After some time, I thought I might listen to Tucker's interview of Joe Kent. I had the interview tab open in my browser for about a week, but didn't bother to get around to watching it. (So many things to do, right?)
https://youtu.be/1cbw1utqzHg?si=5fI6ObMXBdaf01j_
This was after a little bird suggested to me that Kent might perhaps be actually working with Trump to disclose Israel influence. The same bird suggested that potentially Trump is actually working with Iran to destroy Cabal Israel control.
Scenarios I thought worth considering, so I decided to give the Kent Tucker interview a go.
But Gee. Just the opening monologue by Tucker makes it hard for me to listen more. By 11 minutes in, Tucker is making all sorts of assertions that the Iran thing is exactly the same as the US Deep State Cabal (Bush etc) Iraq fake war and then using those assertions as established premises.
jeepers, Tucker. What happened, bro?
He makes one salient question:
"Why did Donald Trump, after ten years of saying one thing, do, in the pivotal act of his presidency, do exactly the opposite?"
But, is Trump doing 'the opposite'? Tucker doesn't seem to even ask that question. Also, he just says the Iran situation is exactly the same as the Iraq thing.
"It's not the first time the US has entered into 'this kind of war', against the wishes of its own population, and in clear contravention of its own interests...."
Wow. here's Tucker, convinced of his own injected premises, instead of truly questioning them. E.g. Is this the same thing? Are the motives the same? Is this actually against the US interests? Or is it wider thinking? A strategic move that ultimately will serve America's future?
"It's not good for us. No one has made the case that its good for us...."
Jeepers Tucker. What happened?
one underlying tucker premise: "when brother and sister are fighting, the one in charge is Dad, who comes in and settles the conflict".... Talking about China coming in and settling the 'conflict'. Tucker doesn't even think that Daddy Trump might be doing this for a reason. Trump isn't the Dad, in Tucker's book. He's just a squabbling kid fighting with a sibling. The Iran regime is just as legitimate as Trump administration, tucker?
What happened bro.
There is one point where Tucker almost chokes. I'd say its a tell. There is a part of Tucker's unconscious (or conscious) mind that knows, he's telling assertions that are not being honestly question by him. https://youtu.be/1cbw1utqzHg?si=t394JLubJbf_ZrHj&t=642
I'll try to watch more, but my critical analysis thinking makes it tough, because there are so many embedded premises already.... Embedded premises smuggled in as if facts are like the really lame set of circumstances in a soap opera that draws in those that indulge in soap operas, but which, if thought about critically, make the whole soap opera script just .... too convoluted and unrealistic.
I'm curious about whether other frogs have listened to the actual interview (partly or in whole) and what take-aways they found.
Tucker aside, what do people make of Kent? Are disinfo opps being thrown at him? Is Kent part of the (rather obvious) psyop attacks on Tulsi Gabbard as Trump's DNI?
OK, So I listened to the whole interview, by and large. A few points.
Firstly, I found Kent to come across as an entirely reasonable and credible interviewee. He didn’t appear to make any radical or emotionally charged assertions, wild claims, or to be anything but quite professional in his responses. Except, perhaps, for the part where he states as fact that there were people who had knowledge of the Kirk murder beforehand, people who posted on the net, etc. He offered no basis or reference points for that very wide claim whatsoever.
Oh, I guess there was the assertion that Trump might be compromised because of concern that ‘the enemy’ (aka Israel) might be able to harm his family. That was dark, imo. I don’t believe Trump could be coerced into actions or decisions that ‘protected’ his family at the cost of hurting America or betraying his oath of office. Maybe some people do….?
Secondly, as Carlson is at pains to point out, Kent spent 24 hours with Carlson before doing the interview. Very plausibly natural, to discuss, get on the same page about things, to walk into the interview on the basis of a good rapport and connection, BUT also plenty of time to discuss how we’re going to present the case’ and how we’re going to shape the narrative. A possibility worth considering.
Thirdly, regardless of how Kent comes cross, Tucker Carlson pretty much gave me the creeps. So very slick, so smooth in embedding assertions, presumptions, and leading towards a shaped conclusion (aka the story he wants to sell).
Anyone who has had substantial training in hypnosis or Neurolinguistic programming can spot the techniques. Methods for embedding ideas under the radar, slipping in presuppositions that lead to a predetermined conclusion, etc.
The Takewaways
So, I’ve come away from the interview wondering what the heck Kent is actually about. If he’s a disingenuous intel asset deployed to spin a narrative, he seems pretty darn good at it, as I couldn’t really pick up any tells about such a possible motive from his body language, expressions, tone or sentence construction.
