Took a peruse of the TPV website today, due to a frog posting a very old (2017) NewsPunch Story to the board.
FYI, TPV (The People's Voice) was formerly NewsPunch, which was formerly YourNewsWire. It's a disinformation / Clickbait operation run now for may years by Sean Adl-Tabatabai and his Gay 'husband'. Curiously, YourNewsWire.com was registered and lay relatively dormant for quite a few years until it was activated around 2014/2015, the SAME time that the "Fact Checkers" operation was pushed forward by teh Cabal globally.
The international Fact Checkers Network, sponsored by folks like the Poynter Institute with help from such luminaries as Bill And Melinda Gates foundation (specifically supporting the Africa Fact Checkers Network. hmm.....)
Curious.
Anyway, even just a quick glance through very recent articles by TPV quoting their own Beiber Article from 2017 shows how this operation takes exposure of truth and developments in the Awakening and then works to exploit and distort them.
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/?s=justin+bieber
Take a look at the articles they have thrown up in the recent weeks since Diddy was arrested and exposed. It will give you a good introduction to how this operation drafts and publishes lies, twists information, using their now standard formula of
a) Create Fabricated (false) Sensationalistic Headline to Attract True Seekers (play to biases)
b) Support with two or three (usually) fabricated assertions which shore up and expand on the Headline, while providing zero source and zero researchable references.
c) Copy/ Paste actual factual stories or content lifted from actual sources that SEEM to lend legitimacy to the Headline and Assertions a) and b), but which in fact are unrelated or which do not actually sustain the a) and b).
While the Website operation is clothed as a clickbait farm, my personal opinion is that this is a deliberate disinformation operation (given timing, how the website yournewswire.com was developed (check via Archive.com), absence of actual advertising, and other factors).
Either way, if you are a frog researcher or even just have a casual interest in pursuing truth, it behooves you to learn about this sort of operation, see their tactics, learn to identify the red flags, and in this manner, build up your Discernment Red Blood Cells.
It's worth it. once you spend a bit of time on this sort of thing, the RED FLAGS of disinfo operations became quite easy to identify.
All part of building up your mental / spiritual / intellectual health.
Cheers.
A recent post by u/brain_dead (New Hampshire the 2nd state to ban Chem Trail (www.eutimes.net)) provided an opportunity to do a little digging into some interesting sauces, both Bogus (aka clickbait, propaganda or disinfo) and Legit (aka based, patriotic, good practices).
I post the results of the dig here for my favorite frogs, ideally to provide some useful info and also some helpful hints for newbies on digging and tracking sauces.
Note: H/T to u/winn for the tip and inspiration to dig a little deeper. Upon digging into the article/sauce, a few things become immediately apparent.
The Good News
Firstly, the good news is that this content itself appears to be legitimate, even though the clickbait publishers fail in typical manner to give credit to the original source.
However, if one tracks: EU Times (100% copy/paste) >>> The People's Voice (86% copy/paste) >>> Granite Grok (Original - Steve MacDonald) one finds the original source and author, Steve MacDonald
Granite Grok is apparently an alt-media operation focused squarely on New Hampshire:
"Dominating the political bandwidth in New Hampshire"
Steve himself appears to be the key honcho at Granite Grok:
Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the Managing Editor and co-owner of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.
An initial perusal through the website suggest they are every bit as legit as they present themselves to be.
They do not use ads (hence clickbait is not a likely driver) and rely on donations and support (emphasizing that they are interested in quality journalism that readers will wish to support).
Their Monday Memes feature sheds an indication of their tone and focus.
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2024/04/monday-memes-108
They seem pretty based to me. Even a reference to an X tweet by Jon Harold (Patel Patriot) - author of the Devolution theory series. https://substack.com/@patelpatriot
If you are a US, East Coast or New Hampshire anon, they might be a good site to bookmark.
The Bad News #1
Firstly, the European Union Times. These guys do not come off as anywhere even near legit as Granite Grok. Not by a mile.
Strike one: 100% copy/pasting an 'article' by The People's Voice, one of the most disreputable sheister disinfo operations this side of the Pecos.
Note that EU Times doesn't give actual credit to their source, merely adds a completely non-descriptive link [Source] at the bottom of the Copy/Pasta, which immediately obscures the fact that the sauce they are using is TPV. (Something OP appears to have deigned to investigate or research, and no doubt EU Times reason for disguising their source)
Strike two: They love the Ukraine (note flag colors) and come across as very anti-Russian, anti-Putin.
After Fooling the People to Reelect Putin, Russia now announces More Cannon Fodder Mobilizations
- heavily slanted headline + derogatory terms
I don't think people need to necessarily be pro-Putin to be fully based. There is room for some diveristy of opinion in that area. But only the blind fail to recognize that the Globalists are using Ukraine as a proxy state and that the Russian initiatives are justified even from a self-defense posture, let alone from a humanitarian angle (to terminate the genocide happening to ethnic Russians in the Donbas, etc.) Not to mention denazification.
Strike three: Whiney McWhiney whine whine.
EU Times are shutting down. (no great loss, I suspect.) But read their article about the how and why. It's a riot.
https://www.eutimes.net/2024/03/goodbye-world-we-are-shutting-down-eu-times-soon/
We are shutting it down because of various reasons but the primary reason is the financial one. This small but yet grandiose project was ran by a small team which was very underfunded. Lack of funds. We don’t generate enough revenue from advertising anymore, people aren’t donating, they would donate to literally anything and anyone but except to keep their favorite news outlet alive…
I suspect that EU Times isn't anyone's "favorite news outlet".
People think that money come from the sky and that here on this website we don’t need their money because we somehow magically get money from the sky..... $5 a month through Patreon for lifetime… I dont think any of you would have become impoverished by subscribing to our Patreon with $5 a month! 100 such people and we would have received a mere minuscule $500 a month funding! You think that’s enough to keep a website alive? What’s $5 a month? If you are a smoker, you pay more than that on a pack of cigarettes every day, yet sponsoring your favorite news outlet is somehow excluded. We barely got any sponsorship, we all have lives and families to take care of. We can’t live without jobs, dedicating our time to this project while this project doesn’t put bread on the table.
