I think everyone is making a mountain out of a molehill with this idea. I don't understand why people think that saying or not saying some oath has some impact on guilt or lack thereof. Like its a smoking gun or something. None of what these people have done magically is excused because they did NOT take an oath. Likewise, none of what these people have done has more severe consequences because they did take this oath.
The one thing it does mean is that whatever powers they have exercised while being ineligible for the office are a nullity.
As for "legal minds," not 1 attorney in 10,000 had the fucking balls to file a single lawsuit against the tyrannical and unconstitutional usurpation of power and trampling of human rights during the Covid scam. So, please forgive us if we don't give a fuck what the "legal minds" think, since they have outted themselves as lazy cowards.
What you are saying is that you are fine with fighting lawlessness with lawlessness and that is antithetical to anything Q said. The ends justifies the means. This philosophy is how we got here.
There is no duty in the sense that it is actionable under some form of contract law or tort claim. It just isn't. No matter how mad you are that they did this, suing under these legal theories is just dumb. Because its non sensical and totally not legally viable. These guys have to know this, too. They are grifting off of it. The last 2-3 pages of their complaint are their 6 causes of action. Don't read the rest of what they wrote because it has no bearing on their causes of action. It is written specifically to capture your attention because it tells a story of egregious fuckery that occurred in the 2020 election and the aftermath leading to the electoral college certification. None of it relates to the 6 claims they make.
The fact of the matter that nobody is discussing is that the Electoral Count Act itself has better than 90% odds of being unconstitutional. It is antithetical to the plain language of the 12th amendment. That amendment requires the counting of the electors and provides no form of rejecting them by Congress. It is the state legislatures from those problem states who (1) had the power to fix the fuckery; and (2) had a duty to fix the fuckery. Those were not named in their lawsuit.
Quo warranto does not apply to President or Vice President. Only impeachment can remove them. And the statute expressly excludes those offices.
It works like this: you can petition the US Attorney General setting forth the grounds of the application. The AG does not have to do anything. If the AG refuses to act, you can petition for leave of court to have the writ issued in the name of any licensed attorney who will then represent the United States in the proceeding. The court must be convinced that the basis in the application rests on sound law or they will not issue.
There is no such thing in our legal system where some type of permanent relief like this would be awarded in 10 days ex parte with no response necessary from the office holder claimed to be unlawfully holding office. This gets litigated.
Does anyone here actually think that these people would not simply cure a deficiency like that, if it is accurate that these aren’t on file? Does anyone here think these people are incapable of signing something like that because they hate the constitution so much they’d rather be removed? These people will do literally anything for power….
What would be far better would be to challenge any regulatory changes that these cabinet officials signed off on without being eligible for the office. Anything they did prior to filing these affidavits is null and void.
Ya this is a real scandal. And oddly enough something I stumbled onto by accident about 3 months ago. Then O'keefe started investigating. I was curious who the largest political donors in my city are. So I got on the FEC website and I saw all of these daily small donations to dem PACs like Biden for President and Act Blue all from the same people. Like every day for weeks on end they were donating $5 or sometimes smaller units. It confused me. But then again, liberals are bizarre creatures. So while I thought it was strange, I did not consider at the time that this was obvious shenanigans.
What I am most puzzled about is that this is so open and notorious. Anyone can look this up where they live on the FEC site. I never conceived of something being so easy to discover like this. Which is why I didn't immediately think I found fuckery afoot. James comes out a few weeks ago and connected the dots for me. Was forehead slapping moment for me lol
I love Dr. Sowell. One of my top 3 influences in my political world.
He is right, here, sort of. It is precisely that self indulgence of ego that has prevented many courts from caving to political correctness. It couldn’t rationally be argued that judges are refusing to call parties before the court by their preferred pronouns because they are taking their ego out of it. It is precisely because nobody is gonna tell that judge how to run his court room but him that we get those decisions. And that is 100% ego.
