ArmyLady created this thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZR499iH/since-its-creation-out-of-thin-a/
We went back and forth on some things, and my response became so big and hit on so many important topics, that I decided to make a new thread for better visibility, and discussion for anyone that might want to join in:
Responding to ArmyLady's questions:
Thanks fren for filling in some more off the pieces!
This is a MASSIVE topic. Also, probably the MOST IMPORTANT topic to grasp, if you want to understand the world and why it is the way it is.
So who are these jewish power holders? are they the cabal, or lead the cabal? or used by the cabal??
G. Edward Griffin gave a lecture about Cecil Rhodes. Rhodes was probably the wealthiest man in the world at the time of his death (maybe besides the Rothschilds, or maybe even wealthier -- no way to know for sure). He basically became the governor of South Africa when the UK owned it as a British territory. As governor, he eventually bought up a bunch of the gold mines and diamond mines.
The country of Rhodesia is named after him, to give you an idea of his status.
Griffin tells the story of how Rhodes set up a series of trusts, and how he was influenced by what the Illuminati had done 200 years earlier.
They set up a structure that is a "circle within a circle within a circle."
Very few insiders run the inner circle (some say it is 13 families). Then, they have organizations in an outer circle, which they control and are open only to a select number, and then they have another outer circle of organizations that are open to many more people.
The true nature is secret, and the true insiders are only known to themselves.
The Council on Foreign Relations would be an example of that middle circle or maybe even an outer circle. Scottish Rite Temple would be outer circle -- lots of people are invited to join, but only very few will ever be "promoted" to the middle circle.
Rhodes left his fortune to several trusts. The Rhodes Scholarship is funded by one of those trusts. Bill Clinton was identified in college as someone to "bring in" to the outer and then maybe middle circle. He was controlled, ultimately, by the inner circle, the members of whom he may have never met.
Clinton's favorite professor at Georgetown was Carroll Quigley, who was hired by these inner circle people to study their organization, because the people in it didn't even have a full picture of their organization's own history. They invited him in to research their history.
Quigly wrote the book "Tragedy and Hope" about this topic. One of his books was banned because he gave away too much about what he found in his research.
Rhodes probably turned his fortune over to Rothschild, Rockefeller, and/or similar types. Of course, Rothschild and Rockefeller already were massively wealthy. It is these types who run this system.
David Rockefeller wrote in his memoir something like: "My family and I have been accused of creating a one world government. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and am proud of it." He wrote that in his autobiography.
Many of these people are jews, but not all.
"The Cabal" has this system in place. "The jews" are part of that, but they also work amongst themselves inside and outside of "The Cabal."
G. Edward Griffin's lecture on Cecil Rhodes and "The System" --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msFKhD7Ofn8
BTW, Glenn Beck was fired from Fox right when he was doing a series on these people and interviewing Griffin on this topic. Rupert Murdock (owner of Fox) is, of course, part of "The Cabal." Too much info was going public, it seems.
And why are they jewish at all? Self-identification, ethnic pride, having a jewish mother or a jewish name??
The jews are jews because of their RACE.
To be "jewish" is to practice Judaism. To be "a jew" is to be racially a jew.
They big ones are atheist?
Possibly, some are. A racial jew can practice any religion or none at all.
But if you want to know WHY the ones who are racial jews behave the way they do, whether or not they practice Judaism, I think you need to understand the real story of the Bible (not the bastardized version promoted by most churches -- and jews -- today).
I have a few comments in this thread that explains my basic position on this --
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASYyyQCGu/edom-theology/
Israel is a secular state which belongs to the "jewish people" [whoever they are] as much as it does to the Martians.
Does not matter. Most average jews don't really know what the fuck is going on, either. Many of them do not know their own history, and have been brainwashed into believing certain things (just as all of us have).
Here are a couple of interesting vids to check out.
2 rabbis who did not understand why Hitler wanted the jews out of Germany, but learned the truth and here they explain it to their fellow jews --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqXs9hXsA4
And another rabbi who clearly and precisely understood why Hitler wanted them out of Germany --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MYHqYJXRsT7k
How do they get ordinary religious Jews to go along?? special race identity?
Propaganda over many decades and centuries.
The Holocaust myth is buried deep into the psychology of most all jews. They all believe it, even though it is a lie.
Plus, it gives them sympathy and MONEY, and some degree of control, so they use it to the hilt.
Did you ever see the movie "Schindler's List?" Spielberg (a jew) made the movie seem like a documentary. But guess what?
The movie was based on the book "Schindler's List," which was originally titled "Schindler's Ark." It was written by an Austrailan man, and the book clearly says THIS on the inside cover:
This book is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places and incidents are either products of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events or locales or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental."
You can read it yourself on Google Books. Look at the first page after the cover.
https://books.google.com/books?id=gM336KrBqbAC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
It won an award by the LA Times for "Best book of fiction" (that was before the movie came out).
Do you want to know where the "6,000,000 died" story came from ?
Jews in New York and London were plotting to take over Russia, institute a communist dictatorship, and then push communism into Europe and take that over, too. Eventually, they wanted to take over the world.
Communism is a jewish invention, and a tool to be used to control the world. A lot of dumb asses today have actually fallen for it.
But this did not happen overnight. It took many years.
The first attempted revolution to take over Russia was in 1904. It failed. The next attempt, in 1917, succeeded.
They started publishing stories in the newspapers in the 1890's and into the early 1900's talking about how "jews are in peril" in Russia. Then the same stories appeared about "jews in peril" in Eastern Europe. Eventually, Germany.
Here is a video showing all these newspaper articles:
https://rumble.com/vtv060-six-million-jews-1915-1938-6-6000000.html
Here is a lecture explaining how and WHY the jews created communism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twEWYTvX3lQ
Now, about that Holocaust thingy ...
We are told that 6,000,000 jews died in the 1940's. But according to the World Almanac (the "Wikipedia" before the internet), there were 15.3 million jews in the world in 1933 and 15.7 milllion in the world in 1948.
That math just doesn't math.
15.3 million - 6 million does not equal 15.7 million.
Yes, there were far fewer jews in Germany, but that's because many left to other places.
The best overall explanation of how this lie snowballed, that I have seen, comes from a man who studied the subject and investigated what really happened in Germany during Hitler's time. His name was Benton Bradberry. He wrote a book about what he found. He is interviewed here (fast forward to about 7 minutes because there are audio issues they try to correct in the beginning):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lWIhsYDStvFo/
A great documentary to watch about Auschwitz is the one by David Cole.
Soon after the Berlin Wall fell, circa early 1990's, East Germany and Poland were in a bit of chaos and nobody was really thinking about people investigating WW2 stuff.
David Cole (not his real name) was a jew who took a camera crew into Auschwitz and basically showed the whole thing was nonsense. Cole's life was threatened and he as become a very weird character, but his documentary was excellent:
Part 1 -- https://www.bitchute.com/video/OOu2lZRh3ZPR
Part 2 -- https://www.bitchute.com/video/j1Aiw7oY9KBO
Here is a document from the International Red Cross explaining that they had people visit Auschwitz and found no signs of a "death camp." It was just a labor camp:
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/OQAUu5AXg8lk.png
Here is Anne Frank's step-sister explaining that the video footage and photos of the Auschwitz liberation was FAKE. It was the Soviets who did that, not the Americans:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/138EteRjYwQD/
However, Eisenhower created a FAKE gas chamber to show members of Congress on their tour after the war ended. Since there were NO gas chambers, he had to create a fake one.
Yes, there were delousing chambers to kill lice as new prisoners came into the camps. They had a shower, had their heads shaved, deloused of lice, and given fresh prisoner clothes.
Typhus was a nasty disease in Europe at that time, and it was carried by lice. Anne Frank died of Typhus, as did many/most of the prisoners who died in the camps.
Fred Leuchter was the world's expert on gas chambers in the 1980's. He was the #1 go-to consultant for states that had the death penalty by gas chamber. He knew how to build them and how to use them so the guards would not be killed by the gas.
Due to a court case in Canada (and then another in Germany), he was hired to investigate the "gas chambers" in the German camps in Germany and Poland.
He compiled a report for the courts. To this day, he is the only man who has been certified by both Canadian and German courts as an expert witness on the subject of WW2 gas chambers in Germany and Poland.
Guess what he found?
There WERE NO GAS CHAMBERS.
There weren't even any physcial structures that could have EVER BEEN gas chambers.
Here is an interview of him:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E7vTj7jfTpVE
Jews have received BILLIONS of dollars from their fake Holocaust story. They profit from it greatly.
Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFklTLNy8c
"Anti-Semitic is a trick we always use:"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/q3sKM5KhT8sG/
Why have jews been kicked out of 100+ countries over the past 1,000+ years?
Because they are easy to get along with?
No.
I think it goes back to what the Bible is all about -- God's Chosen (the White race) vs. the Adversary (aka "Satan" in Hebrew -- the jew race). Again, see my comments in that other thread on this topic.
I can't prove it, but history seems to do a good job of proving it.
The "shabbos goy" of The Cabal are the non-jews who are just psychopaths, and like the idea of being part of "the club" and getting the perks.
Thank you for sharing the fruits of your research!
I have to tell you that my Dad knew and told much or most of this to me, at his knee! I listened. I did not say "but teachers say otherwise." I didn't agree nor disagree, I merely absorbed what he said as a reliable testament of truth to the best of his ability.
HOW DID HE KNOW? From the jewish influence in the communist take over of Russia to establish the USSR, to the concentration camps mythology, and so much more. Back to the lost tribes, to the control over banking and movies and etc. etc. Somehow he knew it all! Hitler's father was the illegitimate son of a Rothschild and a domestic in his service. That the Allies betrayed the German Resistance which would have prevented D-Day when Rommel was ready to turn over The Western Front! Many in the Administration were for it, FDR liked Uncle Joe Stalin better than preventing millions of lives lost!
HOW DID HE KNOW? He would say, "I am just a dumb farmer, BUT . . ." HOW DID HE KNOW? Before our Great Awakening, before internet. All he had was his insatiable quest for knowledge, his brilliant brain, his curiosity for the truth hence talking to vets coming back including his brother who witnessed enough horror not caused by the Germans but against them. Short wave radio? A few agricultural newspapers??
SO I read and I read. He was frustrated that the truth was buried. I assured him there were many books that few would read and would not be promulgated, but those books were there and still are. Like your references.
--
"Anti-Semitic is a trick we always use:" Why does anti-Semitism now mean only anti-Jewish? I never understood that!