Complaining to your readers that they aren't supporting you seems pretty narcissistic. I mean, if you created good content, people would support you.
Read through the whole article, if you dare, but even a cursory glance shows the myopic mentality of this operation. They think the European Union is a great idea, for Pete's sake.
They may not exactly be clickbait artists, despite their copy/pasting someone as disreputable as TPV, but at best they appear to be seriously ill-informed and functioning very much in the Matrix, aka useful idiots, for lack of a better term.
if they are indeed shutting down, then all they really do here is provide an example of Useful Idiocy thinking that they are somehow advancing Christianity and Peace in the world.
The Bad News #2
The other bad news here is The People's Voice (TPV). I mean, anywhere this operation rears its ugly head is bad news. See my other posts on TPV aka NewsPunch aka YourNewsWire (most of them easily found with a "clickbait" search in the GAW 'search community' box) if you need more info.
But as an update on TPV and Sean Adl-Tabatabai, TPV have now upgraded their [Fact Checked] designation that they put on EVERY article they post to [Fact checked by The People's Voice Community].
Sure, that community is going to be totally legit. /sarc/
Also, Mr. Adl-Tabatabai has now listed an intro blurb at the end of his articles, and cites 17674 Articles.
My, that's a few articles, isn't it, Sean? Let's break that down.
Your News Wire (which became NewsPunch which became The People's Voice) started full fledged operations around 2015. So let's give Mr TPV 9 years. 17674 articles in 9 years equals 1963 articles per year. 1963 divided by 52 weeks = 37 articles per week.
So on average, and assuming that Mr. Adl-Tabatabai works 7 days a week, 12 months a year, he's churning out 37 articles per week. If that doesn't tell you about the quality of his work, it should. No serious writer or journalist can produce that many articles unless he is copy/pasting and just churning out low quality tabloid content.
Ok, it's not a massive finding, but I thought it was interesting enough to note.
It's curious that in the case of the current article, the actual content is legitimate enough that TPV didn't have to fabricate sensationalist or disinfo headlines. Nonetheless, any deep dive in to TPV/NP/YNW suggests strongly that they are dubiously funded disinfo operation designed to exploit people beginning to wake up and inject garbage info in to the truth sphere in order to poison the well. At least, to me it does.
Silver Lining
The silver linings in this dig into EU Times / TPV include a) finding Granite Grok, which seems a very legitimate based patriotic alt-media operation, but also
b) final confirmation that Michael Baxter is in fact Baxter Dmitry from TPV, by him publishing a 100% copy paste version of the TPV article under his own name:
https://dainikbidyaloy.com/2024/01/04/new-hampshire-becomes-second-u-s-state-to-ban-chemtrails/
I tracked this down using a simple technique of taking a sample section of text (chosen for relevance and to an appropriate length i.e. between 7 and 20 words long) then searching for it in Google bookended by quote marks: e.g.
"One of the sponsors is a friend, so I’d expect them to offer some follow-up, but if I’m honest"
This forces the search Engine to seek that text strong as a whole unit.
The result can show many instances of where the source text has been copy/pasted or published across the net. In this case, it turned up both legitimate sources (those quoting Granite Grok and which are genuinely journalistic efforts) as well as scum sources (i.e. clickbait, disinfo, tabloid alt-media, etc)
Seeing the parallels and connections between Dmitry Baxter and Michael Baxter over the years (first observed in 2018), I have long held the view that they are one and the same person. This publication of the TPV article under the M. Baxter name all but clinches it.
And that's a nice find.
Conclusion
I suspect that if OP had taken the time to dig a little into the EU Times, he might have thought twice about posting them (and thereby promoting them as a legitimate source) instead of tracking the content to the actual source, which would have been a good find (Steve MacDonald at Grantie Grok). The connection with TPV should have been an instant red flag, but again, this was missed.
All this simply goes to prove the old adage:
All good dishes come with saucy sauce
But note: Saucy sauce is sauce that has been checked, identified, verified and simmered over a low flame for at least 3 or 4 levels of dig.
Carry on.
Edit:
q3616
THE GREAT AWAKENING. You are the news now. Handle w/ care.
If you don't have your supplies yet ,DO IT NOW, THIS IS NOT CRYING WOLF,All the signs and chatter are showing Iran will launch attacks on Israel in the next two days. Tell your Families to get ready ,fill your tanks your cupboards your meds and have your Potassium Iodide on hand ,you can get it free at your local Health Dept with Instructions. If the Straits are blocked for any amount of time it will affect Gas Flows around the World.
Intro
There was a post made to the board today that garnered the attention of a few mods and which was subsequently removed for posting a dodgy sauce with dodgy assertions. (Thank you mods).
Someone suggested I check it out, so I did. After a glance at the article itself, whose headlines plus first few lines stunk to high heaven (sensationalism, over-the-top claims, appeal to known biases, favorite villain, etc), I went into dig mode and applied an approach that I have found to be very useful for digging up potentially bad or evil sources.
I present that approach here (Three Steps) for pedes to consider, as a case study into 'busting' potential disinfo or clickbait operations or operatives. I invite pedes to draw their own conclusions from the data (even though I also post my own).
Note 1: As the narrative war steps up, the best, first defense is developing our discernment skills and investigatory practices.
Note 2: The following is a cursory (meaning not thorough or detailed) study using a few easy-at-hand resources.
Subject: Article: https://slaynews.com/news/wef-pushes-ban-home-grown-food-fight-climate-change/
Step One
search for same text from other publications > attempt to find original source or verify that the article / text is original here. (tool: search engine, i.e. google, etc)
Method: take a section of the text, sentence, etc, and search in search engine
=
Almost identical text found published on "News Addicts" (N/A)
https://newsaddicts.com/wef-warns-home-grown-food-causes-climate-change-demands-ban/
Slay date: March 1, 2024 vs. N/A date: February 3, 2024
After finding other earlier source (and no other), run a comparison between them.
Step Two
verify or investigate authors > check avatars, names, etc. (Tools: search engine, pic recognition, google, tineye, etc)
=
Two-1: check profile
Slay author : Frank Bergman
https://slaynews.com/author/frank-bergman/
Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.