I would really like to see the fraud data in Nebraska because I have never heard of this before. I’d like to consider myself a black belt level consumer of election fraud stories/data. And this one wasn’t on my radar.
I did a deep dive on this Sinaloa stuff from the AZ hearing (Liz Harris was just expelled for inviting this witness to testify). Nothing said in that hearing can be verified. And this guy has not provided any evidence that he claims to have, at least that I could find anywhere. Looking at some of his litigation history, he has a pattern of suing many different parties (including all 3 of his ex wives) for fraud and then having his case dropped for not pushing it to trial. Leaving open cases idle on the docket gets judges booting them. I cant find a case he took to trial.
Something stinks about the entire narrative with that story. It is easy to believe those named officials are corrupt. It is maybe even way more likely than not these officials are corrupt. And they may actually be engaged in all sorts of corrupt shit. But none of what this guy claims can be verified.
There have been some who said they have looked up, and subsequently discovered these sham mortgages from non existent companies on Katie Hobbs’ title history. I have not actually seen the deeds of trust that were filed in any of these stories. If it is, I would be interested in seeing them. I have been under the impression that the Maricopa county register of deeds has put up some hurdles to accessing public data so I haven’t tried to look myself. Even if this were true, that does not remotely mean that the Sinaloa cartel did it as bribes. It means that there is mortgage fraud going on there. Which happens every day all across the country. Mostly, it is money laundering. But often it can just be plain theft. The “take multiple mortgages from different companies” scam is not new. I think some ex NFL players went down for that a couple of years ago. That wasn’t laundering; it was profiteering. People can also pledge their homes as collateral for something else. Deeds of Trust get filed for this. Which could be from any number of different corporations/LLCs who are not in the business of mortgage lending. Nothing says the only thing your house can be collateral for is a mortgage loan.
If I were this sub stack author, I would not have spent half my otherwise great article talking about this lawyer’s allegations as if it is demonstrably true. Because that isn’t even close to the case here. These remain allegations that have yet to show evidence to back them up.
Dude is totally a patsy that they are trying to make take the fall.
Having said that, don’t immediately assume that this leak was done for altruistic purposes. Maybe it was. But it is way too early to know. It could just as likely be deliberate from the Biden admin as a way to exit this shit show in the least embarrassing way. A classified leak like this could be a way to create a charade to display the public sentiment against further intervention there. Which gives Pedo Peter a way of telling Zelensky his hands are tied and he cant do anything else. And Zelensky can’t really dispute it. After all, if Washington actually wants to abide by the will of the people, that will says GTFO of fuckin Ukraine immediately. Never mind that most of us didn’t ever want to go there from the start.
It is pretty clear at this point that we are working on an exit strategy. It started with Blinken trying to get a cease fire agreement 2 months ago. With obviously retarded terms like “immediate withdrawal of all Russian forces” and giving Ukraine back the territory they took. Can’t blame him for asking I suppose. While this retard administration thinks that they can win this thru Russian attrition, Russia knows that they can last longer. They don’t have to do anything more than they have done: achieve goals and hold. Conquering all of Ukraine and laying siege to Kiev would be the last act of a desperate Russia. They never wanted that. Juice not worth the squeeze. Restoring law and order to Ukraine would take 15 years and tens of billions of rubles better spent in Russia. They just want the threat removed from their front door step.
Pedo Peter has no hope of a negotiated exit because Russia does not trust him, the west, or NATO. For obvious reasons of being serial liars and bullshitters. So with that not on the table, what else does he have to give cover to a GTFO plan? Seems to me that I bet we find this to be the case. Just my thoughts.
After the fall of the Roman Empire, we entered a multi century period that historians call "the dark ages." So for all of its flaws, the fall of the Roman Empire was not exactly a good thing for a very lengthy period of time. I'd like to hope that we won't have 15+ generations living in the dark ages after our generations are gone.
WTF? Wow that's bad.
Not saying this to dispute what you see in this video, but I have a serious question: My 5 year old phone will do 4k video. So will most phones. Why are all of these videos in complete dogshit resolution? Would certainly be helpful if people used uncucked resolution for this type of thing...
