2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Be careful what you wish for........

It is ironic that so many are clamoring for the military to take over our federal government considering our founding fathers were 100% against a standing army and made sure our military would be 100% subject to civilian control.

I hope that there are truly White hats in the current military and that they can be trusted to transfer power back to the people. otherwise, we could see one form of dictatorship replaced by another.

“What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. ...Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.” ~ Elbridge Gerry (1744-1814) of Massachusetts, Signer of the Declaration of Independence and Member of the Constitutional Convention spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment, I Annals of Congress at 750, August 17, 1789

“But if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Federalist, No. 29

“A standing army, however necessary it may be at some times, is always dangerous to the liberties of the people. Such power should be watched with a jealous eye.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution."

“It is always dangerous to the liberties of the people to have an army stationed among them, over which they have no control ... The Militia is composed of free Citizens. There is therefore no danger of their making use of their Power to the destruction of their own Rights, or suffering others to invade them.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution." 3 Samuel Adams, Writings 251 (Henry A. Cushing Ed., 1906).

“ ... as all history informs us, there has been in every State & Kingdom a constant kind of warfare between the governing & governed: the one striving to obtain more for its support, and the other to pay less. And this has alone occasioned great convulsions, actual civil wars, ending either in dethroning of the Princes, or enslaving of the people. Generally indeed the ruling power carries its point, the revenues of princes constantly increasing, and we see that they are never satisfied, but always in want of more. The more the people are discontented with the oppression of taxes; the greater need the prince has of money to distribute among his partisans and pay the troops that are to suppress all resistance, and enable him to plunder at pleasure. There is scarce a king in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh, get first all the peoples money, then all their lands, and then make them and their children servants for ever ...” ~ Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) US Founding Father before the Constitutional Convention, June 2, 1787

“The governments of the great States have two instruments for keeping the people dependent, in fear and obedience: a coarser, the army; and a more refined, the school.” ~ Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) German philosopher, cultural critic, poet, philologist The Complete Works of Frederick Nietzsche, 152 (O. Levy Ed. 1974)

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have to have been legally and duly elected to the Presidency in order to have a coup against you. In this case, Biden and gang led a coup against President Trump in 2020. There cannot be a coup against them since they are usurpers.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not true. The purchasing power of an FRN "dollar" and a U.S. Mint Silver or Gold Eagle are vastly different.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, the legal precedent is written in the Supreme Law of the Land. The 14th Amendment is void because it goes against the original intent of the Constitution, as it was ratified and adopted.

SCOTUS rulings that go against that original intent are null and void.

"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Illegally. One wrong doesn't negate the Constitution.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

It must matter, or every sacrifice for our Republic was for nothing. The whole fight has no meaning if it doesn't matter.

In a Constitutional Republic, when the Federal Government ignores the Constitution, you have an illegitimate Government. The Constitution is quite literally the contract, or license, for Government to exist and operate.

"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every single person who works for the federal government that is elected, appointed, or employed into positions of public trust and are bound by oath to honor, obey, uphold, and defend the Constitution, should be subject to capital punishment when they betray that public trust and sacred duty. If their lives were forfeit for choices and actions of betrayal, there would be a lot less traitorous scum in these roles.

Our founders understood this principle and spelled it out in the Declaration of Independence, and by including the 2nd Amendment as a solemn warning to government about the consequences of violating or infringing on individual rights that were given by our Creator. Man has no authority over the Creators dominion.

We, The People, need to hold our servants accountable to the same standards as our founders did. That was the original intent, and nothing has changed that expectation.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every single person who works for the federal government that is elected, appointed, or employed into positions of public trust and are bound by oath to honor, obey, uphold, and defend the Constitution, should be subject to capital punishment when they betray that public trust and sacred duty. If their lives were forfeit for choices and actions of betrayal, there would be a lot less traitorous scum in these roles.

Our founders understood this principle and spelled it out in the Declaration of Independence, and by including the 2nd Amendment as a solemn warning to government about the consequences of violating or infringing on individual rights that were given by our Creator. Man has no authority over the Creators dominion.

