We need just the opposite. We need them serving the sentences of anyone they wrongly convict. I guess most Americans need a reminder of the original intent of prosecutors', and indictments.
“The function of the prosecutor under the federal Constitution is not to tack as many skins of victims as possible against the wall. His function is to vindicate the rights of the people as expressed in the laws and give those accused of crime a fair trial.” ~ Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice
“If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his case, it follows that he can choose his defendants. Therein is the most dangerous power of the prosecutor: that he will pick people he thinks he should get, rather than cases that need to be prosecuted. With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. In such a case, it is not a question of discovering the commission of a crime and then looking for the man who has committed it, it is a question of picking the man and then searching the law books, or putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this realm -- in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass, or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense, that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself.” ~ Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U. S. Supreme Court Justice
“Today the grand jury is the total captive of the prosecutor who, if he is candid, will concede that he can indict anybody, at any time, for almost anything, before any grand jury.” ~ William J. Campbell (1905-1988) United States federal judge, longest serving Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Newsweek, 22 August 1977
“[The] purpose of a jury is to . . . make available the common sense judgment of the community as a hedge against the overzealous or mistaken prosecutor and in preference to the professional or perhaps over conditioned or biased response of a judge.” ~ U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522, 530 (1975)
By what authority does the communist regime occupying the WH have to seize anything from foreign sovereign countries?
They can't "overthrow" the Constitution because then they would cease to exist, or to have any granted powers. It would mean the deputy is over the master.
In a word, this would start another Revolutionary War to remove the old dysfunctional government to replace it with a new one that honors and obeys the Constitution. If you need proof, just read the Declaration of Independence.
Get government out of Education, Health Care, Weapons Control, Almost all Law Enforcement (other than the US Marshall's Service), and every other area they don't have granted power.
It should be a capital crime. No prison time.
The U.S Constitution cannot be "enforced" on American Citizens. It is enforced upon our government. It's the contract or license granting certain specific powers to government. Anything beyond those limits is usurped or stolen powers.
The military option is something our founding fathers warned us about. A standing army is a bane to Liberty.
I believe that we should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc.
Well, my project car would eventually be completed, lol.
Very good write up. One thing that is also forgotten is that government is only authorized to tax just enough to cover the expenses of running the government, and no more than that. This means operating strictly within the limitations of the Constitution.
There should be no bills passed involving increasing the debt that cannot be paid back in full within 10 years. Per Thomas Jefferson, and other Founders, in their own words.
They are also prohibited from using tax revenue for welfare, of any type. Doesn't to stop them though.
https://www.fff.org/2022/11/04/davy-crocketts-political-revelation/
I am inclined to beleive:
Ronald Reagan was shot in order to make him toe the line and quit going against the cabal. I am sure his family was threatened.
JFK was ending U.S. involvement in Vietnam, and also about to eliminate FRN's and return to coins. So the bankers and cabal had him eliminated.
Abraham Lincoln was eliminated to silence him about who was behind the agenda to destroy State's Rights.
Andrew Jackson survived several assassination attempts because he fought the bankers and ended up beating them. He was the last President to do so.
By using additional precious metals, you reduce the weight issue significantly. So, Silver, Gold, Platinum, Palladium, Copper, etc........
You can then have coins representing much larger denominations that do not have the weight of large gold coins. Not to mention, you still have technology to use electronic transactions, but now they are not backed by debt based FRN's, but by actual deposits of your real money in your account.
Support your local farmers and ranchers and your supply of meat will never disappear.
Although the Democrats took control of Denver, the rest of the State of Colorado is pretty much solid red. If the illegals start attacking / destroying Denver, the rest of the population could come in an suppress them fairly quickly.
Of course, it might be prudent to wait long enough for the MS-13 gang to eliminate the democrats first.
Time for the citizens of Colorado to form local and regional militia's to save their State.
The FRN was created by the Federal Reserve and called a dollar to confuse the people and suppress what is truly and originally a U.S. Dollar:
The Federal Reserve " Dollar" is really the Federal Reserve Note (FRN). A real dollar is not made of paper. Our Founders were very clear that there would be no paper money in our Republic.
The purchasing power of a real dollar vs an FRN is as different as an FRN from a Mexican Peso.
What they wanted us to forget is that we already had sound, lawful, and legal tender gold and silver money. Our founding fathers established it, and modern government suppresses it to control us. We could easily eliminate the Federal Reserve and go back to what we originally had, and still have.
These are already right in front of us, but are treated as commodities by government, instead of as what they really are. Sound money:
This one has also been minted at the U.S. Mint, and would only need Congress to pass it to be as lawful, legal, and sound as the gold:
They have some in Palladium, as well, but I did not include them as they are redundant. As far as coins with under a dollar value, Congress can authorize the mint to make half dollar, quarter dollar, and any other denomination needed to make purchases exchanges easier.
In the end, we do not need to reinvent the wheel or fix what isn't broken when it comes to sound, legal, and lawful tender. Our founding fathers were genius enough on that front.
Our Founders intended Gold, Silver, and copper for the measurements of money. Paper money was not to be used, ever.
