You're not falling for the Candace Owens grift, right frog? RIGHT FROG??😅
(twitter.com)
— Fifth Gen Warfare —
Comments (55)
sorted by:
I've known about this bullshit all along. I'll break my arm patting myself on the back because the stories of how evil Charlie's wife is are fucking retarded stories for retards
I've sat this one out.
Both of you made the right choice. Instincts are often correct. But when in doubt wait it out.
👍 it takes to much time. We have many other issues....
U sir are smarter than most
That whole crew - Candace, Tuck Tuck, and old Nick. All grifters. Controlled opposition to split MAGA. Why do some not see that and continue to buy what they're selling? Complete distraction and BS. When I heard it I knew it was all crap. Tuned out.
The e-mail may be fake but various people like Dan Bongino , and others, calling her 'demonic' , is real. For questoning the obvious fake story of CK death. Over the top! People seem terrified about the info she's digging up.... including some on here.... hmmmm..
Regardless of what Candace or TPUSA says, I think Tyler Robertson is the patsy of a sinister plot to get rid of Charlie and steer TPUSA in a direction more favorable to Israel than what Charlie was considering. My opinion is that the Israelis are involved. I don't believe for a minute Charlie was shot with a 30-06.
Don't listen to the amateur ballisticians on social media. Bullets do unexpected things all the time, just ask anyone who was in combat or spends time on the shooting range.
I think your other points are valid. It is my suspicion that Candace is poisoning the well, making people think only a crazy person like her would consider Israel being involved. Classic cabal tactic.
I'm not listening to any of them and I agree 💯% that he was not shot with a 30-06 based on harvesting literally well over 100+ deer (200+ butchering experience) and primarily shooting them in the neck (why ruin a shoulder when there's three sets of vitals in the neck) with various high powered rifles.
He was not shot with a .30 cal rifle in the neck. That is as impossible as jet fuel melting steel beams. IDC what any pundit says for or against the matter, my IRL experience tells me that the official narrative is bullshit.
I cannot and will not speculate as to why the reason for the lies. Doesn't matter. Lies are lies period end of story. CK was not shot in the neck with a 30-06 is all I can definitively say.
How many hours have you spent on the range? How many calibers have you fired? Ever shot anything other than a paper target?
Experience tells me it is entirely possible for Charlie to have been shot by a .30
Kek... fren, Ive spent well over 1,000's of hrs in the field harvesting large and small game for over 50 yrs. I've skinned and butchered literal tonnages of meat. And that's not even counting something like range time! I've more familiarity and firearm experience than most I am confident in claiming.
You're replying to the wild man of Appalachia and Latgale fren. This machine provides venison for an entire clan annually for decades now. I stand by my assessments and claims.
Well then you couldn't possibly be wrong, is I guess what you're implying? And my own experience means nothing?
I think you are ignoring the testimony of others who are far more experienced with how bullets react on hitting a human body after glancing off a plate carrier. This is not central to the post though, so no point in arguing.
Far be it for me to question such an experienced huntsman, but you have no idea what round was loaded into that rifle. No pictures of the ammo cartridges have been released or published. Have you ever fired a 110 grain varmint round through a human neck? Everyone is comparing what happened to shooting bucks and the like, but that is baselessly assuming that the round was 150+ grain. Everyone just keeps making assumptions. Shooting a 180 grain round through a target dummy and saying, "See, the human neck can't stop a 30-06 round therefore it wasn't 30-06!" as the YouTubers are doing is deceptive. Varmint rounds are designed to fragment and are much less likely to fully penetrate a target, exactly like the bullet that was recovered from Charlie's neck. Prove to me that varmint rounds can not be stopped by a human neck (you can't), then I will believe you.
While technically correct, I'd say the burden of proof lay in the evidence being provided. Those type of frangible rounds are relatively hard to acquire due to low demand in larger caliber.
Personally, I dont use frangible rounds for small game. It's not practical IMO for hunting. Picking shot out of critters is tedious enough, I would imagine flechette style shrapnel to be even more so.
The only universal practical purpose for frangible rounds seems to be law enforcement and military application in high civilian density urban areas.
There is little evidence to work with, but I would say that the bullet that was recovered from Charlie's neck is evidence, and it does fit. Tyler Robinson's family exposed him to hunting from a young age, and probably engaged in varmint hunting. The Mauser Model 98 was a family heirloom passed down to him from his grandfather. The likelihood of him having access to this ammunition high. 110-grain varmint rounds are readily available and not difficult to acquire. These rounds are produced by major manufacturers such as Federal, Hornady, and Speer, and are sold under popular lines like Federal Varmint & Predator and Hornady V-Max. They are commonly stocked by online retailers, though availability can fluctuate based on demand. While not as ubiquitous as 5.56 NATO or .223 ammo, 110-grain varmint rounds are easily obtainable through both online and brick-and-mortar gun shops, particularly in regions with active hunting communities. While I wouldn't want to use such a round to hunt something like rabbits I see no issue with using it to hunt something like coyotes, which are common in Utah, which allows year-round hunting with no bag limit.
I'm tired of hearing about it, and have unfollowed all involved on X and TS. I couldn't give two shits less.
That is The Great Awakening.
So some random account posting a possibly false story invalidates anything Candace has dug up on Ms. Frantzve? Lol. LMAO even.
When a tiny account creates a fake image that is immediately pushed by a bunch of other tiny accounts in comments, it reeks of influence op.
When the position they are trying to reinforce is logically flawed and overtly anti-Trump, that should be a red flag to everyone.
What part of the investigation is "overtly anti-Trump"?
Trump has always worked closely with Charlie Kirk and TPUSA. He continues to work closely with Erika. Did you watch the SOTU?