We, The People, need to hold our servants accountable to the same standards as our founders did. That was the original intent, and nothing has changed that expectation.

Whomever was responsible for this gross dereliction of duty (I am sure there are multiple parties) falls into the categories I outlined above in regards to positions of public trust.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every single person who works for the federal government that is elected or appointed into positions of public trust and are bound by oath to honor, obey, uphold, and defend the Constitution, should be subject to capital punishment when they betray that public trust and sacred duty. If their lives were forfeit for choices and actions of betrayal, there would be a lot less traitorous scum in these roles.

Our founders understood this principle and spelled it out in the Declaration of Independence, and by including the 2nd Amendment as a solemn warning to government about the consequences of violating or infringing on individual rights that were given by our Creator. Man has no authority over the Creators dominion.

We, The People, need to hold our servants accountable to the same standards as our founders did. That was the original intent, and nothing has changed that expectation.

13
427windsorman 13 points ago +13 / -0

I fully believe this Crowdstrike issue is the trojan horse to set up the 2024 election steal by the deep state and communist democrats.

There was a story that is being suppressed by MSM on how the Dominion voting machines were being impacted. How can that be if they do not have the capability to get on the network, as Dominion and the Democrats have been trying to convince us of since 2020.

Crowdstrike is delivering code to Dominion to enable the next steal. That is what I think this is all about.

7
427windsorman 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe it had 2 purposes. 1) To cause a major disruption and distraction to allow 2) the Dominion Voting machines to receive instructions to steal the 2024 election.

I saw a story about Dominion machines being impacted by the Crowdstrike issues, but wondered how that could be since the Dominion CEO stated there is no provisions for their voting machines to connect to a network.

16
427windsorman 16 points ago +16 / -0

Dan Crenshaw is not the only RINO needing to be rooted out. There are several who undermine President Trump, or fail to support the Conservative agenda.:

Mitt Romney Chris Christie Lindsey Graham Rick Santorum Lisa Murkowski Susan Collins Todd Young Mitch McConnell John Thune Mike Simpson John Cornyn Mike Pence Nikki Haley Kevin McCarthy Mike Johnson

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

The cartels are not limiting themselves to drug trafficking. They are human trafficking, and operating on American soil as soldiers. If Mexico will not stop them, then America has every right to do so, and to treat is as an act of war if the Mexican government chooses to do nothing.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would rather have an honest 72 year old that is also healthy and has a proven track record of integrity and love of our Constitutional Republic. Regardless, the pick was made and we have to trust it was a good one.

3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is not the wind at our Creators command? Is there any evidence that this 20 year old wanna-be sniper had any formal sniper or ballistics training of any type? I am not sure he had the knowledge, equipment, intelligence, or training to factor in wind, elevation, etc..........

3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, I was hoping it would be Ben Carson, but I will trust and support President Trump in the choice he made.

5
427windsorman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, I was hoping it would be Ben Carson, but I will trust and support President Trump in the choice he made.

10
427windsorman 10 points ago +13 / -3

I do not believe there were 3 shooters. I am doubting there were even 2.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, if his attention is kept on the ladder he can't shoot at anyone else, either. Regardless, there are plenty of things they could have done, had they chosen to do so. The current penchant for milling around and waiting for someone else to do something is not the America I grew up in, nor the America our Founders established.

4
427windsorman 4 points ago +4 / -0

In my experience it was 100% of those in combat doing the fighting, unless they were wounded or dead. There may be hesitation the first time facing combat, but you get over it pretty quick. You will not last long in a combat unit if you refuse to fight.

I do agree though, there was plenty of opportunity for the men nearby to get involved. I realize some went to get the cops, and there were people on video yelling about the guy on the roof with a gun, but not one man went to confront or stop him. A group of men could have easily overpowered him, even if risking getting shot themselves.

There was a time when men did what needed to be done, regardless of the risks.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›