2
Awilen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Allow me to impart more lingo.

The origin of kek.

In the game World of Warcraft, there are two factions of races battling against each other. To avoid collusion in "Player vs. Player" servers, there is a word scrambler such that one factions cannot understand the other. Each faction has a common language, Human for the Alliance, Orcish for the Horde. And when "lol" is said in Orcish, Alliance faction players read "kek" instead.

Then there's Pepe, a frog character turned meme.

It turns out Kek is also a deity from Ancient Egypt, represented by a frog, and the characters on the base of statues of Kek look like a person in front of a computer https://world.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/keke_pepe.jpeg

Since then Kek has become the purveyor of meme magic, and Pepe his prophet. Praise Kek.

2
Awilen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Science.

Did you mean Faith?

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Both are about genetic evolution in the context of pressure from an outside agent leading to destruction; or the capacity of at least one off-spring to randomly become immune to whatever it is that's destroying its ancestor, and become ancestor of new off-springs that are immune too, and thrive.

2
Awilen 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Antibiotic overconsumption leads to the proliferation of strains of bacteria resistant to the antibiotics through mutation."

"There is no link between the proliferation of strains of the virus resistant to the immune system through mutation and mass vaccination."

Only one of them is true.

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The reminder is very appreciated. Thank you.

4
Awilen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Government is slow. It's a feature.

6
Awilen 6 points ago +6 / -0

Confession through projection.

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends. Becoming more lethal in a context where lower lethality already led to a part of the elderly dying but not the active spreaders is a non-issue.

Lethality can increase while keeping under a threshold to allow spreading among the active, young population, to the older population who has more of a chance to die.

3
Awilen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another point I've made in the past.

We're told "there's no link between vaccination and the appearance of new variants".

We're also told "do not overuse antibiotics, as antibiotic-resistant strains will need stronger and stronger antibiotics until either of them kills us", because of the same genetic system known as "mutation", or "evolution".

Why the contradictory messaging?

Finally, how come new variants seem to pop up across several countries at the same time despite the original strain having taken months to reach various regions of the world? Fishy. Extremely fishy

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've heard about the "specific target" effect of the vaccines on the immune system. I'm still doubting considering how the immune system works, but it seems to make sense.

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the other thing, I've looked into HCQ. Raoult seemed on the right track, considering he's looked into the drug after the first epidemy of SARS/MERS, of which some studies pointed at CQ as a potential drug against them. I remember finding this study too.

The only double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with a large patient pool (the gold standard of clinical trials) of HCQ I found showed no real difference between that and the placebo for patients treated with early COVID19. Granted, there's no AZ or Zinc. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-4207

Ivermectin, I found the site ivmmeta.com which lists no less than 60 studies, a lot of which are gold-standard as mentioned above, but that may play on my confirmation bias of "anything but those rushed so-called vaccine". How many such gold-standard studies are there still out there showing no real effect? I don't know. I'm not a doctor, and even now my faith in doctors has severely decreased.

I remember the Mediator scandal, a drug that was prescribed for type-2 diabetes which had actually no real effect. Officially, 500 people died from it, other counts are into the 1500 to 2000, and that led to its removal after showing its complete lack of effect and even its toxicity. Was it tested and approved by the authorities? Yes. And that scares the hell out of me.

3
Awilen 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've known this doc for decades. He's also an EMT and a ME. He doesn't lack practice and he's getting old. He is known throughout all the medical establishments on the island of Corsica (an island of 330k people).

He's the only one who looked far into my mother's fibromyalgia, at a time when it was a "trashbin disease" that's been used as a diagnosis for a bunch of other diseases, decredibilizing it entirely when it comes to officially recognizing the disease as a handicap for the purpose of government programs related to housekeeping help. He doesn't take free time, his only preoccupation is the well-being of his patients. I've seen it. He fought with her as she was slowly crumbling from the constant muscle pain.

He also told us he's pro-vaccination but that forced vaccination is against his ethics. I've asked him, knowing I'm in my 30s and kinda overweight, if it's a good idea for me to take it, he could only tell me he's pro-vaccination again, not that it was a good or a bad idea. I left from there without a clear answer.

