I think its hilarious. Always putting on the show of being an intellectual. Now you get to see who he really is. Who he really cares about. Did anyone see this out of him ever before? No. Because he is a brand monkey. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Is that puppy photo verified? Why would yh pu wear surgical gloves w a dog who is do clean looking?
If it be faked in one direction it can be faked in many. Just need to make sure.
He sold out DailyWire to a bigger media company during the last selection cycle, since then their standards have fallen greatly since they don’t need to prove a point anymore (no longer hungry.) Go on, take the money and run.
This. He made a name for himself as being a provocateur in college and never really got out of that mentality. He can't really hold arguments against adults, so he still limits himself to high schoolers and college aged kids.
Now, I have to laugh, since the "use" of phosphorus is distinctive by reason of the different uses. And now you are abandoning the camouflage of legality.
The unsafety of unexploded ammunition is well-known, but no one in their right mind points to that as an objection to using it.
It would help if you made sense. What is there to laugh about? The incinerated corpses are deep 3rd degree burns. Children seldom stick around for that. What argumentation? That Hamas committed war crimes by killing Israeli children? The children received more than "injuries;" they were incinerated to death. How do you think anyone should respond to the perpetrators of horrific murders?
God, I cannot believe how predictive Socrates was. When argument fails, cast aspersions. And for good measure, throw in a bit of prophecy. At least you admit you are showing your hand.
I was 8 years old during the Liberty incident. How many responsible parties are even alive today? This was during the Vietnam War. Do we carry grudges against the Viet Cong? I'm just curious. You must think that there is an eternal continuity of evil intention.
Beware that you will not like how this reality continues. When "Finis" does not show up on the TV screens, you might have a sinking feeling that you were living through a self-imposed mythology.
I've actually thought on one possibility with that. How does a Satanic Cabal hide? Same way we see all the time. Create a victim class, enforce the protection of them through legislation if you can, step into their midst and claim anti-whatever or whatever-phobia. Same thing with gays (victim class created) who pedos and trannies now hide behind.
And how can the satanic Cabal convert, corrupt, kill, and destroy those they despise (non Satanic Jews) when they're scattered all over the earth? Hard to legislate in favor of a scattered vapor that's in so many nations.
Well, make one space for them and encourage or force then into it. Et voila! Many simple ways to get their job done that way - leaving none alive or WILLING to say the words Jesus said some WOULD say: "Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord".
Regular Cabal-fomented attacks against Israel make it that much easier to isolate their target and again claim persecution, leading to a stronger ability to enforce protection of the Cabal's "hiding place".
Lol, nope. OP is a tad confused. On X you can "like" a tweet or comment. There's no upvoting or downvoting. Not sure what role the number of likes plays in how the algorithm handles it, or to who, etc.
To be fair, it looked like he got the image from somewhere else, he didn't create it himself.
So if sharing things that turn out to be fake makes someone "the worst kind of liar", then the majority of people here on GAW are the worst kinds of liars, because I see fake shit shared here everyday.
This isn't defending Shapiro. Someone of his media presence should know to fact check everything before sharing it.
This is more along the lines of "people in glass houses", and generally being annoyed with all the lazy people here reposting every thing they see, without thinking about how important credibility is.
Edited to add: I fact checked the pic myself on the same site that said it was AI generated. If you leave in any part of the pixilated part near the person's hand on the right, it says AI generated.
If you crop the photo so none of the pixilated part is in view, it says it was made by a human.
I 100% agree about vetting things before sharing them, and I said so.
I also agree about not having to edit photos you want to check on AI scanners. But I think this is something that needs to be taken on a case by case situation. I can understand this case because the pixelation would throw off the scan. And pixelation, in general, is important for privacy reasons, so I think an exception could be made for it.
Thanks for your two cents on the subject. It was a bargain.
