I think that's going a little far. Language needs to be descriptive, and to differentiate between things, we need to articulate how they are different from one another. "The taller man" could be offensive to the shorter man standing next to him, but he's going to need thicker skin if he wants to enjoy life. "The white man" can help point out the subject of what you are talking about if he's surrounded by non whites.
I'd like to hear your reasoning for thinking colors are slurs in regards to people.
I agree, soon we will learn the hard lesson again, and it will be very interesting indeed. The precipice will shock a new fear into the hearts of all those who have ears to hear and eyes to see. However, knowing history, I'm sure the hard lesson will be forgotten after a couple generations, just as it always is.
Thankfully, I believe in Christ and His return, so I'm certain that eventually we won't have to worry about this nonsense forevermore!
It's like any other problem the Marxists vow to solve:
-
The problem does not exist in the form they describe it to be
-
Their solutions are the cheapest band-aide crap that ends up being very expensive and stupid
-
The true Marxists emerge richer and more powerful, while the people (useful idiots AND anti-Marxists) are plunged further into debt and earthly slavery
When will mankind learn?
They will eventually come to the clear unadulterated reality that they want to take from others for their own gain, at any cost. We all must. The timing is different for everyone.
Some of us realize this before we die. Others, after...
I totally agree. While I agree with everything he said (including the warning that suicidal ideation is almost a guaranteed future for the victims of this nonsense), it's not right to ridicule someone so harshly. Jesus certainly would be more gentle with people, even in rebuke and call to repentance.
We must speak in truth AND love. Sometimes people can handle the truth wholecloth, other times they need a gentler example.
Lol, love that Islam comment. Yea I guess I never saw the School Board meetings with graphics of blurred CP. All I've seen is adult drawings. Either way, they will deeply regret their actions, either in this life or after it.
Glad this is being accelerated, because it's more sloppy and in the open than it would if they did it in incremental steps.
The best we can do is be good examples to the children in our lives. And if we have children of our own (which I do not yet), and they are in the school system, we can stay involved and vigilant.
Just to clarify; the pornography being allowed and pushed in the public schools doesn't usually portray children in the act. It's usually drawings and graphics of adults performing on each other. That does not excuse it IN THE SLIGHTEST, but I just wanted to clarify.
Also, I urge you and anyone in the UK, just because this is happening in the US mostly, does not mean it won't start in your country, or in any other for that matter. The mindset that has resulted in this travesty is not unique to America...
I would agree, especially since I could have been described as center left growing up. However, I don't identify as "alt-right" due to being a Bible believing Christian. A single-line spectrum like left vs. right is laughably reductive compared to the hyper-dimensional reality that is human thought and philosophy. Not to mention, even IF you use spectrums to organize things, you'd want to be centered on every one so as to avoid overreaction and stick to the truth.
That's a great term! I've seen posts on here to the tune of "Oh a liberal called me a sexist, and I said 'yea what of it'".
The only way to combat a "thought terminating cliche" is to expect it, and ignore it, or in some cases, embrace it for comedic trolling effect.
They know we don't play by their fake rules, it's an asymmetrical game, so they wouldn't buy it if you made such a claim. They are not operating in reason and truth, but in tyranny and lies. You are correct, however, with your logic.
The most important thing is to deny that words can be violence AT ALL. Free speech is how the rights of the downtrodden are communicated and protected.
Honestly, the problem is not that most of these liberals are in support of child rapists. Not yet. Really, the issue is they get their info from Marxists who rephrase things, so instead of saying "this bill targets child rapists" they say something to the tune of "this bill targets the lgbtq community and violates human rights." The libs take these lies at face value and refuse to actually read for themselves the practical wording of the legislation. This is why it works. A lazy population of useful idiots are led off a cliff by bitter hateful Marxists who twist language as they are wont to do. Same diaper, different day...
inb4 "the founding fathers said it's not based on Christianity!!!11!"
Yes, they said that, because they were ignoring or ignorant of the fact that all of free healthy society, which they aimed for with their constitution, is based on God's word. Innocent until proven guilty, distributed decentralized rule, free open markets, I could go on and on. It's all based on God's laws and design for life. Beyond and more important than that, every individual needs to go to the Lord, because He guides His flock with grace and authority to a perfect promised pasture. Without Him, we are doomed to truly die in the end.
Yea many cops enter that field because they recognize they have gifts for the job and would like to bring justice to the world.
Some join for other reasons, too.
I swear there is a word for judging an entire group for some bad elements within...
Yea Fox was and is controlled opposition, that is to say, they are part of the problem.
If they have a platform to speak on television, it's most likely because they are compromised and heed the barking orders of the Mockingbird.