NOTE: blurb, no concrete or verifiable details
Two-2: check identity avatar
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8cba3174a095e11a787c2b1268dc9916?s=100&d=mm&r=g
No other images on web for "Frank Bergman" with any journalist connection.... "writer" "slay" "author"
COMPARE
Two-1:
N/A author : Hunter Fielding
https://newsaddicts.com/author/hunterfielding/
NOTE: no blurb, zero information
Two-2:
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d0285a67d14cc3301b877cc335719bc1?s=100&d=mm&r=g
No other images on web for "Hunter Fielding" with any journalist connection, including "writer" "news addicts" "author"
DATA
*Both identities use https://gravatar.com/ for their avatar.
*Neither avatar appears anywhere else on the web (tools: lens.google.com/, tineye.com)
*Bergman has a very generic "blurb" for his profile in addition to stories he 'authored', no concrete information or data provided. In other words, he is anonymous. Fielding has no blurb at all for his profile, only stories he 'authored'. aka anonymous.
Step Three
Investigate publishing bodies, to see how transparent or otherwise they are, attention to verifiable information or data
Slay News
https://who.is/whois/slaynews.com
Registered 2021-10-30
Check registering provider using TUCOWS, INC. (http://tucowsdomains.com) >
Registration Service Provider: Fasthosts Internet Limited [email protected] +44.3330142700 http://www.Fasthosts.co.uk
Contact, admin : Great Britain, East Sussex.
Name Servers based in the UK : livedns.co.uk
Address on website: 63 Us Hwy #21 Jonesville, North Carolina(NC), 28642
Note: From memory, I have seen this address and location before, including street view, in digging into TPV, NewsPunch etc.
COMPARE
News Addicts
https://who.is/whois/newsaddicts.com
Check registering provider using TUCOWS, INC. (http://tucowsdomains.com) >
Registration Service Provider: Fasthosts Internet Limited [email protected] +44.3330142700 http://www.Fasthosts.co.uk
Contact, Admin : Great Britain, East Sussex
Address on Website: P.O. Box 20989 West Palm Beach Florida 33416
Tel: 561-686-1165
SEARCH Address:
belongs to Newsmax (Google)
https://www.newsmax.com/contact/
Newsmax Tel: 561-686-1165
Questions
Who uses anonymous avatars and profiles with zero concrete information or verifiable sources, but presents themselves as "journalists" writing articles on publications presenting themselves as legitimate sources of news?
Who copies texts from other 'authors' but presents it as their own, with little or zero modification, etc?
What publications paint themselves as "pro-american, patriotic, American values," describe themselves as "the world’s leading independent media source for political news junkies" (N/A) and "one of the nation’s fastest-growing alternative media companies" (Slay News), and are "designed for patriots" (N/A) and "promises to always prioritize its most valuable asset – our readers"?
Sauce:
https://slaynews.com/about-us/
https://newsaddicts.com/about-news-addicts/
What publications would provide a fake or false address and contact information in the US, while being based overseas (i.e. UK)?
Is there a pattern or are there patterns of activity/behavior similar or identical between these two 'sauces'? (hint: yes. Same avatar source, same IP provider, same or similar text, etc)
Also: we are anonymous here, but we do not present ourselves as anything other than anonymous. Who is anonymous but at the same time presents themselves as not anonymous? Why would they do that?
Wrap Up
Often, the first place to start myth-busting disinfo or clickbait operations is to check their details, looking for hints of legitimacy or otherwise. Aka the Sauce Check.
Often, even a cursory check can turn up red flags that make it easy to bring the information being published into doubt. Remember, the BEST disinfo always combines X amount (larger amount, normally) of truth with Y amount of disinfo.
Disinfo is most effectively delivered by wrapping it up in a bundle of seemingly legitimate information, in order to disguise the disinfo.
In addition, information that is presented while appealing to people's emotional biases (aka "We're patriots!) often seeks to circumvent otherwise critical thinking. Thus, a Content Analysis is also a very good option as a starting point.
For me, I think the data, re: these two publications, is pretty damning, to start with. So who do you think they are, and what do you think their motive is? To spread the truth? Or to do something else?
Think about it.
Comments
In the above, I have gone to looking at SAUCE as a first step, based on the red flags the headline and text raised for me straight up. However, another equally valid avenue of approach is to examine the text itself, and compare with other articles on the website. What style do they use? What subject matter do they target? What text format (i.e. themes, sequence, arguments, references) do they use? How robust is the content (sauces, reasoning, style, information)?
The problem here is that content alone can be a tricky beast. If the purpose of the publication is EITHER to grift and exploit truth seekers OR to inject disinfo into the truth sphere using undiscerning truth seekers as their conduits, then the information is going to be presented in a way that primarily plays to the target audience's (aka YOUR and MY) biases and emotions.
Also, disinfo or clickbait is best delivered in a package of apparent legitimacy, so spotting the red flags can be tricky. The Sauce Check approach above can be used to get leverage on the content, so that one approaches the text content in a far more skeptical way.
Together, however, whether Sauce Check >> Content Analysis, or Content Analysis >> Source Check, the two of these together deliver a powerful basis on which to regard the publication and content as either Friendly to Truth or Hostile to Truth.
Content Analysis Bonus:
Note that in the article(s) looked at here, the pattern is VERY similar to the NewsPunch format:
Sensationalist Over-the-top Headline plus 2-3+ sentences with bold but sourceless assertions about <despised group/individual> plus copy/paste or presentation of actual legitimate information
Make of that what you will.
Addendum: I checked out the SLAY address and it is the same address used at
https://demo.hashthemes.com/viral-mag/news/
Which is only a "demo", leading to the possibility that the operators were preparing it as a possible deployment or as a practice run for other operations.
I'm pretty sure I found that when investigating the (bogus, imo) Son of WEF co-founder Pascal Najadi narrative that came out last month.
The Viral Mag thing follows the pattern of Newspunch and also CNBCUS, also huffmag.com, which present themselves (originally) as a legit general news or interest website, before then being used for disinfo deployments.
https://huffmag.com/category/opinion/
Najadi himself linked to this fake dodgy website (CNBCUSA.com (now defunct)) on Truth Social as evidence that his assertions are true and that its going worldwide!!!, which at a minimum calls in to question his capacity for discernment, and more broadly calls into doubt his legitimacy. Look at all the dodgy places his article was posted (aka select a segment of the text and run a search on google or other search engine).