To be fair, it looked like he got the image from somewhere else
A) He has a massive responsibility to vet things
B) He is using it as an emotional weapon to get people to follow an agenda
If he generated it himself or it was generated and given to him, he has a responsibility to ensure that the information is right.
After his bullshit with Crowder he was already on thin ice with me as well as the rest of that shitty company. If this turns out to be AI generated, I don't care where he got it from, Little Benji's reputation is fucked.
Boring outed himself as "Big Con". All of that shitty company behaved like leftists and went immediately into an emotionally charged and robotic lockstep to try and shit on Crowder. During that time, certain videos with low context got released that painted him in a particularly bad light.
It all seemed an awful lot like the leftist playbook and watching them all enter lockstep alone was cause enough for me to give them the middle finger.
I posted this as a response to you CallMeAl because your post was perhaps the most reasonable response to the OP, thoughtful and considered. I will not post to nor engage with the anti-Israel folks here. If they can not recognize evil when it happens that is thier problem.
I did always want a super power. Invisibility or the ability to fly would have been really cool, but I suppose super common sense comes in handy as well. 🤓
“MISSING PROPELLER “ I love you .. comical comment of the year , I'm laying on couch with cramps and fkn laughed out loud so hard my cramps are gone, seriously that was too funny !
Perhaps, but I personally am past the point of allowing him the benefit of the doubt. ConInc is our enemy just as much as CNN, in case the past year hasn't made that painfully obvious.
If he actually used an AI generated picture to push this agenda, he should be cast out from the right. And I do mean straight up cast out; the left hates him, we should completely remove him from anything we do. No invites, no interviews, no views.
Turns out, cancelling someone is good if they're trying to incite world war 3 using false pretense.
This guy has a HUGE following of people who tend to base their opinions and actions more on emotions than anything else. His posts over the years have done a good (or bad, depending on the viewpoint) job of reinforcing that and spreading it to others.
His platform could easily be used to weaponize emotions, if it's not already doing that. Which makes him dangerous.
So, yeah, I agree he needs to stop being given any more attention by others (on the right, left, center, tops or bottoms) just to minimize the exposure he gets.
So, I just ran the same photo, where the little pixilated image is not in the photo, and submitted it to the same website, and it says it was generated by a human. So not AI.
You can check for yourself. Just crop the image so the blurred part by the person's hand on the right side of the image is not included, and upload it to aiornot(dot)com.
this is why i believe the white hats forced getting AI into the public domain. its so that we could have time to determine AI generated photos from real ones.
AI imagery always has a tell-tell sign of being generated. our understanding of such technology will allow us to also defend against the videos that may exist of Hillary, Huma, Obama, etc., where they will claim AI deep fake.
the public has the ability now to see what is real & what is generated.
same with people.
we are now able to see who the real people are & who the puppets are. In this case, we see Shapiro for the puppet he is. Some knew before, but now many know of his fakery.
That's an excellent point that I didn't even consider- how human hands are so difficult for AI to replicate.
The problem with the image I've had is how to get the little pixelated box by the hand on the right side of the image out of the shot without it altering the scan.
If any of the pixelation is left in the photo or I just put a plain black box over it or crop it out without doing anything else, the AIornot scan comes back saying it's AI.
If I crop the photo where it's just of the remains, and take out the person completely, then it says it's human made (not AI).
But that leaves out the hands, which you point out is a huge factor in AI.
Just looking at the hands, they look real. But at this stage, who can tell.
So I guess everything I just said can be summed up with 🤷.
Life gets more and more complex and confusing each day. For me, at least.
😂 idiot. That’s not at ALL what charded people look like. Yea man, you retain your facial characteristics when you burn to death, ask all the burned face transplant victims.
And on https://www.aiornot.com/ I got that both images were made by a human and not AI (with the option to say if its correct or not). So it looks like that AI model has been trained to say BOTH images are human when we know that's not the case.
Thanks for double checking on that! I saw someone mentioned cutting out the pixilated part of the picture and then it changes the results too. It's getting crazy.
