Right. Screw these people. If you can kneel without punishment ("I disagree with what you say but I will defend to death your right to say it") then you can also NOT kneel and not be punished for it. Reality is coming crashing down on these hypocrites and I'm going to enjoy the show.

Thanks kind stranger. Please do share the few boogers if you are easily able. No worries if not.

I'll be bluntly honest. I'm a lurker who's been lurking for a couple years. I haven't looked too closely at Q stuff and, to be frank, I don't care about it. I lurk here to get information that the mainstream media doesn't talk about.

That said, this is the most mind blown I've been in as long as I can remember. Thank you.

I get what you're saying truly (especially with the various login across platform/site methods), and I don't dismiss any possibility completely, but I for one am not going to let these assholes memory hole the fact that the handle/username IS the digital ID. They can go fuck themselves if they're too lazy to check even if the troll creates one that's very similar.

Can we get a link so we can see real-time reporting and not premature celebrating at 1%?

The kicker for me was, and it had 50 some upvotes, was a comment like, “Maybe it would 'help' if the black vaccine hesitant were administered the vaccine by black people.” They actually want segregation again. Insane.

Why do they think comparing Trump to Yoda is derogatory? Lmao. These absolute bumbling numb skulls.

They don’t know what it is to be sweaty and disheveled because they've never done anything remotely physical in their lives.

All due respect you're being evasive. Yeah that's IF you are wasted and carrying. And what you may stupidly do in your own home is your business. If you go to a store to buy booze they're not going to say to you "we checked the database and you're a CCW holder so we can't sell you booze." That's MY point. You shouldn't HAVE to choose between legally obtaining weed (especially for health reasons) and legally carrying. I am saying that you have to choose in several states including mine. It's wrong. You should be able to have legal access to weed AND your concealed carry permit. Everything that it's illegal to do while drunk off your ass should be (and probably is) illegal to do while stoned off your ass.

I'm going to assume by the "pharmacy point" you think it shouldn't be recreationally available and if that's the case then all I can say is wake up from your reefer madness. We tried the Prohibition. It didn't work. Alcohol has devastating effects on your health long term and it's at the center of many domestic disputes. Thousands of people are killed every year because of asshole drunk drivers. There are people who can consume alcohol recreationally who aren't a threat to other people and those who are. Those who are are dealt with accordingly. Weed should be treated the exact same way.

Argue against harder drugs all you want but there is zero legitimate reason to keep marijuana illegal. It's already illegal to drive under the influence. Making and keeping it illegal is a ploy by big pharma to keep us using THEIR concoctions that are expensive and have more side effects than marijuana. And many states block you from holding medical use cards and a CCW at the same time which is so disgustingly wrong. But sure you can get wasted on alcohol and carry a gun legally, that's fine.

The same cognitive dissonance between liberals supporting abortion and shot mandates at the same time. Ridiculous.

Yeah leaning too heavily on streaming absolutely aligns with over reliance. But the internet is very important. Should we depend on it for critical infrastructure? Hell no.

“Defenseless”. I snorted my soda.

This is the only valid point. Anyone who thinks we were better off 100% without technology (like the information access of the internet) is smoking something. There’s a valid point to be made about over reliance on technology absolutely. But to say that we shouldn’t have it at ALL is mind numbingly stupid.

Your downvotes amuse me because yes, the fundies are as much of an issue as the far left commies. I'm a younger Gen Xer, part of the 90's hipster punk scenes, philosophically (not current party) libertarian leaning, and not particularly religious. I absolutely agree that anyone who brings kids to a night club on ANY night let alone a drag queen night should be named, shamed and ostracized. The fundamental Christian Right make me wonder just how much some of them would love to enact their own “Christian sharia” by trying to make strip/night clubs illegal, outlawing gay marriage again, and whatever else they think they need to “solve this problem”. It makes me doom a bit that there will never be peace because the pendulum will always be swinging between the far left and right trying to force their beliefs on everyone. (My comment was mostly pasted from one I just posted because I didn’t see your reply until just now.)

