Peer-reviewed study: 86% of PCR-Positive “COVID Cases” Were Not Real Infections
(www.thefocalpoints.com)
#SUDDENLY PCR FACTS
Comments (43)
sorted by:
The worst strain: Covid BS20.
COVD-B$20
The PCR test was never meant to be spun down 45 times. You can find covid in just about anything spun down that far. And, isn't it interesting in year one of the covid "outbreak' there were zero cases of flu A and fluB deaths reported. We typically have 250,000 to 350,000 deaths reported (from those two) every year in the United States. Hmmmm.
The creator of the test said as much, before his rapid death before COVD. It’s not a diagnostic test. Fauci has been using the test to create false positives for years.
House of Numbers is a great documentary to talk about the hiv false diagnostic epidemic.
Dr. Kary Mullis was the inventor, he had a real beef with Fauchi and mysteriously "died" of pneumonia a few months before the scamdemic was kicked off.
Than you, I'll look it up.
I was never 'diagnosed' with covid, because I refused to be tested.
Same here. People asked, why weren't you tested? Answer: I was never sick enough to see a doctor. Just the usual occasional cough, or headache, or muscle aches. But hey, I'm over 65 and sometimes I need to take some time off (from retirement) to just take care of me.
I expect this is why the PCR test inventor, Kary Mullis, coincidentally died at a rather young age right before the Covid breakout.
So weird. My sister works at a University. She said the kids figured out that an orange will pop a positive covid test. Kids that had positive tests were sent to a different dorm to live together in solitary confinement... but instead the kids wanted to be there because it was a big, open party. They didn't have to go to classes (even though they are in optional school, voluntarily, and their families or their future self is paying for it, they were happy to miss class).
Anyhow, the University eventually caught onto the fact that these kids weren't sick, they were just enjoying a nice party, and somehow figured out they were all testing oranges to get there. I'm sure the University punished them somehow.
Good story though! One I absolutely love.
Baffling.
Not to me. I knew from the start that the "test" was not designed as a test, because the creator said so. The "test" could be forced to show positive by any tester who chose to.
So did i.
We say baffling to mock them.
I have Asperger's, so unless there is a /sarc tag, I might not see the sarcasm. I'm better at it, now that I've lived a long time and my brain contains a crap-ton of information and experience.
Sounds about right.
One year I was visiting my in-laws. Whole house got sick. MIL got sick first. Then rest of us got sick too. Basically cold symptoms. MIL and FIL tested positive for COVID. If that was COVID, then it was bullshit.
And of those 14% that were "real"? 100% of those were pre-existing Corona strains as COVID was complete and utter bullshit, with genetic signatures identical to other CV's from the early 2000's.
The only thing "novel" about this was how many stupid mother fuckers fell for it after the initial 2-4 weeks, when it became painfully obvious that this was a massive medical rug pull on a global scale.
Corona dates back to 65/66.
Agreed. I'm just referencing when the nucleic acid was ID'ed and matches COVID 100% to the ACGT structure. Once I saw that? The fake tests? The pseudoscientific protocols? I knew in 2 weeks this was all BS.
The hospital murder protocols and vaccine PR push on a global scale cemented my opinion in carbonite.
It was also telling how they locked down both hemispheres for a seasonal virus.
The study: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full
BAFFLED.
The "tests" were never really tests, as confirmed by the guy who created the procedure. It was also said that the results could be forced to positive on any patient by any tester if they chose to.
Also, the CDC was moving deaths from the flu column to the covid column. This was proved by a paper on the Johns Hopkins website. They don't like it, but they still have the paper on their site.
They were moving deaths not only from the flu column, but from the car crash, fell off a roof, drowned, shot, dose ‘em with remdesiver and force high pressure air into their lungs till they drown, etc columns.
.
I screamed this on day one! ANY lab monkey could see how many cycles were running in pcr machines and should have asked WHY??? WHY running at 35-45 cycles when NO TEST IS VALID ABOVE 20-22????
more cycles amplifies EVERYTHING and renders the tests invalid
I sold PCR tests for years
"Asympomatic Spread" was likely made up bullshit.
Ya DON'T SAY
86% ? I’m surprised it’s that low, I thought it should be in the 90+
How could it be? They ran the rest at 40 cycles instead of 12. The manual itself says at 40 cycles you get 95 percent false positives. The test isnt made for this diagnostic so they made it appear as though it was by the high cycle/false positive deceltion.
Know a nurse who worked in the ER. They were told to keep testing until it came back positive.
35-40 cycles per test was SOP in 2020.......ALL results with that many cycles are positive. ALL OF THEM......
Surprised it's so low. I would have figured it was over 95%.
mfw
😂🤣😂
Unfortunately some were diagnosed with bad tests that should have been gotten rid of instead of used on unsuspecting people.
I find it interesting that the test was developed BEFORE C19 and even the woman that created said it did NOT test for C19. Yet, it was used throughout and many people died because of it.
Well she was a dude but ya. It existed prior to because it was used for other purposes and then they tried saying it was a diagnostic tool suddenly for the vid.