I am curious about what the frog collective thinks about the concept of 'central casting'.
Some of the time, I think that DJT uses the expression to mean something other than what a lot of anons here consider it to mean.
Some people: 'central casting' means fake persons, actors, someone cast to create the image of something when its not actually real. E.g. 'crisis actors', or simple role play.
I am wondering if DJT uses 'central casting' simply to mean 'typical character', 'typical person'. I.e.someone chosen who actually fits a 'cast type', archetype or stereotype.
He's talking about the appearances, rather than literally saying "oh, this person is nothing more than an actor".
Alternatively, he's dropping a hint that the entire operation (i.e. the downing of the pilot, the rescue, etc') is a form of psyop done for narrative purposes, and never actually happened.
While the latter might be true, I think its impossible to prove or verify using real world facts. As such, I don't see any real or practical value in adopting that view. Unless it motivates you to get out there and focus on the reality you can see and create with your own eyes, ears and hands.
Edit: Q never once mentioned 'central casting' in any Q drop, so 'central casting' theories are definitely 'anon', not 'Q'.
Q uses the word actor to mean a person performing a role, presumably on demand according to a script.
If they perform their role well, POTUS might give them a shout-out.
I believe this would apply both to an actor who impersonates a politician (for example, there were a few Pelosi clips that looked like Michael Jackson was playing Pelosi) or a random person playing Fetterman, and also to an existing politician or TV newscaster who is complying with WH instructions and doing a great job.
Wait.... So you literally believe that when Trump is doing a press conference, or when you see a propaganda report on TV (or the web) that it is actually, a literal movie? As in, a super-long, multi-year length piece of film strip that is simply being projected on any screen or information source you access? I mean, literally?
That logic would destroy anything Q said
That's kinda dumb. No it would not.
relating to Movie or Actors and brand it all analogy
Er, yeah, its an anology. Unless you think every single person you ever thought connected to the work of the [Plan] is being paid a salary to be an actor in a film...
So, is Trump a paid actor?
The analogy that Q employs works. Q is stating, BY ANALOGY, that a lot of what we see is in fact 'acted out' (aka its performative), some of it scripted, some of it dependent on "Moves and countermoves".
I mean, your assertion that its NOT an analogy means it's all literally a film, when Q themselves said referred to the frame as an analogy.
You seem to think that 'analogy' means it's not: effective? insightful? Informational?
The "anything Q said" line is kinda weird, too. That sort of blanket reasoning seems really unproductive/ineffective to me.
Take the current Iran operation, for example. Literally a movie? Or a movie by analogy? Potentially, the information we're given is pure narrative, the film clips produced to look like X, when they are in fact Y, the story lines essentially scripted, etc, but this doesn't mean its literally "a movie". It means the analogy of a movie is a highly informative description highlighting certain aspects and features of what we are 'seeing'.
There should be a FEATURE on this Board for QUESTIONS ANSWERED......this is one of them.
Let Q define what is what, and look he did. META DATA is your friend....search qalerts.pub with the word ACTOR and you will soon see a PICTURE from the words....this is how it works to DEFINE a word....such a simple IDEAD most people never really look at....ALL THE WORDS
Wow, 88 posts containing actor. (some are benefactor, as an example, but most are actor.)
I was going to post some of these, but there are so many. Since we are talking about central casting I think words like actor are in play.
On a side note, I think I have only heard President Trump use the term "right out of central casting" as a compliment to those he is referencing. He often uses it with Generals, as an example. I do not believe he referred to Joe as "right out of central casting" although he could have, because Joe was definitely an actor in my mind.
I'm curious to know as well Fractal. We can't use the Drops as a reference because there are no Drops with Central Casting.
I am wondering if DJT uses 'central casting' simply to mean 'typical character', 'typical person'. I.e.someone chosen who actually fits a 'cast type', archetype or stereotype.
I believe this is PDJT's meaning in the majority of his statements. For example, he's said multiple times referring to Pilots, Naval Aviators etc.:
He's handsome, like Tom Cruise, only better looking, Central Casting.
I believe POTUS uses other statements for Actor Comms, such as recently he said something like, "It's the ears. You can always tell by looking at the ears" (to the best of my memory)
But "actor" is in there 58 times. Most of those refer to a person who commits an act, but maybe 5-10 are referring to performers of one type or another, as in Q461 "what makes a movie great?"
Yes, I thought about it and did a cross-check. I think its always relevant to distinguish between 'Q' and 'anons', and 'central casting' theories fall in the realm of anon. Doesn't mean they aren't necessarily accurate or relevant, but the distinction is real, nonetheless.