When they start ranting and insulting you because you have reasonable reservations and concerns about their propaganda-ising - that's when you know they are the enemy too.
I see folks arguing about whether the image is IA or real all through this thread.
The real question in my opinion isn't is it real. The real several questions are did it even happen at all? When? Where? To whom?
When someone is trying to create a narrative or follow a narrative for an agenda even the basic premise can be a total lie. It may not be a child. It may have been at a different time. The victim may have been someone or something other than what their agenda needs, but none of that matters when you are willing to cheat, lie, and steal. Those three things are the strengths of the opposition here.
Both this image and the supposed base image with the puppy look edited. I don't think either of them are the original image. Either way, the fog of war is thick and one side certainly has a more robust propaganda arm behind them.
I think its hilarious. Always putting on the show of being an intellectual. Now you get to see who he really is. Who he really cares about. Did anyone see this out of him ever before? No. Because he is a brand monkey. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Well, maybe less.
I hope this is the part of the movie where he gets smacked down like the gnat he is. Maybe he will finally admit that he is gay also.
💯
But....his wife is a doctor!?!?! /s
Maybe she built his pussy.
Nope, pretty sure nature did that for "him"
We will build him stronger, faster…
So is Joe's.
Yes she probably never took the jab but probably gave several out.
4Chan also found the original image - it was a puppy in the towel, apparently at a veterinarian's office.
https://files.catbox.moe/9b8tfz.jpg
Is that puppy photo verified? Why would yh pu wear surgical gloves w a dog who is do clean looking? If it be faked in one direction it can be faked in many. Just need to make sure.
Exactly. The puppy could easily be AI generated.
Good point that I had not considered. Hmmmmm
He's really falling apart, he's definitely showing the world the real him.
How badly he's falling apart over Israel shows he should stay out of commentating American politics from now on
Yup.
He sold out DailyWire to a bigger media company during the last selection cycle, since then their standards have fallen greatly since they don’t need to prove a point anymore (no longer hungry.) Go on, take the money and run.
Just like the Colorado pedo Governor Jared Polis.
Shapiro has no problems debating young kids that do not know any better. But when pressed against adults with wisdom his world view is very shallow.
This. He made a name for himself as being a provocateur in college and never really got out of that mentality. He can't really hold arguments against adults, so he still limits himself to high schoolers and college aged kids.
That's because he's a little girl himself. Probably a little teenager LOL
We have been calling him out for a couple of election cycles.
I didn't see the outrage when Israel was dropping white phosphorous on women and children.
Doesn't matter if it is legal use.
Bottom line is that white phosphorus ignites easily when unearthed which is commonly done by children that do not know any better.
Now, I have to laugh, since the "use" of phosphorus is distinctive by reason of the different uses. And now you are abandoning the camouflage of legality.
The unsafety of unexploded ammunition is well-known, but no one in their right mind points to that as an objection to using it.
You can laugh all you want but it is pretty common for children to receive burns because they dig up soils and burn themselves.
Not sure how you can live with yourself and think how righteous you are with your "argumentation".
I think it is horrific the injuries that the children receive.
It would help if you made sense. What is there to laugh about? The incinerated corpses are deep 3rd degree burns. Children seldom stick around for that. What argumentation? That Hamas committed war crimes by killing Israeli children? The children received more than "injuries;" they were incinerated to death. How do you think anyone should respond to the perpetrators of horrific murders?
You are welcome muh chosen loving puppet.
You are not going to like how this movie ends.
God, I cannot believe how predictive Socrates was. When argument fails, cast aspersions. And for good measure, throw in a bit of prophecy. At least you admit you are showing your hand.
I was 8 years old during the Liberty incident. How many responsible parties are even alive today? This was during the Vietnam War. Do we carry grudges against the Viet Cong? I'm just curious. You must think that there is an eternal continuity of evil intention.
