This is what I see and the summary is that Trump is (finally) ending WWII. Also, he appears to be negotiating spheres of influence and a tri-polar world. This is the end of nations chronically arming to the teeth and preparing for war but cooperating when interests are aligned and coordinated through trade or strategic agreements. The outline is clear; Russia gets Europe, China gets East Asia and the US gets the Americas. I suspect that on Trump's recent trip to China (followed by a visit by Putin) he was negotiating a trade of Cuba for Taiwan and taking that off the table for a conflict and WW111.
Could be but I honestly don't know. I noticed that after Trump shutdown the USAID the ads on local radio changed, more local lumber yards, HVAC, plumbers, etc. and fewer ads from the "ad council" or NGOs and other slop.
In any case, I think SNL's days are numbered too just like the latenight "comedy" TV shows.
The real question is who has been funding Saturday Night Live +25 years after its sell-by date?
What Albert Einstein was to 20th-century physics, Alexander Grothendieck was to 20th-century mathematics.
So he was a fraud pushed by the establishment?
I couldn't watch the vid without creating an account so I passed. In any case, here was the teaser;
In this episode, I sit down with China analyst Gordon Chang to understand his view of the recent Trump–Xi talks in Beijing. Who had the upper hand? Why did President Donald Trump take 17 CEOs of America’s largest corporations with him? And what was accomplished? While Xi Jinping tries to present America as a declining power an...
Answering the questions...
Who had the upper hand?
I grow tired of the zero sum premise in politics (i.e. I win, you lose or v-v). Sometimes US/China interests are aligned sometimes not, it isn't (always) about domination, upperhands and browbeating, etc. That is from the Old World Order.
Why did President Donald Trump take 17 CEOs of America’s largest corporations with him?
Trump took them to China as cover for his real purpose. All the news is saying they didn't agree to much nor do anything substantial or not already in the cards. Musk posted a vid of himself sightseeing. The only important CEO was from NVidia because China needs their chips which was a subtle reminder that Trump knows this. How do I know this? Because they made a big production that NVidia CEO was "accidently" left of the passenger manifest and had to connect in Alaska.
And what was accomplished?
Not much except Trump, Putin and Xi are negotiating the future of a tri-polar world order. In my thinking Trump has neuteried the Brits and now negotiating with Russian and China to divy up the world.
Trump first meets with "King" Charles and gives him the bad news, the Monarchy ruling the world is over. Then in the past 2 weeks Trump meets with Xi then Xi meets with Putin the next day. My best guess at the plan is that Russia runs Europe, China runs East Asia and the US gets the Americas. The side bonus to avoid WWIII; Trump is agreeing to trade Taiwan for Cuba.
Sorry to see her go, she seems honest which is a rare quality in DC. Sorry to hear the news about her husband and good on her for putting family first.
I don't hate Massie or Greene or anyone else that opposes or disagrees with Trump on this or that issue or his decisions and occasionally votes with the Dems as long as they support America and the constitution and more specifically the Bill of Rights. We need reps (and citizens) who are honest, think for themselves, defend the constitution, act on principle and can articulate it. The last thing we need is a bunch of mindless MAGA or "America Firsters" who never question or oppose Trump or any leader for that matter. Trump himself has said he can't do this alone, it is up to good Americans to fight the good fight to save the country. He is just making it possible.
That said, Massie and others may not be fully aware of what is going on nor what is at stake so there is room here for an honest difference of opinion.They do have to act on what they know right now.The one thing I hate more than Dems is RINOs because they have sold out this country and gotten rich while pretending to oppose the Dems for over 50 years. The Dems are at least honest about their depravity and goals which will be their downfall.
I also agree with OP that, wittingly or unwittingly, Massie served a purpose in exposing AIPAC. That cat is now out of the bag. The last President that wanted to force AIPAC's predecessor to register with FARA got his head blown off in Dallas. This is one reason why I think everything is moving so slowly. Again, it reminds me of the "One does not simply walk into Mordor" meme which translated here is that "One does not simply take down the deepstate and a global criminal enterprise".
On a happier note: I remember the OP and his main reason for disconnectiong was he was soon to be a father. I sincerely hope for the best and that all is well for him and his family.
Wifi is a black art. If you aren't technical or computer savy I'd pay a friend to help you troubleshoot it. Your symptoms point to too much radio noise in your area and your routers can't compensate. It has probably been going downhill for years but you didn't notice. If you live in a large apartment complex there are probably +20 wifi SSIDs in the vicinity. If you live in a home then this usually isn't a problem but a neighbhor may have set up a new router on your same wifi channel causing issues which should be easy to fix.
I'd do this in this order;
-
unplug the extender. They are notorious for making matters worse. They increase radio noise and cause issues. Routers and computers talking is like talking in a noisy restaurant so as ambient noise goes up convos go down, i.e. connection speeds go down and you get dropouts.
-
Turn off your network and all devices including printers. Do a network scan on a laptop or phone app to see how many SSIDs are nearby and what their power level is (i.e. how close) and what band 2.4 or 5.0 GHz and channel they are using. Change the settings in your devices to use different band or channel to the closest, strongest foreign SSIDs.