How can we be sure some of our jets were shot down? It could have been a fake story to ramp up the next bombing run.
Trump can announce all the targets have been destroyed, the bombing is complete and he is willing to talk about a peace deal. This gives the Iranian military a false sense of security, they rejoin forces or start relocating military equipment. Meanwhile the satellite eye in the sky is watching. New targets are located.
Now run a story about some F-15's getting shot down. Create a story people can relate, stir the emotions, something that would justify another bombing mission. The fog of war.
Trump is screaming open the Straits of Hormuz; in reality he does not want the Straits open yet. Trump announces another bombing run if the Straits are not open by Tuesday. Does the IRGC react, move antiaircraft equipment into position? He is testing them. How much resistance still remains? How coordinated are they? Where are the military commanders relocating to? New targets acquired or is there nothing to see? He will know by Tuesday if another bombing raid is needed.
Also keep in mind the European Union has been largely cut off from all energy imports. They receive much of their oil and LNG through the Straits of Hormuz and Russia said they were contemplating closing down the pipelines.
I think Trump is putting maximum leverage on the EU in hopes that the European Union dissolves itself. The globalists NWO plans completely dissolve. When the people there get angry enough and start demanding their sovereignty back, cutting deals with Russia for energy imports, one by one each country, like dominoes leaves the EU and the centralized control system dies. Along with the UN, NATO, IMF, IMF, World bank, etc. Maximum pain.
Is Trump really planning another bombing run? Is Iran really closing the Straits with threats of terrorism? Is this just a ploy to keep the Straits closed for an indefinite period of time? I'm sure Trump knew where the choke point was. Devised a plan to shut down energy to the entire region. This choke point can be used to bring the EU to its knees.
If Trump invades Greenland, weakening the EU plays to his advantage. How many steps forward can we look where intentionally keeping the Straits closed becomes a strategic advantage?
I am curious about what the frog collective thinks about the concept of 'central casting'.
Some of the time, I think that DJT uses the expression to mean something other than what a lot of anons here consider it to mean.
Some people: 'central casting' means fake persons, actors, someone cast to create the image of something when its not actually real. E.g. 'crisis actors', or simple role play.
I am wondering if DJT uses 'central casting' simply to mean 'typical character', 'typical person'. I.e.someone chosen who actually fits a 'cast type', archetype or stereotype.
He's talking about the appearances, rather than literally saying "oh, this person is nothing more than an actor".
Alternatively, he's dropping a hint that the entire operation (i.e. the downing of the pilot, the rescue, etc') is a form of psyop done for narrative purposes, and never actually happened.
While the latter might be true, I think its impossible to prove or verify using real world facts. As such, I don't see any real or practical value in adopting that view. Unless it motivates you to get out there and focus on the reality you can see and create with your own eyes, ears and hands.
Edit: Q never once mentioned 'central casting' in any Q drop, so 'central casting' theories are definitely 'anon', not 'Q'.
Think about u/#q2956
Q uses the word actor to mean a person performing a role, presumably on demand according to a script.
If they perform their role well, POTUS might give them a shout-out.
I believe this would apply both to an actor who impersonates a politician (for example, there were a few Pelosi clips that looked like Michael Jackson was playing Pelosi) or a random person playing Fetterman, and also to an existing politician or TV newscaster who is complying with WH instructions and doing a great job.
Note how Q writes: "By our analogy...."
Which is direct evidence that its an analogy, not literal. I think too many folks take it literally, when its actually an analogy.
That logic would destroy anything Q said relating to Movie or Actors and brand it all analogy, and I just cant & wont buy that shit for even a sec lol
Check this out, posted under OP's post: https://x.com/harrysoulcoach/status/2041219711975956582
Wait.... So you literally believe that when Trump is doing a press conference, or when you see a propaganda report on TV (or the web) that it is actually, a literal movie? As in, a super-long, multi-year length piece of film strip that is simply being projected on any screen or information source you access? I mean, literally?
That's kinda dumb. No it would not.
Er, yeah, its an anology. Unless you think every single person you ever thought connected to the work of the [Plan] is being paid a salary to be an actor in a film...
So, is Trump a paid actor?
The analogy that Q employs works. Q is stating, BY ANALOGY, that a lot of what we see is in fact 'acted out' (aka its performative), some of it scripted, some of it dependent on "Moves and countermoves".
I mean, your assertion that its NOT an analogy means it's all literally a film, when Q themselves said referred to the frame as an analogy.
You seem to think that 'analogy' means it's not: effective? insightful? Informational?
The "anything Q said" line is kinda weird, too. That sort of blanket reasoning seems really unproductive/ineffective to me.