Spot on. I'm a younger Gen Xer, part of the 90's hipster punk scenes, philosophically (not current party) libertarian leaning, and not particularly religious. I absolutely agree that anyone who brings kids to a night club on ANY night let alone a drag queen night should be named, shamed and ostracized. The fundamental Christian Right make me wonder just how much some of them would love to enact their own “Christian sharia” by trying to make strip/night clubs illegal, outlawing gay marriage again, and whatever else they think they need to “solve this problem”. It makes me doom a bit that there will never be peace because the pendulum will always be swinging between the far left and right trying to force their beliefs on everyone.

And I know what you’re saying about some of the most religious people too. I’ve known a few like that myself and it’s funny how the religious right likes to pretend that doesn’t exist.

Hit the nail on the head. Transgender issues are totally separate and most of the actual gay people who want to be left alone are off the loud and proud train. I know of two of them myself. We know the vocal fight stopped at marriage. Most of the vocal hardcore Christian minority doesn’t want to hear that the “slippery slope” with regard to marriage was letting the state get involved in it in the first place. Some sanctity marriage is supposed to have if I can marry a total stranger off the street today and pay less tax to boot without regard to either of our religious beliefs and desire to have kids. The "slippery slope" if you want to call it that has been the government, specifically the federal government, bloating itself into a disgusting boil that needs lanced. And that’s been happening for decades.

I agree with this 100%. My overall point about gay marriage was how the Right likes to look at it like a slippery slope without stepping back and considering the slippery slope the government has been on for decades. I shouldn’t be able to pluck a random schmuck off the streets and pay less in taxes after legally marrying them but here we are.

That’s the problem, consenting gay adult couples COULDN’T share property or healthcare privileges before they had state marriage privileges. That’s my overall point, the government needs to stay out what consenting adults wish to do. (The government in general is too big.)

I live in a red state and right now I know of a father who was denied emergency custody of a child who was severely and permanently injured after being left unattended by their incompetent mother and this is not the first incident. How’s that going, the state protecting children?

And LEGALLY marriage does not insinuate children at all. You can get married to any random schmuck off the street for money, Healthcare, and even better tax rates. If marriage is supposed to be sacred, how is that sacred? That’s why I said the government needs to stay out of it.

I understand what you’re saying to a degree, but the right isn’t always right either. TL;DR gay marriage cannot be logically or morally illegal when the church is supposed to be separate from the state. Like it or not, you can’t make religious arguments against it when an atheist and a Jew can walk into any courthouse and get married. Of course, no church should be compelled to perform them. The fact remains however that the government grants marital privileges that have nothing to do with religion. The only logical argument is that the government should stay out of marriage completely, and it should remain within the church.

“But the slippery slope and polygamy.” The government does not currently recognize polygamy.

The flaunting of it needs to do a 180 though. We don’t need a gay character in every piece of media. And of course children shouldn’t be exposed to anything sexual.

Wheelchair user here. This is hilarious.

I know the wheelchair stalls are preferable. I don't really care if I have to wait a few minutes to use the bathroom. What pisses me off are the Karens who go into the stall and sit for ten minutes on the phone (has happened 3 times in my 20 something life) and the super morbidly obese (who obviously have issues with the regular sized stall) taking a ten or twenty minute dump in the only stall I can access. I wish paper cuts on those people.

Thank you for the information. How horrifying.

Post deleted. Any info on what it said?

Can someone recommend a good source for watching the trials? I vaguely know of the movie. Is that a good TLDR source or is it not accurate? As a young person I’d have little idea which sources would be the most trustworthy as far as editing and whatnot goes.

Thank you.

I'm newer here. I know a couple people who are considering getting the shot. Can anyone point me to a place where I can get concise information to perhaps dissuade them?