Actually, not true. Slavery was already on its way out, but that isn't relevant to the point. The point is that Lincoln used slavery as his excuse to violate the limits of power, attack States rights, and start a war to force his will on sovereign States and people.

If you are okay with that, then you have no grounds to support Trump over Biden, Harris, or any other enemy of the Constitution.

It is also apparent that you do not understand the nature of the government established by the framers of our Constitution, nor the critical importance the Constitution has in legitimacy of government.

In the case of the Constitution, it is always cut and dried. It is either delegated, or it is not.

Guess what, We have the right, and the ability, to handle that type of danger without government illegally suspending our Constitution, or Habeous Corpus, or any of our rights.

That very same government is infringing on those very rights by interfering with our right to self-defense, right to defend our families, our neighbors, our communities, and our right to defend our property.

The 2nd A was a reminder to government that it could NOT do any of the above.

Regardless, our rights are a gift of our Creator, and exist whether government agrees with them, or not.

We have allowed our government to severely hurt our ability to handle these matters, as intended by the framers of our Constitution.

We have no militia's left to speak of, thanks to our government villainizing them with their propaganda and false rhetoric. A gross violation of the prohibition of government infringement of our preexisting God-given right. I feel we can use the military, or national guard, in a very specific and targeted manner to root out the cartels and illegal immigrant gangs that have infiltrated our cities. Strick rules of engagement need to be in place to prevent American citizens being accidentally targeted by our troops.

I feel we should also have Letters of Marque issued to have these illegal immigrant gangs neutralized. We have plenty of groups, with seasoned combat veterans, that can be engaged to deal with these internal threats.

Last, but not least, repeal all unconstitutional laws targeting our right to form militia's, our right to bear arms, and our right to self defense.

The solution, in my opinion? We need to seriously start considering forming local militia's in every community around America, just as intended by the founders of our Constitutional Republic. These would not be controlled by government, but could choose to assist government, if requested.

I am a firm believer in the fact that we all have a spiritual, moral, and personal responsibility to protect ourselves, our families, our property, and our communities from all threats.

Everyone should be armed and fully trained in the use of the weapons they choose to own and use. Everyone should have emergency plans in place for their households, and should be rehearsing these plans with their families to the point that if something were to happen, everyone knows their role, and what they are supposed to do in SHTF situation.

Taken to the next level, if you have good and dependable neighbors, is a neighborhood plan to coordinate defensive actions across larger areas of responsibility. The recent events in the Southeastern United States, as well as the cartel activity along our borders, should make it very plain why this would be a wise course of action, not only for defense, but for coming to the aid of our communities in times like these. We need to relearn what it is to be neighbors and build communities of people who care about each other and protect & take care of each other. Neighbors that have each others backs.

When seconds count, the government (including police) are minutes away. In events like we face today, government is either absent, or if they do show up, dictatorial in their response. When tyrannical government is involved, they will be even slower to respond or help. Just look at how Biden & Harris are handled the aftermath of the latest hurricane to devastate the southeastern United States.

I believe that we should form local community militias as well as form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from criminals, gangs, government tyranny, invasions, etc.

With the real threat of attacks on Americans, this is more important than ever. We are in more danger within our borders today than we have ever been at any other time in the history of our Republic. Not since the War of 1812, and the Revolutionary War, have we faced the threat of foreign attacks domestically, and within our cities, suburbs, and communities. By reclaiming our right to form militia's, we no longer have to rely on government. We can help ourselves, and our communities. Just as our Creator intended, as recognized by the framers of our Constitution.

Yes, it is. Abraham Lincoln committed a crime by declaring a war to stop the secession of the Southern States. he violated both States Rights, and Individual Rights.

“But the indissoluble link of union between the people of the several States of this confederated nation is, after all, not in the RIGHT, but in the HEART. If the day should ever come (may Heaven avert it !) when the affections of the people of these States shall be alienated from each other, when the fraternal spirit shall give way to cold indifference, or collision of interests shall fester into hatred, the bonds of political association - will not long hold together parties no longer attracted by the magnetism of conciliated interests and kindly sympathies ; and far better will it be for the people of the disunited States to part in friendship with each other than to be held together by constraint. Then will be the time for reverting to the precedents which occurred at the formation and adoption of the Constitution, to form again a more perfect Union, by dissolving that which could no longer bind, and to leave the separated parts to be reunited by the law of political gravitation to the center.” ~ John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) 6th US President in his discourse before the New York Historical Society, in 1839

“A national government is a government of the people of a single state or nation, united as a community by what is termed the 'social compact,’ and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government. A federal government is distinguished from a national government by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign states, united by compact.” ~ Black's Law Dictionary Piqua Branch Bank v. Knoup, 6 Ohio St. 393. [Black's Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition, 1968, p. 1176]

“[T]he only thing wrong with Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address was that it was the South, not the North, that was fighting for a government of the people, by the people and for the people.” ~ H. L. Mencken (1880-1956) American Journalist, Editor, Essayist, Linguist, Lexicographer, and Critic

“If the States were not left to leave the Union when their rights were interfered with, the government would have been National, but the Convention refused to baptize it by that name.” ~ Daniel Webster (1782-1852) US Senator June 1, 1837; Works 1:403

The men that founded our Constitutional Republic were, themselves, rebels, and revolutionaries. They rebelled against tyrannical government to form our Republic. They did not delegate power to our government to suspend our rights because those rights come from God, not man.

