Well, my project car would eventually be completed, lol.
Very good write up. One thing that is also forgotten is that government is only authorized to tax just enough to cover the expenses of running the government, and no more than that. This means operating strictly within the limitations of the Constitution.
There should be no bills passed involving increasing the debt that cannot be paid back in full within 10 years. Per Thomas Jefferson, and other Founders, in their own words.
They are also prohibited from using tax revenue for welfare, of any type. Doesn't to stop them though.
https://www.fff.org/2022/11/04/davy-crocketts-political-revelation/
I am inclined to beleive:
Ronald Reagan was shot in order to make him toe the line and quit going against the cabal. I am sure his family was threatened.
JFK was ending U.S. involvement in Vietnam, and also about to eliminate FRN's and return to coins. So the bankers and cabal had him eliminated.
Abraham Lincoln was eliminated to silence him about who was behind the agenda to destroy State's Rights.
Andrew Jackson survived several assassination attempts because he fought the bankers and ended up beating them. He was the last President to do so.
By using additional precious metals, you reduce the weight issue significantly. So, Silver, Gold, Platinum, Palladium, Copper, etc........
You can then have coins representing much larger denominations that do not have the weight of large gold coins. Not to mention, you still have technology to use electronic transactions, but now they are not backed by debt based FRN's, but by actual deposits of your real money in your account.
Support your local farmers and ranchers and your supply of meat will never disappear.
Although the Democrats took control of Denver, the rest of the State of Colorado is pretty much solid red. If the illegals start attacking / destroying Denver, the rest of the population could come in an suppress them fairly quickly.
Of course, it might be prudent to wait long enough for the MS-13 gang to eliminate the democrats first.
Time for the citizens of Colorado to form local and regional militia's to save their State.
The FRN was created by the Federal Reserve and called a dollar to confuse the people and suppress what is truly and originally a U.S. Dollar:
The Federal Reserve " Dollar" is really the Federal Reserve Note (FRN). A real dollar is not made of paper. Our Founders were very clear that there would be no paper money in our Republic.
The purchasing power of a real dollar vs an FRN is as different as an FRN from a Mexican Peso.
What they wanted us to forget is that we already had sound, lawful, and legal tender gold and silver money. Our founding fathers established it, and modern government suppresses it to control us. We could easily eliminate the Federal Reserve and go back to what we originally had, and still have.
These are already right in front of us, but are treated as commodities by government, instead of as what they really are. Sound money:
This one has also been minted at the U.S. Mint, and would only need Congress to pass it to be as lawful, legal, and sound as the gold:
They have some in Palladium, as well, but I did not include them as they are redundant. As far as coins with under a dollar value, Congress can authorize the mint to make half dollar, quarter dollar, and any other denomination needed to make purchases exchanges easier.
In the end, we do not need to reinvent the wheel or fix what isn't broken when it comes to sound, legal, and lawful tender. Our founding fathers were genius enough on that front.
Our Founders intended Gold, Silver, and copper for the measurements of money. Paper money was not to be used, ever.
From the Coinage Act of April 2, 1792:
SEC. 9. And be it further enacted, That there shall be from time to time struck and coined at the said mint, coins of gold, silver, and copper, of the following denominations, values and descriptions, viz. Eagles—each to be of the value of ten dollars or units, and to contain two hundred fort-seven grains and four eighths of a grain of pure, or two hundred and seventy grains of standard gold. Half eagles—each to be of the value of five dollars, and to contain one hundred and twenty three grains and six eights of a grain of pure, or one hundred and thirty five grains of standard gold. Quarter Eagles—each to be of the value of two dollars and a half dollar, and to contain sixty one grains and seven eights of a grain of pure, or sixty seven grains and four eights of a grain of standard gold. Dollars or the same is now current, and to contain three hundred and seventy-one grains and four sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or four hundred and sixteen grains of standard silver, Half Dollars—each to be of half the value of the dollar or unit, and to contain one hundred and eighty-five grains and ten sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or two hundred and eights of a grain of standard silver. Quarter Dollars—each to be of one fourth the value of the dollar or unit, and to contain ninety-two grains and thirteen sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or one hundred and four grains of standard silver. Dismes—each to be of the value of one tenth of a dollar or unit, and to contain thirty seven grains and two sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or forty one grains and three fifth parts of a grain of standard silver. Half Dismes—each to be of the value of one twentieth of a dollar, and to contain eighteen grains and nine sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or twenty grains and four fifth parts of a grain of standard silver. Cents—each to be of the value of the one hundredth part of a dollar, and to contain eleven penny-weights of copper. Half Cents—each to be of the value of half a cent, and to contain five penny-weights and half a penny-weight of copper.
