"Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.
Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims."
100% a honeypot for the MSM to report on previously debunked fake news. TMZ already fell for it and reported Trump was accused of rape, and posted an already debunked story (limo driver spilling the beans about a girl who was raped and then murdered). They just can't help themselve, they are retards after all.
Some stuff floating about on some of the documents being 'redacted' using adobe and that simply copy and pasting the redacted bit into a word program will let you read the redacted bit.....
Is it only me who finds the disclaimer about Trump here to be really bad taste? Is that just more 4d chess to cause lefties to go rabid again and fervently dig through all the files?
So at what point do the people submitting fraudulent claims for the purpose of playing the lawfare game get prosecuted for lying? Hold on, I know what to do.
This drop will ABSOLUTELY destroy the left. Trump wouldn't allow a disclaimer like that unless there was a slew of evidence against Obama and Clinton in there! They know every word in this release and exactly what it will do.
Watch the libtards dive in full gusto looking for something that implicates Trump...
Only to have EVERY oriface STUFFED with red pills without them even slightly aware it's happening... and all the while finding NOTHING that implicates Trump.
But if they are false statements, why are they apart of the release? Shouldn’t they be used to charge those who made such false claims? I mean really I feel this whole “release” stuff is just bait. I mean it’s gonna make the left foam at the mouth over this Christmas. And give “them” yelling points at gatherings. Because it doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. Flip the script, pretend this was Obama’s DOJ. And they said that. Forums would be livid! Oh well. Thankfully the people I’ll be around don’t care anymore about alot of this. Jesus will be the most thought of for my family. And the gift of a savior.
"Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.
Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims."
https://nitter.net/i/status/2003442658643988641
oh boy is the msm news going to be salivating all over the Trump stuff. Then maybe he can sued them into obliviation...is that a word? lol
"Sue them into oblivion"
Right, but "obliviation" sounds even better.
100% a honeypot for the MSM to report on previously debunked fake news. TMZ already fell for it and reported Trump was accused of rape, and posted an already debunked story (limo driver spilling the beans about a girl who was raped and then murdered). They just can't help themselve, they are retards after all.
Some stuff floating about on some of the documents being 'redacted' using adobe and that simply copy and pasting the redacted bit into a word program will let you read the redacted bit.....
Is it only me who finds the disclaimer about Trump here to be really bad taste? Is that just more 4d chess to cause lefties to go rabid again and fervently dig through all the files?
There you go. It took you until your second sentence, but you got it.
This is a master stroke.
Well pointed out and stated.
I found it helpful. But yes, it's not the kind of thing one likes to see in a world of fair and balanced journalism and data reporting.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf
So at what point do the people submitting fraudulent claims for the purpose of playing the lawfare game get prosecuted for lying? Hold on, I know what to do.
Two more weeks.
Holy shit, DOJ! What a move! To imply Trump falsehoods are in there...people are going to devour that shit ravenously, and then watch....
Fucking brilliant.
Watch what?
This drop will ABSOLUTELY destroy the left. Trump wouldn't allow a disclaimer like that unless there was a slew of evidence against Obama and Clinton in there! They know every word in this release and exactly what it will do.
Watch the libtards dive in full gusto looking for something that implicates Trump...
Only to have EVERY oriface STUFFED with red pills without them even slightly aware it's happening... and all the while finding NOTHING that implicates Trump.
Enjoy your
clams cocksuckershunting, tards...u/#5DChess
Re: clams...
Let's fucking go. 🔥
These documents also 'redacted' in a way that can just be copy/pasted into a text program and this removes the 'redaction'??
We've all made that mistake during the first days in redaction teams lol It's mortifying and you soon learn your lesson!! xD
I saw a couple posted on TS. I don’t believe these posts at all.
But if they are false statements, why are they apart of the release? Shouldn’t they be used to charge those who made such false claims? I mean really I feel this whole “release” stuff is just bait. I mean it’s gonna make the left foam at the mouth over this Christmas. And give “them” yelling points at gatherings. Because it doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. Flip the script, pretend this was Obama’s DOJ. And they said that. Forums would be livid! Oh well. Thankfully the people I’ll be around don’t care anymore about alot of this. Jesus will be the most thought of for my family. And the gift of a savior.
"Full transparency".
Now the lies are further on the record, in the place where the people (normies / softskulls) who refuse to believe wanted them.