Disclaimer: I use google for such searches because they have the largest or one of the largest catchment ranges. I'm not looking for suppressed or censored sources, but purely for web presence, etc.
Hat tip to Charles Dickens for "A Tale of Two Cities" https://www.gutenberg.org/files/98/98-h/98-h.htm
One of my favorite GAW frogs, u/winn, posted an article that has been published on cnbcusa.com
The headline touts Man of the Moment Pascal Najadi (GAW search https://greatawakening.win/search?params=pascal+najadi&community=GreatAwakening), even though the article only refers to him once or twice and links to the "viral video".
One smart frog pointed out that the website urls is different from CNBC (https://www.cnbc.com/) even though it uses the CNBC logo, and voiced his/her suspicion.
I was prompted to dig a little, and I'm posting the results here because I think this is a good opportunity for applying some of that anon analysis and critical research methods that Q has tried to train us in.
What a curious operation. Take a look at the live website: https://cnbcusa.com/
The stories are old, not very active. There are a few things to note:
1 Not very active, stories posted sporadically and with large time gaps (iow, not daily news or even weekly news, which indicates a VERY small number of 'journalists' active there
2 The "About us" blurb make grandiose claims that do not make sense
CNBC USA is the number one business and financial news network on the planet.
Our mission is to help the influential and aspirational to make astute decisions to get ahead.
CNBC International ensures no matter where you are you can keep up to date with the latest breaking business and financial news.
With international headquarters in London and Singapore, we provide you with the perfect 24-hour global business briefing. From the start of trading in Asia, through the Closing Bell on Wall Street, our fast-paced, hard-hitting business coverage makes CNBC essential viewing for any senior business leader.
But click on the "Business" tab, and this is what you get:
Article: Jan 18, 2024; Article Jan 15, 2024; Article: Apr 27, 2023; Article Dec 5, 2022, etc.
So, not exactly the "number one news network", not exactly a source where "you can keep up to date", unless you are a piece of granite with an existence of a few million years. "24-hour global business briefing"? I don't think so.
3 The "author" - David Stevens, has posted only 5 articles on cnbcusa, and he (?) uses a stock photo as his avatar pick
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/bearded-man-listening-music-through-earphones-2054809910
There DOEs appear to be an active Journalist "David Stevens" who also lists cnbc as one of his conduits, but the face does NOT match the cnbcusa David Stevens (obviously)
https://muckrack.com/david-stevens
https://www.housingwire.com/author/david-stevens-cmb/
4 None of the other stories on CNMCUSA or by the so-called cnbcusa David Stevens match or vibe with the current article on Pascal Najadi. They are all about other things, quite a varied theme base, and nothing that resembles the 'blockbuster' "Trump is Wartime President, WEF, Pandemic murders, etc" article.
Note: I did a deep dive dig on my favorite (well, despised) disinfo operation come clickbait site NewsPunch (aka YourNewsWire, ThePeople'sVoice) and found precursor publications on the url covering random, varied topics, like men's fashion, etc, for a few years, before it transformed and exploded out as "News No One Else is Brave Enough to Publish" in 2016.
For more on NewsPunch, see:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9qIDKA0/newspunch--know-your-clickbait-a/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5lYrwWt/the-anons-discernment-prayer--pr/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPeWhp8I/know-your-clickbait-newspunch-cl/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5lYrwWt/the-anons-discernment-prayer--pr/
#Conclusions:
Add all these up and there are a few possible explanations.
Most likely are two:
One, this is a sleeper disinformation operation, that was established in sleeper mode, publishing reportedly legit articles on random topics, prepared to be activated at the right time to publish disinformation or "dirty news" designed to mislead and to poison the water hole in the awakening / truth sphere.
(By "dirty news", I am using the analogy of a 'dirty bomb', an explosive device that contains radioactive elements intended to poison the location and people where it is exploded, to describe the idea of news information that has some explosive power (i.e. truth) but which also contains misinformation and disinformation, the purpose of which is to disrupt the flow of actual fact-based truth and mislead those who have left the MSM matrix.)
Two, this is a clickbait operation by a scumbag person or group whose method is to present themselves (project the image) of being a big, legitimate operation, associated directly with CNBC.
#Discussion:
I don't see ANY clickbait advertising on the website, which indicate that it is funded. By who? Cannot know without further digging. But simply being funded in itself indicates the motive is not clickbait money making.
Why would this website suddenly post an explosive article about Pascal Najadi, out of synch with all its other stories and activities?
A third possibility might be that the operation is a White Hat sleeper operation, put in place to be activated to promote certain types of narrative deployments, which possibly the Najadi narrative is (although I remain skeptical at this point).
A fourth possibility might be that its just some band of anons-type tiny group who are doing their own operation clandestinely but for good purposes. This is highly unlikely, I think, however, considering that the website looks funded and the size and timeline of the operation seems too large for anyone less than a very wealthy batman-type persona.
Either way, this website is NOT what it portrays itself as. So the key question is: WHY?
Based on the above (even superficial) dig, I would be 100% suspicious of this website and ANYTHING they publish.
If you read the article, read it with a high degree of skepticism, and ask yourself:
are there elements / narratives / data in here that are seeking to manipulate me, in my thinking or emotional response?
Is there disinfo nestled in among the fact-based info?
what biases might the article be seeking to possibly exploit?
I read today on one researcher's post this idea: always ask questions. If you keep asking questions, the truth will eventually emerge.
So, don't just swallowing this article because it seems to say all the right things (plays to one's biases, etc), ask and be skeptical. Because there are ALWAYS forces out there seeking to derail us, and mental and emotional vigilance is the price of freedom of thought.
Disclaimer: I haven't gone through the article itself. The information MAY be legit, but I have serious doubts about the sauce, however. So I'm skeptical off the bat.
Thanks to u/The3rdkey who raised the heads up.
Also, kudos to u/winn (OP) who wrote: "This is some weird shit..."
You're right about that, buddy!
