Critical thinking. My dad, a marine, showed me how. I am a woman. I put aside emotion whilst thinking, especially when THEY want my emotions to erupt. You can tell from how they say it, present it / imply it. I think i am ok with the way my thought processes go. Of course the Lord gave me insight and discernment, BIG HELP there. God Bless America.
As a woman, I agree with this. Most females are too stupid to vote or make rational decisions, because all they care about are emotions. That's what swerved society towards the cliff with all the "you're whatever gender you feel like today!" bullshit, and the participation awards so people didn't get their feelings hurt. They denigrated masculinity to the point where we have an entire generation (maybe two) of manbun-wearing soyboys who worry more about what bathroom people use than how to fix the bathroom if something breaks.
Anyone who wants to take part in the political process in our great republic should have to become naturalized. If you don't understand how our government is supposed to work, you have no business voting.
People born inside our borders should be legal residents, but only if born to one or more legal residents.
I think it should go further than that. Originally, only landowners were allowed to vote, because they were the ones funding everything. And there was only one vote per household.
If they abolished income tax, and went with property ownership, it would help things tremendously (and only allow natural citizens to own property). Apartments fill up with a bunch of illegals around here (paid for by hard-working natural citizens) or with GenZ's who think borders shouldn't exist and think everyone should be "given" everything they want, including a house. Get those morons out of the voting pool and we'd be doing much better. Well, as long as we got all the Karens out of the voting pool, too.
same kinda situation years ago, obama 2nd term coming up for vote...i was driving, my friend was in shotgun seat, and longtime friend of hers from grade school in back seat...so i questioned why 75 year old backseat gal was gonna vote for obama AGAIN, and she said "i like the way he looks in jeans..." i almost ran the car into a ditch, but asked my shotgun passenger to PLEASE reach back and slap the EVERLOVIN' SHIT outta this dumb ass!
Whenever I leave the country for work, I come back and tell my kids: "You don't know how good you have it here". Lots of places have turned into hell holes because people got too complacent.
No democrat would ever win without women votes. Meanwhile, no republican would ever win without male votes. Not to mention, the ideals that allowed these corrupt fucks to be "elected" were mainly promoted and allowed because of feelings.
I understand your sentiment, but please put the feelings away and objectively examine it. Remove feelings from it. In a logic only environment, none of those listed would have ever been elected.
No Democrat would ever win without the black vote either. However, I don't see you advocating for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and voting rights acts.
I am not saying the blacks should have their vote removed. I am just pointing out the selectivity of the "barefoot and pregnant" crowd when they want to find excuses to remove the rights of people they wish to control.
It really has nothing to do with electing Democrats at all. If it did, you' d be advocating removing voting rights from both groups.
Oh and by the way, not all women vote Democratic. There are divisions by, age, race, and affiliation. But of course you already know that and don't really care.
And I am viewing a misogynistic viewpoint completely objectively.
The comment was about sex, not race and stated by a woman on the supreme court now.
"In actual presidential elections, the gap is often more pronounced. For example, in the 2020 election, exit polling via the Cornell Roper Center indicated that 57% of women voted for the Democratic candidate (Joe Biden) compared to only 42% of men. Conversely, women also historically turn out to vote at higher rates than men in every presidential election"
It is not misogynistic to observed the statistics and make an accurate statement based off the same statistics.
Again, this is an emotional response based on the topic at hand.
Of course there are other variables and similar statements can be made in the inverse or about different categories, but the one that was discussed here is in fact accurate. If you feel accurate statements are misogynistic then I hate to break it to you but it is an emotional response. I am not advocating for the repeal but when the topic comes up, it is usually by other women. Social media is not the greatest by any means but when this topic is discussed, it is usually a woman saying for it to happen and the men being the ones saying no.
You've sidestepped the issue. Why aren't you calling for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and the voting rights act when the majority of blacks vote Democratic?
If your gripe is truly about groups that primarily vote Democratic and a call to repeal the ammendment which gave them voting rights then you should be advocating for the repeal of both ammendments.
But you're not. You're only advocating taking away the rights of ONE of the groups. Why is that?
I'm talking about what you advocated for on this forum. You're responsible for your own statements. So I want you to explain the double standard you're using.
I am using a perfectly logical argument that is not at all emotional. The only possible reason for you to take that position is misogyny. The large amount of women who vote for Democrats is no more destructive to our society than the large amount of blacks who vote for Democrats. Yet you only advocate for removing the rights of women.
