It was reported:
“Conservative MP Christopher Chope. Chope blocked the bill in June 2019 in an attempt to hinder the progress of the campaign.” — hmmmm
This seems good, but also is woke. This story is very feminist. Maybe we should be asking why she was at this music festival in the first place. Feminists really don't like those kinds of questions, but if we're serious about protecting our girls, then we have to stand up and say that enough is enough.
It is pushing for feminism. This is saying that women can go anywhere they want, dressed any way they want, and shouldn't face any consequences for their lifestyle choices. No one is asking why she was at that concert to begin with, or why she chose to dress the way she did. Now, I'm not saying that what that creep did was OK, it wasn't. But this ideology embraces women making bad choices and living consequence free. Look at her picture, she's obviously a liberal through and through. Feminists push their agenda through the guise of "women's right", which is just wanting protection but none of the consequences. It is like how some people might sail their boat into a storm intentionally, then call the Coast Guard when they run into trouble and expect a rescue. In stories like this, no one is asking "why were you sailing into a storm in the first place" and feminists will say those kinds of questions are sexist and will shut down your free speech.
Why was she at the concert? Why was anyone else at the concert? Presumably, to listen to music -- and now what? Women aren't allowed to leave the house in your view?
Why did she dress the way she did? The article said she was wearing a skirt. Okay -- you want her to wear a burka?
What "bad choice" did she make? Living her life without YOUR permission?
The saddest part is that you're actually serious. This creep shoves a phone under her skirt and it's her fault he can't control himself? What is it with you?
Don't date or get married. You'll make some poor woman miserable with your controlling attitudes.
Agreed. A few years ago I was working in my office. My desk faced the hallway. The desktop is granite and does not have a front on it. One day I was doing my paperwork sitting at my desk. Wearing a skirt. A man slid down the hallway wall opposite me. He looked as if he was doing a wall squat. I realized he was trying to get a peek. (Stood up and shut the door) Found out later he was a pastor.
I specifically said what the creep did was not OK. I'm just asking about why she was in that situation to begin with. If I had a daughter, I wouldn't be OK with her going into that kind of situation. Where is her father in all this? Does she even have a boyfriend? The Great Awakening isn't just about overthrowing the elite cabal, it is about restoring reasonable value and morals in our society. Fifty years ago, this kind of thing wasn't a problem. This isn't about control, it is about keeping women protected and safe.
So basically you are saying that in order to be "protected" women should never be allowed to leave the house because creeps are everywhere. There is absolutely nowhere you can go that you won't find creeps. I personally know one young lady who was raped in her synagogue while attending some sort preparatory class for her bat mitzvah. There isn't anywhere that's safe!
Creeps are creeps. It doesn't matter what you look like. It doesn't matter what you are wearing. It doesn't matter how old you are. They don't care. It isn't about how a girl.looks. IT IS SOMETHING SICK AND TWISTED IN THEM.
Here's a "Great Awakening" for you -- don't blame the victims. It really makes any woman who was ever bothered by a creep see red!
Oh and fifty years ago while walking across campus from the student union toward the Philosophy building I was grabbed by a creep who tried to pull me into the bushes. Luckily, two guys who I knew happened to be in the vicinity and came when I began screaming. So you're wrong! Creeps have been creeping since the dawn of time.
See, your story emphasizes my point. I'm not saying women can't be out and about, they just should have a responsible man with them who can offer protection. You're correct that there is nowhere without creeps, which leads back to my first point. This is why lesbians are such a disaster, they don't have protection. I'm not blaming the victim here, I'm just asking some sensible questions about precautions that I think we should all be asking. If someone gets in a car accident, we ask questions about whether they were speeding or if they were distracted by their phones. Those are sensible questions. But apparently asking questions about the situation is victim blaming. This is the kind of leftist victimization that DEI and feminism is build on, and that we are trying to put a stop to. We should never try to change policy out of a sense of victimhood.
Sure it was. Disc cameras were pretty incognito.
People havent changed their base, fleshly desires, kinks, perversions at all.
Since the fall, a zillion iterations of the same thing have occured.
You are way off base in your self-righteous judgement.
I'm actually kinda "prudish" when it comes to alot of things, but sheesh.
Yes, there will always be pervs. I'm just trying to ask some questions to figure out how we can prevent this from happening again. Why am I the bad guy? If she had a man (a real man, not some clean-shaven yuppie) with her, then this likely would not have happened. This is what the Great Awakening is all about, working together to prevent this kind of thing from happening.