I don't know how people who support Trump but also believe Candace can function, they must have so much cognitive dissonance.
So looking at EK's life, behavior, etc is inherently "anti-Trump" because the administration worked with TPUSA?
Please link ANYTHING at all that Candace has "uncovered" that implicates Erika Kirk or TPUSA in any way.
In order to outweigh all the datapoints indicating that Erika and TPUSA are on Trump's side you will need some serious evidence. Nothing I have seen from Candy even comes close.
Romanian orphanage, lying about her lineage, creeping on a 15 year old girl, lying about her dating history, her mother and her own vast connections to the MIC, Army Intel connections with Ft Huachuca-Michael Aquino-Paul E. Vallely(on the advisory board of TPUSA), the child molester pastors TPUSA keeps partnering with, etc etc etc.
None of that raises red flags for you?
Is that you Candace? Parroting her baseless accusations is not evidence. I'll give you another try. Provide a link to something evidentiary.
Also you implied earlier that Trump "worked" with TPUSA. That is false - he continues to work with the org with Erika at its helm.
Exactly how much cognitive dissonance is clouding your judgement?
It's just opportunism and retards sharing it. Same thing happens here with twatter salad decodes and other paytriot garbage.
IMO the whole Kirk thing is a scam, a sham, a diagram... for how to manipulate people into monetary clicks and traffic.
Dozens, lol. The number one podcast in the world had dozens of supporters fall for a psyop.
I am still team Candace. Not because I believe her narrative about TPUSA but because I am keeping an open mind about it. Most of the legitimate people on this forum wouldn’t have made it this far if they were intimidated by name calling and browbeating.
I passed on the OJ Simpson circus and all of the drama concerning it. I can’t think of any other “who done it?” media circus that I paid much attention to. I was pretty boring around the water cooler. This is my OJ. And Candace is pretty easy to listen to as I do yard work, driving down the road, etc.
Most of the other people whose names get thrown in with Candace, I am not a fan of.
He used "dozens" colloquially. I personally saw that AI fake in every Candace post I came across yesterday.
If you are keeping an open mind, shouldn't you hold off on picking a side?🤔
I am just a data collector. I pick sides when I am convinced by the data.
It is a curse that I was born with. Both sides of an argument that I am agnostic about perceive that I am on the opposing side of their argument.
I haven’t picked a side. The fact that you think I have proves my point. Didn’t you read my comment. I said that I don’t particularly agree with Candace. Listening to her as well as the MSM narrative is having an open mind.
Your words.
I am. I like her. And I will continue to listen to her until she doesn’t entertain me anymore.
You made the jump that because I listen to her that I am picking sides on the TPUSA.
"JUST IN: A 500-follower account posted an AI-generated fake email yesterday claiming TPUSA is running a smear campaign against Candace Owens.
Since then, dozens of her supporters have shared it as fact, alleging there’s a paid TPUSA operation targeting her.
There isn’t.
People are criticizing her for free because her claims are wrong and she repeatedly makes baseless accusations.
P.S. What happened to the “Egyptian planes,” Candace?
You promised an updated interactive timeline over two months ago!
Are we ever going to see it?
If you care about honesty or journalistic integrity, you should tell your audience that the foundation of your Egyptian plane theory was false.
You got the planes’ locations wrong two-thirds of the time on your spreadsheet, and you provided no evidence for Erika’s location.
That means the entire premise of your Egyptian Planes theory was close to 100% wrong.
It was a hoax.
Yet you spent months ranting about how TPUSA, the U.S. government, Israel, French Legionnaires, and Brigitte Macron were tied to Charlie's murder because of those Egyptian planes.
Why not update your audience with the truth?"
I think Candace had it in her mind that she was going to be named CEO. So she is a little but hurt and auditioning at the same time, which makes it a bit bizarre.
TPUSA is one of the biggest threats to the democrats. So it will come under attack from all directions and from people pretending to be who they are not.
Are you claiming it's random chance that all these big profile posters are all within a short time frame using very specific language that aligns with the fake A.I. talking points? Whether the memo was fake or not are you claiming these posts are in no way connected to a coordinated attack?
https://x.com/herbthefox420/status/2027037583260225768
All the replacement theology catholics are banning together, Tucker, Candace, Matt Walsh, Megan Kelly, Steve Bannon, Jack Posobiec and the latest Michael Knowles. Not one of them who supposedly, were Charlie' s "good" friends, has the courage to call out the evilness of Candace. The ONLY one, who isn't a Christian or a catholic, has "righteous" angry calling out Candace's evilness, Ben Shapiro. Weak Christian Brandon Tatum, still hasn't the courage to say her name, but has called her out for attacking Israel.
Personally I think Tucker does not belong on that list, but otherwise agree.
You're correct, but for some reason I felt compelled to include him.
Before I make a judgement on your discernment skills simply tell me:
Interesting how this thread devolves into he said she said.
The heavy handed censoring is also 'dasting. Looking at the mod logs, at least one of those comment removals and bans were excessive, perhaps even vindictive. 🤔
Most of the removed comments were different handshake shills all shrieking about the caliber of bullet that hit Charlie.
The others were low effort drive-by comments.
Believe what you will.
The more I hear the less I care. They are both owned by Mossad. it's two monkeys fighting at the zoo
No one is trying to shut up Candace. Pay attention and read, then you will see that people are pointing out the GAPING holes in her narrative, and her COMPLETE lack of evidence to back up what she says.
Pretty rich that you would call someone disingenuous.
Let me restate your position: it doesn't matter that Candace is wrong all the time and refuses to acknowledge it. And you don't care about the harm done to Charlie's family & TPUSA even if it turns out they are on team Trump.
That mentality makes you a liability at best.