Take the current Iran operation, for example. Literally a movie? Or a movie by analogy? Potentially, the information we're given is pure narrative, the film clips produced to look like X, when they are in fact Y, the story lines essentially scripted, etc, but this doesn't mean its literally "a movie". It means the analogy of a movie is a highly informative description highlighting certain aspects and features of what we are 'seeing'.
There should be a FEATURE on this Board for QUESTIONS ANSWERED......this is one of them.
Let Q define what is what, and look he did. META DATA is your friend....search qalerts.pub with the word ACTOR and you will soon see a PICTURE from the words....this is how it works to DEFINE a word....such a simple IDEAD most people never really look at....ALL THE WORDS
Wow, 88 posts containing actor. (some are benefactor, as an example, but most are actor.)
I was going to post some of these, but there are so many. Since we are talking about central casting I think words like actor are in play.
On a side note, I think I have only heard President Trump use the term "right out of central casting" as a compliment to those he is referencing. He often uses it with Generals, as an example. I do not believe he referred to Joe as "right out of central casting" although he could have, because Joe was definitely an actor in my mind.
u/#wildwest u/#pony
Correct MAGA..
Excellent MrA! 👏
I'm curious to know as well Fractal. We can't use the Drops as a reference because there are no Drops with Central Casting.
I am wondering if DJT uses 'central casting' simply to mean 'typical character', 'typical person'. I.e.someone chosen who actually fits a 'cast type', archetype or stereotype.
I believe this is PDJT's meaning in the majority of his statements. For example, he's said multiple times referring to Pilots, Naval Aviators etc.:
He's handsome, like Tom Cruise, only better looking, Central Casting.
I believe POTUS uses other statements for Actor Comms, such as recently he said something like, "It's the ears. You can always tell by looking at the ears" (to the best of my memory)
But "actor" is in there 58 times. Most of those refer to a person who commits an act, but maybe 5-10 are referring to performers of one type or another, as in Q461 "what makes a movie great?"
Correct MrA! 👏
Well... and there are "actors" that were "put in place" too. Like Zelensky and the Iranian regime.
I can see that there are "actors" on both sides of things.
Yes...I can as well..
Yes, I thought about it and did a cross-check. I think its always relevant to distinguish between 'Q' and 'anons', and 'central casting' theories fall in the realm of anon. Doesn't mean they aren't necessarily accurate or relevant, but the distinction is real, nonetheless.
How can we be sure some of our jets were shot down? It could have been a fake story to ramp up the next bombing run.
Trump can announce all the targets have been destroyed, the bombing is complete and he is willing to talk about a peace deal. This gives the Iranian military a false sense of security, they rejoin forces or start relocating military equipment. Meanwhile the satellite eye in the sky is watching. New targets are located.
Now run a story about some F-15's getting shot down. Create a story people can relate, stir the emotions, something that would justify another bombing mission. The fog of war.
Trump is screaming open the Straits of Hormuz; in reality he does not want the Straits open yet. Trump announces another bombing run if the Straits are not open by Tuesday. Does the IRGC react, move antiaircraft equipment into position? He is testing them. How much resistance still remains? How coordinated are they? Where are the military commanders relocating to? New targets acquired or is there nothing to see? He will know by Tuesday if another bombing raid is needed.
Also keep in mind the European Union has been largely cut off from all energy imports. They receive much of their oil and LNG through the Straits of Hormuz and Russia said they were contemplating closing down the pipelines.
I think Trump is putting maximum leverage on the EU in hopes that the European Union dissolves itself. The globalists NWO plans completely dissolve. When the people there get angry enough and start demanding their sovereignty back, cutting deals with Russia for energy imports, one by one each country, like dominoes leaves the EU and the centralized control system dies. Along with the UN, NATO, IMF, IMF, World bank, etc. Maximum pain.
Is Trump really planning another bombing run? Is Iran really closing the Straits with threats of terrorism? Is this just a ploy to keep the Straits closed for an indefinite period of time? I'm sure Trump knew where the choke point was. Devised a plan to shut down energy to the entire region. This choke point can be used to bring the EU to its knees.
If Trump invades Greenland, weakening the EU plays to his advantage. How many steps forward can we look where intentionally keeping the Straits closed becomes a strategic advantage?
Ireland have started blockading their vital roads in protest against the rising prices of fuel.
I'm open to the idea that everything we see and hear coming out of Iran (I mean to do with Iran) is narrative and not actual or real.
Dasting thoughts j!
CIA = Central Intelligence Agency
Central Casting
BQQM! 👏🫡
idk but when Trump was saying it yesterday it had a weird energy behind it I'm not sure how to feel about it yet