It's a perfectly logical and non emotional argument. Just because you call it "emotional" doesn't make it so.
Again since reading is apparently hard for you. The issue was gender, not race. YOU made it about race. Again like previously stated, I am NOT advocating for it, YOU are implying I am. All I did was point out statistics and advise a truthful statement. YOU are the one side stepping the topic at hand. YOU are the one implying race was the original topic at hand. AGAIN I am NOT advocating for the repeal. YOU jumped to that. Are YOU replying to ALL the others in this thread with the SAME reply that RACE is the topic and not GENDER?
You are proving YET AGAIN that you are being emotional and stating I am advocating for repealing of rights when I have NOT done that in any way. YOU are the one pushing that.
For the FOURTH TIME, I am NOT advocating for the repeal of ANY rights. STOP stating I am. Interesting that you jumped right to black people when pointing out the majority of women vote democrat. By your logic, you are racist then right? Since referring to ANYTHING is automatically against it right?
It is NOT logical to say untrue statements. I have NOT advocated for the removal of rights. Yet you say you are being logical when you state I have?
Perhaps one should have to pass a critical thinking test before being allowed to vote. If someone lacks the ability to exercise logic, they get removed from the voting rolls.
I wonder how many people would be left to vote, then. Most women would be removed. Almost all inner city blacks would be removed. Trailer parkers would almost certainly be removed. Hell, three-fourths of present college graduates would be removed, too, since their "gender studies" bullshit degrees don't teach them how to reason at all.
Really? We worry about our kids being raped and murdered and she's afraid of just threats. Maybe if she lived like we do WITHOUT security maybe she'd rule appropriately.
This should apply to justices, congressman, and everyone else who places themselves above those they are supposed to represent. Force them to live by the laws they force on the rest of us and see how quickly things change.
Heard her whining about having to explain the bullet proof vest to her 12 year old. Didn’t she adopt two African American kids? She’s gonna have to explain a lot more to them about life then that.
Her children aren't unique. All children worry about something happening to their parents. So if she thinks hers are experiencing something no other child does -- I hate to burst her bubble. I remember being terrified of my parents passing away the first time I became aware that there was such a thing. And I was maybe 5 at the time.
So yes, I understand the sentiment. But I don't think it was worth a news interview to state the obvious. I don't think anyone ever really acted against her anyway.
ONLY President Trump's children have had the experience of living through the shock of having someone attack their dad. And.I don't think anyone ever asked them about it, nor do I think they should. Their feelings are theirs alone and nobody should be prying into them.
Or their children…..as a parent what would you do? We can talk a big game until it’s our family that’s being threatened. She needs to be able to shoot first ask questions later. Yes the 2nd amendment on full display.
I understand that there are certain complexities when someone has young children, but it would serve Ms Barrett better if she were to channel Mr Thomas's warrior spirit versus operating under a cloud of fear. It would have been a great opportunity to teach her son that standing up for what's right is not easy and can be downright dangerous in this current environment. Arm up, lady, and get you and all your family members into firearms training classes. We're in a war, like it or not.
That woman should probably not have been made a justice. Her rulings have been disappointing. But Jeanine Pirro would be an excellent justice. Quality has nothing to do with the sex of a individual. It has to do with the character of a person.
That pronouncement gave me chills when it was delivered. It still does. That quiet dignity and strength reminds me of Trump. The same warrior spirit at his core.
This type of shit needs to stop. All this does is create the same type of division that has been distracting us. The issue isn’t gender, it’s the money behind the threats. Look up at the money don’t blame the victims and get caught in this bullshit
Suck it up buttercup. The Supreme Court voted to allow any Tom, Dick or Harry to come in to have a baby here illegally and allow citizenship. Anyone who breaks immigration laws is already raising a child to become a delinquent. This will only encourage further corruption and it is these non-citizens you have to fear for your life. The justices have more protection than the ordinary citizen.
Many shouldn't even be allowed to vote.....
Very few women are willing to take a course in logic and the spend a lot of time sowing feelings based discourse on social media.
Critical thinking. My dad, a marine, showed me how. I am a woman. I put aside emotion whilst thinking, especially when THEY want my emotions to erupt. You can tell from how they say it, present it / imply it. I think i am ok with the way my thought processes go. Of course the Lord gave me insight and discernment, BIG HELP there. God Bless America.
As a woman, I agree with this. Most females are too stupid to vote or make rational decisions, because all they care about are emotions. That's what swerved society towards the cliff with all the "you're whatever gender you feel like today!" bullshit, and the participation awards so people didn't get their feelings hurt. They denigrated masculinity to the point where we have an entire generation (maybe two) of manbun-wearing soyboys who worry more about what bathroom people use than how to fix the bathroom if something breaks.