Beware that you will not like how this reality continues. When "Finis" does not show up on the TV screens, you might have a sinking feeling that you were living through a self-imposed mythology.
How old were you when they were dancing on the roof as the twin towers fell?
Time does not diminish murder.
Exactly. And the murderers here were Islamic terrorists, just like with the Twin Towers. What is your point?
Careful. This loser DeathRay believes the official 9/11 narrative and is here to convert people to his side.
How old were you when the Rothschilds were heavily involved in the rotten inception of the modern day nation state of Israel?
I've actually thought on one possibility with that. How does a Satanic Cabal hide? Same way we see all the time. Create a victim class, enforce the protection of them through legislation if you can, step into their midst and claim anti-whatever or whatever-phobia. Same thing with gays (victim class created) who pedos and trannies now hide behind.
And how can the satanic Cabal convert, corrupt, kill, and destroy those they despise (non Satanic Jews) when they're scattered all over the earth? Hard to legislate in favor of a scattered vapor that's in so many nations.
Well, make one space for them and encourage or force then into it. Et voila! Many simple ways to get their job done that way - leaving none alive or WILLING to say the words Jesus said some WOULD say: "Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord".
Regular Cabal-fomented attacks against Israel make it that much easier to isolate their target and again claim persecution, leading to a stronger ability to enforce protection of the Cabal's "hiding place".
Michael Knowles should really jump ship over there.
Absolutely.
He's getting rekt on Twitter. You love to see it. He keeps retweeting other people's posts to hide the onslaught on him.
u/#supplies
I think that is Mr. Long Duck Dong.
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1712479655956279712
Lots of very based comments there.
I upvoted most of them.
You can upvote on x?
Yes. Just click the heart symbol on the bottom of the post.
Probably need an account.
Lol, nope. OP is a tad confused. On X you can "like" a tweet or comment. There's no upvoting or downvoting. Not sure what role the number of likes plays in how the algorithm handles it, or to who, etc.
Lmaooo page doesn’t exist any longer. 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
Says sensitive content and can’t view, but my settings allow it. What gives, x?
"It's not a lie, if you believe it." - George Costanza
I love that quote but with this tool .. I don’t think he believes it , he is a hate war monger and he’s doing what they do !
Benny boy malding that people are no longer believing in IDF lies.
Send this shit to TUCKER!!!
PAYBACK TIME.
singing this --- thank you!!!
Typo, send, not sent...
I'm not on X, but for those that are, send this!
It looks like a piece of elephant crap. Randy Marsh would be proud.
Def more than 13 Courics
At least it isn't Bono.
How do we know?
He never curls into a fetal position.
He's such a faggit.
Awesome job BTW, Benny...
Optics tell everyone that Jews like you are nothing but the worst kind of liars.
Absolutely despicable.
If you ever find your missing propeller - stick it up your ass - sideways.
To be fair, it looked like he got the image from somewhere else, he didn't create it himself.
So if sharing things that turn out to be fake makes someone "the worst kind of liar", then the majority of people here on GAW are the worst kinds of liars, because I see fake shit shared here everyday.
This isn't defending Shapiro. Someone of his media presence should know to fact check everything before sharing it.
This is more along the lines of "people in glass houses", and generally being annoyed with all the lazy people here reposting every thing they see, without thinking about how important credibility is.
Edited to add: I fact checked the pic myself on the same site that said it was AI generated. If you leave in any part of the pixilated part near the person's hand on the right, it says AI generated.
If you crop the photo so none of the pixilated part is in view, it says it was made by a human.
So, it might not be faked.
I 100% agree about vetting things before sharing them, and I said so.
I also agree about not having to edit photos you want to check on AI scanners. But I think this is something that needs to be taken on a case by case situation. I can understand this case because the pixelation would throw off the scan. And pixelation, in general, is important for privacy reasons, so I think an exception could be made for it.
Thanks for your two cents on the subject. It was a bargain.