They also intended for us to have superior firepower over our government to hold government in check. Not only was government prohibited to infringe in any way on our right to own and carry arms, but also from infringing on our right to form militia's that were intended to be able to defeat any standing military formed by our government.

In other words, our founders would be appalled at the thought that people today were depending on the military to save us when they knew full well that a standing military was the bane of liberty.

Some of you have seem to be ignorant of the founding principles of our Republic, of the source of rights, and the intent of the framers of our Constitution.

I am not saying that there are not White Hats in the military, but I do not believe that the military is the only way, either. History proves that military coups usually end up in a military dictatorship, and not in a liberated people.

Maybe this time will be different.

I believe that the military can only do this successfully, and the right way, only be being assisted by those truly responsible for standing up against the tyranny of our day. They can be identified by looking into a mirror.

The framers of our Constitution did not delegate any such authority to the government. That would mean the government rules over the people, which is not the case. It would also mean that the Declaration of Independence is also wrong.

Again, that is not the case. All power delegated to government comes from the people. The people are masters over government, not the other way around. Therefore, government cannot have power to suspend the rights of the people. To say so is to say that rights are controlled by government, and not conferred upon us by our Creator.

“But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.” ~ Declaration of Independence

“The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution."

“The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism, but the theory of necessity on which it is based is false; for the government, within the Constitution, has all the powers granted to it, which are necessary to preserve its existence; as has been happily proved by the result of the great effort to throw off its just authority.” ~ Justice David Davis (1815-1886) U.S. Supreme Court Justice 1862-1877 Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866) DAVIS, J., Opinion of the Court

“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934

“I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive. It places the governors indeed more at their ease at the expense of the people. The late rebellion in Massachusetts has given much more alarm than I think it should have done. Calculate that one rebellion in thirteen States in the course of eleven years is but one for each State in a century and a half. No country should be so long without one. Nor will any degree of power in the hands of the government prevent insurrections. In England, where the hand of power is heavier than with us, there are seldom half a dozen years without an insurrection. In France, where it is still heavier but less despotic, as Montesquieu supposes, than in some other countries and where there are always two or three hundred thousand men ready to crush insurrections, there have been three in the course of the three years I have been here, in every one of which greater numbers were engaged than in Massachusetts.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President Letter to James Madison, Paris, December 20, 1787. The Political Writings Of Thomas Jefferson 67-68 (Dumbauld Ed. 1955)

“... whenever the Legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence. ... [Power then] devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty, and, by the Establishment of a new Legislative (such as they shall think fit) provide for their own Safety and Security, which is the end for which they are in Society.” ~ John Locke (1632-1704) English philosopher and political theorist Second Treatise of Civil Government [1690], #222 (Lasslet Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1960), p. 460-461; French translation by David Mazel (1691): Traité de gouvernement civil (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1984), pp. 348-349

Our government doesn't have the power to suspend Habeus Corpus. The People did not delegate this power to government, and if government does it, they are usurping undelegated power.

My Mother-in-law is there now, and she travelled alone. She is in her mid-70's and is stuck because her flight for this evening has been cancelled, and her AirBnB was due for check-out this afternoon.

I told my wife to tell her to go to the embassy if she needs help. There is absolutely 0 any of us can do from here, other than pray for her safety and wellbeing.

First of all, you should automatically assume that all people who are working in government are corrupt, until they can prove otherwise. The men that signed the Constitution, and established our Republic would be the first to tell you not to trust government, ever.

My question is what are WE doing about it? We elected another government, which is fine, but I have yest to see any real penalties for those who have perpetrated all of these heinous crimes against us.

How many of us are ready to sit on a Jury? How many of us understand the true power and nature of a juror? Are you ready to stand up to the tyranny from the jury box?

How many of you are ready to serve on a Grand Jury? How many of us understand the true power and nature of a Grand Jury?

How many of you have presented Quo Warranto's against the tyrants living in your towns, cities, counties, and States?

My point is that we can't only rely for others to save us, we have a role in saving ourselves, as well.

Our federal government doesn't have legitimate authority to do such a thing. That would mean government is sovereign to the People, and not the other way around.