-
If your routers are old then replace. Newer routers have better tech to handle radio interfence but you still may have to do step 2).
Tips and caveats:
Many ISP routers are mostly locked down these days and have no user configurable settings for wifi other than SSID and password. The wifi in my ISP router is off and I have my own Netgear wireless access point that has three external antennas for better coverage and is fully configurable.
ISP routers are supposed to have algos to change the wifi settings on the fly to find the best band/channels/speeds (so called "smart wifi") but they often get it wrong. A power cycle reboot doesn't clear the memory so if your router is newer but been running for a few years do a hard reset and reprogram it.
If your ISP router is really old (>5yrs) then call and get it replaced to a new model. This alone might solve the issue.
Main router and any access point location is key and the "black art" element of your problem. Moving them 3ft to the left/right or up/down can fix issues, nobody knows why. Also, don't place them on or near metal like a fridge or metal filing cabinet.
Step #2 above is a bit tricky even if you have a configurable wifi router. Do a search as there are tutorials on how to solve radio interference and setting band/channels and other setting to minimize interference but it gets complicated.
I agree. This seems like a type of parallel construction. The SF has the fraud but doesn't want to reveal its "sources and methods" as the criminal enterprise is still being tracked.
I have no idea what Trump's plan is other than in broad strokes like ending the FED, balanced budget and living within our means, etc. (If he still or ever believed that). Trump gets smeared in the MSM for having five bankrupcies or whatever but to me that experience is an asset. He knows the country is bankrupt but has the experience and plan to get the US through it in one piece.
The situation reminds me of the wise saying that if you borrow a million dollars from the bank and you can't pay then YOU have a problem. If you borrow $100 million dollars from the bank and can't pay then WE have a problem, i.e. with a big enough debt the bank's future is also on the line. I think this is part of the strategy behind increasing the military spending to $1.5T before the credit line is cutoff. We've all probably heard of people who, when facing bankrupcy, run up their debt and credit cards before the inevitable.
Another angle is that there is no way to discharge $39T in explicit debt plus $160T in implicit debt obligations without some pain. If you run the numbers there is no possible way this can ever be paid off even with the most optimistic assumptions. The only path forward in clearing a bankrupcy is a mix of debt defaults, assets sales, growth and new income, i.e. fighting over who takes the loss + production. Note that more debt is not part of the solution. Moreover, this is the the last boomer presidency and once the younger gens take power they aren't going to be saddled with these debts. It would immediately lead to a revolt and probably a revolution that could destroy the country which I assume Trump is trying to avoid.
I'm with JFK. I think there are secret societies battling for control and that they ARE aligned by national, ethnic, religous or financial interests. When they all agree the president gets assassinated.
I disagree. The fundamental premise of all these -isms is that man is just an animal like all the rest. From that premise it follows that killing, eating, using or enslaving other men is okay as long as the victims are from other tribes, i.e. brute tribalism. There is no morality in the animal kingdom. Is it wrong for the tiger to eat the antelope? The concept does not apply which explains a lot of commie, marxist and socialist behavior and beliefs.
What distinguishes man from other animals is the capacity to reason and consistency implies that All Men (not just you) have the Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
You can't map what you can't define. What is the definition of consciousness?
Godel’s incompleteness theorems and Douglas Hofstadter's book Godel, Escher, Bach get hung up (or lost in space in the case of Hofstadter) on self-reference. Granted, Godel uses his overly complicated mathematical "system" as cover to bury self-reference so it isn't as obvious as 2x2=5 but nevertheless it is wrong.
To wit from the article;
Godel’s extra insight was that he could substitute a formula’s own Gödel number in the formula itself, leading to no end of trouble.
This isn't insight or genius it is proof that he made a mistake. Self-reference leads to "infinity" and "no end of trouble" if improperly defined. If you've read the history of mathematics you'll find that many of them (including Godel and Cantor) went insane thinking about infinity but that is what you get when you use an ungrounded base-case for self-reference. Intentional or not, these incompleteness theorems have led to uncertainty and doubt regarding reason.
BTW, we all safely use self-reference virtually every single day when we say "I" but what do you mean by that?
I don't trust him and his magic financial success then rise in politics. (Rumble Link)
I like Dalrymple and here is one of my favorite quotes;
In my studies of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is ...in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A variety of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.
His comments against witchcraft mania, etc. is the same. He makes some good observation but fails to draw out the implications. As his witchcraft example shows, evil is the master at psychological manipulation (MKUltra anyone?) to whip people into a frenzy and achieve their evil ends. But what about the good guys? What do we need to do to protect ourselves and our children from such tricks? To me that is the key question.
He only hints at the answer when he writes "To assent to obvious lies is ...in some small way to become evil oneself." So the question really boils down to if good people can be 100% honest or not. There is an old expression in the con artist world that you can't con an honest man. It is really that simple but everyone seems to like cutting a few corners and "become [a little] evil oneself".