A) He has a massive responsibility to vet things
B) He is using it as an emotional weapon to get people to follow an agenda
If he generated it himself or it was generated and given to him, he has a responsibility to ensure that the information is right.
After his bullshit with Crowder he was already on thin ice with me as well as the rest of that shitty company. If this turns out to be AI generated, I don't care where he got it from, Little Benji's reputation is fucked.
A) I agree, and I already said so.
B) I agree with this, also.
What happened with him and crowder?
Crowder called out "Big Con".
Boring outed himself as "Big Con". All of that shitty company behaved like leftists and went immediately into an emotionally charged and robotic lockstep to try and shit on Crowder. During that time, certain videos with low context got released that painted him in a particularly bad light.
It all seemed an awful lot like the leftist playbook and watching them all enter lockstep alone was cause enough for me to give them the middle finger.
Thanks fren.
Level heads will prevail
The pict is a still from a video posted on the State of Israel's official Twitter account. This is the link to the video:
https://twitter.com/Israel/status/1712456473303826874
I posted this as a response to you CallMeAl because your post was perhaps the most reasonable response to the OP, thoughtful and considered. I will not post to nor engage with the anti-Israel folks here. If they can not recognize evil when it happens that is thier problem.
MAGA
WWG1WGA
NCSWIC
Well stated.
Thanks for sharing this information. And thank you for the compliment.
Upvote for wielding common sense like a super power.
I did always want a super power. Invisibility or the ability to fly would have been really cool, but I suppose super common sense comes in handy as well. 🤓
“MISSING PROPELLER “ I love you .. comical comment of the year , I'm laying on couch with cramps and fkn laughed out loud so hard my cramps are gone, seriously that was too funny !
You stole the show "missing propeller". Was the Beany and Cecil the beginning of propaganda for kids?
Perhaps, but I personally am past the point of allowing him the benefit of the doubt. ConInc is our enemy just as much as CNN, in case the past year hasn't made that painfully obvious.
If he actually used an AI generated picture to push this agenda, he should be cast out from the right. And I do mean straight up cast out; the left hates him, we should completely remove him from anything we do. No invites, no interviews, no views.
Turns out, cancelling someone is good if they're trying to incite world war 3 using false pretense.
This guy has a HUGE following of people who tend to base their opinions and actions more on emotions than anything else. His posts over the years have done a good (or bad, depending on the viewpoint) job of reinforcing that and spreading it to others.
His platform could easily be used to weaponize emotions, if it's not already doing that. Which makes him dangerous.
So, yeah, I agree he needs to stop being given any more attention by others (on the right, left, center, tops or bottoms) just to minimize the exposure he gets.
So, I just ran the same photo, where the little pixilated image is not in the photo, and submitted it to the same website, and it says it was generated by a human. So not AI.
You can check for yourself. Just crop the image so the blurred part by the person's hand on the right side of the image is not included, and upload it to aiornot(dot)com.
this is why i believe the white hats forced getting AI into the public domain. its so that we could have time to determine AI generated photos from real ones.
AI imagery always has a tell-tell sign of being generated. our understanding of such technology will allow us to also defend against the videos that may exist of Hillary, Huma, Obama, etc., where they will claim AI deep fake.
the public has the ability now to see what is real & what is generated.
same with people.
we are now able to see who the real people are & who the puppets are. In this case, we see Shapiro for the puppet he is. Some knew before, but now many know of his fakery.
I just ran the image, unblurred, through that same site, and it says it's AI-generated.
I haven't tried a different site that checks for AI generation, though.
Maybe it's how it's cropped. Because I cropped it right up to the pixilated part in the photo, and it said AI generated
I'm going to crop out just the pixilated part and see what it says.
Ok, I just re submitted it, and it says it was made by a human. So not AI generated.
Maybe I left too much of the pixilated image in my last submission, who knows.
So, after all that, 🤷.