Unfortunately, Americans allowed themselves to become ignorant about lawful money vs legal tender. Regardless, gold and silver coins from the U.S. Mint remain lawful money, but ignorance among the people has resulted in very few understanding this and very few accept it as payment.
The point is that we already have a lawful money currency right under our noses that both the federal reserve, and the government, do not want you to know about. They label it a commodity instead of lawful money and hope no one wakes up to that fact.
I would like to see a return to the Coinage Act of 1792, or something very similar. The Act defined the proportional value of gold and silver as 15 units of pure silver to 1 unit of pure gold. Standard gold was defined as 11 parts pure gold to one part alloy composed of silver and copper. Standard silver was defined as 1485 parts pure silver to 179 parts copper alloy. The Act also specified the dollar as the "money of account" of the United States, and directed that all accounts of the federal government be kept in dollars, "dismes", cents, and "milles", a mille being one-tenth of a cent or one-thousandth of a dollar. The silver content of a dollar under this act was almost exactly equal to 1/5 of the silver content of the contemporary British pound sterling, or 4 British shillings.
When I say similar, I mean making coins from the mint the only legal and lawful tender of our Republic, but also making sure it the ratio of silver to gold is correct. Originally, it was set at 15 units of pure silver to 1 unit of pure gold. That was an unintentional mistake because the actual ration at that time was 16 to 1. As long as the ratio's are correct, silver, gold, and even platinum, could be the lawful / legal tender that could not be manipulated by any outside influence or force.
This is correct. The same premise applies to Constitutional Amendments. An Amendment cannot go against the original intent of the Constitution, it can only add to it in a manner consistent with the original intent at the time the Constitution was written and adopted.
There are a few paths for us to right these wrongs. One is Nullification:
Yale Law Journal Quote “The right of the jury to decide questions of law was widely recognized in the colonies. In 1771, John Adams stated unequivocally that a juror should ignore a judge’s instruction on the law if it violates fundamental principles: “It is not only ... [the juror’s] right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” There is much evidence of the general acceptance of this principle in the period immediately after the Constitution was adopted.” ~ Yale Law Journal Note: The Changing Role of the Jury in the Nineteenth Century, Yale Law Journal 74, 174 (1964).
"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)
There is ample evidence calling into question whether the 17th Amendment was truly properly ratified. Due tot hat, it should be repealed and have to be ratified properly today. If not, then it no longer would exist.
What many seem to be forgetting is that she is not eligible to even run since, by her own words, she supports Somalia and her Somali people over the Constitution. If you cannot take that oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign, and domestic, you are ineligible to run for, or hold, office.
Every lawyer has a duty to support the BAR first, and the client second. You cannot serve 2 masters, so the client will always lose when it comes to priority. There is a reason they are called "Officer of the Court".
You have a right to protect your property the same as your life. If government won't help, then go help yourself. Form a local militia and remove the squatters from the property and dump them in the streets. If they are no longer in possession, they are no longer squatters.
This is exactly why it is important that every single American become an informed Juror, and seek to be on Jury Duty. That is one of the most powerful check and balance we have against government corruption in our courtrooms.
The Judge did not allow her witnesses to testify, nor her evidence to be presented to the Jury. The Judge worked hand-in-hand with the prosecution to convict her. I am positive the Judge also illegally tampered with the Jury like they did on another case I personally witnessed back in 2011 in Houston, TX.
The Judge absolutely manipulates the Jury in many Federal cases. 99.9% of Jurors have no idea what a Juror is supposed to do, nor what the powers and duty of a Juror actually is. So they are easily controlled.
No demotion, he was never promoted past Master Sgt
He abandoned his troops after they received warning orders to deploy to war. That is a coward move. It also left his troops exposed to more danger due to his dereliction of duty.
He was a MSGT, so enter text
We do not need the help of the military for this. We need to form our own community and regional Militia's, as intended by our Founders. By doing so, we take the responsibility to defend ourselves, our families, our communities, and our property.