What do pedes think about the article?
What about the Najadi narrative, that has burst on the scenes in recent weeks, apparently with all the kinds of things awakened frogs would like to hear?
Are you skeptical? Are you convinced? What convinces you? What data points is your attention drawn to?
THIS IS NOT CLICKBAIT,he says he was in trumps motorcade and has personally seen JFK JR alive
The clickbait Shi*te article from The People's Crap, Sorry, I mean The People's Voice is now doing the circles. Sadly, the penetration from this disinformation clickbait site run by an ultra liberal gay couple (targeting truth seekers and patriotic persons who have begun to wake up) is increasing, with more people spreading the rubbish.
(Check out the site to see just how fake this rag is. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/ Used to be NewsPunch, but they have rebranded just this past year because their reputation became so bad.)
The story at hand is that a whistleblower related to the Biden-Burisma connection has been found dead.
This is proven fake news.
Sadly, the crap from NewsPunch aka The People's Voice aka Your News Wire is now reaching more and more of the community and far too few people are practicing discernment. Even Hannity had this story posted until they found out it was super crap clickbait. InTheMatrixxx also retweeted the story, etc.
The standard pattern now used by NewsPunch is 1) ultra fake clickbait headline 2) followup one or two paragraphs of fabricated clickbait 3) underwrite with actual news that SEEMS to lend verisimilitude to the made up clickbait headlines.
A quick video by Sather on this story (Burisma whistleblower dead) - about how the truth was distorted for clickbait.
https://rumble.com/v2ugq3g-was-a-whistleblower-against-biden-found-dead.html?mref=nmtun&mrefc=3
FYI: for background on The People's Voice:
Know your Clickbait:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6Rbli8W/know-your-clickbait-the-peoples-/
More from Sather on this:
This is what people are misinterpreting about the "Biden whistleblower found dead" clickbait going around
From Giuliani's interview with Newsmax - he said he gave the DOJ "a witness to was the wife of Burisma's former owner".
That former owner is Mykola Lissin, who died in 2011.
Giuliani did NOT say his witness died - parse his words.
But disinfo site "The People's Voice" are twisting his words into "Biden Whistleblower found dead!" - which is false - yet it's going viral now.
You see how easily things are misinterpreted and false narratives go viral?
https://t.me/jordansather/8896
Note: I'm only quoting Sather here because he pulls apart a LOT of clickbait disinfo stuff.
Opinion: As anons we search for and analyse truth. We also need to point out disinfo and fake clickbait lies which target our community when they happen.
TLDR:
The People's' Voice = Newspunch = Clickbait (Disinfo) and an Attack on Truth in the current 5th Generational Warfare
If you examine ANY article on https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/, formerly known as Newspunch (Go to Newspunch.com, and it links directly to https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/)
Invariably, the Headline is clickbait bullsh*te, followed by two or 3 paragraphs of baseless, made-up assertions with no sauce, then followed by actual real content provided in order to somehow shore up the original disinformation headlines and primary assertions.
Case Study
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6N5KqN1/barack-hussein-obama-has-urged-t/
Former President Barack Hussein Obama has urged the Biden regime to declare a national emergency and use its powers to eradicate all independent media online ahead of the 2024 election.
Speaking to CBS News on Tuesday, Obama warned that the mainstream media has lost its control over the narrative and said the only solution is for the U.S. government to step in and take drastic action.
A search for these actual statements delivers NO results or confirmable sauces.
However, Obama DID do an interview with the CBS interviewer, but what did he actually say?
https://news.yahoo.com/obama-concerned-americans-almost-occupy-184557585.html
No other sauce except for NEWPUNCH, and the usual regurgitating clickbait sites can be found for the sensationalist headline that Obama said anything like
We Need Full-Blown Gov’t Censorship To Eradicate Independent Media
It really should be clear to Even newbie anons what is happening here.
We all know Obama is a treasonous POS, quite evil, and that he would LOVE to have complete media censorship.
But that is why clickbait disinfo honcho Sean Adl-Tabatabai and his website publish these outrageous headlines. They are betting people just totally consume it without any discernment. Looking at this post on GAW, do you think he is right?
How many of our pedes just accept it because it is a headline that appeals directly to confirmation bias and is posted on GAW?
The impacts of spreading this clickbait are insidious.
Problem - Reaction - Solution
Step 1. Take some fact and mix with fake content. Create fake-ified bait.
1.a. Ensure that the facts pertain to that you wish to minimize or hide from public understanding
1.b. Maximize reaction factor by ensuring that the fake content is something that will trigger emotional engagement from those who understand truth on some level
Step 2. Promulgate said bait by targeting reactionary impulses in (people)
2.a. Establish and then utilize disinfo sites in the form of clickbait (aka dress the wolves in sheep's clothing)
Step 3. Use Hoax and Fact Checkers to discredit content on the basis of fake-ified details
3.a. The more you generate fake-ified news in order to muddy the waters and poison the information pool, the better
Step 4. Rinse and Repeat
Who is the People's Voice TV?
The People's Voice TV was previously the Video Arm of the CLICKBAIT site Newspunch. Same old Sean Adl-Tabatabai, same old Baxter Dmitry, same old clickbait.
Who is Newspunch?
Newspunch was first created as YourNewsWire.com
https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/YourNewsWire.com
YourNewsWire.com rebranded itself as Newspunch.com in late 2018. Now, the Newspunch Website URL (click here: http://Newspunch.com) and links directly to The People's Voice. In appears, then, that YourNewsWire.com aka Newspunch is once again rebranding itself under another name: ThePeople'sVoice.tv.
YourNewsWire > NewsPunch > ThePeople'sVoice.tv
The same organization and content rebranded under different names were all founded by "Sean Adl-Tabatabai and his husband Sinclair Treadway" Sauce: Wikipedia, who were reportedly the first "married" gay duo in the United Kingdom Sauce: Daily Beast. YourNewsWire was described by (The Hollywood Reporter)[https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hollywoods-hidden-alt-media-firebrands-1041157/] as the "Breitbart of the Left".
Q3038
Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion). Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions). Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs). Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts). Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs). Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
~ The Anon's Discernment Prayer ~
Dear Lord,
I pray that I may always know to identify the clickbait disinfo methodology, to understand its purposes, and how it targets me and your people.
May I realize that I, and only I, together with other anons, am your first line of defense in the disinformation wars.
May I recognize the deception in all of its forms, and stand strong against being manipulated, by putting good practice above reactive instincts.
May I expose the devil's deceptions wherever they appear, and in doing so, form a protective fence for those you are seeking to wake up; first to protect, and then to inform, so that your people can learn to think for themselves.
May it ever be so.
Amen
The PRS Disinfo Methodology
Step 1. Take some fact and mix with fake content. Create fake-ified bait.
1.a. Ensure that the facts pertain to that you wish to minimize or hide from public understanding
1.b. Maximize reaction factor by ensuring that the fake content is something that will trigger emotional engagement from those who understand truth on some level
Step 2. Promulgate said bait by targeting reactionary impulses in (people)
2.a. Establish and then utilize disinfo sites in the form of clickbait (aka dress the wolves in sheep's clothing)
Step 3. Use Hoax and Fact Checkers to discredit content on the basis of fake-ified details
3.a. The more you generate fake-ified news in order to muddy the waters and poison the information pool, the better
Step 4. Rinse and Repeat
- PRS = Problem - Reaction - Solution
Case Study
Recent Post by the august DiveAndBait referencing a Tweet that quotes directly from thepeoplesvoice.tv via an image.
At this juncture, an important question arises. Given information that 'presses all the right buttons' AND which is provided only via an image, with no sauce actually identified or linked, will more readers choose the option of simply believing (accepting) and then spreading? Or will more choose to track down sauce in order to evaluate the information?
The answer should be obvious: Many more will react and spread than will make the effort to evaluate. And by evaluate, I mean
a) identify sauce of information and associated credibility levels
b) identify facts and separate from fiction
c) discern motivation behind the information
Discerning motivation behind the Narrative Impact is the critical factor from the perspective of narrative warfare. It's the WHY that helps to define and evaluate the WHAT.
This is important because information (and disinformation) can be shared to inform and empower towards independent thinking, but it can also be shared in order to manipulate and direct the target along a particular path. So the WHY is important in evaluating the VALUE of the information, and the impact we allow it to have on us.
(Note: anons need to continually ask themselves: am I the former? Or am I the latter? Do I tend to accept information that confirms my biases, or do I track down the information origins to evaluate?)
Rudimentary Evaluation Exercise
So let's look at the SAUCE.
First, do you think that it's curious that this <ahem> wonderful article /<ahem> from The People's Voice, which purports to labels itself with a "Fact Checked" sticker. So, ask yourself this question:
Who uses fact checkers to assert authority and acceptance vs. Who asks people to check facts for themselves in order to promote discernment and independent thinking?
The answer is obvious to most anons.
So who IS the People's Voice TV?
The People's Voice TV was previously the Video Arm of the CLICKBAIT site Newspunch. Same old Sean Adl-Tabatabai, same old Baxter Dmitry, same old clickbait.
Who is Newspunch?
Newspunch was first created as YourNewsWire.com
https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/YourNewsWire.com
YourNewsWire.com rebranded itself as Newspunch.com in late 2018. Now, the Newspunch Website URL (click here: http://Newspunch.com) and links directly to The People's Voice. In appears, then, that YourNewsWire.com aka Newspunch is once again rebranding itself under another name: ThePeople'sVoice.tv.
YourNewsWire > NewsPunch > ThePeople'sVoice.tv
The same organization and content rebranded under different names were all founded by "Sean Adl-Tabatabai and his husband Sinclair Treadway" Sauce: Wikipedia, who were reportedly the first "married" gay duo in the United Kingdom Sauce: Daily Beast. YourNewsWire was described by (The Hollywood Reporter)[https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hollywoods-hidden-alt-media-firebrands-1041157/] as the "Breitbart of the Left".
Wanna know moa? Dig deeper.
PAUSE: Wikipedia, the Daily Beast, Hollywood Reporter ~ it's important to apply discernment here. Just because these are Cabal-aligned sources doesn't mean we should ignore them. They provide information. The key is to apply a discernment rubric as described above:
a) identify sauce of information and associated credibility levels
b) identify facts and separate from fiction
c) discern motivation behind the information
Is This The WHY?
So think about it for a minute. An ultra-gay man-couple living in Los Angeles who were reportedly Bernie supporters... Do you really think these people have a genuine interest in promoting correct news and information about the Globalists, Hollywood, Cultural Marxists and myriad other areas that draw the attention of anons and people waking up via the Great Awakening?
What might be their motivation in YNW = NP = TPV?
What might be the motivation of these Globohomo aligned media reporting on and thereby 'promoting' YNW/NP?
Another paragraph in the wiki article provides a hint, imo.
A 2017 BuzzFeed report identified NewsPunch as being the second-largest source of popular fake stories spread on Facebook that year, and a June 2018 Poynter analysis identified NewsPunch as being debunked over 80 times in 2017 and 2018 by Poynter-accredited factcheckers such as Snopes, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and the Associated Press.
Snopes, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and the Associated Press.... These are all organizations connected via the (barf) IFCN, aka the International Fact-Checking Network. For some interesting tidbits on their connections, see this post: Checking Out the Fact Checkers ~ A Preliminary Dig circa. 2018
What should be very obvious to thinking anons is that NewsPunch and its various forms are perfect fodder for the Fact-Checking organizations of the Cabal to shoot down, debunk and thereby discredit in the eyes of the Matrix walkers (the asleep sheep) any content about the various issues that anons work so hard to red-pill the normie world on.
We can reasonably posit that the intent here is not merely clickbait ($$$), but also by inserting fake-fied tabloid-like information into an otherwise important red-pill area, The People's Voice (aka Newspunch) both redirects anons attention, activates reactive responses, and diverts real attention from the real WEF agendas or bona fide red pills that will not only wake people up, but activate independent thinking and discernment.
In other words, Newspunch Et Al play perfectly into the PRS Disinfo Methodology I cited above.
There is another tangent here: We should realize that the "Fact-Checkers" gain authority and trust in the normie world ONLY when there is garbage and fake-ified information for them to debunk.
