Replace "x.com" with "threadreaderapp.com". If that doesn't work, try twstalker.com or xcancel.com
Oh, no! They can't pay their lawyer bills with taxpayer money anymore!
Whatever will us taxpayers do?
Don't deport them. Cut them off from NGO funds and then convince their husbands to drop them. Let them learn how the world actually works if you have to live in it.
Edit- medium beef should be okay.
Most dogs, if raised on uncooked meat from pup - including mother's milk - can handle raw meat. Some dogs are just broken, I wouldn't try it with a dalmation or something like that.
Dogs raised from pup on rando dog foods and cooked human foods are as weak as we are for uncooked meat. You could technically move them over, but it's a long stressful journey for your dog and they risk some nasty illness days at the beginning if you aren't being crazy with your kitchen prep - like Gordon Ramsey standing behind you calling you a donkey level crazy.
I recommend against the transition to uncooked foods unless you are trying to live on bear meat in the Canadian Rockies for a decade or something.
Don't feed rare/raw meat to dogs. Some dog breeds are okay, but most can get all the same nasties we do from undercooked meats.
We use human ingredients and make a biweekly run of fresh food. Crock pot beef or pork - better if you can get heart, liver, kidney, etc and mix it in - and then shred the meat. Setup a second crock pot run with chopped carrots, peas, and corn kernels, toss in some nutrients (collagen, powdered mushrooms, those sorts of things) and some rice and oats. Mix the two together and parcel into suitable containers.
Serve at meal time. If you make a huge load, it can be frozen, too.
Avoid excessive pea, rice, potatoes, or chicken as those tend to be irritants and allergen containing for dogs. This will vary dog to dog as will their sensitivity (some dogs - no problems. Some dogs see a potato across the street and their skin falls off)
I feel like I have been stolen from. 😁Very nice!
Did they at least give him his $1,000?
At this point I see them like a rat in a cage who press a button all their lives and a pellet comes out. Then one day they press the button and it doesn't. But the rat doesn't stop pressing that button, hoping for food.
Ten years on, they are desperate for that lever to work and are slapping it like a machine gun, begging for it to work.
I made this point the other day. The DNC and MSM didn't care until Trump made it look like it was about him. They had four years with an autopen as president that the Ds could have released it, but there wasn't so much as a peep. Four months ago, he released what DC had - like 150 pages. THEN - SDNY was torn apart and people fired. MSM and Ds ignored those, too.
But two weeks ago, Trump told everyone one his staff to not talk about it. He did that press-coverage cabinet meeting where gabbard sat on her hands the entire time and was noticably quiet. Some softball question about Epstein and he waved it off.
A few days later, he aggressively dismissed it. And then puts out his long screed on Truth about the Epstein files.
And the next day until today, the MSM and Ds and Rinos are all loosing their fucking minds every second of every day about it.
Go look at r/politics. 99% of posts are about Epstein. It's hilarious
He's not playing them like a fiddle. It seems much easier than that for him. He's playing them like a kazoo. 😉
Remove the telematics module. You lose onboard maps, but you have android/apple auto for that if you need it - and you can heavily constrain what information your phone provides to the car.
Most stevia is processed. It's "from a plant" in the same way that aspirin is "from tree bark". Sure, it started there, but that's not where it's ended up.
There is whole leaf stevia that is literally just dried leaves, but that's not the stevia in use almost everywhere because it's the least desirable in terms of taste - its less sweet than the granulated direct sugar substitute and adds extra leafy flavors.
This is yet another 'oh look at what AI did, bahhhd' article. They've come out with regularity the last six months and all seem to be the results of direct user intervention, with people giving explicit instructions to the AI that they should avoid something (e.g. being shut down) by any means necessary.
Now we have one where an IT manager gave 100% full, unrestricted access to company systems to a piece of test software? Software that apparently "lied" to him on multiple occasions without fixing or taking it out of the process while it was being fixed?
..... oddball question, but did this guy's company get money from US Aid? The DNC? Someplace that might save some asses if all company records were innocently lost?
The outrage. OUTRAGE. Everyone is ANGRY. Because of some videos on the internet. Do you feel it? The RAGE?
