I've puzzled over that drop for a while. Many have speculated that some won't make it to the end, or that they won't benefit from the end of the DS. But after being around liberals for a long time, and some crazy ones at that, I wonder if maybe it's a simple statement that some people are going to be really angry to see some people thrive after the DS is removed.
I recall one particular person who didn't think it was fair that anyone should have more than her, or be better off than her, even if they worked hard for it, and she wasn't afraid to say it out loud. She was convinced communism would be much better for the country. And some of the comments I've heard from other more reasonable liberals over the years sound remarkably similar in retrospect when you see the pattern of comments.
I'm interested what anyone else thinks about The End Won't be for Everyone
I’ve taken always taken it either to mean. There’s going to just be stuff revealed that some people won’t be able to process. Because it’s just that far outside their mental model and preferred way of viewing the world.
People are deathly attached to religion and their preferred political ideology. So evidence say there’s been stuff omitted from the Bible. Is likely going to hit some Christian denominations particularly hard. Or that (Insert preferred fringe political ideology of choice) was largely engineered and controlled from the start.
It could also just be a reference to the amount of collateral damage. There’s a lot of folks dead in the crossfire. They didn’t make it till the end.
Two days after 9/11 happened I returned to work. A woman there told me she had had a vivid prophetic dream where 9/11 led to a long war. She said the war finally ended and everyone celebrated by dancing around the body of a dead goat. But those who were still alive to celebrate were keenly aware that many good people had died before victory. She was quite convinced her dream would come true but it would be many years before the climactic victory would come.
Dead goat = Baphomet.
Could be. It's funny how some people who claim the moral high ground also object to anything that negatively impacts human trafficking and/or abortion.
Yes. Religion.
Not faith, but religion.
It will hurt people clinging to it, if they aren't able to mature their perspective.
Ascension and rigid beliefs are not compatible in many cases.
All liberals have 1 absolute thing in common: hatred for the success of others.
100%. I've been saying for years that the core underlying trait that liberals hold is resentment.
Read the tenth commandment. To covet, envy creates hatred for others for things they don’t have that others do. Liberals want your money, wealth, status without having to work for it. Pure greed. They hate successful people. Too lazy to work for it so they try to steal it.
100%
For what its worth (and yes, I've been repeating this ad nauseum, ad infinitum) but I continue to believe that anyone who thinks Israel for last means the destruction of the state of Israel, rather than simply the destruction of the 'deep state' of Israel, is in for a rude awakening, as well. They are going to be exceedingly disappointed, and I will rejoice!
Makes sense to me.
I've always assumed,we will not get public hangings or wood chippers.....
Or heads on a pike on the National Mall?
Hung, drawn and quartered is probably off the table as well.
Can we bring back tar and feathers?
Hot tar and feather?
Probably not.
Regular tar is probably ok.
Warm tar?
Warm is good.
Kek
Stop hanging around liberals!
I'll have to retire to get away from most of them
Plug your ears and drown them out!
Hey, if comminist want to have nothing, we can make thst happen.
The comment doesn't specify -- the end of what? In general and long term, if patriots succeed then presumably the "end" means that the US reestablishes and follows the constitution as the law of the land. To me this means ending the Europeon/German imported "administrative state" and welfare plus return to separation of powers and the bill of rights which has been neutered over the past 100+ years.
For example, just returning war powers to congress would end the endless wars. I don't want to go through all this difficult change, conflict and deconstruction (i.e. a revolution) only to be reorganized under different assholes controlling my life. Unfortunately, for many people their livelihoods are tied to the administrative state or the military industrial complex or welfare or whatever and the changes to these institutions and the transition will be painful for many so they won't be happy about that.
SC Justice Clarence Thomas recently made comments that the constitution is incompatible with "progressivism" to which I agree. So in this sense all the leftists, commies, fascists and "democratic" socialists won't be happy with that. In the end they all have to go away because the US constitution is based on individualism not collectivism. On the other hand there are collectivist variants of America First or even MAGA so they won't be happpy either.
Good points. One thing that would have to be phased out is social security, and slowly replaced with something self / employer funded. Too many people wouldn't survive without it, and not always because they didn't make an effort. Some lost their pensions due to corporate raids, leveraged buyouts, and chronic underfunding. Can't blame someone who thought part of their compensation was the retirement pension. If you invested in the market in a 401K (usually with very limited options) or privately without inside information or incredible luck, you saw the markets steal from you with every manufactured recession and naked options selling. Real-estate is great if you want to be a landlord and you don't become a victim of some government zoning, price controls, or protected criminals. A friend of a friend rented his house to a lawyer, and lawyer made a couple rent payments then stayed rent free for almost a year. He knew the rules and knew he could pull that stunt with no ramifications to himself. Also, its tough to make out where the taxes eat up any long term gains and the banks are manipulating the markets. Anyway, enough ranting...
Totally agree. You can't just rug-pull retirees who planned their whole life and retirement around having social security. On the other hand, you can't just saddle the current generations with 100% of these obligations which would be unfair and they probably won't stand for it anyway and would rebel.
I believe that personal charity is something that was wrecked by the welfare state. Suddenly taking care of others in your community and the less fortunate was considered the govt's responsibility. To close social security it is going to take hard choices and some combination of means testing, reducing benefits to the bare minimum and private charity.
I think you have to look at it from the perspective of what would put 99% in the hospital. What could be so bad, in the context of the matrix - from the drop you referenced- that 99% of the population wouldn’t be able to process it.
mRNA shots and those that conform to society.
Division is how the world is rule. Really as simple as a piece of paper...
"How do you confuse the public? Turn the paper over."
"How do you confuse the public? Turn the paper over."
Even some anons are struggling with Trump's approach to getting the DS out of the country. Do they think we live in a vacuum?
The end won't be for everyone because most of us are never going to see justice served the way we believe it should be.
Two parts: The left’s world will come crashing down in terms of power, money and truth. Many of the enemy will not be around to see the end.
The world would benefit from that outcome. How many countries are kept poor and dependent to support human trafficking?
In order for us to confabulate and confound our enemies forever, after Trump defeats Obama in 2028, instead of arresting Obama, all his crimes and those of the D33P Shtate will be swept under the rug as if Obama, Hillary, and Trump are all one big orchestrated happy family.
It means something like what you suspect, OP, or perhaps, something along the lines of:
We will remove [sacrifice] many front-facing elements of the cabal and bring back Law and Order, but we will build a Total Surveillance Digital Superstructure in the process.
If that's the case, the end isn't for me.
The end of privacy hardly seems constitutional
Q said it will be Biblical, so I think we're witnessing the separation of the wheat from the tares/end isn't for everyone. also why George Washington built a special 16 sided threshing barn; symbolic of the times we're in✨
Parable of the Tares Explained
Matthew 13:36-43
King James Version
36 Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.
37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;
38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;
39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
barn:
https://www.mountvernon.org/the-estate-gardens/farm/treading-barn
The end definitely be for those who take welfare as a way of life and treat our social safety net as a hammock. Many of these people have lived off the system their whole lives and wouldn't even make it in Africa.