I've looked into both sides of the argument on the jab. I'm not clear on the testing (one side says they've been through the standard safety tests and the current trials are normal, the other says it's still experimental, the only clear indication on any clinical trial estimated time of completion is from Pfizer's website, and in 2023), I'm not clear on the side-effects and the death rates, I'm not clear if those numbers are even accurate, I'm not clear on alternative treatments, I'm in a goddamn fog. I hate this.

2
Awilen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Feeling only the unvaccinated can spread it after God Fauci told him to double-mask up even after being stabbed.

"Muh Russia" which not only has been completely discredited by the Mueller report but also linked to a measly $100.000 in ads on Facebook for Hillary Clinton

The absolute state.

3
Awilen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have you ever seen a vaccine before?

Louis Pasteur invented the process of vaccination: inoculating a weakened pathogen to induce a natural immune response to it, without disturbing the rest of the system. They'll go everywhere eventually, distributing the load. This is quite possibly the safest way to create an immune response.

mRNA "vaccines" are not vaccines. They inject a long chain of "program data" (the mRNA) creating the pathogenic proteins themselves, disturbing the system to force it to make them based on that program. We don't know the implications of that. The proteins are created locally, inducing a strong, high-stress local immune response. We don't even know how the mRNA is inserted in the cells (edit: according to my research, it is "nanolipids" encapsulating the mRNA to keep it stable, those nanolipids closely resemble cell walls and thus easily fuse with them). Worse, these mRNA vaccines are still undergoing "Phase 3" clinical trial until 2023 and have only been approved for use in the context of emergency (that is, if we are to trust the labs doing those trials!) Currently the state of emergency is being pushed again and again all across the world. Why? Because they can't use the "vaccine" outside of it if there is medication available. Ivermectin says hi! Oh but it's not been approved either despite not being toxic and more than 60 studies on tens of thousands of persons, half of them being sacro-sanct "double-blind randomized placebo-controlled" studies! Sheeeeeesh...

That's before even considering the protein in question, the spike protein, which is already linked to the destruction of mitochondria on cell entry, and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 to be a vascular disease, not only a respiratory one. https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/ How many spike proteins are created by those "vaccines"? How many leave in the bloodstream and induce potentially deadly side-effects?

Finally, before telling me I'm "muh antivaxx", just understanding this isn't a vaccine and that I'm updated on all my vaccines should allow you to reason on the current narrative being pushed if your IQ isn't at room temperature. The media aren't doctors. The government aren't doctors. Mandating vaccination is the illegal practice of medicine and is punishable by law.

Edit: oh and now the lambda variant is blossoming in 27 countries and is slated to be extremely resistant to the stab! Gee, I wonder why, now that populations worldwide are rather well-"vaccinated". It's as if variants proliferate when the old virus is taken care of, but there's no link between "vaccination" and new variants, I mean, there's no link between antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant strains! Oh but, forget that! BE AFRAID! BE VERY AFRAID! BE AFRAID OF THOSE WHO AREN'T AFRAID! THE END IS NIGH! WE MUST ALL LOCKDOWN AGAIN! THE WRATH OF "THE SCIENCE" IS UPON US! Cultist.

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The wise is ashamed of his shortcomings, but isn't ashamed to correct himself.

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've worked for a research center which tries to predict forest fire spread based on "current weather" and "terrain type". They have moved on from the project since, and went into building new weather prediction methods, using simulations and heuristics and whatnot (I don't have details).

Suffice it to say this is very high-level stuff, applying physics to large masses of air at different pressures and speeds (wind), taking into account all parameters like humidity and temperature, to an uneven land with trees and houses and whatever, so never is the starting data set large enough to model reality and predict the future reality... It's extreme.

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Bill Gates says there is one human race, entertains white supremacist thoughts." - CNN

I wish.

15
Awilen 15 points ago +15 / -0

Right to vote

"No ID! NO NO NO NO NO NO! NOOOOOOOO! Bigot."

Right to Freedom

"No no, you must have your COVID passport/mask/whatever."


They have no business talking about rights.

1
Awilen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Violence isn't inherently evil.

Violence is a tool used by both Good and Evil, one to protect, one to aggress. It is the tool you put at the very bottom of the toolbox. You learn to use it, and wish to never have to.

If you ever happen in the situation you run out of tools, you'll be happy it's there rather than not.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›