Do not comply. It really is that simple.
Their duty is to the Constitution, not the politicians. Many of them have forgotten that fact.
I believe there are quite a few democrats unhappy about the swap with no say. They are being ignored by the MSM, and by their party. I recall seeing a few video's of Harris being heckled and protested by democrats at her miniscule rallies.
Likely a GBU-43/B.
The H1B Visa program is being abused, and Indians (conflict of interest) in leadership positions in the U.S. Tech companies are using H1B to hire other Indians to take over these companies. H1B is supposed to be for positions so technical that there are to few, or no, U.S. candidates for the role. That is being abused and exploited to hire for common support roles, manager and director roles, and other roles to import more Indian "talent".
This is illegal immigration because it is abusing a program in ways never intended. Most of the managers / directors are on H1B Visa's and not U.S. citizens. How can they have any say in hiring or H1B decisions? Conflict of interest that is not being investigated under Biden / Harris.
I contend that there is no need, nor has there ever been a legitimate need, for the H1B program. We have always had plenty of skilled professionals in the U.S. but companies started bring foreigners in to make less money in the same roles on our soil. Now, the make much higher salaries than Americans do in similar roles.
It is important that we, as Americans, understand that our Right to Bear Arms comes from our Creator, God, himself. No government has any authority to infringe on that right.
More importantly, the 2nd amendment was put into place to remind government of that prohibition on infringing on that preexisting right.
How does this play into the Courts? Because they are required to always use the Constitution, in the context of its original intent at the time it was written, as the measuring stick for any legislation or act of government.
“The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice. I have no fear of constitutional amendments properly adopted, but I do fear the rewriting of the Constitution by judges under the guise of interpretation.” ~ Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice
“To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm ... is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutionally protected right.” ~ Wilson v. State 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)
“ 'The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.” ~ Nunn vs. State 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251(1846)
“The provision in the Constitution granting the right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the Legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff.” ~ People vs. Zerillo 219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)
“If the legislature clearly misinterprets a constitutional provision, the frequent repetition of the wrong will not create a right.” ~ Amos v. Mosley Amos v. Mosley, 74 Fla. 555; 77 So. 619.
“Americans need never fear their government because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation.” ~ James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President
“Resistance to sudden violence, for the preservation not only of my person, my limbs and life, but of my property, is an indisputable right of nature which I have never surrendered to the public by the compact of society, and which perhaps, I could not surrender if I would. Nor is there anything in the common law of England inconsistent with that right.” ~ John Adams (1735-1826) Founding Father, 2nd US President Boston Gazette, September 5, 1763, reprinted in The Works of John Adams 438 (Charles F. Adams ed., 1851).
“And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; or to raise standing armies, unless necessary for the defense of the United States, or of some one or more of them; or to prevent the people from petitioning, in a peaceable and orderly manner, the federal legislature, for a redress of grievances; or to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, papers or possessions.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution." Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1788 (Pierce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)
“The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ... the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” ~ Tench Coxe (1755-1824) American political economist Pennsylvania Gazette, February 20, 1788
“The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ... the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” ~ Tench Coxe (1755-1824) American political economist Pennsylvania Gazette, February 20, 1788
“But if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Federalist, No. 29
“Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the_real_object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?” ~ Patrick Henry (1736-1799) US Founding Father June 9, 1788, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution, in_Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution,_ Jonathan Elliot, ed., v.3 p.168 (Philadelphia, 1836)
“No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.” ~ Zachariah Johnson June 25, 1788, Virginia Constitutional Ratification Convention. Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Jonathan Elliot, ed., v.3 p.646 (Philadelphia, 1836)
“To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” ~ Richard Henry Lee (1732-1794) Founding Father
“The highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does not exceed one hundredth part of the souls, or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This portion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. ... Besides the advantage of being armed, ... the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. ... [The governments of Europe] are afraid to trust the people with arms. ... Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors.” ~ James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President The Federalist Papers, No. 46
The U.S Constitution cannot be "enforced" on American Citizens. It is enforced upon our government. It's the contract or license granting certain specific powers to government. Anything beyond those limits is usurped or stolen powers.
The military option is something our founding fathers warned us about. A standing army is a bane to Liberty.
I believe that we should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc.