1
Brennywaffle 1 point ago +2 / -1

Scientists don't need to pander to the non-scholars.

Biologists dont know jack shit about the words engineers say meanwhile they also dont know what the archeologists are talking about.

When you reach a high enough understanding, new words really help. A process that needs 10 sentences to describe, can just be boiled into "convergent enantiomerization", and scientists know immediatwly what page everyones on.

It saves a lot of time for science and being a scientist today would be impossible without this upgraded language.

1
Brennywaffle 1 point ago +1 / -0

They take a common chemical with a boron carbon bond, then they can replace that bond with another common piece of molecule to it. And that attachment can now be toggled as left and right, instead of both and us having to deal with it.

This means that the rare chemical we make from the simple ones have a tremendously higher yeild (cheaper). EXPONENTIALLY CHEAPER when considering you need multiple switchings of left and right to make a pharma-drug.

2
Brennywaffle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes like in borosilicate glass. Boron is boron, and boron silicate is boron put into a crystal lattice along with other atoms.

2
Brennywaffle 2 points ago +2 / -0

For us to forever be able to choose one side or the side?

That seems like a chemistry nobel prize

1
Brennywaffle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you think if the cathedral builders degenerated into shack builders, that the cathedral wouod still be standing and immaculately clean?

0
Brennywaffle 0 points ago +1 / -1

OMG HOLY SHIT!

I Didn't think he'd whip out THIS one!

2
Brennywaffle 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's calling The Donald your father. And there's saying your The Donald's BITCH.

Massive MASSIVE difference!

2
Brennywaffle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah I'm not buying two weeks. Thats double the wars current duration, and Isreal has their own nukes in case things take too long.

5
Brennywaffle 5 points ago +5 / -0

What do you think we should do about that fortified enrichment plant?

3
Brennywaffle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it really a win when the resistance was constitutionally moot anyways?

0
Brennywaffle 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why Isreal to do this? If China acted this way wouldnt that be a harder Sampson to deal with? Is china on our side as far as no nuclear preemptive strike policy.

2
Brennywaffle 2 points ago +3 / -1

If Iran starts saying this shit it'll be because they want to build cause to attack us, when they talk like this it'll be time for the US to join in. Just like the Nazi's sinking lend lease ships

3
Brennywaffle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Iran needs uranium to build nukes theyre not going to throw it to their enemies to harvest. And Isreal knows what to do if theyre hit with nuclear terrorism

1
Brennywaffle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Evidence evidence evidence... Greatawakening.win is PACKED with evidence

2
Brennywaffle 2 points ago +2 / -0

The song is perfectly timed, hits hard on the ears AND the soul...

1
Brennywaffle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gallons of acid means its a colorless liquid that is pretty corrosive. When Nitric acid dissolves things the nitrogen atom can eject from the melting and bond with oxygen.

Normal nitric acid is very well known for producing orange gasses.

4
Brennywaffle 4 points ago +4 / -0

If a base is so little defended that an assault like this was chosen, then this is practice against CARTEL compounds.

Or this can be extended to ANY DEEPSTATE BLACKSITE!

1
Brennywaffle 1 point ago +1 / -0

No if its "unexploded munitions" (UXO) that basically means relic bombs which have deteriorated to becoming mines.

Why ANYONE would want to store these somewhere and NOT just blow them where they sit is baffling!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›