“By a declaration of rights, I mean one which shall stipulate freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of commerce against monopolies, trial by juries in all cases, no suspensions of the habeas corpus, no standing armies. These are fetters against doing evil, which no honest government should decline.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President Jefferson letter to Mr. A. Donald, on February 7th 1788

“Why suspend the habeas corpus in insurrections and rebellions? Examine the history of England. See how few of the cases of the suspension of the habeas corpus law have been worthy of that suspension. They have been either real treasons, wherein the parties might as well have been charged at once, or sham plots, where it was shameful they should ever have been suspected. Yet for the few cases wherein the suspension of the habeas corpus has done real good, that operation is now become habitual and the minds of the nation almost prepared to live under its constant suspension.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President letter to James Madison, 1788 Definition of 'habeas corpus': A writ having for its object to bring a party before a court or judge; especially, one to inquire into the cause of a person's imprisonment or detention by another, with the view to protect the right to personal liberty.

We are that check and balance. We used to have our arms, and militia's. Government didn't dare pull anything of this sort in those days.

Every Justice that rules contrary to the Constitution is subject to Quo Warranto for failing to fulfil a basic condition of employment as a SCOTUS Justice.

“Whereas civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as military forces, which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” ~ Tench Coxe (1755-1824) American political economist Writing as "A Pennsylvanian," in "Remarks On The First Part Of The Amendments To The Federal Constitution," in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789, p.2 col.1

“The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice. I have no fear of constitutional amendments properly adopted, but I do fear the rewriting of the Constitution by judges under the guise of interpretation.” ~ Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice Lecture, Columbia University, 1968

“The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution."

“Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence.” ~ Justice Tom C. Clark (1899-1977) US Attorney General, 1945-1949, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1949-1967 delivering the opinion of the Court in MAPP v. OHIO, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)

“In the general course of human nature, A power over a man’s subsistence amounts to a power over his will.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury The Federalist No. 79

“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury The Federalist No. 78.

“The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subject to the coercion of the laws. But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. ... Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now. Thus in France the emetic was once forbidden as a medicine, and the potatoe as an article of food.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President Jefferson's Notes on Viriginia, Query XVII (1781-1785)

“Freedom is independence of the compulsory will of another, and in so far as it tends to exist with the freedom of all according to a universal law, it is the one sole original inborn right belonging to every man in virtue of his humanity.” ~ Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher

“Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, of course, lays out the delegated, enumerated, and therefore limited powers of Congress. Only through a deliberate misreading of the general welfare and commerce clauses of the Constitution has the federal government been allowed to overreach its authority and extend its tendrils into every corner of civil society.” ~ Edward H. Crane (1944-) American libertarian, co-founder of the Cato Institute A Constitution of Liberty, Cato Institute 1995 Annual Report

That act was null and void from its inception. That power was never delegated to government, and government was warned that it had no delegated power through the words of the 2nd Amendment.

What do you mean by restraint on the 2nd Amendment by the very existence of the ATF? Clarify, if you would.

They need to band together and start their own independent meat processing company, like several ranchers have done in Idaho and Oklahoma.

12. Enact a 5% federal flat income tax on all non-citizens living in our country. If they earn their citizenship, they would no longer be subject to that income tax. All excess funds over what is required to fund the limited government would go to paying off the federal debt. Once that debt is paid off, all surplus funds would be evenly distributed to all American Citizens at the end of each year, with the exception of replenishing the emergency fund in #3 above, and funding the deportation of illegal aliens apprehended or extradited within our borders.

13. Charge $100,000.00 for a four year student visa, and $200,000.00 for a 4 year H1-B Visa. Include the President Trump's Gold Card Visa program by charging $5,000,000.00 for this visa to qualified foreigners, with a cap of 2 million Gold Card Visas issued at any one time. Taking American school slots and American jobs is going to cost non-citizens. Any person, company, or school that is caught using any visa fraudulently will be fined $250,000.00 per incident for Student and H1-B, and $1 million for Gold Card Visa's. These funds would help defray the cost of deporting illegal immigrants. All excess funds over what is required to fund the limited government would go to paying off the federal debt. Once that debt is paid off, all surplus funds would be evenly distributed to all American Citizens at the end of each year, with the exception of replenishing the emergency fund in #3 above. Any person in the United States on a Visa is subject to having their Visa revoked immediately for engaging in unethical or illegal conduct or activities, or for any act or participation in protests against the United States of America. This includes stealing, damaging, desecrating, or destroying our flag, or advocating the violation or overthrow of our Constitution.

14. Require all legal immigrants to live within the United States for 14 years before allowing them to become a U.S. Citizen (8 years for those married to a U.S. citizen, or for a minimum of 8 years honorable military service). During this time they must earn their citizenship and prove they truly intend to become an American, to include passing an exam proving they are 100% proficient in the English Language. They would also be required to pass an extensive exam covering true American history, the principles upon which our Constitutional Republic was established, and have a thorough knowledge of our Constitution, and our federal government. They would be required to watch the video series listed in #31. This would also eliminate most green card scammers, green card divorces, etc.

15. Enact a Constitutional Amendment establishing English as the official language of These United States of America. Prohibit any government forms, publications, etc., to be printed in any language other than English.

16. Enact a Constitutional Amendment forbidding all non-citizens, all foreign governments, and all foreign companies from purchasing / owning any land or any other real estate. If they already do own some, they have to sell it within 12 months of the ratification of the Amendment. If it is not sold, it will be taken through Eminent domain, and sold at auction to State Citizens, and not to government or corporations.