In any case, its clear that from the outset, Tucker is spruiking the narrative that the War in Iran is being driven by Israel, not by President Trump, that it is against America’s interests, that it’s a mistake (that could destroy America, apparently). And, he's very smooth, quite slick perhaps, very 'reasonable' and persuasive, too. A little too much, for my liking.
He also touts lots of reasons to doubt and question Trump’s administration. Some of those questions re: the overall administration I would agree with, but I cannot also help but wonder how grand an operation the Cabal might be affecting to take down President Trump and His Agenda.
So, the question remains: whose agenda is Tucker Carlson serving?
High effort fren.
I think this is a major battlefield for the info war right now.
It comes down to the relationships between the US, Israel and Iran, who is working with who, what are Trump's objectives and who is calling the shots.
Like you I'm listening to different analysis on this and I don't think it's as simple as Tucker wants to make it out to be.
I would like to point out that Iran has basically two parallel governments, the civilian one, led by Pezeshkian, which has been untouched by the US and which the US has actually protected from unauthorised Israeli strikes and the clergy government and the IRCG which the US and Israel have both targetted.
Exactly who has what weapons between the civillian and religious governments in Iran is unclear to me, but I would wager that Trump can and has made certain deals with the civilian government and has failed to with the religious government.
IMO the religious government is the cabal linkage in Iran and that connects to the UK, the CIA and most likely Mossad.
We've got to take this all into account when trying to see through the fog.
It's definitely not what we're being told it is.
That is my assessment as well fren... albeit somewhat redundant in your description.
I say that because we know if we rewind the clock back to the beginning of the 1900s, the "British" and city of London were the ones who carved up the middle east from the start, created Saudi Arabia and setup the borders of each country - dug in like ticks to get cheap oil and created Israel.
French intelligence to a lesser degree were also involved in that region and BOTH French and British intelligence maintained a presence there to this day...Brits/CoL/cabal recruited, groomed and financed the mooslim brotherhood way back then... and they're the ones who became the psycho religious government headed by cabal/CoL controlled the kakameme Ayatollah of gorgonzola.
CoL controls BOTH Iran AND Israel - as to always have an antjar they can shake up any time they need a boogeyman to spill out chaos in the region... which in predictable fashion causes boom/bust cycles of scarcity (oil), money and allows them to acquire even more money, land and control every time they shake things up. It's the same old story, same old song and dance, uh my fren.
Regarding Candy gurl and Tucks medicated pad, I believe that candy is a CoL asset along with her British Lord husband. Tuckulent is from what I gather a double agent working for CoL and American interests. He's a member of the Pilgrim Society and son of a US clown agent...
I know that's not "real scientific" but that's what I see at this moment when I clear the fog, and peel back the layers - in light of all the moves Trump has been making - essentially - in each case, Britain and CoL are in the cross hairs and losing ground in every case - Venezuela, Iran and soon.... Greenland as the Strait becomes less relevant and alternative routes are established in the Arctic etc.
Enjoy the show...
u/#vincewalk
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SkXJ1snRqFI
That's Tops!
Even better than Aerosmith
Maybe four times as good, even!
Lets take the first and most important point: "Iran posed no imminent threat to US"
Already this is a strawman. This implicitly creates an expectation that unless there is an "imminent" threat, action against Iran is not justified.
But even with this strawman argument, they pull further tricks to further railroad the thinking of their audience:
He framed the entire answer as if it rested solely on point 3 of Marco Rubio's briefing to Gang of Eight starting with "Israel was about to attack Iran".
Here is the full briefing where point 3 sits in context with the real issue of enormous conventional missile capability being used as a shield for their nuclear program.
Of course there were numerous other indications even for this "imminency" of the threat - including the threat of enriching their 400kgs of 60% Uranium in 2 weeks to build 11 nuclear weapons.
The real question Tucker would have focused, if he was an honest journalist, would have been to explore the entire visibility for the Director of NCTC to be able to assert that all the reasons for an attack against Iran, including publicly stated and otherwise, were false
Thats an impossibility for anyone except the President, considering NCTC is one organistion under ODNI which is one amongst 17 Intel agencies.
And even the dynamics of this first segment is striking. Tucker asks a question, Joe starts answering, and then Tucker takes over and starts laying it out.
This is the feeling I keep getting when I watch Joe - poor guy is letting people take advantage of his naiveness.