He got sanctioned for fairly substantial money in some Texas case a year or so ago. Can't quite recall what it was about.
Some might argue that this indicates "over the target." And in most circumstances, I'd probably agree. Here...something was just not right with this entire story. The premise is entirely plausible; if not entirely probable. But nothing checks out. This "lawyer" has a shit ton of lawsuits he's filed against various people/entities accusing them of fraud. Nothing ever goes to trial. Mostly, those cases are dismissed "for lack of prosecution." Which is a way of saying the dude filed them, and then quit doing anything in the case. A judge gives you a warning he is going to dismiss if something doesn't happen. And the guy obviously doesn't continue to push the case towards trial. So it goes away.
The cynic in me says they kicked her out for calling them out. But I can't buy that from what was presented. To date, no proof of squat has come out. So while I am certain these people are crooked...I'm fairly certain this lawyer is a larper. I'd find it far more likely Liz Harris was a plant to make anyone accusing them of corruption look retarded and normies subsequently ignore the claims. Because these claims are pretty retarded.
I might be...perhaps slightly ahead of you. I've actually given up trying to be all things. Kind of forced to. But I got a plan and am relieved it looks possible to not need to do this kind of run yourself into the ground "business." Just need to get going on it!
The only upside is that flyover country might be the only place in the country capable of uniting together to help each other. Seems like large urban areas might be the worst place to attempt this. Everyone expects someone else to do something.
Absolutely correct that one man cannot do all things. There are limits. And attempting to defy them results in predictable disaster. Been there. Probably longer than it should have taken to learn that lesson.
Fellowship is underrated. I used to think it was weird as a kid. And a lot of the people at church I wanted nothing to do with. While I still struggle to work and play well with others, I finally understand this concept. More people should do this. Hopefully that will be one of the positives to come out of this clown show.
Self sufficiency to a point. As a serial entrepreneur and sole proprietor, I can tell you that I have run myself into the ground hard trying to be all things. A lucky turn of events has happened for me and I have had the last 60 days away from work. I am slowly digging myself out of this funk. Today wasn’t a good day for me but I am finally having way more good days than bad.
I need to redefine my understanding of “self sufficient” because it ain’t working at all trying to do everything myself. I think moving forward, “self sufficient” will mean “pulling your own weight” to me. The last 15 years has been more than an exhausting struggle trying to be jack of all trades, master of none. More specialization is needed for sanity, and that’s exactly where I am going at the end of the month. We need each other for support, assistance, and efficiency. This isn’t exactly the type of “rugged individualism” that I grew up aspiring to. It has been a hard adjustment. I wish someone had enlightened me many moons ago. I might have more hair and less of it gray.
The IMF is merely a vehicle to tax world citizens without firing a shot. The funny thing about this - I watched Ana Kasparian on Young Turks getting dangerously close to realizing this during a discussion last year when the Biden puppet lost the presidential election in Colombia in favor of an open socialist. Man did she cope hard to avoid the obvious. I think she will red pill herself by years end on the trajectory she’s currently traveling.
Here is the IMF blueprint in simple form:
- Reach out to 3rd world and/or countries in turmoil
- Offer large sums of cash for “infrastructure” and/or “social spending” and sell it as “humanitarian assistance” or whatever nice sounding buzz word fits. Of course, at confiscatory rates of usury.
- Pay under the table large sums - preferably 8-9 figures - to the country’s president and 7-8 figures to his underlings to bribe him into accepting these loans.
- Know that said president will be retiring to a 20 million mansion in _________ tropical beach resort by the time the economic effects of paying people to not work kick in.
- Insist on austerity measures from the next administration to deal with the predictable shit economy that follows
- collect ursury paid for by the general public tax revenues of that country - the people who didn’t agree to take that loan, couldn’t stop it, but are stuck with the bill; and now have increased taxes from said “austerity” measures.