17. Eliminate Social Security, and the Social Security Administration. This could be done by establishing a "cut-off" age. Anyone over that age gets to finish out their Social Security payments. Anyone under that age gets all of the money they put in over the years refunded in a lump sum payment that is not taxed. They would also receive a full refund of their spouses contributions, if they are deceased. This could easily be funded by all the other unconstitutional expenditures that would be stopped, as noted in #5 above. Anyone that did not pay into SS will not get SS. Once the unconstitutional / socialist program finishes paying out, then it would be forever abolished.

18. Enact a Constitutional Amendment mandating that the President has Line Item Veto power.

19. Enact a Constitutional Amendment mandating only single issue Bills can be introduced, and all Bills / Laws must be simple, short, and easily understood by any citizen with a high school level of education.

20. Enact a Constitutional Amendment requiring all deals and all votes in the Legislative Branch be public. The public will see who voted on what, who voted, or didn't, and how each member voted. No more secret backroom deals, and no more secret votes.

21. Enact a Constitutional Amendment recognizing in every federal court that jurors are the sole judges of the law and the facts.

22. Enact a Constitutional Amendment mandating everyone working for the government, elected or appointed, to be audited by an independent agency every 2 years. This includes all judges, all elected representatives, POTUS and Vice POTUS, as well as all cabinet members, and all department heads and managers. Make the penalty for violations of their oath or the law expulsion / termination and a lifetime ban from ever again working in the government, or holding office. For more serious violations, the penalty should be felony prison time.

23. Enact a Constitutional Amendment prohibiting recurring taxes on any type of property. This would prohibit government from infringing on the natural right to actually 100% own property.

24. Re-task the IRS to collect non-citizen income tax, tariffs, and the business taxes. Take away their "police" powers (No guns or arrest power), and make them the accountants and auditors they were created to be.

25. Privatize the USPS by selling it. Retain all government specific tasks (passports, etc.) by moving them under other Constitutionally delegated departments.

26. Enact a Constitutional amendment to impeach any federal judge, including sitting SCOTUS Justices, for failing to render decisions in accordance with the Constitution. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought of course to be preferred; or in other words, the constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents. On every question of construction of the Constitution let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.

27. Enact a Constitutional Amendment limiting all federal judges to 6 year terms in office, with a maximum of 2 terms of office in the Judicial Branch.

28. Enact a Constitutional Amendment eliminating any requirements of a law degree, or any legal experience, to be elected or appointed as a federal judge. This applies to all levels of federal courts, including the SCOTUS. Instead, candidates are required to have an inviolable reverence and extensive knowledge and understanding of the Constitution, and the principles upon which the framers of the Constitution established our Republic. #31 and #32 are particularly important for federal judges to understand and master.

29. Enact a Constitutional Amendment requiring all candidates for any elected or appointed federal office be a natural born citizen to be eligible, and can't hold any other citizenship. These requirements apply to hold a security clearance or to be employed (to include volunteers) within the federal government.

30. Make it a capital crime for anyone in government to misappropriate, steal, or misuse our government funds, in any manner. Same principle as if you robbed a bank. The difference is it is a government public trust situation, and should have the penalty of forfeiting the life of any guilty party.

31. Require anyone elected, appointed, volunteering, or employed by the federal government, in any capacity, to watch the 6-hour Constitution class taught by Michael Badnarik before they take their Oath of Office. Make the penalty of betraying that oath punishable by prison and a lifetime ban from ever working in the federal government, or holding federal office. (URL: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wp-48d_jSb4)

32. Require anyone elected, appointed, volunteering, or employed by the federal government, in any capacity, to learn this simple, but critical, principle before they take their Oath of Office. Make the penalty of betraying that oath punishable by expulsion and a lifetime ban from ever again working in the federal government, or holding federal office. (URL: https://mises.org/articles-interest/not-yours-give)

We do not need an income tax, and we should abolish it to return to a true Constitutional Republic, as originally intended and established by the framers of our Constitution.

What if all 80 million people that voted MAGA united to boycott paying federal income taxes? We would overcome the RINO's, Democrats, Communists, and Deep State agents by taking their money supply away.

What is the ultimate goal? To have the following conditions met:

1. A 100% full forensic accounting of all the money, expenditures, of every department, program, or agency with unconstitutional spending is provided to the American People. If the Constitution doesn't specifically delegate it, then it must be abolished. Require that the federal budget be balanced every year.

2. Publish the actual cost to run the federal government through an annual forensic audit with full disclosure and transparency, once #5 has been completed.

3. Establish a $1,000,000,000,000.00 federal emergency fund that is used only for legitimate emergencies. Any funds used must be replenished within the span of 4 years of being used.

4. Secure all Federal Elections 100%. Make it a capital crime to tamper with or commit fraud in our elections.

5. Reduce the federal government to the size and scope the founding fathers intended when they wrote the Constitution. Eliminate all departments, all agencies, all programs, all projects, and all roles not specifically delegated to government through the Constitution. End all forms of welfare, including foreign aid, corporate aid, and domestic welfare programs. This will eliminate most unconstitutional spending. It will also shrink the government back to the size and scope originally intended. All departments and delegated powers that belong to the States will be funded 100% by those States, and with no federal dollars.

6. Eliminate the Federal Reserve and the Fiat Currency known as Federal Reserve Notes. Return to using the real legal and lawful tender we have always had, and are still minting, called Silver Eagles, Gold Eagles, and add both Palladium and Platinum Eagles. These are real American Dollars, as intended by the Framers of our Constitution.

7. No more prosecuting victimless "crimes". If you couple this with repealing all unconstitutional federal weapons laws, and laws against forming local militia's, these actions would save millions to billions of dollars annually, while increasing the safety / security of citizens.

8. Eliminate all federal taxes on American citizens across the board. No other income taxes on citizens of any type at the federal level. This includes every form of property tax, and every single federal consumption tax: gasoline, diesel, communications, water, etc.

9. End all entangling alliances with foreign nations. This includes the U.N., NATO, WEF, and any other alliance or treaty that interferes with our sovereignty and independence. End all Treaties that are not favorable to the USA, or compromise our sovereignty in any way.

10. Enact sensible tariffs on foreign trade, just as the framers of our Constitution intended. All excess funds over what is required to fund the limited federal government would go to paying off the federal debt. Once that debt is paid off, all surplus funds would be evenly distributed to all American Citizens at the end of each year, with the exception of replenishing the emergency fund in #3 above.

11. Enact a flat 5% tax on businesses, but only on those with annual revenue over $10,000,000.00. This would allow small business owners plenty of breathing room to establish and grow a small business to a point of success allowing it to thrive once it was subject to the federal flat tax. All excess funds over what is required to fund the limited government would go to paying off the federal debt. Once that debt is paid off, all surplus funds would be evenly distributed to all American Citizens at the end of each year, with the exception of replenishing the emergency fund in #3 above. All other federal government fee's or charges for American owned businesses would be eliminated. Government is not intended to generate profits, only raise enough revenue to cover the actual cost of running a small and efficient government.

We have multiple ways open to us to peacefully assist POTUS in reclaiming control over our rogue government, returning our government to operating strictly within the limited powers delegated to it through the Constitution, and to restore our Constitutional Republic to what was originally intended by our founders.

One of the most effective ways is for POTUS and AG Bondi let the almost 80 million Americans that elected this administration help by using the constitutional system that is our Grand and Petit jury system at the federal level.

As Grand Jurors, we are not limited like the Executive branch to investigate and charge the rogue judges and other deep state actors using lawfare against them. No need to wait on an apathetic Congress to impeach - we can investigate and make a presentment or have the DOJ indict these judges to remove them from office.

Through Petit juries, we can ensure the Executive branch as well as private parties are protected from illegal orders. You do not have to do this alone!

Another remedy people have forgotten is Quo Warranto. The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.

A critical key to achieving federal constitutional compliance is to resurrect quo warranto and other common law writs. This involves reasserting and strengthening the original All-Writs Act and repealing or declaring unconstitutional legislation, such as the Anti-Injunction Act, and those Rules of Judicial Procedure, that have restricted the jurisdiction of federal courts to accept petitions for these writs and grant a fair hearing ("oyer") and a decision on the merits ("terminer") on such petitions.

Quo warranto - the legal term for a writ (order) used to challenge another's right to either public or corporate office or challenge the legality of a corporation's charter. When the authority of an official or corporation to take action is challenged, a quo warranto action may be used to demand that the right upon which they base the action be stated.

Why is this important to you? Because Quo Warranto, like Jury Nullification, is one of the most powerful remedies available to the people against government abuses of power.

We also have the Writ of Prohibition - "Prohibition is a process by which a superior court prevents an inferior court or tribunal possessing judicial or quasi-judicial powers from exceeding it's jurisdiction in matters over which it has cognizance or usurping matters not within it's jurisdiction to hear or determine. A means of restraint on judicial personnel or bodies to prevent usurpation of judicial power, and it's essential function is to confine inferior courts to their proper jurisdiction and to prevent them from acting without or in excess of their jurisdiction; it is preventive in nature rather than corrective." - Black Law Dictionary Sixth Edition id 842

I also posted one of my longest proposals to help on X. It just takes up too much posting space here. You can see it here:

https://x.com/427windsorman/status/1909333009951605215

And, finally, We, the People, have the right to directly remove anyone from office that is in breach of their duty and their oath. The Declaration of Independence clearly states this.

Government has no power, except for what we allow it to have. That, unfortunately, is not common knowledge today, as it was in the days of the founders of our Republic.

Regardless, it doesn't make it any less true.

That is not a government problem to solve. Certainly not with other people money.

Government Welfare and Charity are completely different.