Anytime there is a car accident, we ask about if the driver was speeding, on their phone, or inebriated. But when this kind of accident happens, suddenly asking these questions is victim blaming. This is how feminism and DEI get started. Everyone is a victim which is then used to shut down free speech and discourse. I'm trying to help people figure out how we can avoid this happening in the future. If she hadn't gone to that concert in the first place, then this wouldn't have happened. Why is trying to figure out how to stop this from happening again make me the bad guy?
Her name is Gina Martin. She was at a music festival in London when a man pushed his phone between her legs and took a photo under her skirt. She reported it to the police immediately. They told her it wasn't a criminal offence. There was nothing they could do.
She went home and decided that was unacceptable. With no legal background, no political connections and no funding she launched a campaign to make upskirting a criminal offence in England and Wales. She petitioned. She lobbied MPs. She spoke publicly about what had happened to her. The government initially blocked the bill.
She kept going. The Voyeurism Act passed in January 2019. Upskirting now carries up to two years in prison. Scotland followed. Other countries are following. A woman at a festival with no lawyer, no funding and no political connections rewrote the law for an entire nation in eighteen months.
Regardless of who she was it wasn’t that long ago when you would get a beatdown for doing that. Camera boy needs a serious arse kicking, one that will hurt for a long time
progress for protection of girls & women!
It was reported: “Conservative MP Christopher Chope. Chope blocked the bill in June 2019 in an attempt to hinder the progress of the campaign.” — hmmmm
He lost, Gina Martin wins.
Student paper with extra details on the story: https://theboar.org/2019/01/upskirting-criminal-offence/
You are so good. Thank you.
This seems good, but also is woke. This story is very feminist. Maybe we should be asking why she was at this music festival in the first place. Feminists really don't like those kinds of questions, but if we're serious about protecting our girls, then we have to stand up and say that enough is enough.
Not even close to woke. How is stopping a voyeur woke? I'm cornfuzed.
It is pushing for feminism. This is saying that women can go anywhere they want, dressed any way they want, and shouldn't face any consequences for their lifestyle choices. No one is asking why she was at that concert to begin with, or why she chose to dress the way she did. Now, I'm not saying that what that creep did was OK, it wasn't. But this ideology embraces women making bad choices and living consequence free. Look at her picture, she's obviously a liberal through and through. Feminists push their agenda through the guise of "women's right", which is just wanting protection but none of the consequences. It is like how some people might sail their boat into a storm intentionally, then call the Coast Guard when they run into trouble and expect a rescue. In stories like this, no one is asking "why were you sailing into a storm in the first place" and feminists will say those kinds of questions are sexist and will shut down your free speech.
Why was she at the concert? Why was anyone else at the concert? Presumably, to listen to music -- and now what? Women aren't allowed to leave the house in your view?
Why did she dress the way she did? The article said she was wearing a skirt. Okay -- you want her to wear a burka?
What "bad choice" did she make? Living her life without YOUR permission?
The saddest part is that you're actually serious. This creep shoves a phone under her skirt and it's her fault he can't control himself? What is it with you?
Don't date or get married. You'll make some poor woman miserable with your controlling attitudes.
Some people are pro sharia. They want to control women and have no personal resposibility.
When your religion says you can't control yourself...you must control everyone else.
Which of course is useful for their Supremacist handlers.
Agreed. A few years ago I was working in my office. My desk faced the hallway. The desktop is granite and does not have a front on it. One day I was doing my paperwork sitting at my desk. Wearing a skirt. A man slid down the hallway wall opposite me. He looked as if he was doing a wall squat. I realized he was trying to get a peek. (Stood up and shut the door) Found out later he was a pastor.
I specifically said what the creep did was not OK. I'm just asking about why she was in that situation to begin with. If I had a daughter, I wouldn't be OK with her going into that kind of situation. Where is her father in all this? Does she even have a boyfriend? The Great Awakening isn't just about overthrowing the elite cabal, it is about restoring reasonable value and morals in our society. Fifty years ago, this kind of thing wasn't a problem. This isn't about control, it is about keeping women protected and safe.
So basically you are saying that in order to be "protected" women should never be allowed to leave the house because creeps are everywhere. There is absolutely nowhere you can go that you won't find creeps. I personally know one young lady who was raped in her synagogue while attending some sort preparatory class for her bat mitzvah. There isn't anywhere that's safe!
Creeps are creeps. It doesn't matter what you look like. It doesn't matter what you are wearing. It doesn't matter how old you are. They don't care. It isn't about how a girl.looks. IT IS SOMETHING SICK AND TWISTED IN THEM.
Here's a "Great Awakening" for you -- don't blame the victims. It really makes any woman who was ever bothered by a creep see red!
Oh and fifty years ago while walking across campus from the student union toward the Philosophy building I was grabbed by a creep who tried to pull me into the bushes. Luckily, two guys who I knew happened to be in the vicinity and came when I began screaming. So you're wrong! Creeps have been creeping since the dawn of time.
See, your story emphasizes my point. I'm not saying women can't be out and about, they just should have a responsible man with them who can offer protection. You're correct that there is nowhere without creeps, which leads back to my first point. This is why lesbians are such a disaster, they don't have protection. I'm not blaming the victim here, I'm just asking some sensible questions about precautions that I think we should all be asking. If someone gets in a car accident, we ask questions about whether they were speeding or if they were distracted by their phones. Those are sensible questions. But apparently asking questions about the situation is victim blaming. This is the kind of leftist victimization that DEI and feminism is build on, and that we are trying to put a stop to. We should never try to change policy out of a sense of victimhood.
Sure it was. Disc cameras were pretty incognito. People havent changed their base, fleshly desires, kinks, perversions at all. Since the fall, a zillion iterations of the same thing have occured.
You are way off base in your self-righteous judgement.
I'm actually kinda "prudish" when it comes to alot of things, but sheesh.
Yes, there will always be pervs. I'm just trying to ask some questions to figure out how we can prevent this from happening again. Why am I the bad guy? If she had a man (a real man, not some clean-shaven yuppie) with her, then this likely would not have happened. This is what the Great Awakening is all about, working together to prevent this kind of thing from happening.
Looking is one thing. A camera up the dress is a violating.
All i see is a headshot so i dont know what she was wearing, which is absolutely irrelevant to a perv jamming his camera up her skirt.
Total tangent re: her politics, her fashion choice, venue she chose to attend, etc.
You just made up a scenerio to rant.
Anytime there is a car accident, we ask about if the driver was speeding, on their phone, or inebriated. But when this kind of accident happens, suddenly asking these questions is victim blaming. This is how feminism and DEI get started. Everyone is a victim which is then used to shut down free speech and discourse. I'm trying to help people figure out how we can avoid this happening in the future. If she hadn't gone to that concert in the first place, then this wouldn't have happened. Why is trying to figure out how to stop this from happening again make me the bad guy?
good observations, I thought there might be something was woke in this so added the comment but had not fully studied the article
maybe some will go from woke to based in time as they face issues in life
Notice how it intentionally make conservatives look bad? I bet this isn't the full story.
yes, the student paper = woke socialist perspective
If anyone says, "Pics or it didn't happen" you're getting banned...
Just letting you know... Don't even think about it.
Seriously...Stop thinking about it!
BUT we can "THINK" about it and have a wonderful time...RIGHT???
I HAVE a URL ready to go...can I, PRETTY PLEASE!!!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👏👏
Oh I am sure they would do that.
AI can always generate one.
https://nitter.poast.org/soigomaa/status/2077121326293438642
Thank you so much for bringing that.
Yw!
I don't like how this makes it look like conservatives are the enemy here.
It does? Where?
“Conservative MP Christopher Chope. Chope blocked the bill in June 2019 in an attempt to hinder the progress of the campaign.”
It does not. People that would seek to control women do though. LDE.
What a brave woman!
Amazingly brave
👆
Goes to show that we can make a difference even if we are not well versed in law if we apply ourselves.
She is, but this story is woke. Soon she'll be pushing the feminist agenda.
What about the kilts? Still legal?
Should be.
Um….. what topic does this fall under?
Politics?
1000yd stare of a neohippie who realizes she got what she voted for
She does look like one of the leftish
Regardless of who she was it wasn’t that long ago when you would get a beatdown for doing that. Camera boy needs a serious arse kicking, one that will hurt for a long time
She's amazing. I respect people who have the guts to stand up.
Are we even sure that is a women?
What colour was the skin of the guy who took the photo?
And which shithole country did he come from?