Yeah, we need to roll back suffrage. Weve sufferaged enough already.
As a woman, I agree with this comment.
As a woman, I somewhat agree with this comment, some men shouldn't be able to vote either...
I've met many bad ass women and too many soy boys.
Tru dat!
Frankly, birthright citizenship should NOT exist.
Anyone who wants to take part in the political process in our great republic should have to become naturalized. If you don't understand how our government is supposed to work, you have no business voting.
People born inside our borders should be legal residents, but only if born to one or more legal residents.
I think it should go further than that. Originally, only landowners were allowed to vote, because they were the ones funding everything. And there was only one vote per household.
If they abolished income tax, and went with property ownership, it would help things tremendously (and only allow natural citizens to own property). Apartments fill up with a bunch of illegals around here (paid for by hard-working natural citizens) or with GenZ's who think borders shouldn't exist and think everyone should be "given" everything they want, including a house. Get those morons out of the voting pool and we'd be doing much better. Well, as long as we got all the Karens out of the voting pool, too.
😆😆😆 Correct!
I remember my conservative dad was mad when my mom announced that she decided to vote for Bill Clinton because he was "Attractive".
same kinda situation years ago, obama 2nd term coming up for vote...i was driving, my friend was in shotgun seat, and longtime friend of hers from grade school in back seat...so i questioned why 75 year old backseat gal was gonna vote for obama AGAIN, and she said "i like the way he looks in jeans..." i almost ran the car into a ditch, but asked my shotgun passenger to PLEASE reach back and slap the EVERLOVIN' SHIT outta this dumb ass!
Wow. That's sad.
Whenever I leave the country for work, I come back and tell my kids: "You don't know how good you have it here". Lots of places have turned into hell holes because people got too complacent.
How do you explain Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, and I could go on and on...
Do you think YOU should be stripped of your right to vote because of their behavior?
No democrat would ever win without women votes. Meanwhile, no republican would ever win without male votes. Not to mention, the ideals that allowed these corrupt fucks to be "elected" were mainly promoted and allowed because of feelings.
I understand your sentiment, but please put the feelings away and objectively examine it. Remove feelings from it. In a logic only environment, none of those listed would have ever been elected.
No Democrat would ever win without the black vote either. However, I don't see you advocating for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and voting rights acts.
I am not saying the blacks should have their vote removed. I am just pointing out the selectivity of the "barefoot and pregnant" crowd when they want to find excuses to remove the rights of people they wish to control.
It really has nothing to do with electing Democrats at all. If it did, you' d be advocating removing voting rights from both groups.
Oh and by the way, not all women vote Democratic. There are divisions by, age, race, and affiliation. But of course you already know that and don't really care.
And I am viewing a misogynistic viewpoint completely objectively.
The comment was about sex, not race and stated by a woman on the supreme court now.
"In actual presidential elections, the gap is often more pronounced. For example, in the 2020 election, exit polling via the Cornell Roper Center indicated that 57% of women voted for the Democratic candidate (Joe Biden) compared to only 42% of men. Conversely, women also historically turn out to vote at higher rates than men in every presidential election"
It is not misogynistic to observed the statistics and make an accurate statement based off the same statistics.
Again, this is an emotional response based on the topic at hand.
Of course there are other variables and similar statements can be made in the inverse or about different categories, but the one that was discussed here is in fact accurate. If you feel accurate statements are misogynistic then I hate to break it to you but it is an emotional response. I am not advocating for the repeal but when the topic comes up, it is usually by other women. Social media is not the greatest by any means but when this topic is discussed, it is usually a woman saying for it to happen and the men being the ones saying no.
You've sidestepped the issue. Why aren't you calling for the repeal of the 15th ammendment and the voting rights act when the majority of blacks vote Democratic?
If your gripe is truly about groups that primarily vote Democratic and a call to repeal the ammendment which gave them voting rights then you should be advocating for the repeal of both ammendments.
But you're not. You're only advocating taking away the rights of ONE of the groups. Why is that?
I'm talking about what you advocated for on this forum. You're responsible for your own statements. So I want you to explain the double standard you're using.
I am using a perfectly logical argument that is not at all emotional. The only possible reason for you to take that position is misogyny. The large amount of women who vote for Democrats is no more destructive to our society than the large amount of blacks who vote for Democrats. Yet you only advocate for removing the rights of women.