Welfare is the government illegally taking from those who produce and giving it to those who produce nothing.

The framers of our Constitution understood that there could be no power delegated to government to dispense any money or items for welfare or charity. This power was not delegated, and was not possible to be delegated, since it was outside of the scope of limited government.

“Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.” ~ James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President

“We must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not attempt to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right as individuals to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of congress we have no right to appropriate a dollar of the public money.” ~ Davy Crockett (1786-1836) American hunter, frontiersman, soldier and politician 1827, spoken on the floor of Congress concerning a proposed relief bill for the widow of a naval officer.

“I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for public charity, ... [it] would be contrary to the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and subversive to the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded.” ~ Franklin Pierce (1804-1869) U.S. President In 1854, when vetoing a bill to help the mentally ill

“The constitutionality and propriety of the Federal Government assuming to enter into a novel and vast field of legislation, namely, that of providing for the care and support of all those … who by any form of calamity become fit objects of public philanthropy. ... I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for making the Federal Government the great almoner of public charity throughout the United States. To do so would, in my judgment, be contrary to the letter and spirit of the Constitution and subversive of the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded.” ~ Franklin Pierce (1804-1869) U.S. President May 3, 1854, President Pierce when vetoing a bill to help the mentally ill

“[It is not the purpose nor right of Congress] to attend to what generosity and humanity require, but to what the Constitution and their duty require.” ~ William Branch Giles (1762-1830) American statesman, US Senator and Congressman from Virginia, 24th Governor of Virginia 1796, spoken on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives concerning a proposed relief measure for fire victims.

“I feel obliged to withhold my approval of the plan to indulge in benevolent and charitable sentiment through the appropriation of public funds... I find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution.” ~ Grover Cleveland (1837-1908) 22nd & 24th US President, mayor and governor in New York state In 1887 when vetoing an appropriation to help drought-stricken counties in Texas

https://capitalism.org/wealth-poverty/charity-vs-welfare/

Welfare is the forcible transfer of wealth by the government from those who produced the wealth to other individuals who “need” that wealth. Welfare is the forcible transfer of wealth (usually by taxes) by the government from those who produced the wealth to another individual (or group of individuals).

Where private charity is voluntary, the “paternalism” of government welfare is involuntary.

The alleged justification for welfare is altruism: sacrifice of one’s interests for others The justification for this expropriation of funds is that those who are receiving the wealth (handouts) “need” it, and those who do not voluntarily give their money have “greed” so their money must be forcibly taken from them.

At the root of the claim that the creators of wealth owe the non-creators is the ethical code of altruism — self-sacrifice of one’s own life for others (‘altru’ meaning other). In Marxist jargon, this means that wealth is plundered “from each according to his ability” and distributed “to each according to his needs.” The producer has the ability, i.e., “greed”—the welfare recipient has a need—the inalienable rights of the producer be damned.

Welfare renders the producers slaves and the “humanitarian” middle-men as their masters. Whether the thief is wearing a ski mask or is a dressed in a pinstripe suit of a congressman, does not change the nature of their actions in principle: both are looters as both are initiators of force. With one exception, the man wearing the ski mask is more honest: he is not a big enough hypocrite to tell the citizen he is robbing him of his hard-earned wealth “for his good,” or “for the good of the people.”

What of those who cannot help themselves under capitalism? Under capitalism, all government coercion and theft is prohibited and replaced with voluntary methods, i.e., private charity.

The few individuals in a capitalist society who are incapable of taking care of themselves — such as the mentally disabled, crippled, and orphans (which are a small and tiny minority in any free country) — are provided for through voluntary means, i.e., private charity.

This is one of the primary reasons our founding fathers wanted us to have our community militia's. Not only to stand against government tyranny, but also to stand against any threat to our Constitution, and to our Republic.

Sharia Law is an enemy to our Constitution. There can only be one Supreme Law of these United States of America, and it is not going to be Sharia!

We need to seriously start considering forming local militia's in every community around America. I am a firm believer in the fact that we all have a spiritual, moral, and personal responsibility to protect ourselves, our families, our property, and our communities. Everyone should be armed, and fully trained in the use of the weapons they choose to own and use. Everyone should have emergency plans in place for their households, and should be rehearsing these plans with their families to the point that if something were to happen, everyone knows their role, and what they are supposed to do in SHTF situation.

Taken to the next level, if you have good and dependable neighbors, is a neighborhood plan to coordinate defensive actions across larger areas of responsibility. The recent events in the Southeastern United States should make it very plain why this would be a wise course of action, not only for defense, but for coming tot he aid of our communities in times like these.

We need to relearn what it is to be neighbors and build communities of people who care about each other and protect & take care of each other. Neighbors that have each others backs.

When seconds count, the government (including police) are minutes away. In events like this last hurricane, government is either absent, or if they do show up, dictatorial in their response. When tyrannical government is involved, they will be even slower to respond or help. Just look at how Biden & Harris are handling the aftermath of the latest hurricane to devastate the southeastern United States.

I believe that we should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc.