"Semitic people or Semites is an obsolete term for an ethnic, cultural or racial group formerly used in connection with ancient and modern peoples of the Middle East and the Horn of Africa, including Akkadians, Arabs, Ammonites, Arameans, Canaanites, Edomites, Habesha peoples, Israelites, Jews, Judahites, Moabites, Phoenicians, Samaritans, and others. Use of the terminology is now largely confined to the field of linguistics in reference to "Semitic languages"
But 99.9% of people believe Semite means the race of the Jews?!?
Anti-Semitism is a code word like racism or misogyny or homophobe and basically means nothing meaningful. It is a language misnomer to hammer people with. Censor them, marginalize them. Beyond the pale of discourse.
Seems like it would have been tough for your dad to learn so much -- especially before the internet.
Cool dad.
"Semitic" has two explanations.
The ivory tower types want to believe it is all about language of the region. The languages were similar. The Edomites (i.e. jews) would have had to communicate to others, so their languages were similar. But this does not point to only jews being "semites" due to language. Makes no sense.
The other explanation is biblical. Semites are the descendants of Shem. Those who stayed within the race are still Semites or Semitic, while those who crossed over and mixed outside of the race are not. Jews are not Semites.
But of course, they push a fake narrative, as they do in so many things.
Bascially today, "anti-semite" is just an attack word for anyone that jews don't like. Like you said, it means nothing.
BTW, thanks for bringing up a lot of these points in the other thread, so I could spout off in this one. LOL.
[The only other explanation about my Dad: he lived through the times, and people knew. But it was suppressed. ]
The "allies" were gonna bomb Auschwitz. They had data from the partisans on Auschwitz and some of the other Death camps. The einstazgruppe were notorious around the Russian Front and their mass killing events. If Auschwitz and the other camps was nothing, why were there trials? Hoess (and others) were hanged. So - there was never an extermination network consisting of Auschwitz, Treblinka, Maidanek, Sobibor, Chelmno and Belzec and all their sub camps? What about the hungarian jews and gypsies being shipped to Auschwitz - the very event that made soros the opportunist that he is today? What about IG Farben and Zyclon B...? All fake? Nah - not buying it. MAYBE the numbers were a bit off, but why?
Below are the death camps and the current claims of those slaughtered.
Auschwitz-Birkenau 1.1 million
Treblinka II 800,000 – 925,000
Bełżec 435,000 – 600,000
Chełmno 152,000 – 320,000
Sobibór 167,000 – 250,000
Majdanek 78,000 – 130,000
***Auschwitz used to be 1-4million. Treblinka always seems to hover around 800-900,000. Maidanek used to be 1.5 million... Bełżec , Chełmno and Sobibór seem to be pretty much the way I've always seen them.
They were going to bomb (and kill) a bunch of prisoners?
I think that would be a war crime. If someone WAS thinking about doing it, they obviously did not.
So, it's a very questionable claim. And there would be no point, ultimately.
There has been a lot of false propaganda about that. Maybe some of it MIGHT be true. But the Germans, contrary to the jew narrative, had MORAL PRINCIPLES, and were not usually about that.
Goering wrote an article called, "Churchill's Lie Factory."
In it, he mocked the British for lying about everything. He was partly referring to the atrocities of the jewish Soviet military doing dirty deeds in Poland, and the Brits blaming it on the Germans. But he was also referring to Churchill and other high-ranking Brits who had a history of lying.
This was known as "The Big Lie" that jews falsely claim about the Germans. Jews claim that Goering was bragging about how the Germans could lie to their own people, but Goering was actually talking about how the Brits did it to their own people.
I will give you a few links to consider --
"Churchill's Lie Factory" - https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb29.htm
Video showing those atrocities by the brutal Polish and Soviet communists (jews), and a speech by Adolph Hitler to explain WHY he had to move his army into Poland to protect the ethnic German people who were living there (after WW1, the national boundry lines changed, and some ethnic Germans who HAD bee living "in Germany" were suddenly living "in Poland" due to the artifical change of boundries. The jews brutally raped, tortured, and murdered these Germans. Hitler asked the world to help stop the atrocities, but nobody would listen. So, he sent in his army and ended it. England and France then used that as justification to declare war on Germany. -- https://www.bitchute.com/video/GvJVRJdPi9K8
The Germans lost the war. The jews wanted blood.
But, consider this.
The American, English and Soviet judges and lawyers, who presided over the trials, did NOT use American or English legal standards. They used Soviet standards.
That included (a) no witness testimony need be verified, (b) confessions by torture were allowed, and (c) no evidence was necessary if the judges decided it should be so.
These were nothing but kangaroo trials.
I forget the specifics now, but there was a story a couple of years ago where Hollywood wanted to do a movie about the Nuremberg Trials.
They read some of the trial transcripts, and even they could not justify moving ahead with some of the stuff. It was so OBVIOUS that the trials were rigged from the start.
No. Those camps were originally used as prisons for criminals. Remember, when Hitler came to power, Germany was in shambles. Crime was rampant. He cleaned that shit up REAL quick.
Almost the moment that Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, "World Jewry" declared open war on Germany. They boycotted all German goods and did everything they could -- both from without and from within -- to destroy Germany.
Therefore, they became enemies within.
Once the war stared, and the German people realized how the jews living in Germany had stabbed the Germans in the back with the Balfour Declaration, the jews were considered enemy combatants.
Those who were found or suspected of being saboteurs were sent to the prisons.
Once the war started, then those camps also became prisoner of war prisons and labor camps.
When the war was over, the Americans found several thousand jews living in Berlin, who owned firearms.
THERE WAS NO EXTERMINATION PROGRAM.
It is and always was a jewish lie.
The "Final Solution" was to get jews OUT of Germany, and ideally out of Europe. That is WHY Hitler made a deal with high-ranking jews to do the Havaara Agreement.
I don't know. Were they criminals? Partisans? Enemy combatants?
Probably, a lot were.
Soros is Hungarian. Germans occupied Hungary in 1944-45.
Soros was a sell-out of his own people.
And a piece of shit, too.
Zyclon B was used as the delousing gas to kill lice, not people.
Watch the documentary that David Cole did at Auschwitz. Also the Fred Leutcher interview. His JOB was to inspect the "gas chambers." He took samples of the walls to understand the Zyclon B, and used it in his official reports to the courts. Cole also checked that out. Both links are in my OP.
The stuff was used to kill lice, to stop the spread of typhus.
Right. CLAIMS.
But ... there is no EVIDENCE to back up those claims.
Originally, they said 4 million died at Auschwitz. Now, it's 1.1 million? They have no idea. They just make up whatever numbers they think will sell.
Yes, that is my point. The numbers are CLAIMS and they are meaningless without any evidence to back it up.
Looks like that Bellamy salute link did not work, and somehow I can't edit that post.
So, here is what I tried to post:
https://www.thoughtco.com/why-americans-gave-the-bellamy-salute-3322328
Lmao, nobody believes your atrocity propaganda anymore, rabbi....
Also, Mike Kings books are great! A very trusted source of mine for non revisionist and accurate history.
https://realnewsandhistory.com/
If you want an in depth history series that is written and produced by 2 top grade professional researchers/historians I would recommend
The Fall of the Cabal by Janet Ossebaard and Cynthia Koeter.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFcmyVq5/archive-it-out-of-shadows--fall-/c/ https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFmAKeO8/the-fall-of-the-cabal--from-2019/c/ https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFckionI/janet-ossebaard-died-of-suicide-/c/
They really explain a lot of the subtle concepts that a good percentage of people miss or misunderstand.
There are a good amount researchers who throw the baby out with the bath water, per se...They do not!
Hey fren, you started out fine with accurate description of Quigley and Griffin and then went off the rails.
Was going to start by saying Rhodes's organization demonstrates that it's not precisely circle within circle. Rather, all the big circles think they're the innermost because they're all doing different big work. But at any moment any member, or any circle, might get "voted off the island" aka cast into the volcano to appease the gods aka counterfeited as another sacrifice instead of Jesus's once-for-all sacrifice.
There are some things to criticize about Jews at large, but when you overdo the criticism you play into the hands of Jews at large by making their opponents look irrational. This might lead people to think you're shilling for them by making anti-Semitism look stupid.
For instance, I've listed the idea of foreknowledge of 6 million deaths as hoax #3 and the idea of being kicked out of 100+ countries as hoax #11. Your neglect of birth rates in the population analysis is a bit tone-deaf.
Your reporting of the Russian revolution neglects Griffin's coverage, from the same book about Jekyll Island, of how this was mostly overseen by Edward House. It's a bit facile to say the cabal is all either Jews or shabbat goyim, because that's like saying the cabal is all either Muslims or crypto-Muslims. It's saying nothing. Rather, the cabal is all satanists, adversaries of Jesus's body.
I appreciate your providing a lot of links for review. I encourage you, just stick to the demonstrable facts and don't get bogged down in assumptions that tie to collectivist judgment. You seem to affirm the Hebrew language of the Bible, so learn what it actually says so that we can use Hebrew better than the Jews (that our righteousness in Christ may exceed that of the Pharisees). Keep researching, don't go stagnant on things.
Sure, that's possible. No doubt, all these players are working together but also competing to see who can get what they want over others who want something a little different.
No different than politics.
Not exactly sure what you mean by "foreknowledge of 6 million deaths."
That seems to imply that (a) there actually WERE 6 million killed, and (b) somebody knew it would happen ahead of time.
If that is what you are saying, then I call bullshit.
There were NOT 6 million killed.
Those newspaper articles were real, and they were to try to gather sympathy AND DONATIONS to help ... but that money was being used to attack Russia, not for the stated purpose.
And yes, it was jewish newspaper publishers and jewish bankers in New York and London that were trying to raise money to fund the first Bolshevik Revoluation, and then the 2nd.
After all, mercenaries had to be PAID to go in and do the dirty work. The jews didn't have the numbers of manpower to do it all themselves.
THEY NEEDED MONEY. YOUR MONEY (ideally, not theirs).
Side note: It's kind of like today's "Kars-4-Kids" advertisements.
Ever notice they want your car and your money, but they NEVER tell you WHICH kids would be helped or HOW?
That's because if you trace the IRS public tax returns of Kars-4-Kids, you will find that ALL the money goes to a JEWISH organization, and if you research that organization, you will find that they fund TRIPS TO ISRAEL FOR JEWISH KIDS, and a SUMMER CAMP.
Has nothing to do with anyone who is impoverished, needing food, needing medical help or any such thing. Just fun for jew kids.
Well, that's what those newspaper articles back then were about, too -- claim money is needed for one thing, but actually use it for something else. I did the research. That's how I know.
And that's WHY they were publishing those stories about "muh 6 million jews in peril" back then.
And notice it was ALWAYS EXACTLY 6 million.
Not 5 million. Not "over a million." Not "millions."
SIX MILLION.
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
But it never happened.
I don't think that is foreknowledge (of something that never actually happened). I think it was propaganda to push for the narrative they wanted to push.
For those who don't know, Auschwitz USED TO HAVE a plaque outside that said 4 million died there (4 mill of the 6 mill).
Then a few years ago, they quietly replaced that plaque with a new one that said 1.5 million died there.
What happened to the other 2.5 mill?
Nothing. Because only about 200,000-300,000 prisoners died in all those camps, combined. Most of that from typhus.
There were German prison guards who were put on trial for abusing prisoners. There was one camp commandant who was executed (BY THE GERMANS) for abusing prisoners.
That would never happen if the Holohoax story were valid.
So ... you think that in 15 years, when MILLIONS (supposedly) were in "death camps" ... there were somehow more than 6 million born?
Jews are less than 2% of the population. They DON'T breed like rabbits.
And although the fact that there is a birth rate is valid, there is also a old-age death rate that is also valid.
I don't remember the exact number now, but there was something like 3,000 jew children born at Auschwitz during those years.
BTW, I just looked up on Wiki. How many jews are in the world today?
Answer: 16.5 million.
So ... from 1933-1948: 15.3 million to 15.7 million.
Then ... from 1948 to 2026: 15.7 million to 16.5 million.
You're trying to tell me that in 15 years, 15.3 million jews had 6 million kids, but in the next 78 years, they only had less than a million?
Get out ...
LOL.
I'm sure there were those involved in plotting the Russian Revolution(s), and others plotting the Federal Reserve, and others plotting the Titanic, and others plotting something else.
So what?
BTW ... most jews are not really into Hebrew. That language never belonged to them. It belonged to the Hebrews, not the jews. The jews are into Yiddish, which is a perversion of Hebrew ... for what it's worth.
The fact that there were lots of articles in the early 20th century drumming up support for Jews, and many of them mention millions of dollars or people, has been mistaken by many as indicating a preplan. They only indicate a tendency for mass media to appeal to one particular plight (among many heartstrings it played at over that era). The reason you think it's "6 million" every single time is that you listened to some idiot who only did a text search for the words "6 million" (even when it's about 6 million dollars), whereas my link showed that others (CODOH) who did a more scientific survey found that "3 million" appeared more often than "6 million". (Which wasn't what they were trying to prove.) So the idea that "6 million" needed to be seeded as a narrative is laughable. In fact, the actual kabbalah that was used to claim that "6 million" was prophesied is also laughable, as it only prophesies "6" if anything, as shown by the hoax #3 writeup.
If your numbers were correct, you'd have a gain of 6.4 million in 15 years to correspond to a loss of 6 million, from a baseline of 15.3 million. Since kids age 0-15 are (rough guess from my recollection) 35%-40% of all population, yes, those are reasonable numbers, even if unrelated old-age death is included. You also used "when MILLIONS (supposedly) were in 'death camps'" as a talking point, but you see the ones in death camps mostly died according to the narrative, so they're not the ones giving birth to the next generation (except for those you also allude to). So this is basic demographics that show the fallacy of the argument in itself, and, instead of going to more detail to support the argument, you pivot to ridiculing the basic demographics (and bring in two other very poor arguments that don't need separate spotlight), which is not good optics for you.
The official language of Israel is Hebrew, not Yiddish. English and Arabic formerly had official status but are now downgraded.
Let me add that the phrase "every single time" is unworthy of this elite research forum, because not only does it mean nothing (it only invites people to supply their own meaning), but it also when analyzed becomes the self-fulfilling claim above (i.e. any non-Jews involved can be held to be Jew-influenced, thus unfalsifiable).
I'm very interested in all sides of these questions, including the ones I disagree with, and you are free to make as many posts at c/Holocaust as you would like. I will not censor anything (I only remove for exceptional moral cause, a clause I've never needed to invoke). You appear to be open-minded about it. I've pointed out to others that accepted figures are actually closer to 5.7 million minimum, a number which a little more noodling could easily round down to 5 million, but people don't seem to argue from this evidence but put forward the idea (which I should probably add to the hoax page) that 6 million people were all cremated in a small number of places in an impossible timeframe. That just makes them look dumb. You seem to be taking people's word for things and more frequently in one direction than another. God would want you to test all things for yourself and only hold onto what his Spirit approves.
(1) Newspapers --
I don't think you even looked at that video, or you wouldn't be saying something about 6 million dollars. That was not in those articles.
The fact remains that there WERE numerous articles published IN THE EXACT SAME YEARS THAT THE JEWS WERE TRYING TO OVERTHROW RUSSIA, all specifically mentioning SIX MILLION JEWS in peril.
And then a few decades later that same 6 million number has been "etched in stone" as the narrative.
Now, if you think the creator of that video just cherry-picked that number and there are other numbers (like 3 million) that are more common, which he ignored ... THEN SHOW ME.
Your link didn't refute anything.
(2) Population --
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
I think you're still trying to justify the 6 million claim, but I can't make heads or tails from what you wrote.
If so ...
The 15.3 million vs. 15.7 million was over 15 years (1933-1948).
But ... "muh SIX MILLION" ... ADDITIONAL deaths ... was only over about 5 years (the "death camp" years of 1940-1944).
There is no "jew population explosion of births" to offset those EXTRA 6 million.
The next 78 years was the same as those 15 years -- roughly even births and deaths, with slight increase.
Where were the 6 million EXTRA BIRTHS in those 5 years ... such that the total worldwide jew population increased slightly?
DID. NOT. HAPPEN.
Which means, the additional 6 million deaths did not happen, either.
(3) Official language of modern state of so-called Israel.
Does not matter.
Jews are not Hebrews of the OT.
They hijacked Hebrew by creating Yiddish, a bastardized version, and calling it "Hebrew."
Oy vey!
(4) Your attempt at censorship.
DON'T try to censor me or anyone else.
I have freedom of speech, just as you do.
(5) Your fake numbers.
Is that a web page created by jews?
I don't care if you want to claim 6 million or 5.7 million or 3 million or 1 million jews purposely killed by the Germans in WW2.
THE. HOLOCAUST. IS. A. LIE.
BTW, I see what you did there. You did the old "limited hangout."
You are saying, "OK, ok, maybe it wasn't 6 million, maybe it was more like 5.7 million."
FUCK. and NO.
The TOTAL numbers of people who died in all the German camps was probably less than 300,000 -- and the vast majority was typhus, or towards the end could have been starvation.
The German civilians were starving, too, as the allies cut off all incoming supplies towards the end of the war.
David Irving found some of the original papers in the British archive, proving that British intel came up with "muh Holocaust" story, and then the jews pushed it for sympathy and money.
The numbers are IMPOSSIBLE.
Not enough crematoriums. Not enough coke to fuel them. ZERO gas chambers, only delousing chambers.
Only 500,000 jews living in Germany BEFORE Hitler came to power, with most of them LEAVING before the war -- because they were not welcome, due to the havoc they created in the 1920's.
Only 3,000,000 jews living in Poland.
I don't know if there were even 6 million (or 5.7 million) jews living in all German-occupied or controlled territory in the first place.
Even using MODERN crematorium equipment, it takes a few hours to burn ONE body.
NO WAY POSSIBLE for 1940's equipment to just make 6,000,000 bodies go ... poof ... disappear.
And then an ADDITIONAL 6 million babies on top of the natural birth rate -- in a war-torn world, no less -- would have to happen to offset the additional deaths.
JUST NONSENSE.
The only thing more ridiculous are the ACTUAL STORIES that some jews have pushed, like the "roller coaster of death."
I saw an interview of an older jew clearly admitting that he lied about things he "saw" during the Holocaust. He said it was justified to lie because the story is important and needs to be told.
Yeah.
Judaism teaches that lying is a moral good if it helps the jews.
And he was not the only liar. Many of them claim they saw things ... even if they were never there to see them.
The entire story is built on lies.
Starting with "Schindler's List" which is a book of FICTION, derived from the author's IMAGINATION.
Says it all.
First, it's not confrontational, I told you that you can say anything and because it's free speech I'll politely agree or disagree or compare my notes with yours. If you feel confronted about it, maybe check whether the source of truth (i.e. Jesus) is certain enough to withstand all confrontation.
I did show you, but I anticipated that you would click through what I showed you. I didn't look at the video because the original story about predictions of 6 million haphazardly included reference to 6 million dollars, reference to 6 million Jews in the first century, and several other superfluities. If they cleaned it up, it still doesn't prove. So what if the Jewish population of Russia was about 6 million at a time when they were shilling for it; that's not something that proves that anyone was seeding that number so as to popularize it with a different event later. Nor is it etched in stone, it's just a historical consensus that can be challenged, such as people like CODOH are doing. In the paragraph I pointed you to, you could have clicked through the sentence, "Germar Rudolf in intro to Don Heddesheimer's First Holocaust gives actual results of searches for millions of Jews from 1 to 7: "three million" is the most common number cited, despite Rudolf backpedaling by treating the data differently even though the generic nature of the data remains constant." Clicking through would give the actual details. Now, I didn't link the details because I didn't think CODOH would be so banal as to purge this unsupportive evidence from their site, but they did, and the preface I cited is now shortened and lacking this detail; it appears in the 5th edition, 2018-07, pp. 31-32, stable PDF. The deletion speaks volumes.
The basic demographics of this population question are that it's reasonable, if taken alone, for 15 million to become 20 million in 15 years and if they don't it's reasonable for a few million to be missing. Now, you provide a partial answer by saying that we don't see these numbers increasing in other periods, and so you answer my rough calculation with another rough calculation. But neither one is probative. The reverting to caps and emphatic delivery suggests you might feel this is becoming contentious; so, since you've answered it, it's merely my observation that it's not enough to cite the two data points alone and then expect everyone to rough-calculate the same way you do. That's assuming you're right about trends since 1945, which don't sound totally accurate either, but that's beside the point. [Add: I see I fell for a trust trap. While World Almanac 1948 does list 9,372,666 Jews in Europe as you link, they used this exact same number every year since 1942 due to lack of updates (1941 didn't have this section). Pew estimates actual 3.8 million in 1945. So unless there's a reason for accepting stale 1942 data, I don't have indications that World Almanac should be the judge of the postwar population.]
"Jews are not Hebrews of the OT"? I've discussed this with many people, and there's always a theory presented that at some point the descendants of Judah (Ioudaios) were totally lost and totally replaced with some other people. If it was done by intermarriage, then the continuing Jewish polity would retain the rights to be called Jews; if it was done by total replacement, then there would be a historical point where that replacement was obvious. But these people never take either tack, so I don't see a reason to question those who demonstrate genealogies that do go back to Judah. (No, Jews don't call Yiddish Hebrew, all linguists know the distinction even though they use the same "alef-beth".)
My pointing out something (IMHO) unworthy is not censorship. The fact that you pivot to charging censorship when we're both anons is itself quite interesting. The mods here are perfectly capable of determining what behavior breaks the rules without my helping them and without censoring anything for content.
I just cite the USHMM to have a baseline from which to speak; it makes zero difference how many Jews are involved in it, because truth and lies can be seen for themselves. Just looking at CODOH a moment ago, they set the baseline at 5.3-6 (which of course they reject), but I don't have a more direct source for 5.3 so I summarized it above; note, only half those are in the camps proper. The issue isn't that I believe the numbers are fake or real, I believe these are a baseline for discussion. But to say (capitalized punctuated) the Holocaust is a lie is to say hardly anything, even though I give you credit for establishing a framework afterward, saying what really happened is 300,000 of all people died in camps, mostly of typhus and starvation. So there you have your own baseline, thanks. I don't know what Irving found, I don't know your gas/oven calculations, I don't know your comparative population stats. I respect your distrust and your sharing of detail but the USHMM is also sharing its detail and you're in competition for the truth. If the truth is on your side, its presentation should be just about as easy for you as the USHMM's, instead of cobbled together from sites that have trouble demonstrating their data convincingly; and you wouldn't need the side trails into emotional stylization and rhetoric.
"Judaism teaches that lying is a moral good if it helps the jews": I do know from comparative religion that that is not a tenet of Judaism, but is a minority view that is also held historically by many original Christian and Muslim sources that are not reflective of the majority tenets of those faiths. If I didn't like Cardinal Newman I could easily cite him to pretend that Catholicism teaches that lying is a moral good if it helps the Catholics.
Returning to my point, I applaud you for providing backup on a point I suggested was incomplete, and for being willing to add detail; at the same time, the matter looks more complicated than you make out because you've listened to rhetoric and exaggeration and have let that flow into your presentation as well. If the truth is as you say, then that would mean the successors of those Jews that would have arranged the hoax are also busy today seeding the anti-Holocaust narrative with shills promoting easily debunked versions. I trust you've seen how this works with other psyops: people close to the truth, being over target, get infiltrated with shills who look like they believe the same things but also act irrational, illogical, and unable to present the pursuit of truth straightforwardly. The shills are there to demoralize and disconnect the truth seekers. To the degree you are a truth seeker, you will see the psyop techniques and avoid including them in your own material, and you can present the facts dispassionately and winsomely. That's why I created c/Holocaust, so that everyone can debate and get to the bottom of it who wants to. I encourage you to feel free to make yourself at home there, as I won't be nearly as critical there as I would at GAW; even though it's little watched, I'd love to see you be able to collate a collection of evidence to lay out your view. But the primary issue I'm going after is whether people are committed to the truth at all costs. I'm prepared to ditch the mainstream Holocaust narrative if the truth leads that way, but so far for me it hasn't.
OK ... I will try ONE more time.
I will just leave you with this about the so-called "Holocaust" numbers.
Simple math.
The narrative is that the Germans systematically murdered 6,000,000 jews. You say it is "closer to" 5.7 million. Fine. Let's use that number.
In 1933, the World Almanac shows there were 15.3 million jews living in the entire world.
In 1948, it shows there were 15.7 million.
We can assume there is a natural birth rate and a natural death rate, each year, that is roughly equal. From 1948 to 2026 the total world population of jews went from 15.7 million to 16.5 million.
Looks like a fairly steady rate to me, with NATURAL births/deaths roughly equal, with a slight increase over time.
The numbers from 1933-1948 seem to be a steady rate, and the same applies to 1948-2026.
BUT ...
You want me to believe that in or around 1940-1944 (5 years) -- the so-called "Holocaust years" -- there were an ADDITIONAL 5.7 MILLION JEWS MURDERED, ABOVE AND BEYOND the natural annual rate.
That would mean the population SHOULD have gone from 15.3 million in 1933 DOWN to 9.6 million by 1945.
These would not have been NATURAL deaths. They would have been ABOVE AND BEYOND anything natural.
And THEN ...
You want me to believe that the worldwide population of jews when BACK UP from 9.6 million in 1945 to 15.7 million by 1948 -- just THREE YEARS LATER.
That is such an outrageous and ridiculous proposition that it should not even be discussed by mature adults.
It is IMPOSSIBLE -- and there is NO EVIDENCE -- that there was any sudden explosion of jew births in those 3 years. Nevermind that it would have been in the aftermath and clean up of a massive war in Europe.
This idea is just not believable in any way, shape or form.
THE. HOLOCAUST. IS. A. LIE.
I rest my case, and am frankly tired of continuing to explain WHY it is impossible.
You believe what you want.
No hard feelings.
Best wishes.
I appreciate your assisting me with my optimistic numbers, but there's a bigger problem (which I indicated in the "Add:" section):
No, when I looked at it, in 1948 it shows that it hadn't gotten any new Europe information since it reported the exact same European number every year since 1942, as I linked. Therefore we cannot assume that the 1948 total was accurate at all.
1942: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015055427978&seq=903&q1=jews
1948: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjRaro7MlB1dkXzTtuoDvsEPGe8nuHaCZTyAQWDid03V9mwD4xfMIX9d6V3puVYuOw0KImlTRqU-rlSO_IjTpXfpqXaLykpEjgwk3xtdsY82H2kSkgjyWjAKzyI1cTqVxUtNBUvwDdN0U4/s1600/Jews+Population+Figures+002.JPG
I'm not asking you to believe anything. I'm skeptical myself. I'm saying that we don't make the decision based on one snippet that, when researched, proves to be published in 1942 and therefore is totally unusable for calculating prison camps 1941-1945.
And that's what Pew reports, and they're generally not charged with being Jewish shills. Did you want to comment on Pew's evidence? https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/02/09/europes-jewish-population/
Since what you say to be impossible is indeed highly unlikely, now we need to deal with the probability that reliance upon a single source that I've proven to be dated is insufficient to decide the case. So who do you trust for accurate Jewish population, since between us we now have zero trustworthy sources so far?
"starvation. The German civilians were starving, too"
And there was rationing everywhere including the US.
One reason:
"Glycerine for explosives during WWI and WWII primarily came from the nitration of glycerol, which is derived from natural sources like fats and oils [e.g. meat]. This process produces nitroglycerin, a key component in explosives such as dynamite and smokeless powder."
There were oil and fat collection drives in the US during WWII.
OH YES! Used cooking fats, used oils, anything and everything!
Newspapers were pushing that fake "6,000,000" figure ever since the late 1800s. It was always 6,000,000. Never once was it 5,000,000 or 7,000,000. According to population stats, there weren't even 6,000,000 "Jews" in Europe at the time they were supposedly killed. Most Jews in camps died of disease, overwork, or starvation. It has been proved that it is physically impossible for that many people to have been cremated in the time WWII happened. Even today, those numbers are impossible.
Maybe tens of thousands died in the camps from various causes, including shooting. But 6,000,000 is, in every way, totally impossible.
You seem to be looking at a text search for "6,000,000" only. As I linked herein, CODOH admitted (against their interests) that 3,000,000 was the most common between 1 and 7 million, but then they argued that 6,000,000 is more significant anyway even though there are many fewer mentions; and deleted this backhanded admission from their text shortly after I noticed it.
As linked in OP, there were 9,494,363 Jews in Europe in 1933.
As I linked herein, apologists for the 6,000,000 point out less than 2.7 million died at death camps, with the remainder attributed to mass shootings, massacres, ghettos, other camps, riots, executions, murders as partisans, and deaths in transit. Obviously not all the 2.7 million were cremated either.
Those three are all before we get to whether my (and the OP's) links are true or not, they're all just about what the thread's already discussed. So, I'd love for you to contribute to c/Holocaust, but before you start in a thread you might want to review the links already posted in that thread, so that you're responding to the facts already laid on the ground rather than repeating what you've heard without links. I appreciate your desire to contribute, as I like to hear all sides of the matter.
I watched a video of a guy turning the pages of actual print newspapers of the time showing article after article. And each article only mentioned 6,000,000. Millions left Europe for America and elsewhere. Because of all the exits, there were not 6,000,000 "Jews" in all of Europe to be killed. Also, there were still people in the camps when they were liberated, and many never got caught and put in camps. I would like to see even one real confirmed gas execution chamber.
You want links? Here's a link to the newspaper video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb-glOFJ3OU
BTW, those articles mentioning "3,000,000 Jews" were not about any killings, but about people living in certain areas or combinations of areas, such as Poland.
Nice, they look real enough, but I don't know why someone would go to the trouble of assembling those exact newspapers (from the Seattle public library, as seen at 7:22, and the Ag Department, 15:55) when they don't prove anything. Yes, you get credit for putting it forward reasonably, but a few minutes at Google shows the same can be assembled for any similar search. All those articles mentioned "6 million" and "Jews" in some combo (as others mentioned the number of dollars in a Jewish fund, or the number of Jews allegedly killed by the Emperor Titus of the Romans, etc., as my link shows); but if I did the same for all the articles mentioning "3 million Jews" I'd have a lot more references than he did, as my other link shows (from CODOH): namely 123 articles instead of 71 articles. Since I have a moment, the video shows 10:
1915-06-06 New York Sun "six million Jews" persecuted, half world population.
1918-10-18 New York Times "6,000,000 Jews" need a billion dollars. [Found in my previous link.]
1919-09-08 New York Times "Jews ... 6,000,000" in peril in Ukrainia and Poland. [Found in my link as "6,000,000 Jews".]
1919-11-12 New York TImes "Jews ... 6,000,000" in peril in Eastern Europe, says Felix Warburg, half world population. [Found in my link.]
1920-02-23 Atlanta Constitution "6,000,000 Jews" in Eastern Europe and Palestine need relief money.
1920-05-07 New York Times "six millions ... Jews" in Central and Eastern Europe get funded by Nathan Straus.
1921-07-20 New York Times "6,000,000 Jews" in peril in Russia. [My source had the same article in Chicago Tribune too.]
1931-12-29 Montreal Gazette "six million Jews" at risk of starvation in Southeastern Europe says Rabbi Wise. [Found in my link.]
1936-05-31 New York Times "millions of Jews", "European holocaust" (no 6 million noted). [Found in my link.]
1938-02-23 New York Times "6,000,000 Jews" deprived in Central Europe. [Found in my link.]
So not much new there. The use of the word "holocaust" in one case to refer to a human massacre is consistent from at least the 1910s based on its earlier meaning as a "whole" animal offering, which is a natural application to any persecution before it got attached to a particular stated one. That too shows no preplan, only a word already established that is getting repurposed opportunistically.
Now, the first search I find doing 3 million Jews is in Google Books rather than newspapers, but it's still a good baseline. I immediately find:
1894 The Russian Jews p. 25 "3,000,000 Jews" with no right of residency in Russia beyond the pale.
1917 Glory of Israel p. 24 "3,000,000 Jews" in Ukraine, half are leaving for Palestine.
1920 Prayer and Work for Israel p. 93 "3,000,000 Jews" of Ukraine organizing to leave.
1921 Sweater News p. 155 "3,000,000 Jews" want to leave Poland.
1926 Annual Report [American Jewish Committee] p. 71 "3,000,000 Jews" in Russia religiously restricted.
1926 The Survey [Survey Associates] p. 72 "three million Jews" starving in Russia.
1927 Menorah Journal p. 164 "3,000,000 Jews" cannot exist in Poland and must emigrate.
1928 Current History and Forum p. 687 "3,000,000 Jews" uprooted from Europe.
1929 National Jewish Monthly p. 274 "3,000,000 Jews" in distress in Poland.
1937 Current History p. 44 over "3,000,000 Jews" tragically starving in Poland.
So that's the first 10 applicable hits I got, out of the first 61 hits in all, which is pretty good. In short, it's impossible to prove anything by picking an arbitrary two very common terms and back-searching them for occurrences in a broad context. The closest thing I see is that ca. 1920 there was a coordinated fund appeal for 6 million Jews in the East Europe area where that number was repeated (5 of your sources over one year), and there was separately a lot of appeal for 3 million Russian Jews in Ukraine (5 of my sources). Because, like the World Almanac, people repeat the same population numbers from year to year. Jewish fundraising appeals mentioning any particular number of millions are literally a dime a dozen. Your articles aren't about "killings" any more than mine are; on either side their are occasional mentions of persecution and possibly actual deaths, but this is never related to death of a whole group of millions. If you're still trying to hold on to some qualitative difference between the ones you get from a source that agrees with your preconception, and the ones that come from a source that doesn't ... can you let me know why you selected your username? Because at GAW we use our autism powers for elite research.
Separately, as you wrote I was just looking at how many Jews left Europe out of 9.5 million, and I got about 500,000 from Poland, 300,000 from Germany, and 100,000 from Austria. You then added displaced persons, maybe 300,000, and hidden movement, maybe 100,000. So you could stretch it over 1.5 million, but it wouldn't account for the whole problem. Let me know if you get differently.
Also, if you had money, Christian and Jew, the German government targeted you. Took your money and threw you into camps quite often. Germany was broke and a war machine costs money.
The cabal and the current war. The cabal had two fundamental weaknesses: they were few and fragile. Even the middle ring is limited in number. There are several vestiges of the cabal’s power that remain, but those are systematically being dismantled and replaced.
Depends on which time period you are talking about.
After WW1, Germany was a disaster. And they were forced to pay all the war costs for both sides.
They had no economy. They were in a greater depression than even the rest of the world (including USA) would face in the 1930's.
During the 1920's, the jews had largely taken over. They turned Germany into the sex depravity capital of Europe. They took over a lot of government jobs. They bought up a lot of land from the German people for pennies on the dollar due to the hyperinflation. They were using high rates of usury to impoverish the German people.
Check out that video I posted about the rabbi who gave a lecture on the first 2 laws that Hitler passed when he came to power -- (1) No more pornography (which the jews were pushing), and (2) no more usuary (which the jews were also pushing).
Within 5 years of Hitler comming to power (1933-1938), Germany went from having massive inflation and being one of the most impoverished countries in Europe, to being the wealthiest country.
They called it the "Economic Miracle." Happened in just 5 years!
So, during those times, Germany was NOT "broke" because there WAS NO "war machine" at that time.
England and France declared war on Germany in 1939.
Many researchers say they did it because they were afraid of Germany's sudden economic rise to power.
So, stories of Christians having their stuff stolen and thrown into camps is probably a jewish lie.
Even the jews were allowed to KEEP ALL THEIR WEALTH if they moved to Palestine.
It was called the Havaara Agreement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
I hope that is what the Q Op is all about.
^ Matter of fact, here is a video of a story told by a young man about what it was like to live in Hitler's Germany, in the 1930's.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iEP3VtQ9ZTbR/
The Economic Miracle was real.
And Hitler REFUSED to use jew banker funny money.
That's why it happened so quickly.
Yep. Operators are active.
Thanks for putting in the time & linking many of the documentaries and videos that I stumbled upon a while back, but could no longer find.
u/#updoot
Downvotes start at sundown...
LOL.
Yeah, that's the worst part -- hard to keep track over time, especially when they magically disappear sometimes.
Yes... possibly even magickally disappearing as well...
OK, get this.
I posted this before, but I will again.
Let's take the event of 9/11.
Happened on 9/11/01.
First plane was Flight 11 (North Tower).
Next plane was Flight 175 (South Tower).
Next plane was flight 77 (Pentagon).
Last plane was Flight 93 (Pennsylvania).
I am using a Base 13 number system (because I think "13" is important for hidden communications).
Flight 11 = 11
Flight 175 = 1+7+5 = 13
Fight 77 = 7+7 = 14 = 1+4 = 5
Flight 93 = 12 = 1+2 = 3
From the planes, we have 11,13,5,3
From the date, we have 9,11,1
That's 1,3,5,9,11,11,13
But don't forget Buildng 7.
So: 1,3,5,7,9,11,11,13
Convert those to letters of the alphabet:
A,C,E,G,I,K,K,M
What does that spell?
KEK MAGIC
What is "kek magic?"
-- Wikipedia
It has been related to Pepe the Frog.
There WAS an entry for "kek magic" which had to do with dark magic, but it seems to have ... disappeared.
Interdasting ...
P.S. Edit -- I just realized that I copy and pasted your comment about "magickally" and when it printed on the screen, a slash between "c" and "k" shows up. I did not put it there, and neither did you. WEEEIIIIRD ...
Well that's damned interesting...
Here's another.
Have you ever looked at the term:
PRIDE MONTH
Look again:
PRIDEMONTH
I wonder if these sorts of things happen naturally, without someone planning it out, because they are of the satanic seed.
Well there's a whole "thing" with the English language being "magick"
Such as:
Cursive...
Spell-ing
Hidden meanings/Etemology
Excellent compilation.
Hey, I got on a roll this afternoon.
What can I say?
I've assumed that Anne Frank was another psyop. Surprised to see you give it any credence. Ever looked into that one?
Anne Frank was just a girl who kept a diary during wartime.
Most of the "juicy parts" of the diary were written by her father and his accomplice, not Anne.
Must of it was written with a ball point pen, which was not invented until after the war.
Otto Frank, her father, was a suspected cheat. He owned a business that produced a product that the German military bought to use as a preservative for soldier rations.
They discovered he was cheating them via double billing or some similar fraud.
They also found out he and other jews in his neighborhood were counterfeiting food coupons.
That is why the German police raided the place where he did business. They found a hidden apartment in that space.
Also, his older daughter, who was over 18, had been sent a letter by the Germans to report to a factory for work, but Otto kept her from going.
The Germans arrested Otto, the mother and daughters to sort it all out later.
Otto survived the war. He faked the "Anne Frank Diary" and made millions from it.
^ Here is a good discussion about the Anne Frank diary:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qFllqXd5oJiS/
Excellent summary; thanks.
👍
I went to Dachau twice, those mythical gas chambers are still there and right out the back door are the incinerator ovens, with trolleys. I guess that was a figment of my imagination, twice.
I think nobody who claims that the holocaust doesn't exist has actually been to any of those sites.
I find it VERY interesting that Dachau was the camp you toured.
I mentioned Fred Leuchter in my OP. I have watched several interviews of him and checked out his "Leuchter Report," which was submitted to the courts as evidence in at least two trials for people accused of the crime of "questioning the Holocaust."
As a reminder, he is (AFAIK) the only man in history to be certified by both the Canadian courts and German courts as an EXPERT WITNESS for WW2 gas chambers in Germany and Poland.
Keep in mind, both Canadian and German courts are extremely hostile towards any questioning of the Holocaust narrative, which is why they were prosecuting people for questioning it.
Leuchter specifically has talked about what he found at Dachau, which was very bizarre.
As he was taking measurements to compile his report, he noticed that his measurements and the blueprints were not in agreement.
Ultimately, he did some digging through archives at the Library of Congress, and he discovered that Eisenhower had ordered a construction crew to build a FAKE gas chamber at Dachau.
The Americans did not have control over any of the camps in Poland at that time (the Soviets did), so he could only look at the camps in Germany.
Since none of the camps in Germany had any gas chambers (they did have bomb shelters, large room showers, and delousing chambers, but no homicidal gas chambers), he ordered construction of a FAKE gas chamber. He did this so he could "show" members of Congress what a gas chamber looked like -- except, that it was only in his imagination.
So, that "gas chamber" that you saw was built by Eisenhower, not the Germans.
You, like all the other tourists there, were duped.
I'd have to see evidence of that myself and that doesn't address the next door incinerators and trolleys. Eye witness accounts of the forces were atrocious, yet the local population supposedly had no idea what was going on in there. (Typical innocent plea) The museum also had tons of artifacts and photos, hard to imagine it was all a fabrication.
Watch the interview of Fred Leuchter.
He is the world's authority on this subject -- even GERMAN courts say he is an expert witness on the subject.
That's because nothing nefareous was going on (other than it was a prison).
Watch the interview of Benton Bradberry. He interviewed a man who lived right across a farm field from Auschwitz when he was a teenager.
He could see right through the fence. He watched people moving around, busses picking up to go off to the factory in the morning and bringing them back at night.
No shootings. No weird human flesh smells. Just a prison.
That's because you want to read into it something that isn't there.
That's called REALLY GOOD PROPAGANDA.
Bradberry talked about going through a tour of Auschwitz with this man who lived there as a teen.
The tour operator would walk by the room with lots of human hair piled up and tell of a horrific story. Then the guy who actually lived there told Benton, "No, that's just what they want you to believe. When the prisoners came in, they all had their hair shaved and sent through the delousing chamber to kill lice, then they had a shower and were issued a new set of clothes. They threw away and burned the clothes they came in with to avoid the spread of lice. That's all it was."