From the Coinage Act of April 2, 1792:
SEC. 9. And be it further enacted, That there shall be from time to time struck and coined at the said mint, coins of gold, silver, and copper, of the following denominations, values and descriptions, viz. Eagles—each to be of the value of ten dollars or units, and to contain two hundred fort-seven grains and four eighths of a grain of pure, or two hundred and seventy grains of standard gold. Half eagles—each to be of the value of five dollars, and to contain one hundred and twenty three grains and six eights of a grain of pure, or one hundred and thirty five grains of standard gold. Quarter Eagles—each to be of the value of two dollars and a half dollar, and to contain sixty one grains and seven eights of a grain of pure, or sixty seven grains and four eights of a grain of standard gold. Dollars or the same is now current, and to contain three hundred and seventy-one grains and four sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or four hundred and sixteen grains of standard silver, Half Dollars—each to be of half the value of the dollar or unit, and to contain one hundred and eighty-five grains and ten sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or two hundred and eights of a grain of standard silver. Quarter Dollars—each to be of one fourth the value of the dollar or unit, and to contain ninety-two grains and thirteen sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or one hundred and four grains of standard silver. Dismes—each to be of the value of one tenth of a dollar or unit, and to contain thirty seven grains and two sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or forty one grains and three fifth parts of a grain of standard silver. Half Dismes—each to be of the value of one twentieth of a dollar, and to contain eighteen grains and nine sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or twenty grains and four fifth parts of a grain of standard silver. Cents—each to be of the value of the one hundredth part of a dollar, and to contain eleven penny-weights of copper. Half Cents—each to be of the value of half a cent, and to contain five penny-weights and half a penny-weight of copper.
Unfortunately, Americans allowed themselves to become ignorant about lawful money vs legal tender. Regardless, gold and silver coins from the U.S. Mint remain lawful money, but ignorance among the people has resulted in very few understanding this and very few accept it as payment.
The point is that we already have a lawful money currency right under our noses that both the federal reserve, and the government, do not want you to know about. They label it a commodity instead of lawful money and hope no one wakes up to that fact.
I would like to see a return to the Coinage Act of 1792, or something very similar. The Act defined the proportional value of gold and silver as 15 units of pure silver to 1 unit of pure gold. Standard gold was defined as 11 parts pure gold to one part alloy composed of silver and copper. Standard silver was defined as 1485 parts pure silver to 179 parts copper alloy. The Act also specified the dollar as the "money of account" of the United States, and directed that all accounts of the federal government be kept in dollars, "dismes", cents, and "milles", a mille being one-tenth of a cent or one-thousandth of a dollar. The silver content of a dollar under this act was almost exactly equal to 1/5 of the silver content of the contemporary British pound sterling, or 4 British shillings.
When I say similar, I mean making coins from the mint the only legal and lawful tender of our Republic, but also making sure it the ratio of silver to gold is correct. Originally, it was set at 15 units of pure silver to 1 unit of pure gold. That was an unintentional mistake because the actual ration at that time was 16 to 1. As long as the ratio's are correct, silver, gold, and even platinum, could be the lawful / legal tender that could not be manipulated by any outside influence or force.
This is correct. The same premise applies to Constitutional Amendments. An Amendment cannot go against the original intent of the Constitution, it can only add to it in a manner consistent with the original intent at the time the Constitution was written and adopted.
There are a few paths for us to right these wrongs. One is Nullification:
Yale Law Journal Quote “The right of the jury to decide questions of law was widely recognized in the colonies. In 1771, John Adams stated unequivocally that a juror should ignore a judge’s instruction on the law if it violates fundamental principles: “It is not only ... [the juror’s] right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” There is much evidence of the general acceptance of this principle in the period immediately after the Constitution was adopted.” ~ Yale Law Journal Note: The Changing Role of the Jury in the Nineteenth Century, Yale Law Journal 74, 174 (1964).
"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)
There is ample evidence calling into question whether the 17th Amendment was truly properly ratified. Due tot hat, it should be repealed and have to be ratified properly today. If not, then it no longer would exist.
What many seem to be forgetting is that she is not eligible to even run since, by her own words, she supports Somalia and her Somali people over the Constitution. If you cannot take that oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign, and domestic, you are ineligible to run for, or hold, office.
Every lawyer has a duty to support the BAR first, and the client second. You cannot serve 2 masters, so the client will always lose when it comes to priority. There is a reason they are called "Officer of the Court".
You have a right to protect your property the same as your life. If government won't help, then go help yourself. Form a local militia and remove the squatters from the property and dump them in the streets. If they are no longer in possession, they are no longer squatters.
This is exactly why it is important that every single American become an informed Juror, and seek to be on Jury Duty. That is one of the most powerful check and balance we have against government corruption in our courtrooms.
The Judge did not allow her witnesses to testify, nor her evidence to be presented to the Jury. The Judge worked hand-in-hand with the prosecution to convict her. I am positive the Judge also illegally tampered with the Jury like they did on another case I personally witnessed back in 2011 in Houston, TX.
The Judge absolutely manipulates the Jury in many Federal cases. 99.9% of Jurors have no idea what a Juror is supposed to do, nor what the powers and duty of a Juror actually is. So they are easily controlled.
No demotion, he was never promoted past Master Sgt
He abandoned his troops after they received warning orders to deploy to war. That is a coward move. It also left his troops exposed to more danger due to his dereliction of duty.
He was a MSGT, so enter text
We do not need the help of the military for this. We need to form our own community and regional Militia's, as intended by our Founders. By doing so, we take the responsibility to defend ourselves, our families, our communities, and our property.
For sure, when our Messiah returns. Maybe a bit sooner, if enough Americans decide that the communist's have gone far enough with destroying our Western Civilization, our Constitutional Republic, and our freedom to practice our Christian religion.