With the threat of internal attacks in American communities, this is more important than ever. We are in more danger within our borders today than we have ever been at any other time in the history of our Republic. Not since the War of 1812, and the Revolutionary War, have we faced the threat of attacks domestically, and within our cities, suburbs, and communities.

By doing this, we no longer have to rely on government. We can help ourselves, and our communities.

For further understanding to how critical this issue is to our entire Republic: https://nccs.net/blogs/articles/the-u-s-constitution-and-sharia-law

I have been saying this for years. Social Security is 100% in opposition to the principles our Constitutional Republic was founded upon. It was introduced as a temporary measure, and was limited to just a small group of WW2 veterans, to begin with.

It was quickly made into another source of revenue for government that is not allowed by the Constitution, but they manipulated the SCOTUS to give it approval.

Congress has been dipping into the SS funds for decades.

They steal money from Americans all the time. For instance, if a married couple both worked full time all their lives, but one dies, the survivor only gets to choose one of the "benefits", and the other is stolen by the government.

It is time to eliminate Social Security, and the Social Security Administration. This could be done by establishing a "cut-off" age. Anyone over that age gets to finish out their Social Security payments. Anyone under that age gets all of the money they put in over the years refunded in a lump sum payment that is not taxed. They would also receive a full refund of their spouses contributions, if they are deceased. This could easily be funded by reducing the federal government to the size and scope the founding fathers intended when they wrote the Constitution. Eliminate all departments, all agencies, all programs, all projects, and all roles not specifically delegated to government through the Constitution. End all forms of welfare, including foreign aid, corporate aid, and domestic welfare programs. This would eliminate most unconstitutional spending. It will also shrink the government back to the size and scope originally intended. All departments and delegated powers that belong to the States would then be funded 100% by those States, and with no federal dollars. Anyone that did not pay into SS would not get SS. Once the unconstitutional / socialist program finishes paying out, then it would be forever abolished.

This is how all of 80 million of us MAGA voters can help:

We can do so using the constitutional system that is our Grand and Petit jury system at the federal level.

As Grand Jurors, we are not limited like the Executive branch to investigate and charge the rogue judges and other deep state actors using lawfare against POTUS. No need to wait on an apathetic Congress to impeach - we can investigate and make a presentment or have the DOJ indict these judges to remove them from office.

Through Petit juries, we can ensure the Executive branch as well as private parties are protected from illegal orders. POTUS does not have to do this alone!

All he has to do is engage us as provided by the Constitution.

We should all be more than willing to serve on juries.

You can own your land, if you learn how to do so: https://teamlaw.net/land.htm

Edited Excerpts from: "Do you own your Land?"

The foundation of this nation was real property ownership. That’s why the settlers came here. To insure private ownership of land, the nation’s founding fathers made it unlawful for government to own land except for the ten square miles of Washington D.C., and such as may be needed for erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings. (The Constitution).

When an American fulfills the requirements to obtain a “Land Grant” the grant is assigned by, and made patent under, the hand and seal of the President of the United States of America, in accord with an Act of Congress.

Fictitious entities, like trusts, corporations, etc. cannot obtain land patents except by express act of Congress. An example of Congress granting land through patents to fictitious entities is the railroad grants made to compensate the railroad companies for building railroads across America.

The Land Patent is the only form of perfect title to land available in the United States. Wilcox v. Jackson, 38 US 498; 10 L.Ed. 264

In America today people think they own their land, but unless they have the Land Patent on the land they may not own it. Most people today obtain "Real Estate" by contract and then on fulfillment of the contract they transfer control of land by "Warranty Deed".

However, a "Warranty Deed" is merely a "color of title"; and, color of title can mean: “that which in appearance is title, but which in reality is no title”. Howth v. Farrar, C.C.A. Tex.; 94 F.2d 654, 658; McCoy v. Lowrie, 42 Wash. 2d 24, Black's Law Sixth Ed.

It is important to note that when in contest a Warranty Deed cannot stand against a Land Patent. A grant of land, made Patent, is a public law standing on the books of the State and is notice to every subsequent purchaser under any conflicting sale made afterward. Wineman v. Gastrell, 53 FED 697, 2 US App. 581

The Land Patent is permanent and cannot be changed by the government after its issuance. "Where the United States has parted with title by a patent legally issued and upon surveys made by itself and approved by the proper department, the title so granted cannot be impaired by any subsequent survey made by the government for its own purposes." Cage v. Danks, 13 La.Ann 128

. In the history of this county no Land Patent has ever lost an appellate review in the courts. As a matter of fact in Summa Corp. v California, 466 US 198 the Supreme Court ruled forever that the Land Patent would always win over any other form of title. In that case the land in question was tidewater land and California's claim was based on California's constitutional right to all tidewater lands. The patent stood supreme even against California's Constitution.

. Land cannot be taken for debt or taxes, but Real Estate can be.