When the prisons first started operating, and someone would die of old age, they would bury them in the field.
But they discovered that some of them had lice, which then got into the ground water, and spread typhus.
So, THAT is why they changed it up and started cremating dead bodies. It wasn't for evil purposes. It was to prevent the spread of lice to the popluation in the nearby town.
Some people are willing to look at BOTH SIDES of an argument, and THEN decide what they think is more likely to be true.
Maybe you are one who will, or maybe one who won't.
That's up to you.
Did they have any pictures of the bright pink bodies of the prisoners killed in the gas chambers? Or testimonies from other prisoners who had seen such bodies? Didn't think so.
You sound exactly like one of those cultural revolutionists . inflicted with O.D.D. as outlined in the DSM-5.
OK, I'll help you out since you're a little slow on the uptake.
There were no pictures or testimonies of bright pink bodies because there were no gas chambers for killing prisoners. Hence, no bodies.
The death camps were all in Poland. Zachary was a concentration camp,similar to the ones we had.
Yeah, I've been there several times too. Each time I visited, I felt that there was something not right about what I was seeing. The stories that I heard there in the late 80's/early 90's were completely different from the stories that were being told there in the 2010's. It was like a lot of the "horror" stories were being downplayed and the "punishment: stories were now front and center. e.g. the prisoners were bent over a table and had their asses whipped (Caned (?). This is NOT anything that was ever presented previously. It was almost like they were saying that the prisoners had their asses whipped, as you would have an unruly child. Too many inconsistencies in the narrative.
Any chance that back door was hermetically sealed? Didn't think so.
Also, I just remembered:
Bill Clinton, I think it was in his first address as President, specifically thanked Caroll Quigley for all he had done.
This was a message to "The Cabal" that he (Clinton) was one of [them], or at least on [their] side.
Just an interesting footnote.
An excellent thread of work Anon! This takes a lot of legit pieces and puts them together well.
thx
You premise breaks down within a few mere sentences.
"The Most Important Topics" are not authored by Rhoades and Griffin.
Instead, they are found in The Bible. Gods word. Try again. We won't be dissuaded.
I think it is all related, as I said in my OP.
But to each their own.
Certainly, the events of WW2 and the aftermath of the past 80 years since, is an excellent example of the Bible proving true.
IF I am right -- the wheat and the tares -- then the past 100 years' history supports the idea (not to mention the past 2,000+ years).
also, why is it that there is always an explanation about the holocaust not happening along with the "ethnic jews are evil"? what is the solution for the ethnic jews? is there redemption, or will they always be tainted? if so, how much blood qualifies?
That is interesting, isn't it.
I don't set the rules.
The separation of the wheat and the tares is in the Bible, and tells us what will ultimately happen.
But that's not up to me.
doesn't this go directly against the order to evangelize? if some of those people are beyond redemption because there blood is tainted then they cannot be saved, can they?
and there it is. better check your own bloodline then. who knows when something pesky might have snuck in. or, when some grandma had a side piece.
You seem very hostile to this line of discussion.
One might say you are "adversarial."
If you are a jew, I understand why you don't like it.
If you are a zionist, I also understand -- the cognitive dissonance must be extreme, if you were taught things that are counter to what I am presenting.
But all of us should pursue the truth, and maybe we will figure it all out.
i am half portuguese. my last name is jewish, as many of those names are. this would imply some amount of jewish blood. am i redeemable, or not? is everyone welcome in the christian tent, or not? am i to be evangelized, or not? which is it?
i've never considered myself jewish in any sense, but i am aware that my lineage implies that i have jewish blood from one of the countries that demanded that they convert to christianity. if you are going to imply that the blood is tainted then my questions need answering. how many christians will you remove on your quest, if that is your intent?
this is the type of post that would be most viscerally attacked by the normie world, which is what tells me its the touching the truth
Alright, so the Jews (and others) were cordially invited to stay at vacation resorts where they were politely forced to labor for the Nazis, and they all volunteered to have numbers tattooed onto their arms because number tattoos were all the rage back then. They weren't mistreated at all. Nobody actually died in those camps, and in fact those camps don't even exist. Hitler in fact loved Jews. Corrie Ten Boom and everyone else who survived the camps is a liar.
I think there is a lot of bullcrap about the Holocaust and I know that Jews use it to bludgeon everyone over the head with it, but at the same time this "the holocaust never happened" psy-op is also crap.
Good summary fren.
Yes and it's being lapped up eagerly by way too many in this post.
My parents once knew a couple from Germany who'd experienced the suffocating, Satanic spirit of evil at a Hitler Youth Rally, forced to be there against their will, but knowing they'd be in trouble if they had not attended. They were coached to bite the inside of their cheek until they tasted blood in order to resist the overwhelming urge to raise their hands. It was demonic mind control captivating people's hearts and it was the taste of their own blood that kept their senses. They've met people with the tattoos on their arms. They weren't all Jews at the camps.
But let's just forget about all that because Jews are liars, so therefore the holocaust never happened. Now I once had a temporary ban on this forum for making a joke about Jews being pedos. I have quoted the Talmud verses which condone raping children. Judaism is inherently Antichrist because there is no way any Jew does not know who Jesus is as the Talmud is full of disgusting claims about Him. The lie about the Holocaust is that Jews want everyone to feel sorry for them but they were not the only ones at the concentration camps. And people don't seem to realize that there were two types: work camps and extermination camps. Nick Fuentes can make jokes about baking cookies but not all of them were put in ovens.
I don't see any bullcrap conspiracy theories about the Soviet gulags being a myth. It's only about the Nazi concentration camps because... MUH JOOZ.
Thank you for your words fren. We're all humans and all flawed.
The Americans imprisoned ethnic Japanese during WW2, because they were suspected of being enemies within.
World Jewry declared open war against Germany, and tried to destroy it. So, they were also enemies within. That's why they were there.
Those camps, however, did have things that no homicidal program would bother with: swimming pool, soccer clubs (various teams of prisoners who wanted to play), a theater where plays and musical events were put on for the prisoners, a brothel, a hospital which also had a maternity ward for pregnant (jew) women, a post office where prisoners could send and receive mail, among other things.
Your MSM propaganda shows on History Channel didn't tell you about any of that, did they?
If there really was a homicidal program going on to kill all the jews, then the easiest, cheapest, and most efficient method would have been to simply put a bullet in their head as they stepped off the train, and dump their bodies in a ditch.
Or, have them all go into a cave, and blow it up.
But none of that happened. They treated their prisoners with more respect than most countries would.
The Soviets had the gulags, where they worked prisoners to death. Did they put on musicals for them? Hell, no. But the Germans did.
You have been brainwashed, as all of us have, by PROPAGANDA.
It's a tough pill to swallow, what with cognitive dissonance and all.
I understand -- was there myself at one time. But the more one learns about the subject, the more one sees the overt propaganda.
If you actually take a look at those tattoos (there were not many), you will find that they all look DIFFERENT.
Now, if the Germans were anything, they were orderly and systematic. The trains ran on time, etc. There is no chance they would have slapped on sloppy tattoos that all looked different.
Of course, we don't know for certain, but many suspect some jews of putting those on themselves for sympathy.
They certainly do not look like the work of an organized German operation.
There was a German commandant who was EXECUTED -- BY THE GERMANS -- for mistreating prisoners.
If you watch that video of the ex-German soldiers and the Dutch woman talking, they were very clear that they had rules to follow, and anything out of line would be punished by the Germans against the Germans who violated the rules.
Of course, people died, but not from gas chambers (which did not exist).
Of course, they did.
Of course, he did not, and explained WHY he did not like them in his book, "Mein Kampf," which you will never read, so will never understand his reasoning.
Remember, by 1933, communist jews had already taken over Russia, renamed it the USSR, and systematically murdered 60,000,000 ethnic Russians and Ukrainians, and raped, tortured, and murdered ethnic Germans living in Poland.
The Germans HAD to fight because they KNEW the communist jews were coming for them next.
Here is a timeline of how the communist jews actually DID take over parts of Germany in the aftermath of WW1 --
Part 1 - https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1918-20/
Part 2 - https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1921-23/
Part 3 - https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1924-28/
Part 4 - https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1929-33/
Jewish Bolshevik Rape (NSFW) -- https://www.bitchute.com/video/vi3dyEySSt6t/
They were ANIMALS.
I have no idea who TF that is.
No, it is the truth.
When someone digs in and researches it -- with an open mind -- they will find the truth, too.
I read "Mein Kampf" in the 5th grade. Refresh my memory, but did he not speak of the annihilation of the Jewish race from Europe? Hitler was a psychopath who drove his cousin to suicide. Yes, the Japanese were put into internment camps. For the vast majority of them, their allegiance was to the United States. I am no fan of Judaism and I've been temporarily banned on this forum for being harsh against it. It is an Antichrist religion, but most Jews don't know their ass from a hole in the ground, much like most Muslims.
I keep an open mind. I even approached the whole "Flat Earth" nonsense in the same fashion. I subjected myself to hours listening to their stupid babble and in the end, it was still all horseshit.
Corrie ten Boom was a Dutch Christian woman whose family had a hidden room built into a wall in which they helped Jews escape the Nazis. She wrote the book "The Hiding Place" and a movie was made of her ordeals. She and her sister were arrested by Nazis and put into the Ravensbruck concentration camp. According to you, it must've been like a resort. According to her, her sister eventually died there from health complications and was not given proper health care due to mistreatment.
Josef Mengele's crimes against humanity are well-documented. It was not just Jews but invalids, mentally retarded people, Gypsies, and Christian dissidents who were also put into the camps. I guess according to you, Hitler must have forgotten to add to his "Final Solution" a "J/K, LOL" at the end. Although I suppose you would claim that the Final Solution is a Jewish fabrication?
I will watch the stuff you've provided. It just is a bit odd that a man who hated Jews so much and made speech after speech about how rotten they are and also called for their extermination would have in the end been a wuss who didn't follow through with the core of his identity with all the power at his disposal to act on it. I fully accept that he had valid criticisms of how Jewish banksters were destroying Germany. I am willing to accept that actual numbers could have been exaggerated and such. But when you have admission from the man himself that he wanted Jews exterminated, it seems a bit odd that he wouldn't follow through with it when he had the means to do so.
I live in Japan and there are people here who claim that the Rape of Nanking is nothing but Chinese propaganda. They point at some doctored propaganda movie that America made in which footage of Chinese Nationalists executing communists in the streets was used, by cropping into the footage to remove the Nationalists' uniforms. Of course they had to mess around with stuff like that because the Imperial Japanese Army wasn't about to just let some Westerners film their atrocities. They did some very disgusting things there. Unit 731 did a lot of depraved stuff like Mengele did. Japanese people can be incredulous while doubting that their country could have possibly done anything so barbaric. Well, my wife's grandfather was in China and he once told me that when his unit was ordered to massacre innocent civilians, he said that he missed with his rifle on purpose. Whether he killed them or not, it doesn't matter to me. His brother was killed when MacArthur retook the Philippines and had every right to hate Americans, yet he loved me and accepted my love for his granddaughter immediately. My point is that humanity can be capable of great barbarism. I am not denying how dangerous Judaism can be.
If there were six million killed, how come none of the survivors have number tattoos with seven digits? Why do all the tattoos look like they were scribbled by a third grader? The Germans are a methodical people. They would have used machines with identical typeface for numbering.
Oh good grief. Every camp had their own numbering obviously. Do you think they were coordinating with other camps? "Hey Hans, we just received a fax from Dachau. They say that they've already processed numbers 4,621 to 6,092. You'll have to re-tattoo the new arrivals today, starting with number 6,093. And make sure you stick to the Helvetica font! No more of that Times font. Are you trying to make us Germans look bad?"
so, anyone with any ethnic jewish blood is tainted? needs to be removed? wiping out portugal and a few other places?
"Go date" of Russia destruction operation (via communism vector) was 1889 when the cabal initiated a "flu pandemic" in Russia. The 100 year plan was completed in 1989 when Russia was "broken up" politically with Ukraine SSR, Georgia SSR, and Kazahkstan SSR all stolen Russian land hived off to be re-assembled later.
Doestoevsky's 'Demons' (1873) details the origins of the Communist Jews and their useful idiot supporters in Russia who had revealed their 1905/1917 intent already by around 1866: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demons_(Dostoevsky_novel)
They succeeded in assassinating a czar in 1881 (bomb) after numerous failed attempts in 1870s)
Destruction of US 100-year plan appears to have been activated in 1989 (to facilitate the rise of CCP). Others appear to go back to at least 1489: French Republic destruct (start 1789), Mogul Empire destruct? (start 1689), Dutch Republic destruct (start 1589), Japan destruct? (start 1489). There are some overlapping and running simultaneously. 1389, 1289, and 1189 not yet identified. 1089 appears to be related to England infiltration (orchestrated by Venetians or related party?): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Venice
Plans are 100 years because key families play 100 year roles with Grandfather, father, and son each contributing a "core" 33.3 years of their lives to the cause. Thus, 100 year plans are really 99.9 years (inverted 666).
Puzzle me this. Looking at the map of the allotment of the 12 tribes in the Promised Land. [OK there are various maps and you are more familiar with them than I am.]
The 12 tribes of Israel came from Jacob's lineage. Plus: The Edomites were the descendants of Esau (who was also called Edom), brother of Jacob, who was tricked out of his heritage.
In the Old Testament I mostly see the Northern Kingdom (Israel) and the Southern Kingdom (Judea). They did not have the same history. Was the Babylonian captivity only of the Northern Kingdom?
So does the Old Testament tell us what happened to the other tribes and the Edomites?
Modern Israel claims heritage from the Northern Kingdom? All 12 tribes?
OK I have tried to search and figure out the history, but I need the perspective of the 20th and 21st Centuries!
ELI5!
Which tribe or tribes does modern Israel assert to be descendant from?
Many thanks, fren. I never could understand all this.
ArmyLady ... you're gonna LOVE my answer. ;-)
Right.
Right. Almost.
Esau was the older brother. Therefore, it was his to inherit, not Jacob's.
BUT ... Esau did not follow God's Law.
Remember, "God loved Jacob, but hated Esau."
Why?
I explained it in my OP reference to my comment in the "Edom Theory" thread.
This thread: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASYyyQCGu/edom-theology/
Correct. Almost. It was the "Kingdom of Israel" and the the "Kingdom of Judah" (not Judea).
No.
Around 700 BC, the Kingdom of Israel (the northern kingdom) was conquered by the Assyrians.
Around 500 BC, the Kingdom of Judah (the southern kingdom) was conquered by the Babylonians.
The Babylonians eventually freed their captives, many years later. Those who returned to their old land were returning to a land that was no longer the "Kingdom of Judah."
Now, it was a Roman province, since Rome conquered that area in the meantime. The province was now called Judea.
This is why it can get confusing.
The Kingdom of Judah was before Christ. The Roman province of Judea was during the time of Christ.
Also, in those intervening years, the Edomites, who lived just to the south of the Kingdom of Judah, moved into the old Kingdom of Judah territory when the Judahites (who were also a subset of the Israelites) were removed by the Babylonias.
But the time that Rome conquered that area, they used the Edomites for the local governing body, subject to the higher authority of Rome.
By the time Christ was living there, Judea was no longer an Israelite (or Judahite) society. It was "muh diverse" society with a mix of different people living there -- true Judahites (aka Israelites of the Judah and Benjamin and some Levite family trees), some Edomites, and assorted others all living there.
Kind of like how Detroit was once a White city, until the blacks moved north.
BTW, this also happened in Egypt, centuries earlier. Those pyramids were built when the White folk were living there. The arabs and others live there now, but they had nothing to do with it.
When the Assyrians let the Israelites go, the Israelites did NOT return back to their original land like the Judahites did.
Instead, the migrated north into the Caucasus Mountain region (near southern Russia).
Many years later, they would further migrate again westward into the wilderness of Europe.
They would become the "Europeans." They knew their ancestors came from the Caucasus region, which is why they were called "Caucasian."
BUT ...
The did NOT know they were also the true Isrealites of the Bible.
The Bible prophesized that the Israelites would forget who they were.
THIS is the video you want to watch: "Israel's Fingerprints" by Bertrand Compere --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/m30YKGbnCvnW
"The Roman province of Judea was during the time of Christ."
Got it. It included Bethlehem and Jerusalem.
So we have the Jews living at the time of Christ. After all the captivities, etc. who were those Jews? Remnants of the Southern Kingdom as you have described? Were there any remnants of the Northern Kingdom? Was there any priesthood?
"The exile of Judah, accompanied by the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, brought an abrupt end to the Levitical and priestly service in the temple. After the exile, the temple was rebuilt and priests and Levites resumed their duties in the sacrificial system. Some of those who returned claimed to be of priestly descent but could not prove it." So the line of succession of their priests was lost a long time before Christ . . .?
Then what happened to the Jews of Biblical times, until 1917? The Catholic Church has a list of Popes from that time until now. So we know who the Catholics are.
I still don't get, who are the jewish people in the state of Israel now? And who were they at the time of Christ?
I always wondered about all the genealogies etc. in the Old Testament. I am getting a tingle in my genealogy research instinct; it is there to show us that the Jews of Christ's time and of today are not the same as the Jews of the OT??
The "fork in the road," so to speak, was with Jacob and Esau.
They were twins. Their father was Isaac, and grandfather Abraham.
Their family tree went like this:
OT: God >> Adam >> Seth >> ... Noah >> Shem >> ... Eber >> ... Abraham >> Isaac >> Jacob & Esau.
NT: Picks up with Jacob/Israel >> Judah >> ... Mary >> Jesus.
That's why the genealogy is in there. It is all about the bloodlines of the family trees ("This man begat these sons; that son begat this son," etc.).
The descendants of Adam are sometimes called "Adamites," though that term is not used by the mainstream churches. They want everyone to believe that Adam was the "first man," but he was not. Clearly, we know from archeology that there were other humans on Earth prior (Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, etc.).
The descendants of Shem are the Semites. This is where things start to get off track, as jews try to claim that they are the descendants of those people.
The descendants of Eber were the Hebrews. This is important because the Hebrews had the religion of the Old Testament. Jews try to claim this, too.
And then, Jacob/Israel, patriarch of the Israelites. Again, jews try to claim this, but do so only via fraud and deceit.
Esau is the one who took that fork in the road. He began to race mix with the Canaanites and others, which was prohibited by God.
This is where the modern day line of "jew" started to take shape.
Canaanites lived among the Kenites, who were descended from Cain, the evil child.
Cain was the child of Satan. The Garden of Eden was not about an apple. "Fruit" and "seed" had to do with sex.
The "snake" (not an actual reptile, but a human of satanic origin) "beguiled" Eve, which means seduced.
While Abel was the biological son of Adam, Cain was not.
Cain's satanic seed (btw -- "Satan" simply means "Adversary" in Hebrew) was passed down to the Canaanites, Hittites, and Esau/Edom and the Edomites.
By the time of Christ, the original Israelites had been deported out of the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah.
That land area was now Judea (a province of Rome). The Romans used the Edomites for local law, subject to higher authority of Rome.
Herod, and Edomite "king" (subject to higher authority of Rome) made all the people of Judea convert to Judaism. They started practicing some aspects of the old Hebrew religion (OT) such as circumcision, and tried to use that to claim they were Hebrews.
But they were just fake. Just doing copycat stuff, basically.
They were not true Hebrews or Israelites.
But this is where things got a little mixed up, and is why Christians do not have a good understanding today.
Jews have tried to destroy Christianity from the beginning. They claimed they were the Hebrews, and so they could tell the Christians what the OT said.
But jews do not follow the OT. They followed back then the Tradition of the Elders. That was a bunch of jewish rabbis who decided that they knew better what religion should be all about by creating their own rules (such as it was okay to rape a young girl, as long as she was under 3 years old).
That Tradition of the Elders religion eventually became today's Talmud. Jews today have schools ("Yeshivas") which are dedicated to studying the Talmud.
That is their religion -- the ones that follow it.
What we think of today as a "jew" were the Edomites living in Judea at the time of Christ.
This is why Jesus told them that they are not of God, but are of Satan.
John 8:44 --
That's KJV. I like to also check out the Expanded Bible, because it gives various wordings form multiple Bibles:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%208%3A44&version=EXB
So, what happened regarding "jews" between then and now?
Like others, they have migrated and some have mixed with others.
That's why they don't all look the same.
The ones in and running the modern day state of "Israel" (so-called) are not "fake jews." They are real jews.
And they tend to have a particular way of living life -- particular behaviors -- some moreso than others.
Whites tend to be "too trusting" and too willing to just let things happen. That is a weakness, as we see what is now happening in White nations -- Europe, USA, Australia, etc.
I have met some jews that I like. They are not all the same. But their fundamental nature tends to lean more towards being deceitful.
Although I have known a few I liked, I have never done business with someone who I knew was a jew and who acted in a fair manner.
That is just my experience, but if the Bible is true, then this is the type of thing we should expect.
To a large extent, there are high-level jews who are behind MUCH of the mayhem taking place in our world today.
That does not mean that every single jew is "in on it." But there ARE certainly a group of jews who just can't stop trying to kill off Whitey.
They are behind the 3rd world invasion of White countries.
They are behind the push for race mixing Whites and blacks or others. The ones who push the Kalergi Plan want everyone in the world to be race-mixed, except for them, so they can control the world.
They are behind communism -- they created it, and they push it. Again, for control.
They are behind transgender and multiple genders. They created the first sex change operation in world history -- in Germany during the Weimar Republic.
They run much of the pornography business.
They owned the slave ships and ran the slave trade back in the day. Slave auctions were closed on jewish holidays.
There is a lot more beyond that.
If the Bible is true, and if my reading is more or less correct, then it makes sense that the "Adversary" would be constantly trying to deceive and mess things up. It would be in their nature, according to Christ.
And if it is not true or my reading is not correct, then how can one explain ALL the SHIT that so many jews have pushed on the world for centuries?
Just a coinkidink?
Best of luck in your own search for truth.
It is certainly confusing, and I am certainly not going down all these rabbit holes!! but I do want to understand the present influences, back to Christ.
Bottom line? SO the Jewish religion does not accept the Old Testament of the Bible as its history and teaching? And prophesy? I always thought the OT was the "Jewish Bible."
To Christianity, the Old Testament is the Old Covenant. Superceded by the New Covenant created by Jesus Christ and documented by the New Testament. The Jewish People are no longer the Chosen People because they rejected that -- many times with idols and then by rejecting their Messiah Jesus Christ.
Many Jews converted to Christianity, many did not. God opened Salvation to the gentiles as well.
More now than before our conversation, I view Israel as a nation state carved out of geography by the powers that were, for secular reasons, which has nothing to do with the Chosen People or those who lived in Judea at the time of Christ and before.
Thanks fren.
P.S. SO the descendants of Abraham were the Chosen People. Destined to receive the Messiah, the Only Begotten Son of the Father, the Savior! SOME of them were the first to accept Him! His apostles and disciples. It was a bit later they realized their mission was to the gentiles too, and indeed to preach to all peoples of the world! Which many missionaries did and are still doing!
So with all the prophecy etc. the other descendants of Abraham, the jewish people / religion who rejected their special heritage, their special place in history, to reject their own Messiah, they are by definition apostates? Jesus slapped down the Pharisees. What are we to conclude?
I conclude: those of the Chosen People who did not accept Christ are apostates of their own history and faith. How can one view it otherwise?
If you haven't done so yet, watch that video "Israel's Fingerprints." It is an eye opener, and explains things much better than I can.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/m30YKGbnCvnW
Also, Benjamin Freedman's 1961 speech is outstanding for understanding why WW1 was the cause of WW2. Freedman was a jew who personally knew many of the high-level jews. But the man introducing him for his lecture to the audience said he "is a former jew. And I mean FORMER jew."
He goes into "jew" in the Bible, as well, and where it came from.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZSBmYAlllLo
Those are two excellent videos to get a better picture of things.
Jews use deceit in many ways. They use the term "Torah." They tell US that Torah means the first 5 books of the OT -- Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
I do believe there are SOME jews, who are not all that religious, who read that and consider those books to be the Torah (some jews are ALSO duped).
That video in my OP about the 2 rabbis were talking about how they never knew why "Hitler hated the jews." They learned that it was primarily because jews created communism. And communism had destroyed Russia and was heading westward to destroy Europe, and especially Germany (which was already happening in the 1920's).
My point: Not all jews realize WTF is going on, just like the rest of us.
However ...
There are other jews who ALSO use the word "Torah" to mean ALL teachings of Judaism. That includes the Talmud and other jewish teachings.
You see that? Using the same word to mean two different things, but not disclosing which meaning they are using. That's deceit.
It's kind of like Christianity. Not ALL Christians look at it exactly the same. The same goes for jews.
But the ones who follow the Talmud, follow THAT. Where there is any disagreement between the OT and the Talmud, they go with the Talmud.
Same as Muslims who go with the Quron where it differs with OT.
The jews were NEVER the Chosen People.
The Chosen People are the ISRAELITES, and the jews are NOT Israelites (though they claim to be, falsely).
The promise was made to Abraham, passed down to Isaac and then Jacob/Israel.
What was the promise?
That Abraham would (a) be the father of many nations, (b) have many kings, and (c) be a blessing to the world.
Have the jews created many nations? No. They have NEVER created even ONE nation. The one they have today was GIVEN to them.
But White Europeans created many nations all throughout Europe, Russia, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
Have the jews had many kings?
No. But European history is full of hundreds of kings.
Have the jews been a blessing to the world?
No. They have been a pain in the ass.
But Whites have created almost every invention worth talking about, created the best form of government so far figured out, and given more charity to the rest of the world than everyone else on Earth combined.
Those are called "cryptojews." Some may be sincere, but others have done so in order to "fit in" to the society they were living in -- and some probably did it to sabotage Christianity from within.
See, here's the problem.
WORDS and TERMINOLOGY ... often being misused and/or misunderstood.
Let's say someone goes to medical school to be a doctor. Do you think they are taught 100% truth and 0% falsehood?
I don't. I think the people who RUN the medical schools teach the students what they want them to think, and MOST doctors never research anything on their own.
They just buy into it, hook, line, and sinker ... without question. That's MOST doctors.
The same concept applies to MOST lawyers who went to law school.
And MOST law enforcement officers who went to a police academy.
All of these schools are taught through SOMEONE ELSE'S perspectives, biases, and agendas.
They don't necessarily get 100% truth.
And I would say the same is true of the seminiaries. MOST of today's clergy believe in some (not all, but some) false dogmas and doctrines.
Most of them believe that jews are the Israelites, and that is what they preach.
But what if that is wrong?
When it comes to certain words, such as "gentile," you can't just assume that the jews told you the truth about what that word means.
They manipulate words to their benefit.
To a jew, a "gentile" is someone who is not a jew.
But the English word "gentile" comes from the Latin "gentilis" which means clan or tribe.
In Roman times (when the NT was using that term), it meant someone who was not a Roman citizen.
Gentile does NOT mean "non-jew."
It means one who is of the nation -- whatever nation you are talking about.
"Nation" comes from the Latin "nacio" which means "of birth."
So, it has to do with BLOOD RELATIONS.
And that is what the Bible is all about.
It is a book to the White nations, about the White nations, for the White nations, and explaining the past and future.
So, the word "gentile" is really misused most of the time.
The modern day churches teach a lot of misinfo -- often without knowing.
Check out this sermon by Pastor Bertrand Compere (who also did the "Israel's Fingerprints") --
"Jesus Was Not a Jew."
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VFxCAi8MFAtz
Also, we can use more than just the Bible to understand history.
The Old Testament is a history, but it ends around 400 BC.
The New Testament picks up around 100-200 AD.
That time in between is a mystery. But there are archeological digs, writings by historians (the writings of whom have survived), and other ways we can try to piece it all together.
Check out this video:
100 Proofs the Israelites Were White:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8nTWbmBUDN1G
Shedding the propaganda that the jews were somehow "God's Chosen" is one of the tough ones to get.
The propaganda started before either of us were born. And the modern seminaries are pushing into a certain direction, that jews have manipulated, such that most Christians get a false understanding. That's why there are so many damn zionists.
If you ever hear the term "Judeo-Christian" you KNOW that the person has no idea what they are talking about.
The Talmud proves that jews HATE Christianity, and will try any way the can to destroy it.
More or less, yes.
Though, there was a time around the time of Christ that Whites and jews both lived there.
The modern day jews have manipulated the situation to get their piece of land -- mostly due to money, which comes from the fractional reserve central banking system.
That needs to be destroyed and go back to the gold standard.
Fractional reserve is not terrible, and has a usefulness, but FIAT (which means the money has no inherent value) is very bad.
"Give me the power to print the money, and I care not who makes the laws." -- Mayer Amschel Rothschild
The promise was ultimately handed down to Jacob. So, it is more specifically the Israelites -- who eventually became the Europeans.
If you believe that good/evil has been playing out between Whites/jews over the last many centuries/millenia, then it starts to make sense why the Aryans of Germany were defending themselves from the communist jews of USSR.
And today, we have 3rd world invasions, Talmudic transgenderism, etc.
If the Bible were not true, it would be one hell of a coincidence.
Does the Mossad know all of this? HA!
Seriously, thank you for the time to explain this. [Note if my Dad had not shared knowledge like this with me in my childhood, I would be more skeptical; but he is a source from an earlier time, and clearly much of the tribes of Israel and their dispersion was known.] [Like from the Bible??]
I found this a succinct explanation: https://www.answerthebible.com/what-happened-to-the-lost-tribes-of-israel/
So the tribe of Israel was gone, and the remaining peasants: This remnant of poor Israelites left in the land eventually intermarried with the foreign settlers over time. Their descendants became the [hated] Samaritans who lived in the region during the time of Jesus."
"All but Judah and Benjamin, both of which were based in the neighbouring Kingdom of Judah, and therefore survived until the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem in 587 BCE."
Interdasting that the Messiah was to arise from the House of David, which was the Southern Kingdom and rejected by the rest:
"Solomon's death led to the rejection of the House of David by most of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, with only Judah and Benjamin remaining loyal: the dissenters chose Jeroboam as their monarch and formed the Kingdom of Israel in the north (Samaria); while the loyalists kept Solomon's son Rehoboam as their monarch and formed the Kingdom of Judah in the south (Judea). With the success of Jeroboam's Revolt having severed Israel's connection to the House of David, only the Judahite monarchs, except Athaliah, were part of the Davidic line."
The Northern Kingdom, the Kingdom of Israel, rejected their Davidian line. They were dispersed before the time of Christ.
SO WHY is this new nation state called Israel?!? The ones who were dispersed and rejected the Davidian line? and lost the line of their priesthood? If they want a claim to this land, they should have held it at the time of Christ, and they clearly did not.
AACH!
This is a very good and educational post. But it is only one side. The other side is the roman imperium. A century long scam that owns your strawman through the birth certificate, the time through the calendar system etc.
Holocaust denial is vile. You are sick.
"It's not"
I don't know whom it is you are quoting, but being a bigot is disgusting.
Jews who push the Kalergi plan, which is the genocide of the White race, are bigots.
Would you agree they are bigots?
I would not, because your purported white genocide is an anti-Semitic canard.
Yeah, that's what I thought you would say, handshake.
Turns out, you are the bigot, after all.
I'm not a bigot. Bigot against whom?