Oh, I think I was confused. The military members injunction was denied so it looked like they had lost the case, so I wasn't sure why it was being referenced. It looks like although they were denied the injunction, they also won on the claim that they are in fact not "interchangeable".
Ummm look at what you just wrote. "DENIED... injunction". That was the service members getting rejected. Where is the actual ruling saying that they aren't equivalent.
Options:
- Find a new job. Realize that there is a large chance that the 1/4 date will be pushed back if you're in a red state. If you're in a place like commiefornia don't expect this.
- Apply for a religious exemption. Don't ever mention anything scientific or political in your exemption. 2a) Get approved for your religious exemption (potentially with testing that you can also fight with another religious exemption). Keep job or keep looking without being under pressure. 2b) Get denied for your religious exemption and have option to sue within timeframe (usually 6 months to file "charge of discrimination")
Don't get the jab, it will never end until they are dead. And I sure hope you aren't planning on ever having kids with them.
Where is the actual ruling from the judge. The childrenshealthdefense link doesnt actually link or even say who the judge is. Anyone have it?
Lets build upon your burger example. Assume you have a 100 burgers eaten by 100 people, 10 cooked rare and 90 cooked well done. 8 people catch food poisoning eating your burgers. Assume all 8 people who got food poisoning also ate a rare burger.
You can either say "8% of the people that ate a burger got food poisoning" or "80% of the people that ate a rare burger got food poisoning" depending upon what you are looking at.
So yes, you remove the "700" because they are people who received the vaccine during the third trimester. The entire point of the infowars article is that the risk was in the early trimesters (1st and 2nd). If you remove the 700 and only look at the 124 the ratio is abysmal.
The conclusion should be do not vaccinated during first or second trimester as there is a very high chance of losing the baby.
Umm you clearly misread the entire article. Most of the article is about why the 700 are removed.
The entire purpose is that the evidence is showing a ridiculously high miscarriage/spontaneous abortion rate for the first (and second) trimesters but not in the third trimester.
Therefore if you look only at first trimester it has an 82% chance of losing the baby.
I'm not disagreeing especially for a lot of their videos, but this particular article is a good article looking at firm data.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33882218/ is actual journal publication. Note that the authors are intentionally misleading so if you read the summary it "appears" to say the exact opposite.
Infowars did a pretty good article on this a while back: https://www.infowars.com/posts/depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions/
George Soros
It's simple actually a pretty simple test. Where do they need to use the fear?
Introducing a new tablet you can take called PfizerD
I have a dick so....anyone even know what winter vagina is?
Men can have winter vagina too you bigot!!
Direct link to today's court blocking CMS (healthcare) vaccine mandate nationwide: https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/docs/press-releases/2021/motions/28_Memorandum_Ruling_Granting_Nationwide_Preliminary_Injunction.pdf
Direct link to today's court blocking Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate for TN, KY, OH (but will likely be expanded): https://cdn.govexec.com/media/gbc/docs/pdfs_edit/120121cb1.pdf
While its only three states (Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee), it will likely get expanded nationwide just like the healthcare one just did (it started as a few states and then was expanded nationwide just now).
Over my dead body!
You don't have to take the vaccine.
"Just think about how much worse it would have been without the vaccine!"
Yeah... maybe you would have developed natural immunity the first time instead of having a weak immune system where you are catching it repeatedly.
My best instance was walking through a grocery store maskless when everyone else was wearing the "mandatory masks". Some guy walked past me (wearing a mask), looks me in the eyes seeing I was maskless, says "fuck this commie bullshit", and takes it off.
The disease is communism. The virus is the people pushing this.
I mean, these Chinese accounts don't have the ability to vote anyways but that doesn't stop them.
He's a Chinese communist party basketball player.
Must just be that 8% causing problems for everyone!
You sure that is right timestamp? Audio is only 50 minutes long. I checked todays and it wasn't talking about it at 48minutes.
Here is direct link to order: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/21/21-60845.0.pdf
Resisting America becoming great.
The fact that vaxxed are catching COVID now at much higher rates than unvaxxed (e.g. see any of the weekly UK reports) is a good indicator of one of two things happening:
(1) Vaccine is preventing people from developing natural immunity, meaning they will keep getting reinfected over and over again and/or
(2) Vaccine is suffering from Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).