In his comment to the aforementioned post, Fatality directly alludes to this methodology in action when he writes:
Note, that they didn't call them "Information Warriors" so if you go out with wording like that you're going to be sent here, and they'll screech "fake news!"
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5lWbheX/x/c/4TsavlgffBg
To corroborate this fact, notice how a search for "newspunch" on Google brings up plenty of debunking sites instead of the actual Newspunch site itself?
https://www.google.com/search?q=newspunch
It's the old hegelian paradigm. Problem - Reaction - Solution (PRS), and in the narrative wars, disinfo clickbait sites like Newspunch and ThePeople'sVoice.Tv provide really wonderful "problems" and "reactions" to which the GloboMarxists and Cabal want to offer the solution.
Anons really are the first line of defense when it comes to the disinfo operations of the globomarxists.
The Kicker
You may have not noticed it but a) the Tweet In question from Bernie's Tweets does NOT link to sauce, but only provides an image. However, there was a tweet from the same account of August 2022 which actually linked to sauce. https://twitter.com/BernieSpofforth/status/1560216089086332930. Which means that the story was at least first published in August 2022.
Notice also how the Newspunch/PeoplesVoice article published in April 2023, is essentially regurgitating information from a 2020 newsrelease from WEF.
So, in Nov 2020, WEF was going to
".... recruit(ed) 110,000 information volunteers, and we equip these information volunteers with the kind of knowledge about how misinformation spreads and ask them to serve as kind of 'digital first-responders' in those spaces where misinformation travels,"
That was 2 and a half years ago. 30 months ago. And The People's Voice is (re)publishing an old article about it now AS IF IT WAS CURRENT. If that doesn't tell you how clickbaity this is, nothing will....
And in case you haven't noticed, the WEF is increasingly a massive failure, because more people and more nations wake up every day to the COVID19 Scamdemic and the Vax Hoax.
Corroboration
If you want to actually check out NewsPunch's history of clickbait and fake-fied content, you'll have to look it up on an archive site.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/newspunch.com
One thing. Notice here how the frequency of archiving dramatically sped up in 2018 and 2019. If the frequency of archiving is any indication of penetration of Newspunch into the Information Sphere, then is it a coincidence that NewsPunch's activities (appear) to have increased along with the growth of the Great Awakening?
Here's an example. Just read the headlines.
WEF Says US Must Implement ‘One Child Policy’ For White Families
Trigger much?
Hillary Clinton: ‘People Who Identify as Women Are Being RAPED by Man-Made Climate Change’
Is that what she wrote? So if not, then WHY exaggerate and hyper-sensationalize it?
problem, reaction, solution.
CONCLUSION
It's instructive to read through and analyze such Clickbait Articles, to apply the discernment rubric. Notice that such articles take certain factual elements (i.e. quotes) but then mix them with fictional or distorted aka fake-fied headlines etc. What might be the purpose of doing that?
For one, it hyper-activates the clickbait value with embedded emotionally attractive nuances that draw in those in the Awakening or partly awakened spheres.
Because most of us are actually hyper-emotionalized. We've been fighting an information war for one, two, five, or 10 years. Veterans are less likely to be taken in by such methods, but if you are war weary, emotionally on edge, or even outraged, then such tactics are well designed to exploit your vulnerabilities.
Being resilient to such attacks and deployments is something that all anons need to constantly work on. To do so, we need to understand the PRS methodology, how it is applied to clickbait that targets those who are awake on some level, and how to counter it by applying discernment along the 3 axes: source, fact vs. fiction, possible motivation.
And to that end, I shall offer a prayer....
Q3038
Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion). Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions). Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs). Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts). Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs). Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
NEWSPUNCH?
Newspunch is a long-standing clickbait site that exhibits extremely poor or non-existent journalistic skills. Newspunch has been around since at least 2018, and back in th day when patriots around the world were latching on to Q and waking up to begin their journy into becoming anons, NewsPunch had a field day.
Just a few hours ago, our prolific and awesome u/Undine53 posted an article and headline from Newspunch.
I think that the article and the posting of content from Newspunch is a good opportunity to examine some of the ways in which clickbait works, how that is relevant to anons, and what potential outcomes of disinfo clickbait operations can do.
What is clickbait? Clickbait's primary methodology is to use exaggerated, distorted, or fabricated headlines and content in order to trigger an emotionally charged response that quickly overrides any semblance of discernment, critical thinking or reasoning in the mind of the reader.
Back in the day, clickbait made money by getting people to click and thereby earn ad revenue. But Clickbait has also been widely incorporated into the disinformation operations of the Cabal and their minions as well. It is used to inject fake and false or distorted narratives, achieving numerous possible outcomes:
-
distort or camouflage the truth to dampen any awakening process that the real truth will aid
-
discredit patriotic or other truth seekers by flooding the sphere with purposefully created false narratives "You believe in Q? Oh, you also believe that JFK Junior is really the current vice president, right?"
-
undermine the development towards clear thinking and fuller comprehension of somewhat awakened people by enabling and perpetuating the programming that is so heavily relied on with the normie masses - emotionalistic responses instead of reasoned, clear or critical thinking
And more. For multiple reasons, anons should ALWAYS be aware that there are disinfo operations going on against us and the normies all the time, and we should develop a strong discernment that spots and quickly identifies clickbait-like disinfo opps, etc.
Review of the Article
Florida To Begin Sentencing Pedophiles to Death – Democrats Outraged
False. There is NO evidence that Florida is *going to begin sentencing". What Florida is going to be doing is to begin pursuing the possibility of using capital punishment in certain pedophile cases. ONCE that possibility becomes real, THEN Florida could begin sentencing, but certainly not before that.
See the distortion? Possibility and potential. Is there any difference? Absolutely. But journalistic integrity is not something clickbait has any interest in.
Fact-checked
That should be a giveaway right there. WHO does "fact checking" or posts "fact checked" on their stories except sites that want mindless sheep (or unthinking humans) to accept it because it has been "fact checked"?
the death penalty for anybody convicted of pedophilia in Florida.
