It has come to the point that the line between humor and serious (but zany) proposition is indiscernible. There is probably a meaning in that, but it's early in my day and I dislike handling worms.
No, I wanted to make a joke about sending in the Marines. You couldn't see that?
Hat tip. My ears aren't that fast, and there was a lot of commotion.
You don't have to take them up. They were just illustrations of how Q does not advocate any number of paranoid conspiracy theories. You could have passed them by, but no, you had to make a thing out of it. You illustrate topic dilution.
I didn't hear anything about Freemasons.
My original reaction to the coup in Niger was that anyone in Africa who wants to kick out the French can't be all bad. I have been reserving judgment.
Good point.
Show up with a frigate and a platoon of Marines?
Not likely. I've been familiar with John Birch Society backgrounding since I was a teenager. Familiar with lots of lies. Just not interested in fabulous stories about nonsense having no substance.
Glad you are keeping tabs. Don't be disappointed if deeply-cherished notions are not proven. In some ways, trying to anticipate Trump is like trying to prophesy the End Times.
Every city is a municipality (mini-state) within its greater polity, so what you are saying is a truism. As to rule, that is for the future to prove or disprove. Hard to see the hand of rule in the chaos that seems to prevail. What is the UCC? Quote me the language of any binding document that establishes a private corporation to supervene over the government of the United States. The Organic Act of 1871 and the Treaty of 1871 are empty suits. Delete that whole concept and you get the America we have had since its founding. Nothing has been put over our head that we haven't allowed to be put over our head. Maybe you can't face the dismay of realizing that many of our fellow citizens are fools and craven perverts, but that is the problem we have. If there is no Great Awakening to Christ, there will be no progress.
To sink to your level, what you are saying is bullshit. I accept Q for what he purports to be, a person on the inside with news about events behind the scenes. He is not party to fancies. He does not believe the Earth is flat. He does not believe the Apollo program is a hoax. And he does not believe that JFK or Evis are alive. I've never seen that stupid "blueprint," and I have no need of it.
All this has come out from your miserable performance in trying to discuss the notion that the United States is some kind of covert private corporation---absolutely not sustained by anything put forward. You don't even have a good grasp of the history of the 49th parallel. Am I showing you the nakedness of your attire? Could be, but you have too much of your ego wrapped up in it. Some self-reflection could do you good.
Straining over a gnat. The Organic Act of 1871 only establishes "Washington" as a "body corporate for municipal purposes." Not for any other purpose (such as performing the offices of the Constitution). This is only and no more than the usual incorporation of a city, per se, to establish the usual civic services and be a legal entity. The whole idea of a "corporate United States" never appears and is mere flim-flam. You can look at the actual Act all you want, and will never find the mythological "corporate United States."
This is approaching Flat Earth territory.
Do you? Don't be so quick to categorize yourself as a "nobody.'
Same thing. One plane at a time. 650 flights of planes. If they were military cargolifters, that could mean one plane a day for 2 years. Feasible, but would be noticed.
It is basic chemistry. Lithium has the highest combustion energy with oxygen or fluorine than any other element (except beryllium). This means it will burn the oxygen out of water, carbon dioxide, calcium carbonate (limestone powder), sand (silicon dioxide), iron oxide, etc. It will burn the fluorine out of any halocarbon fire extinguishing agent (as the firefighters at the 787 lithium battery fire in Boston discovered) or fluorinated plastic (like Teflon). Literally, the only way to extinguish a lithium fire is to smother it in a layer of molten metal (Class D extinguisher). (Spraying it with liquid nitrogen or argon is possible, but not really feasible.)
Think of how tenacious a magnesium fire is and then double it in intensity. Imagine such vehicles parked closely together (as in parking garages) and one of them lights off. Like so many piles of lumber impregnated with phosphorus.
Not really. It is a word that originally denoted substitutes for legal tender, like coupons. It signifies anything written. That it is also an abbreviation for "prescription" is a coincidence arising from them coming from the same root.
Late-breaking realization, now that you have invested hundreds of words of discussion, degenerating into bad-mouthing. Now you want to retroactively disown the whole disgraceful exchange. If you really didn't care...you wouldn't have bothered to make your message to me of: "I don't care what you think" (but I care that you know that I don't care what you think). Don't you realize you are playing the fool?
I am very skeptical about the 600-650 planes allegation. What kind of planes? Commercial passenger planes? There would have been a significant shortage of air transport through that interval. Commercial cargo planes? Same problem. Military transports? Feasible, but that would be a tremendous logistical maneuver, putting them out of service for normal activities, but would still consume fuel. It would be hard to conceal from the troops who would be aware of activities having no military transport function. How would the ground offloading from the Vatican to an airfield not be noticed? And likewise from the U.S. destination points to the repositories? The idea that all this massive transportation can happen without notice is not plausible.
I don't recall Q ever making any claims about "corporate United States," but I do think you are lacking in understanding or sauce. It always ends up that guys like you have only assertions to make---but no substantiation. And when you are out-maneuvered (e.g., treaty of 1846) you are exasperated and all you have left are insults, name-calling, and hostility.
And I don't much respect the attempt to put nonsensical conspiratorial theories on Q's back.
What fake? You keep on making claims and accusations and you provide nothing. One reads the primary documents (Organic act of 1871, Treaty of 1871) and they have nothing to do with the fantasy you are touting. Original sources trump "fact check" in my book.
Not wrong about the 49th parallel; nothing wrong about reaffirmation from earlier times, in order to settle the agreement. The process followed after the treaty of 1871 led to the resolution of the ownership of the San Juan islands and the creation of Point Roberts. You missed the Oregon Treaty of 1846, didn't you? You must live in a research-free zone.
This happens all the time in the self-gaslighting conspiracy environment. A claim is made and fingers are pointed...but there is no key fact that can be stated in a sentence. And the damning claim is always by a process of convoluted inference. The proponents are usually inarticulate and can only refer you to lengthy documents. This is tiresome and indicative of there being no substance to the claims.
This whole idea that the United States is a "corporation" like IBM is as nutty as a walnut tree. I think you can't handle the emotional letdown of realizing that this has all happened with the stupidity, callousness, and perversity of your neighbors far and wide. Yeah, a massive legal maneuver can "free" us from covert tyranny---but what are we to do when our fellow citizens can't think worth shit? Sniff hard. There's no magic in the air.
Economic Freedom Fighters, the party of the Marxist, Robert Mugabe wannabee, Julius Malema. Since the mainstream media are pro-white-genocide by default, this is not surprising, though it truly is appalling. The pro-Jewish-genocide media has opened its window of doom for more inclusion.
This definitely falls into the "How awkward!" category.
I doubt that the bank will collapse (not a good outcome), although it will probably go into receivership as the primary officers are jailed. The shareholders will need to be summoned to a meeting to choose a new board of directors and CEO. It will be up to them to hold the fort with transparency and integrity.
I am trying to popularize this outlook: whenever a Democrat laments about the threat to American "Democracy" it is their code-speak for "rule by Democrats." Everything they say thus becomes true by decode. Trump is the chief threat to rule by Democrats. Give it a try in conversation, when appropriate. I'd love to hear how it goes.
Then why do you sustain interaction? It takes two to tango. Don't complain to me about your choices.