Mike Adams is the Health Ranger.
Relatively speaking, we are talking about a short time period. 3-6 years? I agree with the comments about repetition and his confidence in pending events, they are valid comments of shared frustration.
But, think of the future, maybe 10-15 years from now! X22 will be seen as a teacher of this transition, this great awakening.
Done with Dave - NO WAY!
Those of us that have been tuned in to Dave for several years already know the lesson.
We really don't need to hear the K-12 great awakening education over and over, we are on to higher education, but memory enforcing occasional listening is a great idea.
But, and this is critical - the newbies and normies need it and x22 delivers incredibly well.
All the best teachers use repetition of built up facts and lessons to teach complicated subjects.
You can't teach calculus without geometry, trigonometry, etc. And just consider how much geometry you remember 10 years after the lessons are over.
World politics and world economics are hugely complicated.
I agree with some of the posters that stated Dave has a critical role and he does it very well.
My higher education now is learning how to correct my status in the world to an American State National.
It does take some time and thought to understand and overcome the f?^ckery delivered by the so called scientists who make the claim that SARS-CoV-2 exists and has been isolated.
I believe Jon Rappoport's articles bring clarity of truth.
SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated nor proven to exist.
A hundred and fifty years ago people didn't use credit to buy things. Transactions were "cash on the barrelhead". So, if you had a house, you worked for it, earned it, and then lived in it. If you had children you fell in love, got married, and supported the children that resulted. If you had food, you or someone quite close to you, raised it and brought it to market.
Fourth edition discussed here Black's 4th edition PDF with a reply regarding the 2nd edition.
If you want to keep your dentist, write this in cursive on the signature line and they will act as thought you signed it.
Non Assumpsit
NON ASSUMPSIT. The general issue in the action of assumpsit; being a plea by which the defendant avers that "he did not undertake" or promise as alleged. Standard Fashion Co. v. Morgan, 48 Okl. 217, 149 P. 1160.
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern By HENRY CAMPBELL BLACK, M. A. Author of Treatises on Judgments, Tax Titles, Intoxicating Liquors, Bankruptcy, Mortgages, Constitutional Law, Interpretation of Laws, Rescission and Cancellation of Contracts, Etc. REVISED FOURTH EDITION
FYI
ASSUMPSIT. Lat. He undertook; he promised. A promise or engagement by which one person assumes or undertakes to do some act or pay something to another.
https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/
Correct your status
Trust the Science! kek