- enjoy a lack of serious competition in virtually any industry from that country because the economy there is a train wreck.
- repeat in next country.
DeSantis is a moron for openly consorting with the bottom of the barrel rino crowd. The same morons that thought it was a good idea to run Jeb fuckin Bush after we just barely survived 8 years of Obama and the country was still in deep Bush fatigue. As if we want legacy family presidents…as if legacy family presidents are even a good idea…
If you asked me how to best torpedo your future presidential campaign as a republican, I’d tell you to huddle up with Karl Rove, the Bushes, and Mitt Romney. Follow their instructions and adopt their ideals. Maybe even suck up to Mitch McConnell That will guarantee you’ll never see the inside of the Oval Office as president in your lifetime.
If I had slept through 2016-2019, I would probably opt for DeSantis. Because I would still think that Trump’s mouth is what makes him controversial. And I’d think really idiotic shit like “If he had just endorsed masks, he would have won the 2020 election…that was an easy thing to just do so the lunatics would shut up.” And I’d be worn out by the MSM psyop onslaught. “If he just learned to stop yapping and responding to any possible sleight from whatever woke moron, it would be so much better…” It’s literally battered woman syndrome. DeSantis ball washers simply have not awakened. To them, we must choose our candidate based on how ANTIFA and trannies react to that candidate. This is itself our side’s mental illness.
I should probably dig into that before commenting. But all I’ve seen is him attacking the NRA. What’s wrong with that? I am never going to belong to that corrupt controlled opposition grift “advocacy” group. All they do is charge money to members so they can have expensive Ruth’s Chris steakhouse dinners that the members aren’t invited to. Where was the cucked NRA on this red flag nonsense? Why were there 11 of their most financially supported reps voting IN FAVOR of this bs?
So I say he’s right..screw the NRA. They are a danger to America. Because they simply pretend to fight for gun rights while grifting tons of money to stop nothing. GOA is a much better outfit. Though I have my beefs with them too. NRA needs to be defunded and those donations given to better lobbyists.
Lol @ realizing Dennis Kucinich isn’t as insane as we were led to believe. Never thought I’d see the day where I’d have to eat that crow…
The Kennedy fortune comes from bootlegging during prohibition. My guess is that their operation competed with deep state goon grifts. And they probably refused to pay the DS their tribute. Kinda makes the mafia gang wars of the 20s and 30s take on a different light. Wouldn’t it be some shit to find out that the NFA was passed to give the goons a means of prosecuting the bootleggers that outcompeted them based on their firearms? No clue if that is remotely grounded in reality but these days anything is possible.
Absolutely this is by design. They want it like this. Our focus is misplaced. It is on the people leaving the dismal conditions in their home countries. The problems they cause here pale in comparison to the drug trafficking and human trafficking. While we are all side tracked with “they took r jerbs!!” The DS is busy raking in billions from illicit businesses. We should be focused on government, politicians, and the DS. Solve that, and the rest takes care of itself.
Man that was substantive. Riveting exchange of ideas, mate.
Certainly a possibility. But anything like that to me is a secondary or tertiary “benefit” to the DS. Until the primary issue is dealt with - drug/human trafficking - everything else is an exercise in frivolity.
I think the illegals here are merely a symptom. What is a bigger problem: illegals trying to work or drug/human trafficking? Not to say that you can bring millions upon millions of poor and uneducated people in without issues. But I don’t see how that is even close to the main problem. It is the drug and human trafficking that is the issue. Except that the focus is on dealing with the symptom and not the cause. If you treat the pain of cancer, you still have cancer. Likewise we can deport all we want, but as long as the money in the cartel business is so high, they’ll be right back here.
Its amazing that this case is like a sacred cow to so many here. Such that anyone who doesn't immediately embrace it is personally skewered. This place is filled with analyzing and critiquing opinions/data and debating the merits or lack thereof. Except with this Brunson case. Nobody responds with an actual argument. It is the people who pointed out the lack of a cognizable claim in the suit that must be the problem apparently.