussion)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELkCI0xadgk
Why do you think so? Details and introspection are always welcome.
Oh, Man! And McCoy is billed as a Christian 'Pastor', isn't he? But, one of those who makes a lot of money doing so?
Evangelicals are completely captured by Israel.
Whenever some politician or public figure says a pro-Israel stance represents most Americans, I always wonder who they're talking about. I feel like most people if they aren't against Israel, they are pretty much indifferent.