It's a perfectly logical and non emotional argument. Just because you call it "emotional" doesn't make it so.
Again since reading is apparently hard for you. The issue was gender, not race. YOU made it about race. Again like previously stated, I am NOT advocating for it, YOU are implying I am. All I did was point out statistics and advise a truthful statement. YOU are the one side stepping the topic at hand. YOU are the one implying race was the original topic at hand. AGAIN I am NOT advocating for the repeal. YOU jumped to that. Are YOU replying to ALL the others in this thread with the SAME reply that RACE is the topic and not GENDER?
You are proving YET AGAIN that you are being emotional and stating I am advocating for repealing of rights when I have NOT done that in any way. YOU are the one pushing that.
For the FOURTH TIME, I am NOT advocating for the repeal of ANY rights. STOP stating I am. Interesting that you jumped right to black people when pointing out the majority of women vote democrat. By your logic, you are racist then right? Since referring to ANYTHING is automatically against it right?
It is NOT logical to say untrue statements. I have NOT advocated for the removal of rights. Yet you say you are being logical when you state I have?
Perhaps one should have to pass a critical thinking test before being allowed to vote. If someone lacks the ability to exercise logic, they get removed from the voting rolls.
I wonder how many people would be left to vote, then. Most women would be removed. Almost all inner city blacks would be removed. Trailer parkers would almost certainly be removed. Hell, three-fourths of present college graduates would be removed, too, since their "gender studies" bullshit degrees don't teach them how to reason at all.
Backbone vs ego.
Conviction vs self care
Amen
Really? We worry about our kids being raped and murdered and she's afraid of just threats. Maybe if she lived like we do WITHOUT security maybe she'd rule appropriately.
This should apply to justices, congressman, and everyone else who places themselves above those they are supposed to represent. Force them to live by the laws they force on the rest of us and see how quickly things change.
Heard her whining about having to explain the bullet proof vest to her 12 year old. Didn’t she adopt two African American kids? She’s gonna have to explain a lot more to them about life then that.
Her children aren't unique. All children worry about something happening to their parents. So if she thinks hers are experiencing something no other child does -- I hate to burst her bubble. I remember being terrified of my parents passing away the first time I became aware that there was such a thing. And I was maybe 5 at the time.
So yes, I understand the sentiment. But I don't think it was worth a news interview to state the obvious. I don't think anyone ever really acted against her anyway.
ONLY President Trump's children have had the experience of living through the shock of having someone attack their dad. And.I don't think anyone ever asked them about it, nor do I think they should. Their feelings are theirs alone and nobody should be prying into them.
There is a man who trusts in the the Lord and knows it is all for His glory. May he continue to be protected as he fights the good fight every day.
ACB on the other hand is only concerned with herself and thus fears all and allows that to impact her decisions
u/#q2283
But yeah, it’s just a woman thing 🙄🙄
Or their children…..as a parent what would you do? We can talk a big game until it’s our family that’s being threatened. She needs to be able to shoot first ask questions later. Yes the 2nd amendment on full display.
I would decline a position that would put them in danger.
I understand that there are certain complexities when someone has young children, but it would serve Ms Barrett better if she were to channel Mr Thomas's warrior spirit versus operating under a cloud of fear. It would have been a great opportunity to teach her son that standing up for what's right is not easy and can be downright dangerous in this current environment. Arm up, lady, and get you and all your family members into firearms training classes. We're in a war, like it or not.
That woman should probably not have been made a justice. Her rulings have been disappointing. But Jeanine Pirro would be an excellent justice. Quality has nothing to do with the sex of a individual. It has to do with the character of a person.
That pronouncement gave me chills when it was delivered. It still does. That quiet dignity and strength reminds me of Trump. The same warrior spirit at his core.
This type of shit needs to stop. All this does is create the same type of division that has been distracting us. The issue isn’t gender, it’s the money behind the threats. Look up at the money don’t blame the victims and get caught in this bullshit
https://nitter.net/i/status/2077217780366037075
I believe they imply threats against her kids to influence her rulings.
I'm unimpressed with the female justices we have. I ought to be impressed with any justice that we have.
Suck it up buttercup. The Supreme Court voted to allow any Tom, Dick or Harry to come in to have a baby here illegally and allow citizenship. Anyone who breaks immigration laws is already raising a child to become a delinquent. This will only encourage further corruption and it is these non-citizens you have to fear for your life. The justices have more protection than the ordinary citizen.
Not a logical statement.