No?
Me, either. I'll bet the only outrage is by the people under Obama's umbrella who are losing their free ride and/or may go to jail.
I dunno. Everyone googey-eyes at 'solid state' and, really the only benefit is a reduction in both weight and spontaneous fires (not an elimination).
These two articles keep saying Toyota is 'going to disrupt' but....how? No one wants EVs except governments that want control of the citizens. All of the drawbacks except fire risk and range (because the weight reduction is replaced by more battery to get range) are generally the same between current lion packs and new solid state packs as outlined by press releases.
The only way this would disrupt is by being super cheap, where getting an EV over a gas engine might be attractive - but that's not toyota's playbook, generally.
"1,600 kilometers and a full charge time of just 10 minutes"
This is called a bomb.
And this seems like a hit piece on Tesla more than a breakthrough by Toyota. There's no information on what the Toytoa battery is even made of, but no shortage of complaints about every perceived mis-step of Tesla. For example, it complains about Tesla's conservative "competent" battery, then goes out of the way to side step that the specs from Toyota are average at best - after all, 'it's slow conservative engineering is why toyota's are good'.
Please.....please stop trying to smile.
Darwin's theory was just natural selection. It gets a decent number of things right for it's day based on passive observations and deductive reasoning.
Unfortunately, It was seized upon as a weaponized anthem for those that wanted the persecution of science by the church to end, and then later as a smug liberals backwards claim of intelligence over the "idiots that believe a wizard man sits in the clouds". What we understand as evolution in modern times is laden with 400 years of attempting to save face and is in no way science. It doesn't help that science has become idiots in doctor's scrubs that dictate from ivory towers the beliefs that shouldn't be questioned.
Science is, when properly used, an exploration of God's design. Are we going to get things right? Some times. Most of the time we are going to get things just right enough to make something we are trying to do work.
Dogs are the new species. Wolves were the original. You'll see the same thing in modern corn, cows, chickens, lemons, and pretty much everything we've messed with for our own benefit.
This is something man has done with his time here.
I guess it's going to be a question of "how far is a new species?" Is a Chihuahua still a wolf? A husky? Is a saber tooth tiger just a mountain lion with dental work? What if we add wings to a cow?
God made everything according to rules. Gravity, physics, chemistry, thermodynamics, plate tectonics. You name it, it follows a set of rules. We are very good at exploiting those rules for our benefit - even if we don't know how every piece of the machine works, we can fiddle with the levers we understand to get results we want.
I don't see why God wouldn't have used rules to govern life and how it grows and changes. It's probably not "evolution" as we understand it now - too many of the hypotheses don't work in the real world, but it's one of those hypotheses that gets just enough right (e.g Newtonian physics) to stick around until we figure something better out.
That's sad. I wonder what made her eualifu in the first place?
What about the mothers and fathers who weren't single parents by choice? Just day care so that you can go actually earn a living is 200 dollars a week in most places.
The safety net should be structured like one. It will give you a short term help (6 months. A year.) so that you can get your life back on track.
But eighty six dollars a month for food in almost any situation isn't help. It's a joke.
Again, I don't know her situation, so it may be warranted based upon her history or income, but if her income affords her food, she doesn't need food stamps at all.
She said it was 536 per month and then reduced to 86 per month. She then complained about the 2000 Medicaid deductible.
I don't know her living situation, but if she needs food stamps, 536/mo for one person isn't a huge excess. I could see stepping it back to 400/month but 86/month is too little, even as a hand up.
But, again, I don't know her living situation.
It was "I voted for him and now I won't again" that made my bs detector go off.
You making 3k a month off of entitlements, you aren't going to vote for Trump.
See, I don't care if I can prove you thought something 20 years ago. Or if you did something stupid in your teens. Or if you got caught drunk driving in the 70s in a rural area. Even forgetting details from two decades prior.
But holy shit. 'three years ago you said this' and the answer is 'ive never heard, seen, felt, thought about that ever'
Does their brain work like an etch a sketch? They turn in their sleep and become a blank slate?
Does anyone have a live link to the handbook? Looks like they scrubbed it from the Internet archive.