The manipulated him into saying things that can be used as explosive sound bites.
Oh and I get the feeling that Tucker wrote the entire resignation letter for Joe.
Here are just a few examples of how a real interview would have gone:
"Joe, in your resignation letter you said that there was no imminent threat from Iran. Is that the only reason a president is allowed to start an action against a country like Iran?"
"Joe, what would you say was your visibility into the entirety of the data that was presented to the President? How much of it would you say you were privvy to?"
"Joe, you yourself have stated so many times that its important to take action against Iran. What really changed?"
"Joe, lets say Israel was not going to attack Iran and somehow they managed to stand Israel down, does it mean we would never have had to strike Iran? What about all the missiles pre-targeted against US bases? They would have still been fired no matter who attacked Iran, right?"
Love it.
After my initial monologue review, I listened to the interview, sort of in the background, hoping to get an overall feel.
I love your analysis of what Tucker might have, would have, should have asked if his journalistic trade was the real focus here, rather than narrative deployment.
This, and many more.
if there is one takeaway I would encourage all frogs to consider, its that the stakes are actually massively high, and the psyop activity in the world has never been greater, or more sophisticated. Sure, we love pepe memes, but this psywar is very serious stuff.
The most important question, was easy to answer.
"Did Joe Kent make a compelling case that he indeed resigned as a protestation to Trump's action"
Answer is a overwhelming NO.
Which means, the reports that he was under investigation for leaking is probably real.
Which means, he was the insider source for Candy and Tucker.
Which means, Candy and Tucker are not playing any 5D chess here. Candy is making money and Tucker is setting himself for the coming (according to him) China-NWO
Which means, a faction of the Cabal (probably the one we are fighting right now), really believe the China reset will happen.
That clears so much of the battle fog.
The amount of dooming I’ve been getting on Iran from pro and formerly pro Trump republicans is off the charts.
Very few seem to like this move, which seems to say to me that a lot of people are still suckling “conservative” MSM teat.
It's going to be a hard comeback. So much war has been waged for the wrong reasons in recent decades, its hard to make the case that this war is different.
It's real chaos out there.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZ8Mt4ym/
I dunno why what you said made me think of this.
Iraq was no real threat to America.
Iran IS, and HAS BEEN, a real, on-going threat to the entire West, not only because it's a major (perhaps the largest) sponsor / source of terrorist activity in the world but because it is determined to become a NUCLEAR POWER.
Whether it was "this close!" to having a bomb or a bit farther away, letting the Muslim "kill or subvert all the infidels!" whack-job Iranian government GET ATOMIC WEAPONS was NEVER an acceptable idea. A government that murders 30,000 to 40,000 of "its own" people in a week because they were PROTESTING, and which has been sponsoring terrorism constantly for decades must never have nuclear weapons.
And since they WON'T STOP WORKING TO GET THEM, the West cannot let that government remain in power.
This seems completely obvious to me.
Was ANY other government willing and able to take on the Mullahs?
Of course not. It was Trump and America or nothing.
Tucker ignores (conveniently) the role the deep state CIA played in setting up the Islamic Republic of Iran and in supported and aiding terrorist activities in the Middle East and beyond.
Something like "President Trump is finally undoing something that subversive anti-American forces like a corrupt CIA etc have set up and maintained for decades".
Criticism is good, where warranted, but its really hard to find objective sources that do not have an axe or an agenda to grind.
Exactly. It's painful to consider the amount of evil that the Cabal / deep state / corrupt American government elements have inflicted on the world. They corrupted a government specifically founded to protect human rights and used its military and other resources to plunder, murder, and tyrannize people across the globe.
^ this
(natural, God-given rights)
maybe because he still works for them
Obvious to me too, fren. In fact, it's the only war we had in the last 1/2 century which makes any sense at all, imho
You're trained in hypnosis?
I’ve studied neurolinguistic programming and IMO he nailed it with Tucker.
I believe you. I just wanted to know if we have trained hypnotist anons.
I'd like to know that myself.
Yep. Ericksonian hypnosis, to be precise.
It interfaces well with NLP, as use of language is a central point.
https://britishhypnosisresearch.com/about-ericksonian-hypnotherapy/
Neat! A family member was a lab assistant to hypnotist scientists at Harvard in the 50's & 60's, and did some work on it herself for her masters degree. Probably used some Ericksonian techniques for expediency, but her study was definitely traditional. Occasionally used it to help people change habits like smoking or recover from surgery.
