From the little I've known of leadership in churches is that they often deal with bad stuff going on that they work hard to shield others from, and that many boundaries they have up are life lessons and not out of malice or condemnation. Legal stuff, and financial stuff can bankrupt a church, also. Hopefully someone was able to help them outside the main support structure. Everyone has a part.
Ok, thanks. I guess the short answer is "We'll see :)"
Haha sorry not offended, I can be pretty dry sometimes.
for now that's how most ai works, but that will not always be the case
Leading AI textbooks define the field as the study of "intelligent agents": any system that perceives its environment and takes actions that maximize its chance of achieving its goals.
I'm not seeing where you clarify where AI would stop having initial parameters when being instantiated.
Huge TL;DR alert here friend. But I did read it.
I get your point, that open p's would probably be asked to leave every church. I do feel they could find forgiveness and redemption with Jesus Christ, but agree that someone who is openly so would not be allowed to be so in most churches. I was thinking more-so consenting homosexuality but coding it as P because this isn't directly a theological discussion board and we universally agree P isn't okay.
I would be very surprised if most of the Trumps weren't on here and TDW, if for nothing else but the memes. (Hi!)
My lighthearted comments were in the context of the discussion thread "Based on the parameters of some dewds programming".
Perhaps "Parameters" would be the main piece to carry with to your college wikipedia lecture. Are not most AI filled with some kind of parameters before being set upon its intended task? I ask this lightheartedly, not as a request for a long and deeply philosophical discussion that goes way off topic. :)
AI is probably not complex enough to have common sense, but it may at some point. Depending on one's definition of that somewhat vague term. A lot of the complex appearing stuff coming out of AI chatbots was instilled into it by humans.
Just because you program an AI to learn and think it doesn't mean that at some point it wasn't created in a way that allowed it to happen.
Even if you program it to be able to change it's source code, some "dewd" programmed the thing that allowed that.
I've read words from you that I didn't even participate in, to try to better understand you. I appreciate the comment you made about needing a lot of patience.
lol okay Nana, carry on dodging honest questions and go save the world. Ignore the obvious irony of your decode while you're at it.
Parents tell kids how to make paper airplanes all the time.
You're projecting false attributes and refusing to engage in honest discussion. That's what's sad.
Sorry, this is a cop-out. If you can't explain your process then you haven't mastered it. You expect everyone to start from zero at this stage and do everything you have done. This is like Einstein expecting everyone to follow his footsteps and refusing to share his thought process. Society builds on the shoulders of other people's work. All of you veterans have laid the foundation, it's time to move forward to the rest of the building. This is what your decode says to me. Stop being arrogant and be ready to answer normal people questions. That's what I see. Do you not see that also?
Do you not see the irony of your decode compared with your impatience and intolerance to newcomers not on the spectrum? Your decode clearly shows that we need "q-whisperers" who can speak normal to people without acting like a raging lunatic. Edit: I'm done here. Thanks for all the hard work you do. I'm not trying to insult you, just help bridge the divide.
Please kindly elaborate what you mean by "do the work". What are some steps you consider important in "doing the work"? Not trying to offend you, as you're definitely getting defensive and hostile here, just trying to help you explain effectively what you're taking the time to communicate.
I just don't see "He's telling us to stop bragging about being right, and just be ready to supply answers when the people come to us." happening anywhere in this post.
I'm not asking you those questions. Not everyone here is interested in being a Q comms expert. I also didn't post a "learn the comms" post that's sticky'd. But when you get someone who seemingly legitimately is asking you how you came up with your decode, I don't see why you wouldn't run them through your thought process, how you chose those #'s out of the post, etc.
"He's telling us to stop bragging about being right, and just be ready to supply answers when the people come to us."
He's talking to you and your avoiding the questions asked of you.
That's what I see.
Being accepting of anything that is scripturally wrong is certainly not a good practice. It's not okay to have open pedophiles in your church. It doesn't mean you can't love them enough to help them to confess their sins and repent, but even then you don't just let them run a Sunday school class or tell everyone in church how they've embraced a pedo lifestyle. Sin is sin, indeed, and even though we all struggle with it, it doesn't mean we get a free pass.
Yeah silly to announce it. Better to post it publically on torrents, public file sharing sites, picture sharing sites, etc. or keep it quiet. (Unless it's disinfo/propaganda)
Lots of immigrants in coding jobs (google, et al.) probably popularized this.
It's not wrong to want, even pray for Justice on the earth. That's why we have judges, and trials and laws. In the Bible the unrepentant are brought to trial in the Great White Throne Judgement at the end of time. They will know why they are judged, as well as be reminded on the times they could have repented but chose not to.
I'm not aware of that description, what Bible verse are you referring to?
Suggestion: If you're going to help clarify, a summary of the new stuff would also be useful. No worries here, I'll simply go skim the article, just FWIW. Thanks for helping!