That was probably just a coincidence or "lucky" guess ;-)
yeah, that was the way I was leaning. The whole obviously fake 5 bidens and the whitehouse movie set were the tell for me.
So this can be interpreted in two ways. The most common is that he's going to somehow circumvent the rules and win in 2028. The other angle is that he won in 16, 20 and 24 and secretly ran Biden's presidency due to China interference in the election and stayed on as commander in chief of the military.
The left's interpretation is that his claim is proof of senility and that he should be 25th'd ASAP.
Totally agree. You can't just rug-pull retirees who planned their whole life and retirement around having social security. On the other hand, you can't just saddle the current generations with 100% of these obligations which would be unfair and they probably won't stand for it anyway and would rebel.
I believe that personal charity is something that was wrecked by the welfare state. Suddenly taking care of others in your community and the less fortunate was considered the govt's responsibility. To close social security it is going to take hard choices and some combination of means testing, reducing benefits to the bare minimum and private charity.
The comment doesn't specify -- the end of what? In general and long term, if patriots succeed then presumably the "end" means that the US reestablishes and follows the constitution as the law of the land. To me this means ending the Europeon/German imported "administrative state" and welfare plus return to separation of powers and the bill of rights which has been neutered over the past 100+ years.
For example, just returning war powers to congress would end the endless wars. I don't want to go through all this difficult change, conflict and deconstruction (i.e. a revolution) only to be reorganized under different assholes controlling my life. Unfortunately, for many people their livelihoods are tied to the administrative state or the military industrial complex or welfare or whatever and the changes to these institutions and the transition will be painful for many so they won't be happy about that.
SC Justice Clarence Thomas recently made comments that the constitution is incompatible with "progressivism" to which I agree. So in this sense all the leftists, commies, fascists and "democratic" socialists won't be happy with that. In the end they all have to go away because the US constitution is based on individualism not collectivism. On the other hand there are collectivist variants of America First or even MAGA so they won't be happpy either.
Just saying you are sorry isn't enough. People died or had their lives ruined because of his and other's incompetence and compliance. He went along with the charade to keep his career and salary. I have no sympathy for this "doctor" and if it was up to me he'd be former doctor. If he was sincerely sorry he'd spend the rest of his life fixing the medical system so this could never happen again.
During covid I very quickly decided that taking the vax was a really dumb idea. It was so obvious to me that I thought that the saner heads would soon prevail and we would have gotten these mea culpa's years ago. That still has not happened and Big Farma and their sales reps (i.e. fake doctors) are still pushing MRNA vaxes. Incredible.
I'm taking the positive spin on this. The more the Dems succeed at this (dishonest) strategy the starker the contrast between a MAGA/AmericaFirst Republicans versus a RINO and a Dem. This will make it easier to finally run the RINOs out of the party. Also, this Dem strategy is a tacit admission that their party is irrelevant and doomed.
Nice review, saved me a click and the time to watch it. Thanks.
I never liked Cucker Tarlson even when he was on tell-a-vision. Note that he got "fired" from FOX for being a "truth" teller when TV New's influence was waning and was no longer effective pushing the CIA/DS narrrative. So they had their assets jump to long-form podcast interviews. Tucker then magically founded a billion dollar media company a few months after getting fired with millions of viewers overnight. Also, he is a horrible actor with that fake over-the-top laugh at odd moments. Even Jimmy Dore makes fun of that. He also has that fake dopey look when he hears something "new" that he didn't know but anyone who does rudimentary research knows. "Whaat?!? I never heard that... the mob and Israel had ties to the Kennedy assasination? That is sooo weird"
Yourube.com and social media is now crawling with "ex" CIA or the CIA adjacent doing the podcast circuit and supposedly whistleblowing or "spilling the beans" on the CIA. It is all fake and psyoppy. At one point I thought that the CIA could be reformed but I think it needs to be destroyed. Here's why.
Recently "former" CIA agent (no such thing) John Kiriakou has been pushed on social media and making the rounds to tell his heroic story about how he snitched on the CIA and was sent to prison and his life was destroyed. He claims that he was "taken down" by the CIA but still alive despite whistleblowing and somehow has the financial means to own a home and fly around the country telling his "story".
I saw Kiriakou on the Danny Jones backwater podcast a few months ago before he blew up on the NPC podcasts. DJ is probably a CIA front to test spin and tweak psyops before going "live" with mass distribution. In any case, what was interesting was his so-called "origin story". He was recruited to the CIA by his psychology professor in college. Kiriakou revealed that the CIA entrance exam/test is really a test for sociopath or psychopathic tendencies (ability to lie) which was designed by his Prof. His Prof highly recommended him to the CIA. Kiriakou, on the DJ podcast, proudly claimed that he passed with flying colors. So in my view, an agency that is filtering for sociopaths or psychopaths cannot be reformed. It has to be completely gutted.
NB regarding ex-CIA: Most people don't know but everything a "former" CIA agent publishes or reports publically has to be reviewed by the agency before release. Also, for retired agents, they must know that if they ever step out of line and go off the reservation their retirement benefits from the agency are at risk. So take everything they say with a huge grain of salt.