👍
A good tell that something is AI is how it always f’s up constructing hands. Would probably be able to tell better if there were no gloves.
Either way, sick of this whiny muppet’s self-righteous faggotry.
yes . but hands and feet. fingers and toes are always fked up
That's an excellent point that I didn't even consider- how human hands are so difficult for AI to replicate.
The problem with the image I've had is how to get the little pixelated box by the hand on the right side of the image out of the shot without it altering the scan.
If any of the pixelation is left in the photo or I just put a plain black box over it or crop it out without doing anything else, the AIornot scan comes back saying it's AI.
If I crop the photo where it's just of the remains, and take out the person completely, then it says it's human made (not AI).
But that leaves out the hands, which you point out is a huge factor in AI.
Just looking at the hands, they look real. But at this stage, who can tell.
So I guess everything I just said can be summed up with 🤷.
Life gets more and more complex and confusing each day. For me, at least.
The tiny hat was all I needed
PLEASE post that on his flipping twitter account - what a tool!
I posted in TS.
lying sack of shit really wants war.
https://twitter.com/drq75393677/status/1712581686448492738?s=21&t=dB-CdSml-l9ndk9T78hknQ
Unable to view
EXACTLY!!
If I disagree with Ben, am I jew hater?
Queue Biden: "If you don't vote for me, you ain't Jewish!"
How do we know Optic is trustworthy? How accurate is it in determining an image was made by AI?
😂 idiot. That’s not at ALL what charded people look like. Yea man, you retain your facial characteristics when you burn to death, ask all the burned face transplant victims.
Fucken saved
Alleged original image used in AI photo
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1697168323785759.jpg
I put that one in, compared to the Shapiro one. The detector I used gave 52H/48AI for the puppy and an 86% human/ 14% AI on Shapiro's.
I cropped both of them to just the actual picture.
https://huggingface.co/spaces/umm-maybe/AI-image-detector
That's the site I found just doing a search.
Obviously, one or both are fake. How are we supposed to deal with this stuff?
Catsfive is using Optic Ai or Not
https://www.aiornot.com/
It then becomes a matter of which one is the better GANs model, on top of watching out for this stuff.
The hugging face AI image detector only has 76 likes on it. It doesn't look heavily used like https://www.aiornot.com/
The less used and less trained an AI image detector is, the less like it's correct.
I also checked and got the same result as you on https://huggingface.co/spaces/umm-maybe/AI-image-detector
https://files.catbox.moe/7rk3hx.png
https://files.catbox.moe/uzo809.png
And on https://www.aiornot.com/ I got that both images were made by a human and not AI (with the option to say if its correct or not). So it looks like that AI model has been trained to say BOTH images are human when we know that's not the case.
https://files.catbox.moe/4udgxc.png
https://files.catbox.moe/njdlnc.png
Thanks for double checking on that! I saw someone mentioned cutting out the pixilated part of the picture and then it changes the results too. It's getting crazy.
Isreal has been torturing and killing Palestinians for hundreds of years. They fucked around and now they are finding out.
When they start ranting and insulting you because you have reasonable reservations and concerns about their propaganda-ising - that's when you know they are the enemy too.
Never Agai…… We’ll maybe once more for old time sake.
AI detectors are notoriously wrong.
I see folks arguing about whether the image is IA or real all through this thread.
The real question in my opinion isn't is it real. The real several questions are did it even happen at all? When? Where? To whom?
When someone is trying to create a narrative or follow a narrative for an agenda even the basic premise can be a total lie. It may not be a child. It may have been at a different time. The victim may have been someone or something other than what their agenda needs, but none of that matters when you are willing to cheat, lie, and steal. Those three things are the strengths of the opposition here.
Both this image and the supposed base image with the puppy look edited. I don't think either of them are the original image. Either way, the fog of war is thick and one side certainly has a more robust propaganda arm behind them.
How did they determine it is AI?