I admire you for getting thru the interview because I couldn’t. Thank you for giving us a rundown of it. Your take on Tucker is 100% correct IMO.
Tuckers role is to move the needle on the anti-Israeli narrative and keep it going among the unawake public. 'Saving Israel for last' means getting everyone to understand that Israel is not our ally. Tucker is doing that and doing it very well. The war in Iran is not for Israel. It's to kill the deep state there and to keep Israel from expanding. The real motives of the war have not been explained to the American people (but they have in Q posts), and the fact that too many people actually believe that we are only doing this "for" Israel, proves that.
I completely agree and have espoused as much on this board the past few months. IMHO, TC is being used as tool for reverse social engineering by the WH's.
Lately, I've found the pushback against TC here by some to be interesting at the very least.
The idea that Tucker (and in this case, Kent too) is being mobilized to 'move the needle on the anti-Israeli narrative' was the departure point for me listening to the interview.
I'm not convinced either way whether Carlson is being used by 'the White Hats' or by anti-WH forces, but his manipulative methods in the interview seem unmistakable to me.
My primary concern is that in focusing so intently on Israel here, he is actually doing damage to President Trump's foundation and optics. His conclusions (aka the narrative points he is selling) are that Trump is making a big mistake, one that actually threatens the existence of America, and that Trump is being driven by Israel, not the other way around.
One imagines that he could easily bring exposure to the Israel situation while reinforcing the correctness of what Trump is doing, or the strategic nature of the work. But, he isn't.
Why?
I mean, how difficult is it to make the argument that in taking down the Iran regime, Trump is forcing Israel into a position where their constant war-footing becomes redundant and unnecessary? That the Iran regime has been a real problem and the Israel regime has too? I mean, if we're dropping 'red pills' on the public.
I suspect that in a limited narrow focus, it's easy to consider that Carlson might be exposing the Israel aspect of things at an opportune and important time, but in an expanded perspective, one that includes support for Trump by the American public, the history of the Iranian/Middle east situation in terms of Globalist objectives, does that perspective hold out?
u/JackRyansDog/
Which is a narrative that Tucker is directly promoting, not debunking.
I believe this is part of the plan. The social engineering has gone on for so long and runs so deep in the normie's brains literally tens of millions of Christian's world view must be shattered regarding ISR.
Iran must've have been controlled or flipped for some time now if we are assuming the military theater habbenings and manipulating ISR on multiple levels and to suit alt and mainstream media control narratives.
Sure absolutely, why not? The truth will set the world free. I don't know what trick(s) POTUS will pull to flip public opinion the next few months, I can only speculate. All I know is he always comes out on the tippy top!
I've been thinking about our exchange here, and my initial readings of the Tucker / Kent interview.
I found your comments persuasive. I'm still on the shelf; won't come down until I find more conviction in my conclusions. But the chaotic nature of the situation + DJT always coming out tippy top have me thinking.
I look forward to further perspectives going forward. Just wanted to mention that.
~ Signed, open and undecided
Just out of curiosity, did either Tucker or Kent mention anything about Kent being a leaker?
Thanks, saved me the bother to listen
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Or the frog.
Tucker was cool for about 6 months after he got fired
Excellent high quality analysis. Exactly the reason I come here.
ty
Nice review, saved me a click and the time to watch it. Thanks.
I never liked Cucker Tarlson even when he was on tell-a-vision. Note that he got "fired" from FOX for being a "truth" teller when TV New's influence was waning and was no longer effective pushing the CIA/DS narrrative. So they had their assets jump to long-form podcast interviews. Tucker then magically founded a billion dollar media company a few months after getting fired with millions of viewers overnight. Also, he is a horrible actor with that fake over-the-top laugh at odd moments. Even Jimmy Dore makes fun of that. He also has that fake dopey look when he hears something "new" that he didn't know but anyone who does rudimentary research knows. "Whaat?!? I never heard that... the mob and Israel had ties to the Kennedy assasination? That is sooo weird"
All salient points.
I think its almost certain that, once the Cabal recognized that DJT and a bunch of frogs had essentially demolished the effectiveness of the Lame Stream propaganda, they moved into the 'alt-media sphere' where they have been setting up their new propaganda units and operations as the new 'mainstream'.
Fuentes, Owens, Tucker, and everyone who's podcasting now, Whatshername Kelly, plus thousands of clickbait 'truth teller' accounts everywhere (social media, including X), including swathes of Q accounts that do nothing to promote actual critical thinking, hard analysis or serious research, but which spread the latest OMG gotcha stuff and information slop.