This is a flat out lie. DeSantis indicated that he wants to pursue the possibility to use capital punishment for "the worst of the worst" "serial offenders" etc. But CLICKBAIT NewsPunch writes "for anybody convicted of pedophilia".
Why would any legitimate news organization or journalist want to distort the actual facts so much? Either they are high on crack, or they are intentionally putting out narratives that have the semblance of factualness, but which in fact deliberately distort the information in order to trigger the emotional response that overrides more balanced reasoning and critical thinking. That balanced, reasoned or critical thinking has to be pushed out of the way so that the fake content can go viral or spread more easily.
Whose emotional trigger is Newspunch targeting here? As they have always done for the last 5 years, it's YOU. It's patriots, it's those who see a lot of the corruption and want things to be different.
Undiscerning anons become such easy targets for these guys IF we do not learn to apply discernment and Q-like critical thinking skills for ANY information thrown at us.
Favorite topics? Pedos? Check. Trials? Check. Punishment for crims? Check. Psyops? Check. Rothschilds? Check.
So many topics trigger an instant reaction from anons and awakened folks, because we've been sensitized in a way that is different to normies. But, in these cases, how different from the normies are we? Not that different. (Look how many responses the Newspunch post garnered on our board, with almost NO critical review or discussion of the actual content! Seems almost like 90%+ are simply going along on the basis of the headline (which is false).
The rest of the article is simply Newspunch writing a transcription of DeSantis' speech.
So, a news article with highly exaggerated and deceptive headlines, padded by no news except essentially what the video says.
Learn to read the signs. Know your clickbait sites. NEWPUNCH is clickbait.
Another good example is REAL RAW NEWS, although RRN is a lot more overt and takes the disinfo to a completely new level for the more gullible. (Also, compare the formatting and look. Similarities? Hmmm...)
C L I C K B A I T
NewsPunch: clickbait at best, but much more likely a disinfo/distortion operation.
Edit/Addendum: For a slightly more palatable and reliable sauce (Foxnews) on the DeSantis announcement, see Purkiss' post: https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9qIDJxd/its-hard-to-think-of-anything-wo/c/
NEWSPUNCH?
Newspunch is a long-standing clickbait site that exhibits extremely poor or non-existent journalistic skills. Newspunch has been around since at least 2018, and back in th day when patriots around the world were latching on to Q and waking up to begin their journy into becoming anons, NewsPunch had a field day.
Just a few hours ago, our prolific and awesome u/Undine53 posted an article and headline from Newspunch.
I think that the article and the posting of content from Newspunch is a good opportunity to examine some of the ways in which clickbait works, how that is relevant to anons, and what potential outcomes of disinfo clickbait operations can do.
What is clickbait? Clickbait's primary methodology is to use exaggerated, distorted, or fabricated headlines and content in order to trigger an emotionally charged response that quickly overrides any semblance of discernment, critical thinking or reasoning in the mind of the reader.
Back in the day, clickbait made money by getting people to click and thereby earn ad revenue. But Clickbait has always been widely incorporated into the disinformation operations of the Cabal and their minions as well. It is used to inject fake and false or distorted narratives, achieving numerous possible outcomes:
-
distort or camouflage the truth to dampen any awakening process that the real truth will aid
-
discredit patriotic or other truth seekers by flooding the sphere with purposefully created false narratives "You believe in Q? Oh, you also believe that JFK Junior is really the current vice president, right?"
-
undermine the development towards clear thinking and fuller comprehension of somewhat awakened people by enabling and perpetuating the programming that is so heavily relied on with the normie masses - emotionalistic responses instead of reasoned, clear or critical thinking
And more. For multiple reasons, anons should ALWAYS be aware that there is disinfo operations going on against us and the normies all the time, and we should develop a strong discernment that spots and quickly identifies clickbait-like disinfo opps, etc.
Review of the Article
Florida To Begin Sentencing Pedophiles to Death – Democrats Outraged
False. There is NO evidence that Florida is *going to begin sentencing". What Florida is going to be doing is to begin pursuing the possibility of using capital punishment in certain pedophile cases. ONCE that possibility becomes real, THEN Florida could begin sentencing, but certainly not before that.
See the distortion? Possibility and potential. Is there any difference? Absolutely. But journalistic integrity is not something clickbait has any interest in.
Fact-checked
That should be a giveaway right there. WHO does "fact checking" or posts "fact checked" on their stories except sites that want mindless sheep (or unthinking humans) to accept it because it has been "fact checked"?
the death penalty for anybody convicted of pedophilia in Florida.
This is a flat out lie. DeSantis indicated that the wants to purpsue the possibility to use capital punishment for "the worst of the worst" "serial offenders" etc. But CLICKBAIT NewsPunch writes "for anybody convicted of pedophilia".
Why would any legitimate news organization or journalist want to distort the actual facts so much? Either they are high on crack, or they are intentionally putting out narratives that have the semblance of factualness, but which in fact deliberately distort the information in order to trigger the emotional response in order to override reasoning and critical thinking.
Whose emotional trigger is Newspunch targeting here? As they have always done for the last 5 years, it's YOU. It's patriots, it's those who see a lot of the corruption and want things to be different.
Undiscerning anons become such easy targets for these guys IF we do not learn to apply discernment and Q-like critical thinking skills for ANY information thrown at us.
Favorite topics? Pedos? Check. Trials? Check. Punishment for crims? Check. Psyops? Check. Rothschilds? Check.
So many topics trigger an instant reaction from anons and awakened folks, because we've been sensitized in a way that is different to normies. But, in these cases, how different from the normies are we? Not that different. (Look how many responses this post garnered, with almost NO critical discussion or reasoning or clarification of the actual content. Seems like 90%+ are simply going along on the basis of the headline (which is false).
The rest of the article is simply Newspunch writing a transcription of DeSantis' speech.
So, a news article with highly exaggerated and deceptive headlines, padded by no news except essentially what the video says.
Learn to read the signs. Know your clickbait sites. NEWPUNCH is clickbait.
Another good example is REAL RAW NEWS, although RRR news is a lot more overt and takes the disinfo to a completely new level for the more gullible. (Also, compare the formatting and look. Similarities? Hmmm...)
C L I C K B A I T
See Something. Say Something.
The usual suspects always fagging it up
