2
BeatButStillStanding 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe they were saying it is a religious thing and not a government thing. AKA government marriage is only to screw over men with the guise of no fault divorce and alimony and child support etc. If these things were fair to men then they would work. As they are now is one of the top reasons marriage rates are abysmal and divorce is SO high. Modern feminism ideas have gutted it as well.

5
BeatButStillStanding 5 points ago +5 / -0

Common theme with them... Like the holocaust numbers.... You cant have 12 mil total and lose 6 mil and in less than 3 years be at 15 mil again. All made up numbers.

5
BeatButStillStanding 5 points ago +5 / -0

Prohibited career felon gang bangers says what? Trust me. I know this subject very well. The ones being arrested for gun crimes are not the ones you would even want to have a stapler.

1
BeatButStillStanding 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there an official list of all of the things they cut to get it to this point?

1
BeatButStillStanding 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is possible but highly unlikely and if it does happen that would mean he does stay here costing tax payers money for even longer or would he be set free for being that witness? How long would you expect someone like that to survive? How many others could/would they hurt in the process? This guy is on the level of a street drug dealer. There are hundreds of rungs above him and they will not get them all or have them all flip. Any deal he would accept would be to stay in the US and most likely out of prison or very short sentence. Sorry, I just don't want him back in my home state. I'm still waiting for the "no civil unrest, quick and clean" and "no deals" parts to kick in.... Other than that, deport them all.

1
BeatButStillStanding 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be clear I am referring to bringing him back, going through the entire court process and jailing process for him to either be staying here in jail or re deported all on the tax payers. He was already gone. Its just wasting more money IMO.

If they weren't already awake with all the MS13 and wife beating and the body cam of him human trafficking then what will all the above do to work on those same sleepers?

4
BeatButStillStanding 4 points ago +4 / -0

ACB or Roberts would be the only other possible ones but considering it was a solo vote, Roberts would be out. He wont expose himself like that. Ketanji and ACB would be the two to do it.

1
BeatButStillStanding 1 point ago +1 / -0

The same judge that already dropped the bail by 75%? Which just so happens to be a black woman?

1
BeatButStillStanding 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have been doing everything I can even at the expense of my own well being. I'm just so worn down. Best conversations I have in this state are with the wall. Beyond over it. The shit I see at work every day and its only getting worse.

4
BeatButStillStanding 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lmao, the attorneys in Baltimore use them as well as Homicide detectives. This is the type of stuff that makes us look dumb. Just like the time decode people who change the rules in every one to point to the post they want.

If you use time in Greenland and subtract the temperature you get post boom!

2
BeatButStillStanding 2 points ago +2 / -0

No Big Mike did the flop your wiener on national tv dance.

4
BeatButStillStanding 4 points ago +4 / -0

^ This is the most common experience and why the low life comment was made. It starts with helping single mothers who import the next baby daddy in. Disturbances start and then escalate into crime. This drives the neighborhood down. Cycle intensifies.

1
BeatButStillStanding 1 point ago +1 / -0

This cant be a liberal because they are allergic to libraries and job applications.

2
BeatButStillStanding 2 points ago +2 / -0

Noooo! She was studying the other way squirrels hide nuts for the winter 🤣

6
BeatButStillStanding 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is funny and all but takes away from validity when this happens.... Its the same thing when people do the decodes with 48 different number rules to try and prove a point.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›