What is Land? By definition: “‘Land’ is not restricted to the earth's surface, but extends below and above the surface. Nor is it confined to solids, but may encompass within its bounds such things as gases and liquids. A definition of ‘land’ along the lines of ‘a mass of physical matter occupying a space’ also is not sufficient, for an owner of land may remove part or all of that physical matter, as by digging it up and carrying away the soil, but would nevertheless retain as part of his ‘land’ the space that remains. Ultimately … ‘land’ is simply an area of three dimensional space, its position being defined by natural or imaginary points located by reference to the earth's surface. ‘Land’ is not the fixed contents of that space, although, as we shall see, the owner of that space may well own those fixed contents. Land is immovable, as distinct from chattels, which are moveable; it is also, in its legal significance, indestructible. The contents of the space may be physically severed, destroyed or consumed, but the space itself, and so the ‘land’, remains immutable.” Peter Butt, Land Law 9 (2nd ed. 1988) Reprinted in Black's Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition

What is Real Estate? It’s a document that lays over the land in color of title; though it is not the Land itself, it may include with it the right to real property that sits upon the Land. Banks and corporations like Real Estate because they can own it without an Act of Congress. They and others can use the fiction of title to it to seize property under the color of law.

They've taken their colors of title into the courts for so long that the people (under three generations of deception and ignorance) simply allow them to go ahead. Generally, people seem to have forgotten about land patents.

For that cause when you go into a court today with a real land title case (a Land Patent case) chances are the judge and any attorneys involved won't know what a Land Patent is.

The first court you run into that understands the power of a Land Patent may be a U.S. Circuit court of Appeals, and in the history of this nation there has never been an appellate case where a properly set Land Patent has ever lost its title to the Land.

If you ever have the occasion to have to defend your deeded right to your land in court and someone else presents their proof of right to that land secured by the land patent, you'll lose your land unless you have similar proof.

If you haven't secured your right to your land by its land patent, you may be abandoning your right to your land and any prior owner with lawful right to the land patent could secure it to themselves and evict you off from the land you thought was yours, and you'll have to leave.

So contact us and get your land patent secured. It's important.

Now, let's suppose you have your Land Patent properly secured and for some reason you have to defend your right to the land. What do you do?

If you understand the patent and how it works you'll defend it successfully.

So again, here's how it works:

The Land came to the nation by treaty or war prize. The government only had limited ability to own land, as before mentioned, and all of the remainder of the land was held in the sole disposition of the United States until it was granted under act of Congress by the hand and seal of the President to some person. Then in that same act the President makes the Grant Patent. Which means that the Land came to the nation by treaty and the patent assigns a specific part of that treaty to you and your heirs and assigns forever.

So, your land comes to you from the treaty through your Land Patent. This is critical, the Land Patent secures the treaty to you. The court is bound by the supremacy clause of the Constitution to uphold the treaty making your Patent a statutory limitation throughout the land. Wineman v. Gastrell, 53 FED 697, 2 US App. 581.

If you ever have to defend your right to the Patent here's how. Get a full abstract on your land. The Abstract will show the assignment on the land and patent from the patent to you. Each record of the Abstract is a matter of public record, well established over time. If your right to the land was well secured (with a properly secured Warranty Deed) and you have properly accepted and secured the Land Patent to that Land (Team Law's documentation has worked over 60 years), you'll win, if you're prepared.

This is a real threat. It has been for many years, but there is still time to stop it before it is too late.

Any attempt to establish Sharia Law is a direct attack on our Constitutional Republic, and cannot be allowed to happen. If they try, anyone who is involved should be deported.

The Constitution, by its very nature, is a ban on Sharia Law. There can only be one Supreme Law of the Land.

https://nccs.net/blogs/articles/the-u-s-constitution-and-sharia-law

This is for real. It needs to be investigated because companies like Microsoft have been fraudulently using H1B to bring people in for normal jobs like manager, tech support, director, etc. in order to take control of the company. H1B is ONLY supposed to be for very high skilled roles that there are no American candidates to fill.

Well, that, in itself, is fraudulent. I have been in the tech sector for nearly 30 years. I have never had trouble finding qualified U.S. citizens for any roles in that time. Where H1B's have been hired in companies I have been with, it was not for more qualified candidates.

I have been advocating that we enact a Constitutional Amendment mandating everyone working for the government, elected or appointed, to be audited by an independent agency every 2 years. This includes all judges, all elected representatives, POTUS and Vice POTUS, as well as all cabinet members, and all department heads and managers. Make the penalty for violations of their oath or the law expulsion / termination and a lifetime ban from ever again working in the government, or holding office. For more serious violations, the penalty should be felony prison time.

Enact a Constitutional Amendment requiring all candidates for any elected or appointed federal office be a natural born citizen to be eligible, and they can't hold any other citizenship. These requirements apply to hold a security clearance or to be employed (to include volunteers) within the federal government.

Make it a capital crime for anyone in government to misappropriate, steal, or misuse our government funds, in any manner. Same principle as if you robbed a bank. The difference is it is a government public trust situation, and should have the penalty of forfeiting the life of any guilty party.